Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (13): 13-17.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0438
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Jiatao1(), LIU Mengdao1(
), GUO Mianyan2, FU Zhengbo1
Received:
2023-06-12
Revised:
2023-09-04
Online:
2024-04-28
Published:
2024-04-28
ZHAO Jiatao, LIU Mengdao, GUO Mianyan, FU Zhengbo. Effects of Different Densities and Nitrogen Amounts on Fresh Grass and Grain Yield of ‘Baodamai 25’[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(13): 13-17.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0438
处理 | 鲜草 | 籽粒 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(t/hm2) | 位次 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 位次 | ||
A1B1 | 24.45Ef | 9 | 6300Bb | 9 | |
A1B2 | 29.15BCDEcde | 6 | 7254Aa | 6 | |
A1B3 | 33.40ABab | 3 | 7566Aa | 3 | |
A2B1 | 26.05DEef | 8 | 6333Bb | 8 | |
A2B2 | 30.20ABCDbcd | 5 | 7600.5Aa | 2 | |
A2B3 | 34.05ABab | 2 | 7434Aa | 4 | |
A3B1 | 27.45DEef | 7 | 6667.5Bb | 7 | |
A3B2 | 31.6ABCabc | 4 | 7666.5Aa | 1 | |
A3B3 | 34.70Aa | 1 | 7399.5Aa | 5 |
处理 | 鲜草 | 籽粒 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(t/hm2) | 位次 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 位次 | ||
A1B1 | 24.45Ef | 9 | 6300Bb | 9 | |
A1B2 | 29.15BCDEcde | 6 | 7254Aa | 6 | |
A1B3 | 33.40ABab | 3 | 7566Aa | 3 | |
A2B1 | 26.05DEef | 8 | 6333Bb | 8 | |
A2B2 | 30.20ABCDbcd | 5 | 7600.5Aa | 2 | |
A2B3 | 34.05ABab | 2 | 7434Aa | 4 | |
A3B1 | 27.45DEef | 7 | 6667.5Bb | 7 | |
A3B2 | 31.6ABCabc | 4 | 7666.5Aa | 1 | |
A3B3 | 34.70Aa | 1 | 7399.5Aa | 5 |
处理 | 全生育期/ d | 基本苗/ (万/hm2) | 最高茎蘖数/ (万/hm2) | 有效穗/ (万/hm2) | 成穗率/ % | 株高/ cm | 穗长/ cm | 总粒数/ 粒 | 穗实粒数/ 粒 | 结实率/ % | 千粒重/ g | 锈病 | 白粉病 | 倒伏 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
程度 | 面积/% | ||||||||||||||
A1B1 | 146 | 183 | 609 | 309 | 50.7 | 88 | 6.3 | 55.3 | 51.0 | 87.5 | 41.6 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A1B2 | 147 | 183 | 640.5 | 357 | 55.7 | 90 | 6.5 | 59.3 | 51.1 | 86.2 | 41.4 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A1B3 | 148 | 183 | 655.5 | 369 | 56.3 | 90 | 6.7 | 59.8 | 50.9 | 85.1 | 41.0 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A2B1 | 146 | 243 | 618 | 319.5 | 51.7 | 91 | 6.5 | 58.8 | 50.7 | 86.2 | 41.4 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A2B2 | 147 | 241.5 | 700.5 | 376.5 | 53.7 | 92 | 6.6 | 58.4 | 51.0 | 87.3 | 40.4 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A2B3 | 148 | 243 | 747 | 384 | 51.4 | 92 | 7.0 | 58.9 | 49.7 | 84.4 | 40.0 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A3B1 | 147 | 304.5 | 736.5 | 343.5 | 46.6 | 92 | 6.6 | 56.0 | 48.9 | 87.3 | 40.6 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A3B2 | 148 | 304.5 | 796.5 | 370.5 | 46.5 | 92 | 6.7 | 58.3 | 50.8 | 87.1 | 40.1 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A3B3 | 149 | 304.5 | 802.5 | 382.5 | 47.7 | 93 | 6.8 | 58.3 | 49.0 | 84.0 | 39.9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10.3 |
处理 | 全生育期/ d | 基本苗/ (万/hm2) | 最高茎蘖数/ (万/hm2) | 有效穗/ (万/hm2) | 成穗率/ % | 株高/ cm | 穗长/ cm | 总粒数/ 粒 | 穗实粒数/ 粒 | 结实率/ % | 千粒重/ g | 锈病 | 白粉病 | 倒伏 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
程度 | 面积/% | ||||||||||||||
A1B1 | 146 | 183 | 609 | 309 | 50.7 | 88 | 6.3 | 55.3 | 51.0 | 87.5 | 41.6 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A1B2 | 147 | 183 | 640.5 | 357 | 55.7 | 90 | 6.5 | 59.3 | 51.1 | 86.2 | 41.4 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A1B3 | 148 | 183 | 655.5 | 369 | 56.3 | 90 | 6.7 | 59.8 | 50.9 | 85.1 | 41.0 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A2B1 | 146 | 243 | 618 | 319.5 | 51.7 | 91 | 6.5 | 58.8 | 50.7 | 86.2 | 41.4 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A2B2 | 147 | 241.5 | 700.5 | 376.5 | 53.7 | 92 | 6.6 | 58.4 | 51.0 | 87.3 | 40.4 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A2B3 | 148 | 243 | 747 | 384 | 51.4 | 92 | 7.0 | 58.9 | 49.7 | 84.4 | 40.0 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A3B1 | 147 | 304.5 | 736.5 | 343.5 | 46.6 | 92 | 6.6 | 56.0 | 48.9 | 87.3 | 40.6 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A3B2 | 148 | 304.5 | 796.5 | 370.5 | 46.5 | 92 | 6.7 | 58.3 | 50.8 | 87.1 | 40.1 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
A3B3 | 149 | 304.5 | 802.5 | 382.5 | 47.7 | 93 | 6.8 | 58.3 | 49.0 | 84.0 | 39.9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10.3 |
处理 | 用种量/ (kg/hm2) | 种子成本/ (元/hm2) | 氮肥用量/ (kg/hm2) | 氮肥成本/ (元/hm2) | 种子及 氮肥成本/ (元/hm2) | 鲜草 | 籽粒 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/ (t/hm2) | 产值/ (元/hm2) | 经济效益/ (元/hm2) | 产量/ (kg/hm2) | 产值/ (元/hm2) | 经济效益/ (元/hm2) | |||||||
A1B1 | 104.85 | 629.1 | 375 | 843.75 | 1472.85 | 24.45 | 14670 | 13197.15 | 6300 | 13860 | 12387.15 | |
A1B2 | 104.85 | 629.1 | 525 | 1181.25 | 1810.35 | 29.15 | 17489.7 | 15679.35 | 7254 | 15958.8 | 14148.45 | |
A1B3 | 104.85 | 629.1 | 675 | 1518.75 | 2147.85 | 33.40 | 20040.3 | 17892.45 | 7566 | 16645.2 | 14497.35 | |
A2B1 | 139.8 | 838.8 | 375 | 843.75 | 1682.55 | 26.05 | 15630.3 | 13947.75 | 6333 | 13932.6 | 12250.05 | |
A2B2 | 139.8 | 838.8 | 525 | 1181.25 | 2020.05 | 30.20 | 18119.7 | 16099.65 | 7600.5 | 16721.1 | 14701.05 | |
A2B3 | 139.8 | 838.8 | 675 | 1518.75 | 2357.55 | 34.05 | 20430 | 18072.45 | 7434 | 16354.8 | 13997.25 | |
A3B1 | 174.75 | 1048.5 | 375 | 843.75 | 1892.25 | 27.45 | 16470 | 14577.75 | 6667.5 | 14668.5 | 12776.25 | |
A3B2 | 174.75 | 1048.5 | 525 | 1181.25 | 2229.75 | 31.60 | 18960.3 | 16730.55 | 7666.5 | 16866.3 | 14636.55 | |
A3B3 | 174.75 | 1048.5 | 675 | 1518.75 | 2567.25 | 34.70 | 20819.7 | 18252.45 | 7399.5 | 16278.9 | 13711.65 |
处理 | 用种量/ (kg/hm2) | 种子成本/ (元/hm2) | 氮肥用量/ (kg/hm2) | 氮肥成本/ (元/hm2) | 种子及 氮肥成本/ (元/hm2) | 鲜草 | 籽粒 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/ (t/hm2) | 产值/ (元/hm2) | 经济效益/ (元/hm2) | 产量/ (kg/hm2) | 产值/ (元/hm2) | 经济效益/ (元/hm2) | |||||||
A1B1 | 104.85 | 629.1 | 375 | 843.75 | 1472.85 | 24.45 | 14670 | 13197.15 | 6300 | 13860 | 12387.15 | |
A1B2 | 104.85 | 629.1 | 525 | 1181.25 | 1810.35 | 29.15 | 17489.7 | 15679.35 | 7254 | 15958.8 | 14148.45 | |
A1B3 | 104.85 | 629.1 | 675 | 1518.75 | 2147.85 | 33.40 | 20040.3 | 17892.45 | 7566 | 16645.2 | 14497.35 | |
A2B1 | 139.8 | 838.8 | 375 | 843.75 | 1682.55 | 26.05 | 15630.3 | 13947.75 | 6333 | 13932.6 | 12250.05 | |
A2B2 | 139.8 | 838.8 | 525 | 1181.25 | 2020.05 | 30.20 | 18119.7 | 16099.65 | 7600.5 | 16721.1 | 14701.05 | |
A2B3 | 139.8 | 838.8 | 675 | 1518.75 | 2357.55 | 34.05 | 20430 | 18072.45 | 7434 | 16354.8 | 13997.25 | |
A3B1 | 174.75 | 1048.5 | 375 | 843.75 | 1892.25 | 27.45 | 16470 | 14577.75 | 6667.5 | 14668.5 | 12776.25 | |
A3B2 | 174.75 | 1048.5 | 525 | 1181.25 | 2229.75 | 31.60 | 18960.3 | 16730.55 | 7666.5 | 16866.3 | 14636.55 | |
A3B3 | 174.75 | 1048.5 | 675 | 1518.75 | 2567.25 | 34.70 | 20819.7 | 18252.45 | 7399.5 | 16278.9 | 13711.65 |
[1] |
赵加涛, 刘猛道, 付正波, 等. 粮草双高大麦保大麦25号的选育及栽培技术[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2022, 39(4):60-62.
|
[2] |
陈晓东, 赵斌, 王瑞, 等. 不同刈割茬次与刈割时期对大麦饲草产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(12):36-39.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-2371 |
[3] |
陈晓东, 赵斌, 季昌好, 等. 刈割期对多棱饲料大麦饲草及籽粒产量与品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(3):409-413.
|
[4] |
张京, 李先德, 张国平, 等. 中国现代农业产业可持续发展战略研究——大麦青稞分册[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017.
|
[5] |
赵加涛, 杨向红, 付正波, 等. 不同大麦品种饲草产量及品质分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(27):27-31.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0746 |
[6] |
冯辉, 王树杰, 郜战宁, 等. 种植密度对驻大麦8号生育期及产量性状的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2015, 4(4):23-26.
|
[7] |
俞天胜, 胡锐, 李培玲. 大麦种植密度和氮肥用量对籽粒产量的影响[J]. 大麦科学, 2004, 4(3):32-33.
|
[8] |
张黛静, 马雪, 王晓东, 等. 品种与密度对豫中地区小麦光合生理特性及光能利用率的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 34(3):388-394.
|
[9] |
李喜焕, 常文锁, 张彩英, 等. 引进秋播啤酒大麦不同播期、密度与产量的关系研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 34(3):388-394.
|
[10] |
薛海楠, 王磊, 李国兴, 等. 肥料与密度对春大麦干物重和产量的影响[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 33(3):225-231.
|
[11] |
赵准, 李剑, 宋瑞娇, 郭岩, 等. 不同种植密度对大麦产量和青贮品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, 4(1):110-116.
|
[12] |
乔海龙, 陈和, 陈健, 等. 施氮量和密度对大麦苏啤7号茎叶氮含量、产量及籽粒蛋白质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(4):557-560.
|
[13] |
赵加涛, 刘猛道, 郭勉艳, 等. 保大麦14号密度肥效两因素试验研究[J]. 中国种业, 2015, 4(9):53-54.
|
[14] |
赵加涛, 刘猛道, 杨向红, 等. 播种密度和氮肥用量对保大麦16号产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(16):40-42.
|
[15] |
陈健, 沈会权, 乔海龙, 等. 施氮量和种植密度对苏啤4号大麦麦草产量和籽粒性状的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(2):448-449.
|
[16] |
乔海龙, 陈健, 沈会权, 等. 施氮量和种植密度对苏啤3号大麦鲜叶产量及品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2009, 29(4):680-684.
|
[17] |
付正波, 刘猛道, 字尚永, 等. 保大麦13号种植密度与氮肥用量最佳栽培模式研究初报[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015, 4(12):63-66.
|
[18] |
吕超, 许如根, 张新忠, 等. 密度和施氮量对啤酒大麦扬农啤9号茎蘖动态及产量的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2013, 4(4):35-37.
|
[19] |
杜志钊, 张志奇, 陆瑞菊, 等. 不同播期、密度及施肥量对大麦新品种‘海花1号'产量的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2013, 29(2):17-19.
|
[20] |
陈志伟, 施晓钟, 陈银华, 等. 不同播期、密度和施肥量对大麦新品种“花11”产量和品质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2009, 25(4):18-21.
|
[21] |
刘帆, 杨俊青, 蔡秋华, 等. 种植密度与施氮量对凤大麦7号农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 中国种业, 2018, 4(1):65-67.
|
[22] |
王贤智, 张京, 葛双桃, 等. 不同密度和施氮量对鄂大麦507产量相关性状的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2009, 48(12):2959-2961.
|
[23] |
党爱华. 不同密度及施肥水平对垦啤麦7号和垦啤麦9号产量和品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江科技信息, 2016, 4(29):271-272.
|
[24] |
宋伟, 王婧, 于晓春. 不同肥密水平对垦啤麦8号及垦啤麦9号产量的影响研究[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2011, 4(4):29-32.
|
[25] |
许立彬, 冯雪蓉, 郭彦泰, 等. 不同肥密对垦啤8号啤酒大麦产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2011, 4(7):8.
|
[26] |
赵加涛, 付正波, 杨向红, 等. ‘保大麦20号’化肥减量增效技术研究初探[J]. 农学学报, 2022, 12(4):29-32.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0230 |
[1] | YANG Zhiwei, QIAN Aiping, ZHANG Wei, CAO Xiuxia. Effect of Planting Density on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Flax [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 1-5. |
[2] | QIAO Yue, HU Cheng, WAN Jianhua, XU Hualin, LIU Maojun, GUO Weihong, DAI Li, ZHANG Chunhua, DENG Chaoran. Effects of Different Fertilization Patterns on Rice Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 9-15. |
[3] | YE Yang, XIANG Guiqin, GUO Xiaowen, MIN Wei, GUO Huijuan. Regulation Effect of Biochar on Bacterial Community in Cotton Field Soil under Saline Water Drip Irrigation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 91-100. |
[4] | YUAN Wenxia, BI Yingdong, FAN Chao, LI Wei, LIU Miao, LIU Jianxin, YANG Guang, DI Shufeng, LIANG Wenwei. Impact of Two New Fertilizers on Effect of Soybean Fertilizer & Planting Density and Soil Enzyme Activity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 53-61. |
[5] | LIU Tianpeng, YANG Kai, CHEN Lin, LONG Wenjing, DENG Hao, SUN Yuantao, XIANG Jianyu, NI Xianlin. Effect of Dense Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Dwarf and Compact Hybrid Waxy Sorghum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 1-5. |
[6] | TAN Jianxin, TONG Jian, YUN Minzheng, JIANG Zhibing, LIANG Sha. Effects of Excessive Nitrogen Application on the Growth and Development of Highland Barley in Tibet Valley Agricultural Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 6-13. |
[7] | GE Wanqing, FENG Di, ZHANG Jinlei, SUN Xiao’an, WANG Zhihe, ZHU Haiyan. Effects of Planting Environment and Density on Growth, Yield and Quality of Fruit Radish [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 67-73. |
[8] | CHEN Yixiang, YANG Junhua, XU Wenguo, LI Xuemei, LANG Chengwei, DING Jiasheng, DUAN Mingyue, YIN Qidai, TANG Lijun, XU Yanguo. Effects of Cultivation Density on Growth, Disease, Yield and Quality of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 121-130. |
[9] | FAN Peng, WANG Ziwei, SHAO Hongqi, YANG Qingwei, WANG Lei, YANG Xihui. Effect of Soil Condition Change on Grain Yield Based on Classification and Monitoring of Cultivated Land Resource Quality: A Case Study of Lankao County in Henan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 83-88. |
[10] | WANG Jingyun, HU Xiaohang, DONG Xinjiu, MA Yahuai, LI Yanli. Nitrogen Fertilization Decision-Making Model During Sugar Growth Period of Sugar Beet Roots Based on Multispectral Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 132-139. |
[11] | SUN Liyang, XU Minggang, WANG Jinfeng, LI Jianhua, LIU Ping, SUN Nan. Response of Soil Available Nutrients and Bulk Density to Straw Returning in North China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 100-108. |
[12] | DU Shanshan, LUO Jing, YAO Qingqing, SUN Huijian, HE Zhongsheng, WANG Dongli. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Topdressing Rates on SPAD Value and Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution of Upland Cotton in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 1-6. |
[13] | WANG Yuhua, WANG Dequan, XIE Qing, SUN Yanguo, LIU Zhongqing, WU Teng, DONG Xiaowei, BAI Zhongyou, YANG Xiufeng, WANG Dahai, WANG Weizong. Effect of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Flue-Cured Tobacco and Quantification of Reasonable Plant Type Index [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 41-48. |
[14] | TANG Jiajia, LI Xiuzhen, WEI Liben, PENG Xiu, DANG Jiangbo, ZHOU Xiaozhou, FENG Dalan. Study on the Suitable Planting Density and Pruning Intensity in Scion Orchard of Early Bearing Walnut [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 55-60. |
[15] | LI Wenqian, ZHANG Haijun, HAN Mingming, MU Qun, LV Lianjie. Effects of Tillage Practices and Nitrogen Rates on Dry Matter Accumulation and Remobilization and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat Under Straw Returning Treatment [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(34): 1-8. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||