Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (18): 153-158.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0435
Previous Articles Next Articles
Xu Jin1(), Su Zhiping1, Su Huirong2, Zhu Hongbo1, Cheng Shengyong3, Wu Zhengwei1(
)
Received:
2020-09-08
Revised:
2020-12-18
Online:
2021-06-25
Published:
2021-07-13
Contact:
Wu Zhengwei
E-mail:xujin@gdou.edu.cn;zhengwei_wu@126.com
CLC Number:
Xu Jin, Su Zhiping, Su Huirong, Zhu Hongbo, Cheng Shengyong, Wu Zhengwei. Insecticide Controlling Sweet Poato Weevil: Selection and Field Efficacy[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(18): 153-158.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0435
供试药剂 | 施用剂量 | 生产商 |
---|---|---|
40%毒死蜱乳油 | 1125~1500 mL/hm2 | 河北青园腾达生物有限公司 |
30%吡丙·噻虫嗪悬浮剂 | 120~150 mL/hm2 | 清流县经济开发区有限公司 |
4.5%高效氯氰菊脂乳油 | 600~750 mL/hm2 | 江门市大光明农化新会有限公司 |
3.2%阿维菌素乳油 | 253.5~337.5 mL/hm2 | 河北中天邦正生物科技有限公司 |
70%吡虫啉水分散粒剂 | 37.5~45 g/hm2 | 拜耳作物(中国)科学有限公司 |
40%氯虫·噻虫胺悬浮剂 | 225~300 mL/hm2 | 东莞瑞德丰生物科技有限公司 |
40%氰虫·甲虫肼悬浮剂 | 600~750 mL/hm2 | 江苏东宝农业有限公司 |
20%虫酰肼悬浮剂 | 1050~1500 mL/hm2 | 山西科锋农业科技有限公司 |
60%哒螨·呋虫胺水分散粒剂 | 150~180 g/hm2 | 东莞瑞德丰生物科技有限公司 |
28%虫螨·虫酰肼悬浮剂 | 750~1050 mL/hm2 | 京博农化科技股份有限公司 |
16%虫肼·茚虫威乳油 | 375~450 mL/hm2 | 京博农化科技股份有限公司 |
5%啶虫脒乳油 | 450~750 mL/hm2 | 山东戴盟得生物科技有限公司 |
供试药剂 | 施用剂量 | 生产商 |
---|---|---|
40%毒死蜱乳油 | 1125~1500 mL/hm2 | 河北青园腾达生物有限公司 |
30%吡丙·噻虫嗪悬浮剂 | 120~150 mL/hm2 | 清流县经济开发区有限公司 |
4.5%高效氯氰菊脂乳油 | 600~750 mL/hm2 | 江门市大光明农化新会有限公司 |
3.2%阿维菌素乳油 | 253.5~337.5 mL/hm2 | 河北中天邦正生物科技有限公司 |
70%吡虫啉水分散粒剂 | 37.5~45 g/hm2 | 拜耳作物(中国)科学有限公司 |
40%氯虫·噻虫胺悬浮剂 | 225~300 mL/hm2 | 东莞瑞德丰生物科技有限公司 |
40%氰虫·甲虫肼悬浮剂 | 600~750 mL/hm2 | 江苏东宝农业有限公司 |
20%虫酰肼悬浮剂 | 1050~1500 mL/hm2 | 山西科锋农业科技有限公司 |
60%哒螨·呋虫胺水分散粒剂 | 150~180 g/hm2 | 东莞瑞德丰生物科技有限公司 |
28%虫螨·虫酰肼悬浮剂 | 750~1050 mL/hm2 | 京博农化科技股份有限公司 |
16%虫肼·茚虫威乳油 | 375~450 mL/hm2 | 京博农化科技股份有限公司 |
5%啶虫脒乳油 | 450~750 mL/hm2 | 山东戴盟得生物科技有限公司 |
处理 | 稀释倍数 | 平均死亡率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||
4.5%高效氯氰菊酯 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 6.67 |
40%氰虫·甲虫肼 | 2000 | 3.33 | 3.33 | 3.33 |
30%吡丙·噻虫嗪 | 2000 | 3.33 | 3.33 | 6.67 |
60%哒螨·呋虫胺 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 10.00 |
70%吡虫啉 | 2000 | 3.33 | 6.67 | 23.33 |
CK | — | 0 | 3.33 | 3.33 |
处理 | 稀释倍数 | 平均死亡率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||
4.5%高效氯氰菊酯 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 6.67 |
40%氰虫·甲虫肼 | 2000 | 3.33 | 3.33 | 3.33 |
30%吡丙·噻虫嗪 | 2000 | 3.33 | 3.33 | 6.67 |
60%哒螨·呋虫胺 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 10.00 |
70%吡虫啉 | 2000 | 3.33 | 6.67 | 23.33 |
CK | — | 0 | 3.33 | 3.33 |
处理 | 时间/h | LC50/(mg/L) | 95%置信区间 | LC90/(mg/L) | 95%置信区间 | 毒力回归方程 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2%阿维菌素 | 24 | 5.22 | 3.37~9.06 | 71.33 | 27.59~772.02 | Y=1.13X-0.81 |
48 | 5.05 | 3.21~8.87 | 75.02 | 28.01~959.56 | Y=1.09X-0.77 | |
72 | 2.83 | 1.54~4.41 | 41.43 | 17.97~342.22 | Y=1.10X-0.50 | |
5%啶虫脒 | 24 | 22.03 | 14.54~48.42 | 155.59 | 63.89~1215.47 | Y=1.51X-2.21 |
48 | 16.69 | 11.87~29.04 | 99.08 | 48.41~441.73 | Y=1.68X-2.03 | |
72 | 6.80 | 5.18~8.99 | 30.06 | 19.79~60.80 | Y=1.99X-1.65 | |
40%氯虫·噻虫胺 | 24 | 28.19 | 18.93~38.15 | 156.43 | 101.18~346.30 | Y=1.72X-2.49 |
48 | 25.49 | 16.43~34.92 | 148.47 | 95.63~335.09 | Y=1.68X-2.36 | |
72 | 21.7 | 12.73~30.64 | 142.62 | 89.96~347.06 | Y=1.57X-2.10 | |
20%虫酰肼 | 24 | 40.11 | 30.99~51.21 | 142.96 | 101.22~252.53 | Y=2.32X-3.72 |
48 | 11.00 | 4.89~16.39 | 53.11 | 37.35~100.73 | Y=1.87X-1.95 | |
72 | 6.43 | 0.32~10.51 | 18.56 | 12.29~35.47 | Y=2.76X-2.25 | |
16%虫肼·茚虫威 | 24 | 109.32 | 91.96~129.78 | 221.226 | 179.10~304.84 | Y=4.19X-8.54 |
48 | 59.58 | 44.05~95.20 | 250.55 | 140.08~786.76 | Y=2.06X-3.65 | |
72 | 20.20 | 12.66~32.57 | 272.23 | 112.66~2406.29 | Y=1.14X-1.48 | |
40%毒死蜱 | 24 | 166.91 | 141.21~210.31 | 311.28 | 237.89~561.63 | Y=4.74X-10.52 |
48 | 100.82 | 86.56~117.28 | 172.54 | 143.84~233.21 | Y=5.49X-11.00 | |
72 | 74.20 | 65.10~84.49 | 109.75 | 94.71~104.90 | Y=7.54X-14.10 | |
28%虫螨·虫酰肼 | 24 | 1037.98 | 629.31~5644.56 | 3841.91 | 1501.15~133746.36 | Y=2.26X-6.80 |
48 | 186.32 | 128.54~285.15 | 559.10 | 347.64~1449.17 | Y=2.69X-6.10 | |
72 | 107.34 | 74.23~160.16 | 289.02 | 187.00~694.40 | Y=2.98X-6.05 |
处理 | 时间/h | LC50/(mg/L) | 95%置信区间 | LC90/(mg/L) | 95%置信区间 | 毒力回归方程 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2%阿维菌素 | 24 | 5.22 | 3.37~9.06 | 71.33 | 27.59~772.02 | Y=1.13X-0.81 |
48 | 5.05 | 3.21~8.87 | 75.02 | 28.01~959.56 | Y=1.09X-0.77 | |
72 | 2.83 | 1.54~4.41 | 41.43 | 17.97~342.22 | Y=1.10X-0.50 | |
5%啶虫脒 | 24 | 22.03 | 14.54~48.42 | 155.59 | 63.89~1215.47 | Y=1.51X-2.21 |
48 | 16.69 | 11.87~29.04 | 99.08 | 48.41~441.73 | Y=1.68X-2.03 | |
72 | 6.80 | 5.18~8.99 | 30.06 | 19.79~60.80 | Y=1.99X-1.65 | |
40%氯虫·噻虫胺 | 24 | 28.19 | 18.93~38.15 | 156.43 | 101.18~346.30 | Y=1.72X-2.49 |
48 | 25.49 | 16.43~34.92 | 148.47 | 95.63~335.09 | Y=1.68X-2.36 | |
72 | 21.7 | 12.73~30.64 | 142.62 | 89.96~347.06 | Y=1.57X-2.10 | |
20%虫酰肼 | 24 | 40.11 | 30.99~51.21 | 142.96 | 101.22~252.53 | Y=2.32X-3.72 |
48 | 11.00 | 4.89~16.39 | 53.11 | 37.35~100.73 | Y=1.87X-1.95 | |
72 | 6.43 | 0.32~10.51 | 18.56 | 12.29~35.47 | Y=2.76X-2.25 | |
16%虫肼·茚虫威 | 24 | 109.32 | 91.96~129.78 | 221.226 | 179.10~304.84 | Y=4.19X-8.54 |
48 | 59.58 | 44.05~95.20 | 250.55 | 140.08~786.76 | Y=2.06X-3.65 | |
72 | 20.20 | 12.66~32.57 | 272.23 | 112.66~2406.29 | Y=1.14X-1.48 | |
40%毒死蜱 | 24 | 166.91 | 141.21~210.31 | 311.28 | 237.89~561.63 | Y=4.74X-10.52 |
48 | 100.82 | 86.56~117.28 | 172.54 | 143.84~233.21 | Y=5.49X-11.00 | |
72 | 74.20 | 65.10~84.49 | 109.75 | 94.71~104.90 | Y=7.54X-14.10 | |
28%虫螨·虫酰肼 | 24 | 1037.98 | 629.31~5644.56 | 3841.91 | 1501.15~133746.36 | Y=2.26X-6.80 |
48 | 186.32 | 128.54~285.15 | 559.10 | 347.64~1449.17 | Y=2.69X-6.10 | |
72 | 107.34 | 74.23~160.16 | 289.02 | 187.00~694.40 | Y=2.98X-6.05 |
时间 | 药效/% | 处理 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2%阿维菌素 | 20%虫酰肼 | 5%啶虫脒 | 16%虫肼·茚虫威 | CK | ||
24 h | 虫口减退率 | 61.26±12.96a | 41.32±3.70ab | 26.60±11.39bc | 17.29±7.38c | 0.03±0.03d |
防治效果 | 57.74±13.89a | 39.30±3.18bc | 24.22±10.89bc | 14.52±5.43c | — | |
48 h | 虫口减退率 | 86.23±8.68a | 77.08±5.21a | 30.25±10.57b | 75.09±2.02a | 0.03±0.03c |
防治效果 | 85.95±8.47a | 76.28±5.35a | 27.82±10.81b | 74.26±1.35a | — | |
72 h | 虫口减退率 | 97.85±3.73a | 91.87±3.21a | 37.13±15.3b | 85.06±1.78a | 0.032±0.03c |
防治效果 | 97.78±3.85a | 91.59±3.30a | 35.08±15.76b | 84.57±1.46a | — |
时间 | 药效/% | 处理 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2%阿维菌素 | 20%虫酰肼 | 5%啶虫脒 | 16%虫肼·茚虫威 | CK | ||
24 h | 虫口减退率 | 61.26±12.96a | 41.32±3.70ab | 26.60±11.39bc | 17.29±7.38c | 0.03±0.03d |
防治效果 | 57.74±13.89a | 39.30±3.18bc | 24.22±10.89bc | 14.52±5.43c | — | |
48 h | 虫口减退率 | 86.23±8.68a | 77.08±5.21a | 30.25±10.57b | 75.09±2.02a | 0.03±0.03c |
防治效果 | 85.95±8.47a | 76.28±5.35a | 27.82±10.81b | 74.26±1.35a | — | |
72 h | 虫口减退率 | 97.85±3.73a | 91.87±3.21a | 37.13±15.3b | 85.06±1.78a | 0.032±0.03c |
防治效果 | 97.78±3.85a | 91.59±3.30a | 35.08±15.76b | 84.57±1.46a | — |
时间/d | 药效/% | 处理 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
3.2%阿维菌素 | 20%虫酰肼 | CK | ||
1 | 虫口减退率 | 83.72±2.33a | 89.47±2.63a | 11.11±10.28b |
防治效果 | 81.6±0.77a | 87.92±3.40a | — | |
2 | 虫口减退率 | 89.15±3.55a | 90.35±4.02a | 15.20±7.37b |
防治效果 | 87.24±4.41a | 88.81±3.98a | — | |
3 | 虫口减退率 | 96.12±1.34a | 90.88±3.04a | 21.73±14.96b |
防治效果 | 94.95±2.05a | 86.98±6.366a | — | |
4 | 虫口减退率 | 93.8±3.55a | 94.74±2.63a | 22.8±21.98b |
防治效果 | 91.01±5.76a | 92.26±5.96a | — | |
8 | 虫口减退率 | 81.40±6.15a | 79.82±4.02a | 36.84±11.50b |
防治效果 | 70.76±8.00a | 67.84±5.65a | — |
时间/d | 药效/% | 处理 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
3.2%阿维菌素 | 20%虫酰肼 | CK | ||
1 | 虫口减退率 | 83.72±2.33a | 89.47±2.63a | 11.11±10.28b |
防治效果 | 81.6±0.77a | 87.92±3.40a | — | |
2 | 虫口减退率 | 89.15±3.55a | 90.35±4.02a | 15.20±7.37b |
防治效果 | 87.24±4.41a | 88.81±3.98a | — | |
3 | 虫口减退率 | 96.12±1.34a | 90.88±3.04a | 21.73±14.96b |
防治效果 | 94.95±2.05a | 86.98±6.366a | — | |
4 | 虫口减退率 | 93.8±3.55a | 94.74±2.63a | 22.8±21.98b |
防治效果 | 91.01±5.76a | 92.26±5.96a | — | |
8 | 虫口减退率 | 81.40±6.15a | 79.82±4.02a | 36.84±11.50b |
防治效果 | 70.76±8.00a | 67.84±5.65a | — |
[1] | 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所, 中国植物保护学会. 中国农作物病虫害(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015: 897-901. |
[2] | 黄立飞, 黄实辉, 房伯平, 等. 甘薯小象甲的防治研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011(s1):77-79. |
[3] | 滑金锋, 黄咏梅, 李彦青, 等. 小象甲抗性鉴定方法及不同品种甘薯抗性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(5):1082-1086. |
[4] | 刘建峰, 李敦松, 刘志诚, 等. 利用性外激素诱杀甘薯小象甲试验初报[J]. 广东农业科学, 1999(6):38-40. |
[5] | 潘初沂. 闽东南地区甘薯小象甲发生为害特点初探[J]. 福建农业科技, 2006(5):59-61. |
[6] | 张润志. 甘薯蚁象Cylas formicarlus(F.)[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2015(2):418. |
[7] |
Dotaona R, Wilson B A L, Ash G J, et al. Sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Brentidae) avoids its host plant when a virulent Metarhizium anisopliae isolate is present[J]. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2017,148:67-72.
doi: S0022-2011(16)30167-7 pmid: 28596128 |
[8] | 于海滨, 郑琴, 陈书龙. 甘薯小象甲的生物学特征与综合防治措施[J]. 河北农业科学, 2010,14(8):32-35. |
[9] | 张世祎, TALEKARNS, 李正跃, 等. 甘薯小象甲成虫对甘薯植株不同部位的选择行为[J]. 云南大学学报:自然科学版, 2008(S1):141-143. |
[10] | 陈燕, 杨秀坚, 陈昕, 等. 湛江市野生蔬菜资源及开发利用研究[J]. 湛江师范学院学报, 1999(2):70-73. |
[11] | 孟亚飞. 湛江地区氮收支及湛江湾与南海氮通量估算[D]. 湛江: 广东海洋大学, 2016: 10. |
[12] | 魏龙, 张方秋, 高常军, 等. 广东湛江沿海木麻黄防护林生态系统的辐射通量特征[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2016,32(5):1-6. |
[13] | 李刚, 王宝权. 甘薯小象甲的发生为害及综合防治[J]. 吉林农业, 2013(10):76. |
[14] |
Smith T P, Hammond A M. Comparative susceptibility of sweetpotato weevil (Coleoptera : Brentidae) to selected insecticides[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2006,99(6):2024-2029.
doi: 10.1093/jee/99.6.2024 URL |
[15] | 甘林, 阮宏椿, 杨秀娟, 等. 8种杀虫剂防治甘薯小象甲的药效对比试验[J]. 福建农业科技, 2013(07):45-47. |
[16] | 张菡, 王良平, 范开举, 等. 三峡库区甘薯小象甲防治药剂田间筛选试验[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2013,59(06):34-36. |
[17] | 王容燕, 马广源, 高波, 等. 10种杀虫剂对甘薯蚁象的毒力测定[J]. 农药, 2015,54(10):773-776. |
[18] | 李月芬, 邹建运, 陈钊铭, 等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺防治甘薯小象甲试验分析[J]. 南方农业, 2017,11(11):35-36. |
[19] | 曾晓慧, 张宏宇, 喻子牛, 等. 苏云金芽孢杆菌对甜菜夜蛾幼虫毒力的生物测定方法[J]. 中国生物防治, 1998,14(04):172-175. |
[20] | 邓志勇. 木荷树皮提取物防治小菜蛾的盆栽药效试验[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013,41(05):101-102. |
[21] | 王春娟, 陈先良, 尹丰平, 等. 防治甘薯小象甲田间药效初探[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2018,39(08):55-59. |
[22] | 黄文枫, 赵海燕, 唐良德. 不同杀虫剂对黄曲条跳甲的室内毒力和田间防效[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2018,38(02):65-69. |
[23] | 倪珏萍, 侯华民, 曾霞, 等. 甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐与阿维菌素生物活性比较[J]. 现代农药, 2003,2(3):38-40. |
[24] | 孙鹏, 王相晶, 向文胜. 阿维菌素类杀虫剂与配体门控离子通道相互作用研究进展[J]. 世界农药, 2011,33(4):16-18. |
[25] | 杜育哲, 刘安西. 非甾醇蜕皮激素类杀虫剂的研究进展[J]. 农药, 2002,41(06):7-11. |
[26] |
Wing K D. RH-5849, a nonsteroidal ecdysone agonist: effects on a Drosophila cell line[J]. Science, 1988,241(4864):467-469.
doi: 10.1126/science.3393913 URL |
[27] | Salgado V L. The neurotoxic insecticidal mechanism of the nonsteroidal ecdysone agonist RH-5849: K+ channel block in nerve and muscle[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry & Physiology, 1992,43(1):1-13. |
[28] | 赵艺, 徐华潮, 马艳, 等. 虫酰肼和灭幼脲对锈色粒肩天牛氧化酶和解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018,35(01):174-177. |
[29] | 牟少飞, 梁沛, 高希武, 等. 槲皮素对B型烟粉虱羧酸酯酶和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶活性的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2006,43(04):491-495. |
[30] | 吕敏, 刘惠霞, 吴文君. 谷胱甘肽S-转移酶与昆虫抗药性的关系[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2003,40(03):204-207. |
[31] | 武海斌, 耿海荣, 宫庆涛, 等. 八种杀虫剂对愈纹萤叶甲成虫的毒力及田间防控效果[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2016,53(01):200-206. |
[1] | ZHU Haixia, LI Xiang, WEI Youhai. 800 g/L Prosulfocarb EC: Annual Weeds’ Control Effect and Safety Analysis in Broad Bean Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 97-102. |
[2] | CUI Yanhua, ZHOU Tingting, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, LIN Guocang, YANG Anpei, ZHANG Hang, LEI Junjie, LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng. Ultra-low Dose Spray of Small Plant Protection UAV: Control Effect on Wheat Powdery Mildew in Desert Oasis Wheat Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 147-150. |
[3] | CAI Yongzhan, WANG Ruibao, BAI Tao, LIU Youcai, HAN Xiaonv, WANG Bin, HUA Xiaobing, LI Cheng, MAO Minglin, ZI Wenlin. Control Effect of Three Bacillus subtilis Strains on Tobacco Powdery Mildew [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 125-129. |
[4] | HU Zhongliang, WANG Jianhe, XU Kui, SU Ying, CHEN Zhiwei, JIANG Yin. Effect of Different Insecticides on Field Control of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis: An Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 116-120. |
[5] | ZU Weixi, ZHAO Xiaoxia, GAO Fen. Quality Promotion and Disease Control Effects of Bacillus Strain R57 on Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus and Its Identification [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 129-135. |
[6] | LAI Xiaofang, YU Shanhong, YANG Changliang, LI Lin, CHENG Xu, CHEN Xiaoshang. Fungicide Screening and Control of Stem Blight of Eleocharis dulcis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 78-86. |
[7] | LIU Long, RONG Hua, ZHENG Tongtong, MA Junjie, GUO Qingyuan. Antifungal and Control Effect of Bacillus mojavensis on Pear Valsa Canker [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 140-146. |
[8] | YANG Hongfu, WU Jiawen, CHEN Yuan, ZHANG Jianhua. Fungicides for Wheat Scab Control in Jiangsu Province: Effectiveness Monitoring Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 139-143. |
[9] | LUO Zhenya, LIN Shaoyuan, QUAN Linfa, CHI Yanyan, CHEN Bingxu, XU Shu. Six Insecticides Against Spodoptera frugiperda in Maize: Field Application Evaluation in Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 124-130. |
[10] | Yu Fenghui, Cheng Daoquan, Wang Xiangchuan, Zhou Qian, Wu Wenlei, Zhang Qian, Yang Chuanlun, Han Lixia, Wu Lei, Liu Haiyu, Xu Zeping. Zinc Chitooligosaccharide: Effects on Disease Control, Fruit Quality and Yield of Greenhouse Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(9): 42-48. |
[11] | SUN Taihua, WANG Huasheng, XIONG Xijiao. Evaluation of the Control Effect of Chicken on Bactrocera dorsalis in Orchard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 130-134. |
[12] | YOU Tanggui, DUAN Yanru, ZHANG Yan, GONG Lin, CHEN Yujie, HE Shuqi, XIAO Jiafan, NI Xia, ZHA Hongbo, ZHAO Fang, ZHAO Shengchun, YANG Junzhang. Effects of Four Virus Inhibitors on Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus and Potato Virus Y in Zhaotong Tobacco Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 135-141. |
[13] | CAI Yangguang, DUAN Longfei, QIN Jianfeng, CHEN Guoai, GUO Bangli, XU Cong, YANG Lianghua. The Content Variation of Exogenous Selenium in Different Organs of Konjac at Different Growth Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 61-65. |
[14] | Chen Li, Zhou Tingting, Shen Yuyang, Lu Zifeng, Cui Yanhua, Zhao Haiyan, Liu Qi, Gao Haifeng. Control Effect of 9 Fungicides on Wheat Stripe Rust in Desert and Oasis Wheat Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(35): 78-81. |
[15] | Chai Guanqun, Liu Guihua, Luo Muxinjian, Qin Song, Fan Chengwu. Effect of Selenium and Passivator Application on Available Cadmium Passivation in Soil and Cadmium Reduction in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(32): 102-107. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||