Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1-6.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0083
DU Shanshan(), LUO Jing, YAO Qingqing(
), SUN Huijian, HE Zhongsheng, WANG Dongli
Received:
2022-02-08
Revised:
2022-04-05
Online:
2023-02-05
Published:
2023-01-31
DU Shanshan, LUO Jing, YAO Qingqing, SUN Huijian, HE Zhongsheng, WANG Dongli. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Topdressing Rates on SPAD Value and Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution of Upland Cotton in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 1-6.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0083
施氮处理 | 追氮总量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥施用量/(kg/hm2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06-25 | 07-02 | 07-09 | 07-16 | 07-23 | 07-31 | 08-7 | 08-15 | ||
N0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 244.57 | 12.23 | 24.46 | 34.24 | 48.91 | 48.91 | 31.79 | 24.46 | 19.57 |
N2 | 489.13 | 24.46 | 48.91 | 68.48 | 97.83 | 97.83 | 63.59 | 48.91 | 39.13 |
N3 | 733.70 | 36.68 | 73.37 | 102.72 | 146.74 | 146.74 | 95.38 | 73.37 | 58.70 |
追施比例/% | 5 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 20 | 13 | 10 | 8 |
施氮处理 | 追氮总量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥施用量/(kg/hm2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06-25 | 07-02 | 07-09 | 07-16 | 07-23 | 07-31 | 08-7 | 08-15 | ||
N0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 244.57 | 12.23 | 24.46 | 34.24 | 48.91 | 48.91 | 31.79 | 24.46 | 19.57 |
N2 | 489.13 | 24.46 | 48.91 | 68.48 | 97.83 | 97.83 | 63.59 | 48.91 | 39.13 |
N3 | 733.70 | 36.68 | 73.37 | 102.72 | 146.74 | 146.74 | 95.38 | 73.37 | 58.70 |
追施比例/% | 5 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 20 | 13 | 10 | 8 |
生育期 | 处理 | 叶片 | 茎秆 | 生殖器官 | 地上干物质量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
初花期 | N0 | 18.23±0.75ab | 17.13±0.98b | 1.12±0.4a | 36.47±1.23b |
N1 | 17.99±1.35b | 17.78±1.11b | 1.91±0.39a | 37.67±2.61ab | |
N2 | 19.08±1.16ab | 19.49±0.48ab | 1.14±0.21a | 39.71±1.68ab | |
N3 | 20.91±2.07a | 20.99±2.12a | 1.44±0.91a | 43.33±4.84a | |
盛花期 | N0 | 23.02±3.16b | 23.76±1.51b | 3.60±0.77a | 50.37±5.35b |
N1 | 29.82±1.34ab | 32.44±2.26a | 6.33±0.69a | 68.60±4.13ab | |
N2 | 29.75±6.53ab | 33.99±6.85a | 6.24±3.00a | 69.98±16.34ab | |
N3 | 33.49±5.16a | 38.68±5.49a | 6.77±1.66a | 78.94±11.92a | |
花铃期 | N0 | 26.11±1.66b | 33.34±1.91c | 7.42±2.48b | 66.87±1.94c |
N1 | 31.26±3.09ab | 40.09±4.78bc | 13.44±2.38ab | 84.78±8.60bc | |
N2 | 38.81±5.26a | 51.01±4.71ab | 17.15±6.25a | 106.97±13.24ab | |
N3 | 39.24±6.78a | 54.83±12.3a | 18.16±3.73a | 112.23±22.7a | |
盛铃期 | N0 | 26.12±2.16c | 34.53±3.43c | 31.44±10.28b | 92.08±15.01c |
N1 | 35.42±1.48b | 46.19±6.00b | 48.2±16.41ab | 129.81±23.82b | |
N2 | 43.20±3.31a | 56.08±2.51a | 56.69±3.98a | 155.97±9.75ab | |
N3 | 46.37±3.10a | 60.09±4.26a | 63.83±9.97a | 170.28±9.19a | |
吐絮期 | N0 | 21.04±2.97a | 34.98±0.71b | 74.82±7.07b | 130.83±10.00b |
N1 | 24.18±7.00a | 52.21±4.00a | 116.82±11.89ab | 193.21±21.55ab | |
N2 | 31.51±14.61a | 58.3±11.58a | 116.28±35.21ab | 206.09±60.62ab | |
N3 | 36.81±5.20a | 60.18±13.32a | 132.84±28.58a | 229.83±46.56a |
生育期 | 处理 | 叶片 | 茎秆 | 生殖器官 | 地上干物质量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
初花期 | N0 | 18.23±0.75ab | 17.13±0.98b | 1.12±0.4a | 36.47±1.23b |
N1 | 17.99±1.35b | 17.78±1.11b | 1.91±0.39a | 37.67±2.61ab | |
N2 | 19.08±1.16ab | 19.49±0.48ab | 1.14±0.21a | 39.71±1.68ab | |
N3 | 20.91±2.07a | 20.99±2.12a | 1.44±0.91a | 43.33±4.84a | |
盛花期 | N0 | 23.02±3.16b | 23.76±1.51b | 3.60±0.77a | 50.37±5.35b |
N1 | 29.82±1.34ab | 32.44±2.26a | 6.33±0.69a | 68.60±4.13ab | |
N2 | 29.75±6.53ab | 33.99±6.85a | 6.24±3.00a | 69.98±16.34ab | |
N3 | 33.49±5.16a | 38.68±5.49a | 6.77±1.66a | 78.94±11.92a | |
花铃期 | N0 | 26.11±1.66b | 33.34±1.91c | 7.42±2.48b | 66.87±1.94c |
N1 | 31.26±3.09ab | 40.09±4.78bc | 13.44±2.38ab | 84.78±8.60bc | |
N2 | 38.81±5.26a | 51.01±4.71ab | 17.15±6.25a | 106.97±13.24ab | |
N3 | 39.24±6.78a | 54.83±12.3a | 18.16±3.73a | 112.23±22.7a | |
盛铃期 | N0 | 26.12±2.16c | 34.53±3.43c | 31.44±10.28b | 92.08±15.01c |
N1 | 35.42±1.48b | 46.19±6.00b | 48.2±16.41ab | 129.81±23.82b | |
N2 | 43.20±3.31a | 56.08±2.51a | 56.69±3.98a | 155.97±9.75ab | |
N3 | 46.37±3.10a | 60.09±4.26a | 63.83±9.97a | 170.28±9.19a | |
吐絮期 | N0 | 21.04±2.97a | 34.98±0.71b | 74.82±7.07b | 130.83±10.00b |
N1 | 24.18±7.00a | 52.21±4.00a | 116.82±11.89ab | 193.21±21.55ab | |
N2 | 31.51±14.61a | 58.3±11.58a | 116.28±35.21ab | 206.09±60.62ab | |
N3 | 36.81±5.20a | 60.18±13.32a | 132.84±28.58a | 229.83±46.56a |
施氮处理 | 总结铃数/ (×104个/hm2) | 单铃重/ g | 衣分/ % | 籽棉产量/ (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量/ (kg/hm2) | 氮肥偏生产力/ (kg/kg) | 氮肥农学效率/ (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 94.13a | 6.60a | 40.75a | 6216.21a | 2533.11a | ||
N1 | 99.23a | 6.64a | 41.02a | 6581.32a | 2699.66a | 58.50a | 3.24a |
N2 | 98.28a | 6.60a | 40.92a | 6491.54a | 2656.50a | 28.85b | 1.23ab |
N3 | 85.99a | 6.57a | 41.04a | 5649.39a | 2318.51a | 16.74c | -1.68b |
施氮处理 | 总结铃数/ (×104个/hm2) | 单铃重/ g | 衣分/ % | 籽棉产量/ (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量/ (kg/hm2) | 氮肥偏生产力/ (kg/kg) | 氮肥农学效率/ (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 94.13a | 6.60a | 40.75a | 6216.21a | 2533.11a | ||
N1 | 99.23a | 6.64a | 41.02a | 6581.32a | 2699.66a | 58.50a | 3.24a |
N2 | 98.28a | 6.60a | 40.92a | 6491.54a | 2656.50a | 28.85b | 1.23ab |
N3 | 85.99a | 6.57a | 41.04a | 5649.39a | 2318.51a | 16.74c | -1.68b |
[1] |
郭金强, 危常州, 侯振安, 等. 施氮量对膜下滴灌棉花氮素吸收、积累及其产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2008, 45(4):691-694.
|
[2] |
李新伟, 吕新, 张泽, 等. 棉花氮素营养诊断与追肥推荐模型[J]. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(12):209-214.
|
[3] |
赖波, 汤明尧, 柴仲平, 等. 新疆农田化肥施用现状调查与评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(6):1024-1030.
|
[4] |
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.03.006 URL |
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.01.019 URL |
[6] |
doi: S0981-9428(17)30125-0 pmid: 28441628 |
[7] |
薛晓萍, 王建国, 郭文琦, 等. 氮素水平对初花后棉株生物量、氮素累积特征及氮素利用率动态变化的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006(11):3631-3640.
|
[8] |
薛晓萍, 郭文琦, 王以琳, 等. 不同施氮水平下棉花生物量动态增长特征研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2006(6):323-326.
|
[9] |
石洪亮, 张巨松, 严青青, 等. 施氮量对南疆机采棉生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(3):397-404.
|
[10] |
林涛, 张昊, 汤秋香, 等. 施氮量对南疆机采棉产量形成及氮肥利用率影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2019, 42(2):77-83.
|
[11] |
哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 等. 不同施氮量对棉花产量、养分吸收分配及利用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(8):1422-1428.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.08.006 |
[12] |
张宏, 曾雄, 王爱莲, 等. 不同施氮量对棉花产量、养分吸收及氮素利用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9):1656-1664.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.09.011 |
[13] |
陈防, 鲁剑巍. SPAD-502叶绿素计在作物营养快速诊断上的应用初探[J]. 湖北农业科学, 1996(2):31-34.
|
[14] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.06.014 URL |
[15] |
李伶俐, 房卫平, 谢德意, 等. 施氮量对杂交棉光合生理特性及产量、品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(5):1183-1189.
|
[16] |
张仁和, 王博新, 杨永红, 等. 陕西灌区高产春玉米物质生产与氮素积累特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50:2238-2246.
|
[17] |
李杰, 马腾飞, 郭蕾, 等. 哈密地区棉花品种生长发育特征及产量构成差异研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(3):509-515.
|
[18] |
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00151-9 URL |
[19] |
赵新华, 束红梅, 王友华, 等. 施氮量对棉铃干物质和氮累积及分配的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(4):888-897.
|
[20] |
马宗斌, 严根土, 刘桂珍, 等. 施氮量对黄河滩区棉花叶片生理特性、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4):849-857.
|
[21] |
李春艳, 张巨松, 向雁玲, 等. 密度与氮肥对机采棉生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41(4):633-639.
|
[22] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.10.005 URL |
[23] |
文明, 李鹏兵, 王乐, 等. 减施氮肥对北疆滴灌棉花干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1):120-129.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.01.015 |
[24] |
陈宝燕, 马红红, 牛新湘, 等. 不同生育时期施氮量调控对机采棉花冠层特性影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(11):1990-1998.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.11.004 |
[25] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.018 URL |
[26] |
阿丽艳·肉孜, 郭仁松, 杜强, 等. 施氮量对枣棉间作棉花干物质积累、产量与品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014(3):761-767.
|
[27] |
林涛, 郭仁松, 崔建平, 等. 施氮对南疆荒漠绿洲滴灌棉田产量及棉纤维品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(11):47-53.
|
[28] |
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.013 URL |
[29] |
王肖娟, 危常州, 张君, 等. 灌溉方式和施氮量对棉花生长及氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2012, 24(6):85-92.
|
[1] | TIAN Ting, ZHANG Qing, XU Wen. Prediction of Rice Canopy SPAD Value Based on UAV Multispectral Images [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 149-153. |
[2] | SONG Zhao, LIANG Ludan, HUANG Wenyin, CHEN Xiao, CAO Jian, HE Yuzhi, ZHANG Baige. Establishment and Application of Correlation Model Between Chlorophyll Content and SPAD Value in Pepper Under Waterlogging Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 30-37. |
[3] | Lv Xiaoyan, Xue Lin, Jing Xia, Zhang Chao, Xu Haiqing, Zhu Qifa. SPAD Value Estimation of Tobacco Leaves Based on Hyperspectral Fractional Differential [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(24): 54-59. |
[4] | Ha Faduman, Ma Lulu, Yin Caixia, Su Wei, Li Dongmei, Ding Yiren, Lv Xin, Zhang Ze. Nitrogen Nutrition Index of Cotton: Estimation Based on Leaf SPAD [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(18): 31-37. |
[5] | Mu Chan, Qian Rongqing, Yang Shaocong, Zhang Yanjun, Yao Zhaobing, Li Chengchun, Hu Xuanjiang, Shen Wenzhi, Lin Jiaojiao, Cai Shujiang. The Correlation Analysis of Inorganic N in Rhizosphere Soil and SPAD Value and N Content in Leaves of Tobacco Plants with Different Maturity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 21-26. |
[6] | Zhang Yongqiang, Zhang Lu, Xu Shan, Chen Chuanxin, Chen Xingwu, Lei Junjie, Sailihan· Sai, Xue Lihua. Nitrogen Topdressing Stages and Ratio: Effects on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(25): 1-6. |
[7] | . Economic Characters and Hybrid F1 Expressing Characteristics of iaaM-transgenic Upland Cotton Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(25): 21-25. |
[8] | . Breeding of‘Hengyou 12’: A High-quality, High-yield, Salt-tolerance and Drought-resistance Hybrid Cotton Variety [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(18): 21-24. |
[9] | . Correlation and Path Analyses of Lint Yield and Yield Components of Cotton Chromosome Segment Substitution Lines and F1 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(3): 108-114. |
[10] | Dai Maohua,Liu Liying,Zheng Shuhong,Wang Ruiqing and Wu Zhenliang. Correlation and Cluster Analysis for Main Agronomic Characters of Upland Cotton [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(12): 139-144. |
[11] | . Effect of Fertilizer Application Rates on Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution in Sesame [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(6): 129-134. |
[12] | . Effects of Different Distance to Drip Tape on Dry Matter Accumulation, Distribution and Translocation in Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(3): 182-188. |
[13] | . Genetic Analysis of Plant Type Traits and the Relationships between Plant Type Traits and Yield Traits of hybrids of Bt Transgenic Cotton×High Quality Upland Cotton [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(1): 79-83. |
[14] | . Analysis on Genetic Contribution of Plant Type Traits to Lint Yield in Upland Cotton(Gossypum hirsutum L.) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(23): 151-156. |
[15] | Yan Changchun. 闫长春 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(8): 152-155. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||