Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (30): 158-164.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0935
FU Jiarong(), XU Rong, JIANG Shikuan, TIAN Yaohua, MA Shangxuan, YAN Li, ZOU Jianyun, GUO Gangjun(
)
Received:
2022-11-14
Revised:
2023-03-15
Online:
2023-10-25
Published:
2023-10-19
FU Jiarong, XU Rong, JIANG Shikuan, TIAN Yaohua, MA Shangxuan, YAN Li, ZOU Jianyun, GUO Gangjun. Analysis of Chemical Composition and Polyphenol Oxidase of Different Amorphophallus Bulbifer Varieties[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(30): 158-164.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0935
品种 | 葡甘聚糖 | 粗脂肪 | 粗纤维 | 蛋白质 | 生物碱 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
弥勒魔芋 | 59.71±0.84b | 0.31±0.01a | 3.47±0.16a | 10.20±0.15b | 1.80±0.08ab |
西傣9号 | 55.30±0.46c | 0.28±0.02a | 2.83±0.10c | 8.08±0.02d | 1.74±0.11b |
云热1701 | 63.90±0.56a | 0.28±0.02a | 3.25±0.04b | 10.50±0.06a | 1.85±0.04ab |
云热1702 | 63.01±0.54a | 0.34±0.10a | 2.77±0.08c | 9.96±0.01c | 1.89±0.08a |
云热1709 | 62.88±0.98a | 0.27±0.05a | 2.93±0.02b | 8.08±0.02d | 1.73±0.03b |
品种 | 葡甘聚糖 | 粗脂肪 | 粗纤维 | 蛋白质 | 生物碱 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
弥勒魔芋 | 59.71±0.84b | 0.31±0.01a | 3.47±0.16a | 10.20±0.15b | 1.80±0.08ab |
西傣9号 | 55.30±0.46c | 0.28±0.02a | 2.83±0.10c | 8.08±0.02d | 1.74±0.11b |
云热1701 | 63.90±0.56a | 0.28±0.02a | 3.25±0.04b | 10.50±0.06a | 1.85±0.04ab |
云热1702 | 63.01±0.54a | 0.34±0.10a | 2.77±0.08c | 9.96±0.01c | 1.89±0.08a |
云热1709 | 62.88±0.98a | 0.27±0.05a | 2.93±0.02b | 8.08±0.02d | 1.73±0.03b |
元素 | 弥勒魔芋 | 西傣9号 | 云热1701 | 云热1702 | 云热1709 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
锰 | 6.72±0.09d | 4.36±0.09e | 12.50±0.36a | 10.4±0.17c | 11.5±0.13b |
铅 | — | — | — | — | — |
汞 | — | — | — | — | — |
镉 | 0.0154±0.0006d | 0.0829±0.0008b | 0.0783±0.0009b | 0.0398±0.0009c | 0.206±0.008a |
砷 | 0.0071±0.0001b | — | 0.0102±0.0007a | — | 0.0065±0.0001c |
铬 | — | — | — | — | — |
镍 | — | — | — | — | — |
元素 | 弥勒魔芋 | 西傣9号 | 云热1701 | 云热1702 | 云热1709 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
锰 | 6.72±0.09d | 4.36±0.09e | 12.50±0.36a | 10.4±0.17c | 11.5±0.13b |
铅 | — | — | — | — | — |
汞 | — | — | — | — | — |
镉 | 0.0154±0.0006d | 0.0829±0.0008b | 0.0783±0.0009b | 0.0398±0.0009c | 0.206±0.008a |
砷 | 0.0071±0.0001b | — | 0.0102±0.0007a | — | 0.0065±0.0001c |
铬 | — | — | — | — | — |
镍 | — | — | — | — | — |
保温时间/min | 70℃保温PPO相对活力/% | 80℃保温PPO相对活力/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | 弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | ||
0 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
5 | 77.35±1.06 | 68.41±0.00 | 57.93±0.00 | 56.98±0.07 | 39.82±0.00 | 43.06±0.00 | |
10 | 71.29±0.08 | 54.33±0.72 | 52.29±0.53 | 57.75±0.85 | 35.89±0.36 | 35.19±0.53 | |
15 | 70.75±0.91 | 53.22±2.15 | 51.51±0.65 | 53.25±0.71 | 17.62±1.47 | 22.87±0.80 | |
20 | 61.90±0.91 | 43.58±0.36 | 42.20±0.66 | 43.77±0.49 | 16.33±0.79 | 18.33±1.09 | |
25 | 68.57±1.60 | 42.35±0.98 | 40.50±1.05 | 43.70±1.27 | 15.17±0.51 | 13.06±1.57 | |
30 | 57.75±0.85 | 35.43±1.23 | 38.92±0.14 | 21.57±0.91 | 10.07±0.22 | 10.97±1.63 | |
保温时间/min | 90℃保温PPO相对活力/% | 100℃保温PPO相对活力/% | |||||
弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | 弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | ||
0 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
5 | 1.66±0.08 | 6.91±0.00 | 9.31±0.00 | 0.28±0.00 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.65±0.00 | |
10 | 0.28±0.00 | 0.43±0.15 | 5.28±0.13 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.56±0.00 | |
15 | 0.36±0.21 | 0.43±0.14 | 2.50±0.27 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.48±0.00 | 0.65±0.00 | |
20 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.44±0.00 | 1.11±0.00 | 0.57±0.00 | 0.53±0.00 | 0.56±0.00 | |
25 | 0.43±0.07 | 0.38±0.22 | 0.56±0.26 | 0.19±0.00 | 0.14±0.00 | 0.56±0.00 | |
30 | 0.57±0.00 | 0.40±0.51 | 0.56±0.26 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 |
保温时间/min | 70℃保温PPO相对活力/% | 80℃保温PPO相对活力/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | 弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | ||
0 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
5 | 77.35±1.06 | 68.41±0.00 | 57.93±0.00 | 56.98±0.07 | 39.82±0.00 | 43.06±0.00 | |
10 | 71.29±0.08 | 54.33±0.72 | 52.29±0.53 | 57.75±0.85 | 35.89±0.36 | 35.19±0.53 | |
15 | 70.75±0.91 | 53.22±2.15 | 51.51±0.65 | 53.25±0.71 | 17.62±1.47 | 22.87±0.80 | |
20 | 61.90±0.91 | 43.58±0.36 | 42.20±0.66 | 43.77±0.49 | 16.33±0.79 | 18.33±1.09 | |
25 | 68.57±1.60 | 42.35±0.98 | 40.50±1.05 | 43.70±1.27 | 15.17±0.51 | 13.06±1.57 | |
30 | 57.75±0.85 | 35.43±1.23 | 38.92±0.14 | 21.57±0.91 | 10.07±0.22 | 10.97±1.63 | |
保温时间/min | 90℃保温PPO相对活力/% | 100℃保温PPO相对活力/% | |||||
弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | 弥勒魔芋 | 云热1701 | 西傣9号 | ||
0 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
5 | 1.66±0.08 | 6.91±0.00 | 9.31±0.00 | 0.28±0.00 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.65±0.00 | |
10 | 0.28±0.00 | 0.43±0.15 | 5.28±0.13 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.56±0.00 | |
15 | 0.36±0.21 | 0.43±0.14 | 2.50±0.27 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.48±0.00 | 0.65±0.00 | |
20 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.44±0.00 | 1.11±0.00 | 0.57±0.00 | 0.53±0.00 | 0.56±0.00 | |
25 | 0.43±0.07 | 0.38±0.22 | 0.56±0.26 | 0.19±0.00 | 0.14±0.00 | 0.56±0.00 | |
30 | 0.57±0.00 | 0.40±0.51 | 0.56±0.26 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 |
[1] |
崔熙, 周平, 李松林, 等. 中药魔芋的研究概况[J]. 中药材, 1995, 18(7):368-371.
|
[2] |
doi: 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00044-4 URL |
[3] |
王元. 魔芋葡甘聚糖的性质及在食品中的应用[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2021(19):182-183.
|
[4] |
doi: 10.3390/foods11101379 URL |
[5] |
doi: 10.1080/07315724.2008.10719681 URL |
[6] |
doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1496-x |
[7] |
doi: 10.1016/j.bcdf.2015.03.007 URL |
[8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.bcdf.2013.09.005 URL |
[9] |
龚频, 王双, 杜超, 等. 两种魔芋多糖抗疲劳及降血糖活性[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(7):259-262, 268.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.11.003 URL |
[13] |
吴旭, 杨敏, 刘佳妮, 等. 珠芽魔芋对细菌性软腐病的抗性鉴定研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018, 47(2):176-180.
|
[14] |
张东华, 汪庆平, 贺正国. 珠芽魔芋弥勒种——从低产到优质高产作物的希望之星[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2010, 26(2):135-138.
|
[15] |
李娟, 蒋晓云, 潘剑, 等. 胶园林下间作珠芽魔芋的叶面球茎、地下球茎产量比较分析[J]. 中国热带农业, 2020(5):66-69.
|
[16] |
黄义钧, 徐桂红, 陈兵先, 等. 9种魔芋属植物观赏价值及引种适应性评价[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(1):146-150.
|
[17] |
彭光福, 刘琼, 胡焱锋. 恩阳区双高珠芽黄魔芋绿色丰产种植技术[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2020(21):29-31.
|
[18] |
邹庭, 刘建富, 张志健. 魔芋飞粉生物碱提取技术研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2018(5):134-140.
|
[19] |
郑莲姬, 钟耕, 张盛林. 白魔芋中多酚氧化酶活性测定及其护色研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2007(2):118-121.
|
[20] |
杨晶晶, 杨林夕, 邵娟娟. 魔芋中化学成分的提取纯化[J]. 农产品加工, 2018(8):67-69.
|
[21] |
刘星辰, 雍婕, 肖鹜轩. 珠芽魔芋不同球茎的品质比较[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021(6):24-25,29.
|
[22] |
周启武, 桂云霞, 李明灿, 等. 五种魔芋中主要营养成分及重金属元素分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(14):234-239,248.
|
[23] |
王宏, 刘月, 杨梁钰, 等. 生物碱类化合物抗病毒活性及其机制研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2022, 53(9):2839-2850.
|
[24] |
李磊. 不同种魔芋生物学性状及化学成分比较研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2012.
|
[25] |
GB2762-2017食品安全国家标准食品中污染物限量[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
|
[26] |
张盛林, 郑莲姬, 钟耕. 花魔芋中多酚氧化酶活力及抑制研究[J]. 中国食品学报, 2007(4):51-55.
|
[1] | ZHAO Shouping, XIAO Wendan, CHEN De, YE Xuezhu, ZHANG Qi, WU Shaofu, HU Jing, GAO Na, HUANG Miaojie. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Passivation in Contaminated Paddy Fields Based on Soil Quality and Rice Safety [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 51-62. |
[2] | WANG Peng, WANG Junguang, CHEN Yang, XU Guoqiang, ZHANG Gucheng, ZENG Guanghua, ZHANG Dongqiang. Heavy Metals in Main Crops and Soil in East Hainan: Enrichment Characteristics and Correlation Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 75-80. |
[3] | HUANG Shuoqi, ZHAO Xiaoxin, ZHAI Yan, NI Yuanrong, LU Zhenqiang, LIU Dali. Analysis of BvHIPP24 Involved in Sugar Beet Response to Cadmium Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(27): 110-117. |
[4] | XU Tao, SHI Weigang, LIU Kuolong, XU Xiaofei, FAN Jiaxue. Evaluation on Cultivated Land Soil Quality in Western Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(21): 75-82. |
[5] | LU Gangbin, E Shengzhe, YUAN Jinhua, ZHAO Tianxin, YE Gengkang, ZHANG Peng, LIU Yana, WANG Yuxuan. Soil Heavy Metal Availability: Research Progress on Its Influencing Factors and Transfer Rules in Crop-Soil System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(20): 67-73. |
[6] | LIANG Huan, AN Yue. The Quality Evaluation of Foeniculi fructus from Different Production Origins [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 148-152. |
[7] | GUO Shanhu, WU Zhongming, WANG Yongping, ZHANG Jintao, XU Sai, WU Jia, DING Borui, DA Yingfei, ZHANG Mingtian, LUO Qipeng. Preliminary Research on Reducing Effect of Different Fertilization Measures on Continuous Cropping Obstacles of Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 9-15. |
[8] | CUI Shiyu, JIN Hexian. Research Progress of Heavy Metal Pollution in Community Garden Soil at Home and Abroad [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 67-74. |
[9] | YANG Hefa, HAN Hui, YAN Yong, WANG Lin, LI Ji. Heavy Metal Accumulation and Risk Assessment of Greenhouse Vegetable Soil Under Different Planting Patterns [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(17): 17-25. |
[10] | JIA Wenjing, WANG Zhe, JIANG Hu, LUO Ying, ZHANG Zhenlong, FENG Xiyang, ZHANG Jiaqian, ZENG Qiuping. Development and Application of Rapid Assessment System for Soil Heavy Metal Pollution in Mango Producing Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(13): 157-164. |
[11] | ZHENG Xiaodong, LI Xiang, WEI Lan, HUANG Lianxi, CHEN Weisheng, HUANG Yufen, HUANG Qing, LIU Zhongzhen. Biochar-derived Dissolved Organic Matter Extracted by Different Methods: Property Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 61-68. |
[12] | ZONG Zhaoqi, CAO Shoutao, WU Xiuzhe, LIU Zhiguo, ZHANG Nan, CHEN Xiuzhai, LIU Peng, YANG Mingfeng. Enhancing Tobacco Resistance to Abiotic Stress by Exogenous Substances: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 9-16. |
[13] | LIAO Ruoyu, SUN Yue, LIU Xinbao, NIU Ying, HUANG Yanhua, ZHANG Chun’e. Preparation of Nano-selenium and Its Application in Crop Quality Improvement [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 17-23. |
[14] | LI Xiaoyu. Cultivation and Product Analysis of Pleurotus eryngii on Phragmites australis Substrates [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 51-55. |
[15] | HONG Ciqing, GUI Fangze, CHEN Fangrong, FANG Yun, YOU Yuxin, GUAN Xiong, PAN Xiaohong. The Adsorption of Heavy Metal Nickel by Biochar Prepared from Tea Residue [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 109-114. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||