Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (35): 55-60.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0996
Previous Articles Next Articles
TANG Jiajia1(), LI Xiuzhen1(), WEI Liben1, PENG Xiu1, DANG Jiangbo2, ZHOU Xiaozhou1, FENG Dalan1
Received:
2022-12-01
Revised:
2023-03-26
Online:
2023-12-11
Published:
2023-12-11
Contact:
LI Xiuzhen
TANG Jiajia, LI Xiuzhen, WEI Liben, PENG Xiu, DANG Jiangbo, ZHOU Xiaozhou, FENG Dalan. Study on the Suitable Planting Density and Pruning Intensity in Scion Orchard of Early Bearing Walnut[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 55-60.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0996
指标 | 变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效枝数 | 区组 | 0.08 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.804 |
A | 54.93 | 3 | 18.31 | 109.85** | 0.000 | |
A×区组 | 1.00 | 6 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.992 | |
B | 665.90 | 3 | 221.97 | 168.57** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 7.42 | 9 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 0.764 | |
枝粗 | 区组 | 0.03 | 2 | 0.02 | 1.49 | 0.299 |
A | 0.60 | 3 | 0.20 | 17.28** | 0.002 | |
A×区组 | 0.07 | 6 | 0.01 | 1.55 | 0.205 | |
B | 3.58 | 3 | 1.19 | 160.47** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 0.22 | 9 | 0.03 | 3.33 | 0.009 | |
枝长 | 区组 | 860.93 | 2 | 430.46 | 5.98 | 0.057 |
A | 4928.30 | 3 | 1642.77 | 22.83** | 0.001 | |
A×区组 | 431.73 | 6 | 71.96 | 0.58 | 0.742 | |
B | 119187.36 | 3 | 39729.12 | 320.67** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 3470.68 | 9 | 385.63* | 3.11* | 0.013 | |
有效芽数 | 区组 | 73.24 | 2 | 36.62 | 3.04 | 0.123 |
A | 705.94 | 3 | 235.31 | 19.51** | 0.002 | |
A×区组 | 72.36 | 6 | 12.06 | 0.98 | 0.461 | |
B | 14681.92 | 3 | 4893.97 | 396.88** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 243.36 | 9 | 27.04 | 2.19 | 0.060 |
指标 | 变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效枝数 | 区组 | 0.08 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.804 |
A | 54.93 | 3 | 18.31 | 109.85** | 0.000 | |
A×区组 | 1.00 | 6 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.992 | |
B | 665.90 | 3 | 221.97 | 168.57** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 7.42 | 9 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 0.764 | |
枝粗 | 区组 | 0.03 | 2 | 0.02 | 1.49 | 0.299 |
A | 0.60 | 3 | 0.20 | 17.28** | 0.002 | |
A×区组 | 0.07 | 6 | 0.01 | 1.55 | 0.205 | |
B | 3.58 | 3 | 1.19 | 160.47** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 0.22 | 9 | 0.03 | 3.33 | 0.009 | |
枝长 | 区组 | 860.93 | 2 | 430.46 | 5.98 | 0.057 |
A | 4928.30 | 3 | 1642.77 | 22.83** | 0.001 | |
A×区组 | 431.73 | 6 | 71.96 | 0.58 | 0.742 | |
B | 119187.36 | 3 | 39729.12 | 320.67** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 3470.68 | 9 | 385.63* | 3.11* | 0.013 | |
有效芽数 | 区组 | 73.24 | 2 | 36.62 | 3.04 | 0.123 |
A | 705.94 | 3 | 235.31 | 19.51** | 0.002 | |
A×区组 | 72.36 | 6 | 12.06 | 0.98 | 0.461 | |
B | 14681.92 | 3 | 4893.97 | 396.88** | 0.000 | |
A×B | 243.36 | 9 | 27.04 | 2.19 | 0.060 |
定植密度 | 有效枝数/个 | 枝粗/cm | 枝长/cm | 有效芽数/个 |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 12.97bB | 1.38bB | 98.08bB | 35.58cB |
A2 | 13.14bB | 1.39bB | 103.85bB | 39.97bB |
A3 | 14.81aA | 1.57aA | 120.05aA | 44.69aA |
A4 | 15.47aA | 1.63aA | 121.53aA | 44.89aA |
定植密度 | 有效枝数/个 | 枝粗/cm | 枝长/cm | 有效芽数/个 |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 12.97bB | 1.38bB | 98.08bB | 35.58cB |
A2 | 13.14bB | 1.39bB | 103.85bB | 39.97bB |
A3 | 14.81aA | 1.57aA | 120.05aA | 44.69aA |
A4 | 15.47aA | 1.63aA | 121.53aA | 44.89aA |
修剪强度 | 有效枝数/个 | 枝粗/cm | 枝长/cm | 有效芽数/个 |
---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 19.45aA | 1.21dD | 54.16dD | 21.61dD |
B2 | 15.19bB | 1.36cC | 72.81cC | 28.92cC |
B3 | 12.44cC | 1.47bB | 138.58bB | 48.09bB |
B4 | 9.31dD | 1.94aA | 177.96aA | 66.53aA |
修剪强度 | 有效枝数/个 | 枝粗/cm | 枝长/cm | 有效芽数/个 |
---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 19.45aA | 1.21dD | 54.16dD | 21.61dD |
B2 | 15.19bB | 1.36cC | 72.81cC | 28.92cC |
B3 | 12.44cC | 1.47bB | 138.58bB | 48.09bB |
B4 | 9.31dD | 1.94aA | 177.96aA | 66.53aA |
处理 | 有效枝数/个 | 枝粗/cm | 枝长/cm | 有效芽数/个 | 单产有效芽数/个 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 19.00a | 1.14h | 51.78i | 18.56g | 92783e | ||||
A1B2 | 14.22c | 1.21gh | 63.34fghi | 26.78f | 133883d | ||||
A1B3 | 10.78d | 1.46cd | 119.87e | 41.11d | 205567b | ||||
A1B4 | 7.89f | 1.73b | 157.33b | 55.89c | 279450a | ||||
A2B1 | 18.78a | 1.15h | 56.44i | 18.67g | 46667gh | ||||
A2B2 | 14.22c | 1.29efgh | 70.08fghi | 27.44f | 68608efg | ||||
A2B3 | 11.33d | 1.37defg | 134.11de | 49.22c | 123058d | ||||
A2B4 | 8.22ef | 1.73b | 154.78bcd | 64.56b | 161392c | ||||
A3B1 | 19.45a | 1.29efgh | 50.67i | 24.00fg | 39984gh | ||||
A3B2 | 16.00b | 1.41cdef | 78.08fgh | 30.44f | 50719gh | ||||
A3B3 | 13.89c | 1.47cd | 148.22bcd | 50.45c | 84044ef | ||||
A3B4 | 9.89de | 2.12a | 203.22a | 73.89a | 123095d | ||||
A4B1 | 20.56a | 1.26fgh | 57.77ghi | 25.22fg | 21008h | ||||
A4B2 | 16.33b | 1.51c | 79.75f | 31.00e | 25823h | ||||
A4B3 | 13.78c | 1.58bc | 152.11bcd | 51.56c | 42947gh | ||||
A4B4 | 11.22d | 2.18a | 196.49a | 71.78a | 59790fg |
处理 | 有效枝数/个 | 枝粗/cm | 枝长/cm | 有效芽数/个 | 单产有效芽数/个 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 19.00a | 1.14h | 51.78i | 18.56g | 92783e | ||||
A1B2 | 14.22c | 1.21gh | 63.34fghi | 26.78f | 133883d | ||||
A1B3 | 10.78d | 1.46cd | 119.87e | 41.11d | 205567b | ||||
A1B4 | 7.89f | 1.73b | 157.33b | 55.89c | 279450a | ||||
A2B1 | 18.78a | 1.15h | 56.44i | 18.67g | 46667gh | ||||
A2B2 | 14.22c | 1.29efgh | 70.08fghi | 27.44f | 68608efg | ||||
A2B3 | 11.33d | 1.37defg | 134.11de | 49.22c | 123058d | ||||
A2B4 | 8.22ef | 1.73b | 154.78bcd | 64.56b | 161392c | ||||
A3B1 | 19.45a | 1.29efgh | 50.67i | 24.00fg | 39984gh | ||||
A3B2 | 16.00b | 1.41cdef | 78.08fgh | 30.44f | 50719gh | ||||
A3B3 | 13.89c | 1.47cd | 148.22bcd | 50.45c | 84044ef | ||||
A3B4 | 9.89de | 2.12a | 203.22a | 73.89a | 123095d | ||||
A4B1 | 20.56a | 1.26fgh | 57.77ghi | 25.22fg | 21008h | ||||
A4B2 | 16.33b | 1.51c | 79.75f | 31.00e | 25823h | ||||
A4B3 | 13.78c | 1.58bc | 152.11bcd | 51.56c | 42947gh | ||||
A4B4 | 11.22d | 2.18a | 196.49a | 71.78a | 59790fg |
相关性 | 有效枝数 | 枝粗 | 枝长 | 有效芽数 | 单产有效芽数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效枝数 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
枝粗 | -0.660** | 1 | - | - | - |
枝长 | -0.805** | 0.870** | 1 | - | - |
有效芽数 | -0.807** | 0.891** | 0.967** | 1 | - |
单产有效芽数 | -0.721** | 0.246 | 0.401** | 0.414** | 1 |
相关性 | 有效枝数 | 枝粗 | 枝长 | 有效芽数 | 单产有效芽数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效枝数 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
枝粗 | -0.660** | 1 | - | - | - |
枝长 | -0.805** | 0.870** | 1 | - | - |
有效芽数 | -0.807** | 0.891** | 0.967** | 1 | - |
单产有效芽数 | -0.721** | 0.246 | 0.401** | 0.414** | 1 |
[1] |
魏常燕, 张雪梅, 齐国辉, 等. 不同时期拉枝刻芽对‘绿岭’核桃萌芽成枝和内源激素含量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6):167-171.
|
[2] |
唐佳佳, 李秀珍, 彭秀, 等. 重庆地区早实核桃丰产栽培技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(10):60-61.
|
[3] |
孙继民, 雷项成, 刘彩云. 洛南核桃采穗圃建设与管理技术[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2012, 28(6):2.
|
[4] |
李正银, 丁永平, 蒋德惠, 等. 昭通市区域性核桃良种采穗圃营建技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(8):2.
|
[5] |
杜文艳, 辛国, 张进德, 等. 核桃良种高密度采穗圃快速营建技术[J]. 中国林副特产, 2014(3):47-49.
|
[6] |
李美美, 马华冰, 宋新英, 等. 不同修剪措施对成龄‘绿岭’核桃抗腐烂病能力及树势的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2014, 32(3):61-67.
|
[7] |
韩杰, 张明, 林苏宝, 等. 不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6):13-18.
|
[8] |
陈利英, 董丽欣, 张雪梅, 等. 不同时期修剪对早实核桃枝条生长特性及其营养物质含量的影响[J]. 林业与生态科学, 2018, 33(2):178-183
|
[9] |
魏海林, 欧阳群文, 蒋瑶. 薄壳山核桃成花坐果的主要机理、影响因素及其促进措施[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021(8):106-111.
|
[10] |
郭丽霞, 翟梅枝, 许静, 等. 核桃采穗圃母枝修剪方式研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(22):23-26.
|
[11] |
张晓鹏, 苟晓红, 翟梅枝, 等. 不同修剪方式对‘香玲’核桃新梢及有效穗芽的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(12):34-37.
|
[12] |
吴开志, 肖千文, 廖运洪, 等. 早实核桃采穗圃修剪技术效应研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(36):11835-11836,11855.
|
[13] |
谭华, 黄爱花, 郑德波, 等. 行距配置与种植密度对玉米产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(17):24-27.
|
[14] |
姜兴芳, 陶洪斌, 郑志芳, 等. 株行距配置对玉米根系性状及产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(2):116-121.
|
[15] |
张旦儿. 早实核桃生长发育特点及整形修剪技术[J]. 山西林业科技, 2003(1):44-46.
|
[16] |
王安民, 卢永民. 早实核桃修剪技术[J]. 落叶果树, 2014, 46(6):58-59.
|
[17] |
吴开志, 肖千文, 唐礼贵, 等. 修剪强度对早实核桃萌芽率和成枝力的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2007(4):3
|
[18] |
白岗栓, 谷瑞民, 刘英俊. 修剪时期对核桃伤流及树体生长的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2019(4):39-42,57.
|
[19] |
郑明霄, 李卫东, 梁海林. 核桃树整形修剪技术[J]. 河北果树, 2012(2):48-49.
|
[20] |
高本旺, 王莉. 核桃高效采穗圃系统修剪技术研究[J]. 经济林研究, 2005(1):65-68.
|
[21] |
勒栋梁, 李永荣, 彭方仁, 等. 薄壳山核桃采穗圃的构建与质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(2):134-140.
|
[1] | SUN Liyang, XU Minggang, WANG Jinfeng, LI Jianhua, LIU Ping, SUN Nan. Response of Soil Available Nutrients and Bulk Density to Straw Returning in North China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 100-108. |
[2] | WANG Yuhua, WANG Dequan, XIE Qing, SUN Yanguo, LIU Zhongqing, WU Teng, DONG Xiaowei, BAI Zhongyou, YANG Xiufeng, WANG Dahai, WANG Weizong. Effect of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Flue-Cured Tobacco and Quantification of Reasonable Plant Type Index [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 41-48. |
[3] | HUANG Xiaorong, CUN Jie, GUAN Junjiao, LI Xiaolin, LUO Jinchao, KUI Limei, WANG Chengran, GU Anyu, TAN Jing, ZHANG Jianhua. Effects of Cultivation Density on Yield and Quality of Dry Seeding [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(27): 1-8. |
[4] | GAO Wenhui, YANG Liu, ZHAO Lini, ZHANG Honghong, REN Bo, DING Yuguo, LI Xinchun. Different Planting Densities of Silage Maize: A Comparative Experiment [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 1-7. |
[5] | LAN Huiqing, ZHANG Xiangqian, CHENG Yuchen, SHI Jingjing, CHEN Xuanyi, BU Hengtong, BAI Dongxing, LU Zhanyuan, LIU Yajie, CHEN Lirong. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution in Maize with Density Tolerance and Suitable Machine Harvesting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(25): 1-10. |
[6] | SONG Hongqiao, GUAN Chongwu, ZHANG Yulei. Effects of Culture Density on Growth of Penaeusvannamei and Water Quality in Biofloc Model [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(23): 116-120. |
[7] | QU Yang, MA Wen, WANG Kezhen, GAO Xiaoli, FENG Baili. Effects on Photosynthetic Capacity, Yield, and Quality of Sorghum: Planting Density, Micro-fertilizer and Compound Fertilizer [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(21): 12-18. |
[8] | ZHANG Yanjun, LIU Jia, ZHANG Zhong, ZHANG Cuiping, LI Jianzeng, HU Xuanjiang, SHI Li’an, GAO Yuxi, LUO Lei, CAI Shujiang, LI Huaihong, RAO Min. Effects of Varieties, Planting Densities, Nitrogen Application Rates and Sowing Modes on Biological Characters and Yield of Waxy Sorghum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 1-7. |
[9] | LIU Min, ZHAO Cai, FAN Hong, YIN Wen, FAN Zhilong, HU Falong, SUN Yabin. Effects of Long-term Intercropping and No-tillage on Soil Physical Properties and Crop Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 28-35. |
[10] | JIN Rong, LI Zhong, LI Shiwei, XIA Qingqing, YANG Yun, WANG Peng, YAO Ping, PU Quanbo, ZHENG Zuping. Effect of Planting Density on Anti-lodging Mechanical Grain Harvesting of Maize in Sichuan Hilly Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 1-10. |
[11] | LU Yaoxiong, LI Wei, ZHOU Hu, QU Yuguo, XIONG Youming, WANG Yunsheng. Bacillus velezensis YFB3-1: Optimization of Liquid Fermentation Conditions for High Density [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 123-130. |
[12] | WANG Zhilong, WANG Zhiwei, QIAO Xiangmei, CHENG Geng, CHENG Jiasheng, YU Yaxiong. Effects of Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer on the Quality of Highland Barley ‘Yundamai 12’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 1-6. |
[13] | XIONG Lijun, MA Li, LIU Meize, LI Yinan. Effect of Earthworms on Soil Moisture Changes and Physical Properties in Agricultural Fields Under No-tillage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 77-81. |
[14] | ZHOU Ping, CUI Ling, WANG Haiyan, QIAN Suju, CUI Yakun, CHEN Yanping, YUAN Jianhua. Effects of Planting Density on Plant Growth and Yield of Maize in Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(14): 1-5. |
[15] | LIU Jintao, CHEN Guodong, WAN Sumei, ZHAI Yunlong, MAO Tingyong, LUO Lei, HU Qiang, MA Yunzhen, LI Yabing, FENG Lu, YANG Beifang, CAO Juan, ZHOU Xiang, LIN Feng. Response Characteristics of Cotton Dry Matter Accumulation and Transportation to Density and Row Spacing Configuration [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(14): 12-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||