Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (25): 1-7.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0882
WANG Zheng1(), LIU Jiuyu1, KAN Hongwei1, HUANG Shaoli1, LI Zhi1, DONG Shuchao2, LIU Yangxu2, LI Xiaoting3(
), YANG Xiaobin3, LI Xiancai3
Received:
2021-09-10
Revised:
2022-04-17
Online:
2022-09-05
Published:
2022-08-26
Contact:
LI Xiaoting
E-mail:16627843@qq.com;297342679@qq.com
CLC Number:
WANG Zheng, LIU Jiuyu, KAN Hongwei, HUANG Shaoli, LI Zhi, DONG Shuchao, LIU Yangxu, LI Xiaoting, YANG Xiaobin, LI Xiancai. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Root Morphology and Leaf Quality of ‘Hongda’ Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 1-7.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0882
处理名称 | 纯氮用量 | 处理方式 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机无机复合肥 | 氮钾肥 | 硫酸钾 | 过磷酸钙 | ||
N1 | 45 | 412.5 | 75 | 150+213.75 | 375 |
N2 | 60 | 600.0 | 75 | 150+142.50 | 250 |
N3 | 75 | 787.5 | 75 | 150+71.25 | 125 |
N4 | 90 | 975.0 | 75 | 150+0.00 | 0 |
处理名称 | 纯氮用量 | 处理方式 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机无机复合肥 | 氮钾肥 | 硫酸钾 | 过磷酸钙 | ||
N1 | 45 | 412.5 | 75 | 150+213.75 | 375 |
N2 | 60 | 600.0 | 75 | 150+142.50 | 250 |
N3 | 75 | 787.5 | 75 | 150+71.25 | 125 |
N4 | 90 | 975.0 | 75 | 150+0.00 | 0 |
时期 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 有效叶数/片 | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
团棵期 | N1 | 13.2 | 8.0 | 25.2 | 11.2 | |||||||||||||
N2 | 23.1 | 10.0 | 48.7 | 24.5 | 7.5 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 19.2 | 8.0 | 45.0 | 23.0 | 7.1 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 24.8 | 8.7 | 47.3 | 22.7 | 6.8 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
现蕾期 | N1 | 105.3 | 21.0 | 59.9b | 26.0b | 10.0 | 3.4 | |||||||||||
N2 | 108.0 | 20.3 | 68.5ab | 32.5a | 10.4 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 115.7 | 22.0 | 68.7ab | 33.3a | 10.3 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 122.0 | 22.3 | 73.8a | 30.6ab | 11.0 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
封顶后 | N1 | 98.0 | 18.3 | 80.3 | 30.5 | 9.4 | 3.3 | |||||||||||
N2 | 101.7 | 19.0 | 80.3 | 30.7 | 10.5 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 100.7 | 18.7 | 83.7 | 31.0 | 9.7 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 104.7 | 19.0 | 81.7 | 30.3 | 10.1 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
旺长期 | N1 | 19.2 | 7.3 | 43.7 | 22.2 | 6.9 | 2.2 | |||||||||||
N2 | 13.2 | 8.7 | 25.2 | 11.7 | N2 | 13.2 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 12.8 | 8.3 | 23.5 | 11.3 | N3 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 13.3 | 9.3 | 24.3 | 12.4 | N4 | 13.3 |
时期 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 有效叶数/片 | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
团棵期 | N1 | 13.2 | 8.0 | 25.2 | 11.2 | |||||||||||||
N2 | 23.1 | 10.0 | 48.7 | 24.5 | 7.5 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 19.2 | 8.0 | 45.0 | 23.0 | 7.1 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 24.8 | 8.7 | 47.3 | 22.7 | 6.8 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
现蕾期 | N1 | 105.3 | 21.0 | 59.9b | 26.0b | 10.0 | 3.4 | |||||||||||
N2 | 108.0 | 20.3 | 68.5ab | 32.5a | 10.4 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 115.7 | 22.0 | 68.7ab | 33.3a | 10.3 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 122.0 | 22.3 | 73.8a | 30.6ab | 11.0 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
封顶后 | N1 | 98.0 | 18.3 | 80.3 | 30.5 | 9.4 | 3.3 | |||||||||||
N2 | 101.7 | 19.0 | 80.3 | 30.7 | 10.5 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 100.7 | 18.7 | 83.7 | 31.0 | 9.7 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 104.7 | 19.0 | 81.7 | 30.3 | 10.1 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
旺长期 | N1 | 19.2 | 7.3 | 43.7 | 22.2 | 6.9 | 2.2 | |||||||||||
N2 | 13.2 | 8.7 | 25.2 | 11.7 | N2 | 13.2 | ||||||||||||
N3 | 12.8 | 8.3 | 23.5 | 11.3 | N3 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||
N4 | 13.3 | 9.3 | 24.3 | 12.4 | N4 | 13.3 |
部位 | 处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 叶片结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 58.8 |
N2 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 61.8 | |
N3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 71.7 | |
N4 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 63.9 | |
C3F | N1 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 69.6 |
N2 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 68.2 | |
N3 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 70.9 | |
N4 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 71.5 |
部位 | 处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 叶片结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 58.8 |
N2 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 61.8 | |
N3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 71.7 | |
N4 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 63.9 | |
C3F | N1 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 69.6 |
N2 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 68.2 | |
N3 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 70.9 | |
N4 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 71.5 |
部位 | 处理 | 含梗率/% | 叶面密度/(g/m2) | 抗张力/N | 平衡含水率/% | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 33.98 | 69.15 | 1.57 | 16.08 | 81.00 |
N2 | 33.52 | 62.78 | 1.40 | 13.53 | 76.38 | |
N3 | 34.06 | 61.87 | 1.29 | 14.54 | 73.70 | |
N4 | 33.88 | 65.90 | 1.98 | 14.96 | 84.07 | |
C3F | N1 | 32.44 | 69.54 | 1.66 | 15.93 | 84.04 |
N2 | 29.07 | 62.00 | 1.41 | 15.63 | 80.77 | |
N3 | 32.88 | 56.67 | 1.70 | 18.10 | 80.24 | |
N4 | 35.74 | 52.13 | 1.15 | 16.67 | 66.66 |
部位 | 处理 | 含梗率/% | 叶面密度/(g/m2) | 抗张力/N | 平衡含水率/% | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 33.98 | 69.15 | 1.57 | 16.08 | 81.00 |
N2 | 33.52 | 62.78 | 1.40 | 13.53 | 76.38 | |
N3 | 34.06 | 61.87 | 1.29 | 14.54 | 73.70 | |
N4 | 33.88 | 65.90 | 1.98 | 14.96 | 84.07 | |
C3F | N1 | 32.44 | 69.54 | 1.66 | 15.93 | 84.04 |
N2 | 29.07 | 62.00 | 1.41 | 15.63 | 80.77 | |
N3 | 32.88 | 56.67 | 1.70 | 18.10 | 80.24 | |
N4 | 35.74 | 52.13 | 1.15 | 16.67 | 66.66 |
部位 | 处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 钾/% | 氯/% | 淀粉/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 24.27 | 23.90 | 2.73 | 4.13 | 2.72 | 0.67 | 2.42 | 5.79 | 0.66 | 4.06 | 75.72 |
N2 | 17.71 | 17.51 | 3.02 | 4.41 | 2.91 | 0.56 | 2.51 | 3.97 | 0.68 | 5.20 | 69.43 | |
N3 | 24.35 | 22.53 | 2.75 | 4.49 | 2.43 | 0.43 | 2.44 | 5.02 | 0.61 | 5.65 | 72.20 | |
N4 | 26.27 | 24.26 | 2.49 | 4.20 | 2.40 | 0.23 | 1.74 | 6.25 | 0.59 | 10.43 | 81.24 | |
C3F | N1 | 34.67 | 30.85 | 1.83 | 2.56 | 2.68 | 0.37 | 4.83 | 13.54 | 0.71 | 7.24 | 79.60 |
N2 | 30.41 | 29.21 | 1.97 | 2.63 | 2.64 | 0.34 | 4.24 | 11.56 | 0.75 | 7.76 | 84.71 | |
N3 | 31.43 | 27.02 | 2.26 | 3.21 | 2.17 | 0.38 | 4.11 | 9.79 | 0.70 | 5.71 | 83.59 | |
N4 | 34.16 | 29.14 | 1.75 | 1.90 | 2.60 | 0.34 | 2.72 | 17.98 | 0.92 | 7.65 | 69.60 |
部位 | 处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 钾/% | 氯/% | 淀粉/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 24.27 | 23.90 | 2.73 | 4.13 | 2.72 | 0.67 | 2.42 | 5.79 | 0.66 | 4.06 | 75.72 |
N2 | 17.71 | 17.51 | 3.02 | 4.41 | 2.91 | 0.56 | 2.51 | 3.97 | 0.68 | 5.20 | 69.43 | |
N3 | 24.35 | 22.53 | 2.75 | 4.49 | 2.43 | 0.43 | 2.44 | 5.02 | 0.61 | 5.65 | 72.20 | |
N4 | 26.27 | 24.26 | 2.49 | 4.20 | 2.40 | 0.23 | 1.74 | 6.25 | 0.59 | 10.43 | 81.24 | |
C3F | N1 | 34.67 | 30.85 | 1.83 | 2.56 | 2.68 | 0.37 | 4.83 | 13.54 | 0.71 | 7.24 | 79.60 |
N2 | 30.41 | 29.21 | 1.97 | 2.63 | 2.64 | 0.34 | 4.24 | 11.56 | 0.75 | 7.76 | 84.71 | |
N3 | 31.43 | 27.02 | 2.26 | 3.21 | 2.17 | 0.38 | 4.11 | 9.79 | 0.70 | 5.71 | 83.59 | |
N4 | 34.16 | 29.14 | 1.75 | 1.90 | 2.60 | 0.34 | 2.72 | 17.98 | 0.92 | 7.65 | 69.60 |
部位 | 处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 杂气 | 浓度 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 燃烧性 | 灰色 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 68.00 |
N2 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 66.50 | |
N3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 65.00 | |
N4 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 65.00 | |
C3F | N1 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 66.55 |
N2 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 65.00 | |
N3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 65.75 | |
N4 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 65.40 |
部位 | 处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 杂气 | 浓度 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 燃烧性 | 灰色 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2F | N1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 68.00 |
N2 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 66.50 | |
N3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 65.00 | |
N4 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 65.00 | |
C3F | N1 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 66.55 |
N2 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 65.00 | |
N3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 65.75 | |
N4 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 65.40 |
[1] | 杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(1):36-46. |
[2] | 王宁, 李继光, 娄翼来, 等. 作物根系形态对施肥措施的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(3):53-58. |
[3] | 晁逢春, 张福锁, 杨宇虹, 等. 影响烟草根系发育的几个因素探讨[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2003(2):5-8. |
[4] | 许建定. 土壤水分和氮磷营养对植物根系生长的影响[J]. 山西水土保持科技, 2010(3):12-15. |
[5] | 邹文桐, 熊德中. 土壤交换性钙水平对烤烟若干生理代谢的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2010, 37(2):369-373. |
[6] | 杨宇虹, 华水金, 赵菊英, 等. 氮肥对水田与旱地烤烟苗期根系发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2008(5):614-616. |
[7] | 刘国顺, 赵春华, 王彦亭, 等. 施氮量对烤烟根系发育和某些生理指标的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2007(2):134-137. |
[8] | 王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏. 中国烟草种植区划[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010:3. |
[9] | 吉书文, 腾兆波. 烟草物理检测[M]. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 1997:188-209. |
[10] | 李艳平, 任天宝, 李建华, 等. 烟杆有机肥对烤烟根系发育和矿质元素含量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(6):21-26. |
[11] | 刘丽, 张晓兵, 许自成, 等. 烤烟拉力与主要化学成分的关系研究[J]. 郑州轻工业学院学报:自然科学版, 2007, 22(4):1-3. |
[12] | 雒永强. 贵州乌蒙烟区烤烟叶面密度的变异及与品质指标的关系[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2014. |
[13] | 王瑞新. 烟草化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003:51-237. |
[14] | 尚晓颍, 刘化冰, 张小全, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同烤烟品种根系生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30(2):357-361. |
[15] | 赵阳, 王树声, 张亚丽, 等. 增加烟草一级和二级侧根是抵御干旱的生理机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2):548-555. |
[16] | 汤宏, 王建伟, 李向阳, 等. 水氮耦合对烤烟生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(6):17-24. |
[17] | 宋洪卫, 张会慧, 贺国强, 等. 水氮耦合对假植期烤烟幼苗生长和叶片光合作用的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(2):188-194. |
[18] | 李玥, 赖勇林, 王军, 等. 不同养分缺乏对烤烟根系形态及营养生长的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(2):60-65. |
[19] | 王艳丽, 王京, 刘国顺, 等. 磷施用量对烤烟根系生理及叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(2):410-417. |
[20] | 贾志红, 易建华, 符建国, 等. 磷肥处理对烤烟生长生理及根系构型的影响[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(3):388-391. |
[21] | 林昌华, 张士荣, 肖洲, 等. 不同供钾水平下烤烟生长及硝态氮吸收动力学特征[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(9):1677-1684. |
[22] | 何文高. 施氮量和留叶数对贵州烤烟生理及株型特征的影响研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2014. |
[23] | 邢瑶, 孙泽东, 陈乐, 等. 氮素形态对烟苗根系生长及碳、氮积累的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(5):13-18. |
[24] | 吉贵锋, 王鹏泽, 张书伟, 等. 生物炭对植烟褐土C/N值及烤烟根系发育的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2018, 52(6):863-867. |
[25] | 程浩, 孙福山, 翟所亮, 等. 特色烤烟品种红花大金元烟叶质量的影响因素分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(2):21-25. |
[26] | 谢志坚, 涂书新, 张嵚, 等. 影响烤烟烟碱合成与代谢的因素及其机理分析[J]. 核农学报, 2014, 28(4):714-719. |
[27] | 唐莉娜, 熊德中. 土壤酸度的调节对烤烟根系生长与烟叶化学成分含量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2002, 10(4):65-67. |
[28] | 毛家伟, 马聪, 唐培培, 等. 耕作模式对烤烟根系生长和烟叶钾、氯含量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(8):56-60. |
[1] | GUAN Luohao, YANG Xin, LI Chao, ZHANG Yanling, ZHANG Guangfu, LI Yongliang, ZHOU Hanping, WANG Guangshan, ZHONG Shuai, DAI Huaxin. Influence of Remained Leaves on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Tengchong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 10-15. |
[2] | HOU Jianlin, LI Sijun, HE Mingyu, XIAO Hanqian, XIANG Tiejun, HUANG Jie, LI Wujin, XIAO Yansong, JIANG Zhimin, XU Junhua, DENG Xiaohua. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, Yield and Quality of Paddy-tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 39-43. |
[3] | Jiang Shouan, Xu Yongbo, Liu Xiaobing. Effects of Spraying Different Potassic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(5): 42-45. |
[4] | Bai Hui, Zhang Xiu, Chu Jinpeng, Yu Haitao, Yang Hongye, Xu Chenchen, Dai Xinglong. Nitrogen Fertilizer Level: Effects on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Strong Gluten Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(4): 7-14. |
[5] | Wang Ning, Li Jiguang, Lou Yilai, Wang Yidong, Li Zhongfang, Song Jiqing, Zhang Xiaojun. Response of Crop Root Morphology to Fertilization Measures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(3): 53-58. |
[6] | Yuan Zebin, Mu Changhong, Ouyang Xiuqin, Wang Bo, Sun Xiangli. Effects of Mixed Salt Stress on Biomass and Root Architecture of Iris lactea var. chinensis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(16): 55-60. |
[7] | . Effects on Growth and 15N Absorption, Utilization and Distribution of Malus hupehensis Under Different Nitrate Nitrogen Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(3): 98-103. |
[8] | Qian Facong,Ouyang Jin,,Yang Yongping,Xie Yonghui,Wan Lei,Wang Panlei,Lu Yao and Chen Shihua. Screening Key Factors Affecting Chemical Compositions of Kungming ‘Hongda’ Tobacco by Correspondence Analysis Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(28): 41-46. |
[9] | Wei Yena,Zhang Jie,Yang Guotao,Li Yanan,Fan Yongyi,Jiang Fen,Chen Jing and Hu Yungao. Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Yield Traits of Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(24): 6-10. |
[10] | . Effects of Potassium on Seedling Growth and Root Morphology of Acacia melanoxylon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(22): 5-9. |
[11] | Su Yan,He Qian,Yan Ziyi,Li Jiyue and Wang Junhui. Analysis of the Effect of Nitrogen Supply on Root Growth and Development of Picea abies [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(16): 1-5. |
[12] | . Regulation Effect of Different Nitrogen Levels on the Content of Fluoride in Fresh Tea Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(31): 108-113. |
[13] | . Seasonal Change Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals of the Groundwater in the Dabaoshan Mine Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(23): 190-196. |
[14] | . Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Nitrogen Metabolism, Nodule Growth and Yield of Peanut Variety‘Ganhua 7 hao’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(12): 218-222. |
[15] | . Influence of Salicylic Acid on the Roots Activity and Root Morphology Indicators of Pennisetum glaucum ‘Purple Majesty’ Under Temperature Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(1): 174-177. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||