Effects of Biochar-calcium Peroxide Composite Particles on Benzoic Acid Allelochemical Stress to Tomato Seedlings

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0655

Abstract

Abstract:

Allelopathy autotoxcity effect of phenolic acids has been proved to be one of the important causes of tomato continuous cropping obstacles. Development of technologies for the phenolic acids allelochemicals removal is expected to alleviate the problem of continuous cropping obstacles. In this study, blending method and coating method were employed for the preparation of biochar-calcium peroxide composite particles. The adsorption and oxidation behaviors of benzoic acid on the composite particles were studied by sequencing batch experiments. Then the particles prepared via coating method were used in hydroponics experiments, to investigated the alleviate effect on the allelopathy of benzoic acid stress to tomato seedlings over this novel composite particles. The results showed that, after 3 h of reaction, the removal rate of 100 mg/L benzoic acid could be obtained at 82.6% and 67.0% over 1.5 g/L of the particles prepared via coating method and blending method, respectively. The composite particle prepared via coating method displayed higher catalytic activity due to its better buffering capacity for the hydroxide ions generated by the decomposition of calcium peroxide. The results of hydroponic experiment showed that compared to the treatments with benzoic acid allelochemical stress, the growth indexes of tomato seedling, including individual biomass, root weight, fresh weight of stem and leaf, plant height, root length, and root activity, increased significantly in the treatment with the addition of biochar-calcium peroxide composite particles. The relative permeability of root cell membranes and the content of malondialdehyde in leaves decreased by 23.7% and 30.4%; and the leaf antioxidant enzyme activities, including superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities, increased by 61.0% and 45.6%, respectively. Therefore, the prepared biochar-calcium peroxide composite particles could effectively reduce the concentration of benzoic acid in the cultivation medium through adsorption-oxidation reactions, reducing the physiological stress of phenolic acid on tomato seedlings and promoting its growth. These results have certain guiding significance for the development of new technologies for reducing continuous cropping obstacles.

Key words: continuous cropping obstacle, biochar, calcium peroxide, benzoic acid, allelopathy

CLC Number:

S156.99

Tu Yuting, Huang Jichuan, Wu Xuena, Liao Weijie, Peng Zhiping. Effects of Biochar-calcium Peroxide Composite Particles on Benzoic Acid Allelochemical Stress to Tomato Seedlings[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(8): 39-47.

Figures/Tables 7

References 33

[1]	Liu T, Cheng Z, Meng H, et al. Growth, yield and quality of spring tomato and physicochemical properties of medium in a tomato/garlic intercropping system under plastic tunnel organic medium cultivation[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014,170(7):159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.02.039 URL
[2]	张相锋, 杨晓绒, 焦子伟. 生物炭在连作障碍治理中的应用综述[J]. 现代园艺, 2018,10(19):82-85.
[3]	李明杰, 冯法节, 张宝, 等. 多元组学背景下地黄连作障碍形成的分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2017,42(3):413-419.
[4]	李庆凯, 刘苹, 赵海军, 等. 玉米根系分泌物对连作花生土壤酚酸类物质化感作用的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020,22(3):119-130.
[5]	田给林, 毕艳孟, 孙振钧, 等. 酚酸类物质在作物连作障碍中的化感效应及其调控研究进展[J]. 中国科技论文, 2016,11(6):699-705.
[6]	Mohammadkhani N, Servati M. Nutrient concentration in wheat and soil under allelopathy treatments[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2017,131(1):143-155. doi: 10.1007/s10265-017-0981-x URL pmid: 29082451
[7]	缪其松, 张聪, 广建芳, 等. 设施土壤连作障碍防控技术研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(16):180-185.
[8]	顾美英, 杨蓉, 徐万里, 等. 棉秆炭配施生物有机肥对连作棉花根际土壤微生态和棉花生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019,21(10):47-57.
[9]	Atucha A, Litus G. Effect of biochar amendments on peach replant disease[J]. Hortscience, 2015,50(6):863-868. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.6.863 URL
[10]	武春成, 王彩云, 曹霞, 等. 不同用量生物炭对连作土壤改良及黄瓜生长的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(19):150-154.
[11]	武春成, 李天来, 曹霞, 等. 添加生物炭对连作营养基质理化性质及黄瓜生长的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2014,28(8):1534-1539. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2014.08.1534 URL
[12]	王茜, 唐翔宇, 关卓, 等. 生物炭对土壤中农药的吸附-解吸行为和生物有效性的影响[J]. 世界科技研究与进展, 2015,37(2), 200-205.
[13]	Li Y, Wang J, Zhang A, et al. Enhancing the quantity and quality of short-chain fatty acids production from waste activated sludge using CaO₂ as an additive[J]. Water Research, 2015,83:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.021 URL pmid: 26141424
[14]	Lu S, Zhang X, Xue Y, Application of calcium peroxide in water and soil treatment: A review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017,337:163-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.064 URL pmid: 28525879
[15]	Zhang A, Shen X, Yin X, et al. Application of calcium peroxide for efficient removal of triamcinolone acetonide from aqueous solutions: mechanisms and products[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018,345:594-663. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.104 URL
[16]	余喜初, 李大明, 黄庆海, 等. 过氧化钙及硅钙肥改良潜育化稻田土壤的效果研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21(1):138-146. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0115 URL
[17]	Mei J, Wang W, Peng S, et al. Seed Pelleting with calcium peroxide improves crop establishment of direct-seeded rice under waterlogging conditions[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017,7(1):1-12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x URL pmid: 28127051
[18]	Zhang E, Zhang S, Li L. Effect of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plant part extracts, root exudate and tomato grown soil extract on seed germination and seedling growth of tomato[J]. Allelopathy Journal, 2015,35(1):1-10.
[19]	Sunaina, Singh N B. Alleviation of allelopathic stress of benzoic acid by indole acetic acid in Solanum lycopersicum[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015,192:211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.06.013 URL
[20]	顾欣, 陈天祥, 孙权. 不同措施对设施黄瓜幼苗酚酸毒害的缓解效应[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(8):38-44.
[21]	杨素苗, 李保国, 齐国辉, 等. 根系分区交替灌溉对苹果根系活力、树干液流和果实的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010,26(8):73-79.
[22]	程亚东, 白羽祥, 史普酉, 等. 连作植烟土壤具有显著积累特征的两种酚酸的化感效应评价[J]. 核农学报, 2020,34(10):2307-2315.
[23]	刘卉, 张黎明, 周清明, 等. 烤烟连作下连续施用生物炭对烤烟黑胫病、干物质及产质量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018,32(7):1435-1441.
[24]	王彩云, 武春成, 曹霞, 等. 生物炭对温室黄瓜不同连作年限土壤养分和微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(4):1359-1366.
[25]	Hosseinzadeh S, Bonarrigo G, Verheust Y, et al. Water reuse in closed hydroponic systems: Comparison of GAC adsorption, ion exchange and ozonation processes to treat recycled nutrient solution[J]. Aquacultural Engineering, 2017,78:190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.07.007 URL
[26]	Wang Y, Pan F, Wang G, et al. Effects of biochar on photosynjournal and antioxidative system of Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings under replant conditions[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014,175:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.05.029 URL
[27]	白青青, 吴小宁, 王倩, 等. Fenton反应中拓展pH的研究进展[J]. 化学通报, 2018,81(3):217-222.
[28]	Tu Y, Tian S, Kong L, et al. Co-catalytic effect of sewage sludge-derived char as the support of Fenton-like catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 185-186:44-51.
[29]	高志华, 张学英, 葛会波, 等. 草莓根系分泌物障碍效应的模拟研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14(1):189-193.
[30]	张恩平, 张文博, 张淑红, 等. 苯甲酸和肉桂酸对番茄幼苗根部保护酶及膜质过氧化的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010,19(1):186-190.
[31]	Wardani D K, Darmanti S, Budihastuti R. Allelochemical effect of Ageratum conyzoides L. leaf extract on Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv Grobogan] growth[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018,1025:1-8.
[32]	Lu X F, Zhang H, Lyu S S, et al. Effects of exogenous phenolic acids on photosystem functions and photosynthetic electron transport rate in strawberry leaves[J]. Photosynthetica, 2018,56(2):616-622.
[33]	王艳芳, 沈向, 陈学森, 等. 生物炭对缓解对羟基苯甲酸伤害平邑甜茶幼苗的作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(5):968-976.

颗粒类型	比表面积/(m²/g)	最大变形力/N
包覆颗粒	475.19±19.14	30.13±1.41
共混颗粒	433.51±8.55	29.50±1.26
生物炭颗粒	458.53±19.86	26.25±1.23
过氧化钙颗粒	22.73±0.46	43.92±0.09

颗粒类型	比表面积/(m²/g)	最大变形力/N
包覆颗粒	475.19±19.14	30.13±1.41
共混颗粒	433.51±8.55	29.50±1.26
生物炭颗粒	458.53±19.86	26.25±1.23
过氧化钙颗粒	22.73±0.46	43.92±0.09

处理	生物量/g	根重/g	茎叶鲜重/g	株高/cm	根长/cm
CK	9.52a	1.25a	8.27a	28.83a	19.54a
T1	5.86d	0.59c	5.27c	25.50a	13.20b
T2	8.67ab	1.07ab	7.60ab	27.92a	18.13a
T3	7.51bc	0.90b	6.61bc	27.17a	14.47b
T4	6.26cd	0.52c	5.74c	25.80a	12.13b

处理	生物量/g	根重/g	茎叶鲜重/g	株高/cm	根长/cm
CK	9.52a	1.25a	8.27a	28.83a	19.54a
T1	5.86d	0.59c	5.27c	25.50a	13.20b
T2	8.67ab	1.07ab	7.60ab	27.92a	18.13a
T3	7.51bc	0.90b	6.61bc	27.17a	14.47b
T4	6.26cd	0.52c	5.74c	25.80a	12.13b