Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 10-17.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0230
Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Wenqiang(), SU Lili(
), MENG Lingyi, MA Yijian, TANG Jianghua
Received:
2022-04-01
Revised:
2022-06-23
Online:
2023-04-15
Published:
2023-04-10
TIAN Wenqiang, SU Lili, MENG Lingyi, MA Yijian, TANG Jianghua. Effects of Spraying Time of DPC on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Cotton Under Low Density[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 10-17.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0230
密度 | 喷施时间 | 株高/cm | 株宽/cm | 茎粗/mm | 果枝数 | 果枝始节高/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | D0 | 65.42b | 50.75d | 9.70c | 9.30ab | 18.02cd |
D3 | 65.95b | 51.10d | 10.05bc | 8.90abc | 18.55cd | |
D6 | 68.33b | 64.48ab | 11.14a | 8.20bcd | 22.08b | |
D9 | 73.57a | 67.26ab | 11.30a | 7.40d | 26.67a | |
M2 | D0 | 65.05b | 55.43cd | 9.39c | 9.70a | 16.82d |
D3 | 66.37b | 61.24bc | 10.02bc | 9.00abc | 17.73cd | |
D6 | 68.63b | 65.61ab | 10.10bc | 8.50bcd | 18.34cd | |
D9 | 73.25a | 67.82a | 10.74ab | 8.10cd | 20.85bc | |
F | M | 0.01 | 6.30* | 3.69 | 1.78 | 12.11** |
D | 12.13** | 17.73** | 6.67** | 7.23** | 11.68** | |
M×D | 0.03 | 1.79 | 0.72 | 0.33 | 1.98 |
密度 | 喷施时间 | 株高/cm | 株宽/cm | 茎粗/mm | 果枝数 | 果枝始节高/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | D0 | 65.42b | 50.75d | 9.70c | 9.30ab | 18.02cd |
D3 | 65.95b | 51.10d | 10.05bc | 8.90abc | 18.55cd | |
D6 | 68.33b | 64.48ab | 11.14a | 8.20bcd | 22.08b | |
D9 | 73.57a | 67.26ab | 11.30a | 7.40d | 26.67a | |
M2 | D0 | 65.05b | 55.43cd | 9.39c | 9.70a | 16.82d |
D3 | 66.37b | 61.24bc | 10.02bc | 9.00abc | 17.73cd | |
D6 | 68.63b | 65.61ab | 10.10bc | 8.50bcd | 18.34cd | |
D9 | 73.25a | 67.82a | 10.74ab | 8.10cd | 20.85bc | |
F | M | 0.01 | 6.30* | 3.69 | 1.78 | 12.11** |
D | 12.13** | 17.73** | 6.67** | 7.23** | 11.68** | |
M×D | 0.03 | 1.79 | 0.72 | 0.33 | 1.98 |
密度 | 喷施时间 | Pn/[μmol/(m2·s)] | Tr/[mmol/(m2·s)] | Gs/[mmol/(m2·s)] | Ci/(μmol/mol) | WUE/(μmol/mmol) | VPD/kPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | D0 | 23.73ab | 9.15ab | 377.00b | 212.75bc | 2.78a | 2.80b |
D3 | 23.10ab | 9.00ab | 421.00ab | 248.75a | 2.68a | 2.43c | |
D6 | 22.10bc | 7.83c | 339.25bc | 209.50bcd | 2.85a | 2.80b | |
D9 | 19.35c | 6.43d | 215.75d | 181.00d | 3.03a | 3.28a | |
M2 | D0 | 25.58a | 9.73a | 484.75a | 229.50ab | 2.70a | 2.48bc |
D3 | 23.55ab | 9.23ab | 490.25a | 250.25a | 2.65a | 2.33c | |
D6 | 22.43abc | 8.33bc | 480.75a | 247.25a | 2.70a | 2.45bc | |
D9 | 21.93bc | 7.43c | 243.75cd | 185.00cd | 2.98a | 3.40a | |
F | M | 2.37 | 6.02* | 12.56** | 3.95 | 0.56 | 3.37 |
D | 4.22* | 23.47** | 17.72** | 13.52** | 2.11 | 21.86** | |
M×D | 0.40 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 1.21 | 0.07 | 1.56 |
密度 | 喷施时间 | Pn/[μmol/(m2·s)] | Tr/[mmol/(m2·s)] | Gs/[mmol/(m2·s)] | Ci/(μmol/mol) | WUE/(μmol/mmol) | VPD/kPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | D0 | 23.73ab | 9.15ab | 377.00b | 212.75bc | 2.78a | 2.80b |
D3 | 23.10ab | 9.00ab | 421.00ab | 248.75a | 2.68a | 2.43c | |
D6 | 22.10bc | 7.83c | 339.25bc | 209.50bcd | 2.85a | 2.80b | |
D9 | 19.35c | 6.43d | 215.75d | 181.00d | 3.03a | 3.28a | |
M2 | D0 | 25.58a | 9.73a | 484.75a | 229.50ab | 2.70a | 2.48bc |
D3 | 23.55ab | 9.23ab | 490.25a | 250.25a | 2.65a | 2.33c | |
D6 | 22.43abc | 8.33bc | 480.75a | 247.25a | 2.70a | 2.45bc | |
D9 | 21.93bc | 7.43c | 243.75cd | 185.00cd | 2.98a | 3.40a | |
F | M | 2.37 | 6.02* | 12.56** | 3.95 | 0.56 | 3.37 |
D | 4.22* | 23.47** | 17.72** | 13.52** | 2.11 | 21.86** | |
M×D | 0.40 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 1.21 | 0.07 | 1.56 |
密度 | 喷施时间 | 脱叶率 | 吐絮率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
药后10 d | 药后20 d | 药前 | 药后10 d | 药后20 d | |||
M1 | D0 | 72.29%abc | 86.57%abc | 42.72%c | 78.37%b | 94.16%ab | |
D3 | 77.46%a | 81.86%bcd | 60.48%ab | 79.35%ab | 100%a | ||
D6 | 73.64%ab | 88.30%ab | 9.29%d | 46.57%c | 84.72%b | ||
D9 | 65.54%bc | 91.15%a | 3.14%d | 19.68%d | 55.99%c | ||
M2 | D0 | 70.41%abc | 80.75%cd | 67.66%ab | 86.48%ab | 99.33%a | |
D3 | 71.16%abc | 83.56%bcd | 56.44%b | 80.76%ab | 98.56%a | ||
D6 | 62.89%c | 78.42%d | 69.89%a | 91.72%a | 98.57%a | ||
D9 | 66.32%bc | 80.80%cd | 9.88%d | 43.62%c | 67.17%c | ||
F | M | 3.67 | 12.99** | 54.59** | 36.13** | 6.02* | |
D | 2.34 | 0.69 | 63.24** | 51.66** | 35.49** | ||
M×D | 1.07 | 2.66 | 22.40** | 8.84** | 1.35 |
密度 | 喷施时间 | 脱叶率 | 吐絮率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
药后10 d | 药后20 d | 药前 | 药后10 d | 药后20 d | |||
M1 | D0 | 72.29%abc | 86.57%abc | 42.72%c | 78.37%b | 94.16%ab | |
D3 | 77.46%a | 81.86%bcd | 60.48%ab | 79.35%ab | 100%a | ||
D6 | 73.64%ab | 88.30%ab | 9.29%d | 46.57%c | 84.72%b | ||
D9 | 65.54%bc | 91.15%a | 3.14%d | 19.68%d | 55.99%c | ||
M2 | D0 | 70.41%abc | 80.75%cd | 67.66%ab | 86.48%ab | 99.33%a | |
D3 | 71.16%abc | 83.56%bcd | 56.44%b | 80.76%ab | 98.56%a | ||
D6 | 62.89%c | 78.42%d | 69.89%a | 91.72%a | 98.57%a | ||
D9 | 66.32%bc | 80.80%cd | 9.88%d | 43.62%c | 67.17%c | ||
F | M | 3.67 | 12.99** | 54.59** | 36.13** | 6.02* | |
D | 2.34 | 0.69 | 63.24** | 51.66** | 35.49** | ||
M×D | 1.07 | 2.66 | 22.40** | 8.84** | 1.35 |
密度 | 喷施时间 | 收获株数/(株/hm2) | 单株结铃数/个 | 单铃重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | D0 | 192000 | 6.78de | 4.56b | 5930.43b |
D3 | 192000 | 7.13d | 4.85a | 6637.78a | |
D6 | 192000 | 7.00d | 4.38b | 5885.76b | |
D9 | 192000 | 6.38e | 4.11c | 5022.49f | |
M2 | D0 | 144000 | 8.10bc | 4.47b | 5211.10e |
D3 | 144000 | 8.48b | 4.47b | 5454.57d | |
D6 | 144000 | 8.98a | 4.46b | 5766.42c | |
D9 | 144000 | 8.00c | 3.62d | 4163.42g | |
F | M | \ | 271.37** | 13.35** | 744.06** |
D | \ | 14.41** | 33.34** | 589.07** | |
M×D | \ | 2.59 | 4.72* | 71.08** |
密度 | 喷施时间 | 收获株数/(株/hm2) | 单株结铃数/个 | 单铃重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | D0 | 192000 | 6.78de | 4.56b | 5930.43b |
D3 | 192000 | 7.13d | 4.85a | 6637.78a | |
D6 | 192000 | 7.00d | 4.38b | 5885.76b | |
D9 | 192000 | 6.38e | 4.11c | 5022.49f | |
M2 | D0 | 144000 | 8.10bc | 4.47b | 5211.10e |
D3 | 144000 | 8.48b | 4.47b | 5454.57d | |
D6 | 144000 | 8.98a | 4.46b | 5766.42c | |
D9 | 144000 | 8.00c | 3.62d | 4163.42g | |
F | M | \ | 271.37** | 13.35** | 744.06** |
D | \ | 14.41** | 33.34** | 589.07** | |
M×D | \ | 2.59 | 4.72* | 71.08** |
[1] |
张萌原, 韩忠玲, 程勇翔, 等. 新疆棉花春季冷害风险评估[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(10):102-108.
|
[2] |
李茂春, 练文明, 毛树春, 等. 2021年春季气候变化对新疆棉花生长影响及中期管理建议——以阿拉尔垦区为例[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(6):45-46.
|
[3] |
霍飞超. 南疆1膜3行模式密度与缩节胺对棉花生长及产量的影响[D]. 塔里木: 塔里木大学, 2020.
|
[4] |
张娜, 冯璐, 李玲, 等. 不同种植密度对南疆机采棉叶片生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(5):22-29.
|
[5] |
华烨, 周昊楠, 许婷婷, 等. 密度对棉花株间小气候、农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(19):36-41.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0360 |
[6] |
张娜, 冯璐, 马云珍, 等. 种植密度对南疆机采棉群体农艺特征和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(11):172-180.
|
[7] |
刘帅, 李亚兵, 白志刚, 等. 种植密度对长江流域直播棉花群体生长的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(10):1-6,39.
|
[8] |
韩焕勇, 邓福军, 李保成, 等. 种植密度对新疆高产棉花产量和品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009(4):98-100.
|
[9] |
支晓宇, 韩迎春, 王国平, 等. 不同密度下棉花群体光辐射空间分布及生物量和纤维品质的变化[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(4):365-373.
|
[10] |
刘丽英, 戴茂华, 吴振良. 缩节胺对黄河流域机采棉农艺性状、产量和品质的影响及化控技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(33):38-42.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17090147 |
[11] |
刘铨义, 冯杨, 王国平, 等. 缩节胺对棉花品种生长发育的影响[J]. 种子世界, 2015(3):20-22.
|
[12] |
王志国, 芮秋治, 刘震宇, 等. 长江流域缩节胺运筹对小麦后直播棉产量的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(9):17-20,32.
|
[13] |
刘燕, 原保忠, 张献龙, 等. 缩节胺和整枝打顶对棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(6):8-12.
|
[14] |
李建峰, 王聪, 梁福斌, 等. 新疆机采模式下棉花株行距配置对冠层结构指标及产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(2):157-165.
|
[15] |
李明华, 路茜, 崔静, 等. 增密减氮对滴灌棉花干物质积累分配和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(6):990-999.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.06.002 |
[16] |
周运刚, 王俊刚, 马天文, 等. 不同DPC(缩节胺)处理对棉花生理生化特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(6):1142-1146.
|
[17] |
何庆雨, 代建敏, 窦巧巧, 等. 化学调控对干旱后棉花冠层时空分布及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(6):860-869.
|
[18] |
冯杨, 刘铨义, 王国平, 等. 缩节胺不同施用剂量对棉株空间长势及产量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021(12):137-139.
|
[19] |
田雨, 王方永, 罗宏海, 等. 增效缩节胺化学封顶对不同施氮量条件下棉花群体生长特征的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(4):559-569.
|
[20] |
张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2):396-409.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14026 |
[1] | CHEN Shujian, CHEN Jingdu, YANG Chengqin, XU Meigang, GAO Jianbo. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Quality of Rice with Mechanical Sowing in Line Under Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 1-6. |
[2] | HU Baigeng, LI Xueyang, KONG Haiming, SUN Shasha, WANG Kexiu, HU Jianjun, HE Wei, TANG Mingxia. Different Calcium Concentrations Under Aeroponics: Effects on Growth and Yield of Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 33-39. |
[3] | QIAN Shuanghong, CAI Shikun, ZHU Hanyong, WANG Shaobin, LI Zhengrun, WANG Yingmei, LI Shaoyun. Maize Varieties (Strains) in Different Ecological Regions in Yunnan Province: Analysis of High Yield Potential, Yield Stability and Variety Adaptability [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 7-15. |
[4] | WU Chupeng, SHENG Jiandong, HU Yutong, CHENG Zhihui, YANG Pengfei. Soil Quality Evaluation of Oasis Cotton Fields in Shaya County of Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 71-78. |
[5] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[6] | JIANG Wanyue, HU Xiaohang, MA Yahuai, LI Yanli. GGE-biplot Based on R Language: Application in Regional Trial of Sugar Beet Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 7-14. |
[7] | ZHANG Zihao, LI Xiangcheng, WU Haotian, FU Penghao, GAO Chunbao, ZHANG Yunbo, ZOU Juan. The Appropriate Sowing Rate of Wheat Under the Climate Conditions of Jianghan Plain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 1-9. |
[8] | JIA Limin, ZHAO Xiaoyu, WANG Xuejiao, SU Erhu, LI Qiang, GUO Jiahua. Changes of Agronomic Characters, Quality and Yield of Soybean Varieties Approved in Different Years in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 10-18. |
[9] | ZUO Hongjuan, CAO Hui, ZHANG Hongrui, WANG Feng, ZHANG Xiaoshen. Effects of Planting Date and Number of Topping Times on the Yield of Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Gongju’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 51-54. |
[10] | LI Yali, BAI Jing, WU Zhenghu, HALIHASH Yibati, LI Qingjun. Effects of N, P and K Application Time on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Processing Tomato Under Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 58-63. |
[11] | ZHANG Kexin, YU Xiao, ZHANG Moucao. Effects of Sowing Date on Growth and Yield of Spring Maize in East Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 6-12. |
[12] | YIN Liping, LIU Siyuan, CAI Chengmei, SHI Xiaoli, ZHU Xiaojuan, YUAN Guoming, WANG Jidong, ZHANG Hui, XU Cong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Jiabowen Soil Conditioner on Radish Yield and Quality and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 64-71. |
[13] | ZHOU Jie, QI Chuandong, TANG Chun, GUO Fengling, QIN Zhushan, CAI Xiaodong, WU Jinping. Application Effect of Ethephon, Medium Trace Element and Functional Fertilizer on Ginger [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 72-76. |
[14] | BAI Yulin, WANG Chengqiang, DU Bin, LIU Lu, LIU Xia. The Response of Sea-island Cotton Strains to the Spraying Time and Frequency of Defoliants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 26-34. |
[15] | JIA Xiaoyun, ZHAO Hongxia, ZHU Jijie, WANG Guoyin, LI Miao, WANG Shijie. Upland Cotton Germplasms: Genetic Diversity Analysis of Main Yield and Fiber Quality Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 35-40. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||