Analysis of Climate Conditions and Suitability Zoning for Shine-Muscat Planting in Xianyang

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0066

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the climatic conditions for planting Shine-Muscat in Xianyang and determine the planting suitability, using meteorological data such as daily temperature, precipitation, sunshine, and weather phenomena from 12 national basic meteorological stations in Xianyang City, analysis and research were conducted to screen the major climate indicators affecting the cultivation of Shine-Muscat in the Xianyang Region. Based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, membership functions were constructed for different climate indicators to evaluate and determine the weight coefficients of each climate indicator. Through fuzzy synthesis, a comprehensive evaluation of the suitability for planting Shine-Muscat in different regions was obtained. GIS technologies were employed to achieve a refined zoning of climatic suitability for the cultivation of Shine-Muscat in Xianyang City, and the climatic conditions for commercial cultivation of this variety were determined. The results showed that most areas in Xianyang City met the climate conditions for planting Shine-Muscat, but there were significant differences in the degree of suitability. The most suitable areas were mainly concentrated in the central and southern parts of Liquan, the central part of Qianxian, most of Jingyang, the central and southern parts of Sanyuan, Qindu, and the northern part of Weicheng. The suitable areas were the rest of the southern counties, as well as the southern regions of Yongshou and Chunhua. The generally suitable areas were Changwu, the central and northern parts of Yongshou, the central part of Chunhua, most of Binzhou, and the western part of Xunyi, while the unsuitable areas were the eastern part of Xunyi, the northern part of Chunhua, and the southwestern part of Binzhou. The refined zoning results of Shine-Muscat are basically consistent with the current planting situation in the local area, but there is still room for optimization and adjustment, as well as significant potential for quality improvement and yield increase. This research method can provide scientific reference basis.

Key words: Shine-Muscat, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, membership function, climatic index, GIS technology, suitability zoning

LI Yunxi, ZHA Yangliang, CHEN Mulan, GOU Yaowu, LIU Quan. Analysis of Climate Conditions and Suitability Zoning for Shine-Muscat Planting in Xianyang[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 77-83.

Figures/Tables 4

References 34

[1]	咸阳市统计局. 2022年咸阳市统计年鉴[J]. 2022.
[2]	房玉林, 王录俊, 刘三军, 等. 陕西葡萄产业现状及发展建议[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2022(5):1-5.
[3]	刘俊, 晁无疾, 亓桂梅, 等. 蓬勃发展的中国葡萄产业[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2020(1):1-8.
[4]	黄辉白. 我国北方葡萄气候区域的初步分析[J]. 北京农业大学学报, 1980(2):43-51.
[5]	李记明, 吴清华, 边宽江, 等. 陕西省酿酒葡萄气候区划初探[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1999, 17(3):126-129.
[6]	宋于洋, 王炳举, 董伟, 等. 多因素模糊综合评判在新疆种植晚红葡萄区划上的应用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2001(1):7-9.
[7]	李宏伟, 郁松林, 吕新, 等. 新疆酿酒葡萄气候区划的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2005, 20(1):38-40.
[8]	李华, 孟军. 陕西省酿酒葡萄气候区划指标及气候分区研究[J]. 科技导报, 2009, 27(6):78-83.
[9]	李红英, 张晓煜, 王静, 等. 中国北方酿酒葡萄美乐优质生态区划研究[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2014(5):22-26.
[10]	杨文峰, 朱琳, 李星敏, 等. 基于GIS的陕西省酿酒葡萄气候区划[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3):244-249.
[11]	陶婷婷, 王志, 胡东涛. 模糊综合评价模型在非煤矿山安全标准化中的应用研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2012, 21(8):23-26.
[12]	周海洋, 张家成, 张海君. 基于模糊评价的图们区域旅游合作效应指标体系研究[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2013, 12(13):43.
[13]	刘云超, 马莉, 马文胜. 北方农牧交错带土地生态健康模糊综合评价——以克什克腾旗为例[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(11):2526-2529.
[14]	吴琳, 周静. 基于模糊综合评价的学前英语教师专业技能评估[J]. 英语广场, 2016(12):59-61.
[15]	安娟娟, 樊晓锋, 李蕊, 等. 阳光玫瑰葡萄在陕西关中地区的引种表现与推广前景[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2020, 66(3):59-61,76.
[16]	蒋亚星. 阳光玫瑰葡萄在陕西杨凌地区的引种表现与栽培技术[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[17]	孟创鸽, 刘小媛. 渭南阳光玫瑰葡萄引种表现与栽培要点[J]. 西北园艺(果树), 2022(3):28-31.
[18]	闫永刚, 韩普, 杨帆, 等. 阳光玫瑰葡萄在晋北地区的引种表现及农业气象条件分析[J]. 落叶果树, 2022, 54(4):66-69.
[19]	陈晓丽. 阳光玫瑰葡萄在我国的引种表现及研究进展[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(4):153-156.
[20]	NEMOTO M, HIROTA T, SATO T. Prediction of climatic suitability for wine grape production under the climatic change in Hokkaido[J]. Journal of agricultural meteorology, 2016, 72(3-4):167-172.
[21]	党鹏. 阳光玫瑰价格回落品质化成突围关键[N]. 中国经营报,2022-08-29(D02).
[22]	贺普超. 葡萄学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999:563.
[23]	孔庆山. 中国葡萄志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:578.
[24]	RUDI E. Investigation into the influence of time of irrigation on yield and quality of graperies[J]. Acta horticulturae, 1985, 38(4):329-331.
[25]	ISHT H. The influence of protection from rain during fruit ripening on grape juice and wine quality[C]//.Technical Bulletin Faculty of Horticulture. Chiba: Chiba University, 1988, 41:29-33.
[26]	陈敏. 水能梯级开发生态影响评价阈值研究[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2011.
[27]	王玉竹, 闫浩文, 王小平, 等. 基于GIS的兰新铁路沿线风沙灾害致灾成因分析及评价[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2020, 64(2):51-56.
[28]	王蕾. 基于数字高程模型的中国酿酒葡萄气候区划及品种区域化研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[29]	孟军. 陕西省酿酒葡萄气候区划与品种区域化研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2009.
[30]	史本岩. 辽宁省东部山区农业气候资源精细化模拟研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[31]	刘艳, 刘进, 权文婷, 等. 基于GIS的咸阳石榴种植气候适宜性精细化区划[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(10):109-113. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19020036
[32]	方书敏, 钱正堂, 李远平. 甘肃省降水的空间内插方法比较[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2005(3):47-50.
[33]	王景雷, 孙景生, 周祖昊, 等. 基于DEM的作物需水量估算方法[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2005(5):36-38.
[34]	王蕾, 李华, 王华. 中国葡萄气候区划Ⅱ:酿酒葡萄品种区域化[J]. 科学通报, 2017, 62(14):1539-1554.

气候指标	长武	旬邑	彬州	礼泉	永寿	淳化	泾阳	武功	乾县	兴平	三原	咸阳
活动积温/(℃·d)	1	0.87	0.95	0.87	0.96	1	0.84	0.86	0.87	0.85	0.82	0.86
平均气温/℃	0.4	0.35	0.77	1	0.72	0.56	1	1	1	1	1	1
无霜期/d	0.83	0.9	1	1	1	1	0.97	0.95	0.97	0.96	0.88	1
干燥度	0.88	0.88	0.94	1	0.94	0.94	1	0.88	1	0.94	1	1
降水量/mm	0.82	0.82	0.92	1	0.94	0.89	1	0.89	1	1	1	1
日较差/℃	0.97	1	1	0.95	0.83	0.94	0.95	0.9	0.89	0.91	0.89	0.92
低温日数/d	0	0	0.23	1	0.6	0.2	1	1	1	0.6	1	0.6
高温日数/d	1	1	0	0	0.53	0.58	0	0	0	0	0	0

气候指标	长武	旬邑	彬州	礼泉	永寿	淳化	泾阳	武功	乾县	兴平	三原	咸阳
活动积温/(℃·d)	1	0.87	0.95	0.87	0.96	1	0.84	0.86	0.87	0.85	0.82	0.86
平均气温/℃	0.4	0.35	0.77	1	0.72	0.56	1	1	1	1	1	1
无霜期/d	0.83	0.9	1	1	1	1	0.97	0.95	0.97	0.96	0.88	1
干燥度	0.88	0.88	0.94	1	0.94	0.94	1	0.88	1	0.94	1	1
降水量/mm	0.82	0.82	0.92	1	0.94	0.89	1	0.89	1	1	1	1
日较差/℃	0.97	1	1	0.95	0.83	0.94	0.95	0.9	0.89	0.91	0.89	0.92
低温日数/d	0	0	0.23	1	0.6	0.2	1	1	1	0.6	1	0.6
高温日数/d	1	1	0	0	0.53	0.58	0	0	0	0	0	0

气候指标	气候要素小网格空间推算公式	R	F值
活动积温/(℃·d)	AAT=7.893+0.001h	0.755	13.288^**
平均气温/℃	T=13.586-0.007h	0.964	130.276^**
无霜期/d	FFP=6.6924+0.009h-5.9083×10-6h²	0.751	5.832^*
干燥度	K=1.06λ-105.403	0.685	8.829^*
降水量/mm	R=10.719-0.002h	0.833	22.745^**
日较差/℃	DR=40.524-1082.811φ^-1	0.585	5.213^*
低温日数/d	LT=13.794-0.011h	0.860	28.404^**
高温日数/d	HT=-5.565+0.011h	0.904	44.911^**

气候指标	气候要素小网格空间推算公式	R	F值
活动积温/(℃·d)	AAT=7.893+0.001h	0.755	13.288^**
平均气温/℃	T=13.586-0.007h	0.964	130.276^**
无霜期/d	FFP=6.6924+0.009h-5.9083×10-6h²	0.751	5.832^*
干燥度	K=1.06λ-105.403	0.685	8.829^*
降水量/mm	R=10.719-0.002h	0.833	22.745^**
日较差/℃	DR=40.524-1082.811φ^-1	0.585	5.213^*
低温日数/d	LT=13.794-0.011h	0.860	28.404^**
高温日数/d	HT=-5.565+0.011h	0.904	44.911^**