
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 110-119.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-1020
Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Hong1,2(
), CHEN Taichun3, FENG Zhizhen1,2, CHEN Zhijie1,2, XU Jin4, XU Ximei5, DONG Zhen6, FU Bo1,2(
)
Received:2025-12-05
Revised:2026-03-11
Online:2026-04-25
Published:2026-04-23
CLC Number:
YAN Hong, CHEN Taichun, FENG Zhizhen, CHEN Zhijie, XU Jin, XU Ximei, DONG Zhen, FU Bo. Effects of Tillage Practices on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Microbial Communities and Yield of Wheat[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 110-119.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-1020
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | 处理代号 | 田间具体操作 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | 未深翻 | GL_WSF | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,同步进行12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆离田 | GL_SF_LT | 玉米收获后秸秆离田,先实施25~30 cm深度深翻处理,再开展12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 | |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆还田 | GL_SF_HT | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,经25~30 cm深度深翻作业后,再进行12~15 cm深度旋耕 | |
| 阎良 | 未深翻 | YL_WSF | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,同步进行12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆离田 | YL_SF_LT | 玉米收获后秸秆离田,先实施25~30 cm深度深翻处理,再开展12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 | |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆还田 | YL_SF_HT | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,经25~30 cm深度深翻作业后,再进行12~15 cm深度旋耕 |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | 处理代号 | 田间具体操作 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | 未深翻 | GL_WSF | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,同步进行12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆离田 | GL_SF_LT | 玉米收获后秸秆离田,先实施25~30 cm深度深翻处理,再开展12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 | |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆还田 | GL_SF_HT | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,经25~30 cm深度深翻作业后,再进行12~15 cm深度旋耕 | |
| 阎良 | 未深翻 | YL_WSF | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,同步进行12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆离田 | YL_SF_LT | 玉米收获后秸秆离田,先实施25~30 cm深度深翻处理,再开展12~15 cm深度旋耕整地 | |
| 深翻+玉米秸秆还田 | YL_SF_HT | 玉米收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,经25~30 cm深度深翻作业后,再进行12~15 cm深度旋耕 |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | pH | 电导率/(μS/cm) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 8.22±0.01c | 228.51±2.50c | 20.85±0.07a | 1.52±0.03a | 48.90±1.19c | 43.13±0.75a | 651.89±6.06a |
| GL_SF_LT | 8.43±0.05b | 364.00±2.00a | 15.57±0.19b | 1.08±0.01b | 57.25±0.80b | 25.13±0.25c | 477.01±1.54b | |
| GL_SF_HT | 8.54±0.01a | 356.50±2.50b | 14.87±0.07c | 0.97±0.02c | 60.04±1.19a | 37.13±0.25b | 179.21±0.23c | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 8.50±0.02a | 413.50±3.50a | 18.75±017a | 1.27±0.00a | 74.35±1.99a | 25.75±0.38a | 219.63±1.13c |
| YL_SF_LT | 8.36±0.03c | 239.50±4.50b | 16.44±0.37b | 1.19±0.01b | 62.82±0.80b | 21.38±0.00b | 634.35±6.72a | |
| YL_SF_HT | 8.46±0.02b | 203.70±4.30c | 13.83±0.22c | 0.96±0.01c | 52.88±0.40c | 12.50±0.13c | 417.99±5.32b |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | pH | 电导率/(μS/cm) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 8.22±0.01c | 228.51±2.50c | 20.85±0.07a | 1.52±0.03a | 48.90±1.19c | 43.13±0.75a | 651.89±6.06a |
| GL_SF_LT | 8.43±0.05b | 364.00±2.00a | 15.57±0.19b | 1.08±0.01b | 57.25±0.80b | 25.13±0.25c | 477.01±1.54b | |
| GL_SF_HT | 8.54±0.01a | 356.50±2.50b | 14.87±0.07c | 0.97±0.02c | 60.04±1.19a | 37.13±0.25b | 179.21±0.23c | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 8.50±0.02a | 413.50±3.50a | 18.75±017a | 1.27±0.00a | 74.35±1.99a | 25.75±0.38a | 219.63±1.13c |
| YL_SF_LT | 8.36±0.03c | 239.50±4.50b | 16.44±0.37b | 1.19±0.01b | 62.82±0.80b | 21.38±0.00b | 634.35±6.72a | |
| YL_SF_HT | 8.46±0.02b | 203.70±4.30c | 13.83±0.22c | 0.96±0.01c | 52.88±0.40c | 12.50±0.13c | 417.99±5.32b |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | ACE | Chao | Shannon | Simpson | Sobs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 1122.63±12.100c | 1122.75±15.34c | 6.58±0.04a | 0±0a | 1122.33±23.11c |
| GL_SF_LT | 1367.84±10.23a | 1369.15±20.525a | 6.65±0.10a | 0±0a | 1362.67±14.65a | |
| GL_SF_HT | 1160.48±11.22b | 1160.11±14.62b | 6.57±0.11a | 0±0a | 1159.33±31.31b | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 1403.23±30.12a | 1403.70±15.46a | 6.74±0.01a | 0±0a | 1399.00±20.33a |
| YL_SF_LT | 1130.89±51.42b | 1130.72±51.54b | 6.62±0.07a | 0±0a | 1130.33±51.11b | |
| YL_SF_HT | 1188.60±17.14b | 1188.43±16.87b | 6.63±0.01a | 0±0a | 1187.67±17.21b |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | ACE | Chao | Shannon | Simpson | Sobs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 1122.63±12.100c | 1122.75±15.34c | 6.58±0.04a | 0±0a | 1122.33±23.11c |
| GL_SF_LT | 1367.84±10.23a | 1369.15±20.525a | 6.65±0.10a | 0±0a | 1362.67±14.65a | |
| GL_SF_HT | 1160.48±11.22b | 1160.11±14.62b | 6.57±0.11a | 0±0a | 1159.33±31.31b | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 1403.23±30.12a | 1403.70±15.46a | 6.74±0.01a | 0±0a | 1399.00±20.33a |
| YL_SF_LT | 1130.89±51.42b | 1130.72±51.54b | 6.62±0.07a | 0±0a | 1130.33±51.11b | |
| YL_SF_HT | 1188.60±17.14b | 1188.43±16.87b | 6.63±0.01a | 0±0a | 1187.67±17.21b |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | ACE | Chao | Shannon | Simpson | Sobs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 366.85±47.31a | 366.53±46.88a | 4.24±0.10a | 0.03±0b | 366.33±46.54a |
| GL_SF_LT | 316.00±33.64b | 315.94±33.49b | 4.21±0.07a | 0.04±0b | 315.67±33.65b | |
| GL_SF_HT | 247.00±4.58c | 247.00±4.58c | 3.66±0.12b | 0.07±0.01a | 247.00±4.58c | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 308.95±29.91a | 308.87±30.00a | 4.11±0.13a | 0.04±0.0 c | 308.33±29.16a |
| YL_SF_LT | 238.44±21.94b | 238.37±22.00b | 3.26±0.02c | 0.12±0.01a | 238.00±21.38b | |
| YL_SF_HT | 273.78±18.40ab | 273.70±18.47a | 3.59±0.22b | 0.08±0.02b | 273.33±18.82ab |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | ACE | Chao | Shannon | Simpson | Sobs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 366.85±47.31a | 366.53±46.88a | 4.24±0.10a | 0.03±0b | 366.33±46.54a |
| GL_SF_LT | 316.00±33.64b | 315.94±33.49b | 4.21±0.07a | 0.04±0b | 315.67±33.65b | |
| GL_SF_HT | 247.00±4.58c | 247.00±4.58c | 3.66±0.12b | 0.07±0.01a | 247.00±4.58c | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 308.95±29.91a | 308.87±30.00a | 4.11±0.13a | 0.04±0.0 c | 308.33±29.16a |
| YL_SF_LT | 238.44±21.94b | 238.37±22.00b | 3.26±0.02c | 0.12±0.01a | 238.00±21.38b | |
| YL_SF_HT | 273.78±18.40ab | 273.70±18.47a | 3.59±0.22b | 0.08±0.02b | 273.33±18.82ab |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | 茎高/cm | 穗长/cm | 穗数/m2 | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 51.45±4.07c | 7.37±0.58c | 693.33±9.07a | 40.23±1.02a | 37.18±0.76c | 10369.62±310.00c |
| GL_SF_LT | 60.43±4.36ab | 8.76±0.95ab | 822.33±11.68b | 35.47±1.52bc | 41.08±0.93b | 11990.93±756.42a | |
| GL_SF_HT | 60.91±4.21a | 8.81±0.61a | 778.67±30.66c | 34.18±1.26c | 43.70±1.22a | 11627.50±638.65ab | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 60.57±4.96ab | 7.50±0.50bc | 741.33±9.02a | 31.81±0.34c | 43.45±0.49c | 10248.68±227.88c |
| YL_SF_LT | 63.44±2.61a | 8.55±0.87a | 681.67±16.07c | 38.41±1.34a | 45.09±0.15ab | 11809.05±564.80a | |
| YL_SF_HT | 50.39±3.30c | 7.35±0.58c | 751.33±17.04ab | 34.35±0.90b | 45.19±0.83a | 11659.99±247.13ab |
| 采样地点 | 耕作措施 | 茎高/cm | 穗长/cm | 穗数/m2 | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高陵 | GL_WSF | 51.45±4.07c | 7.37±0.58c | 693.33±9.07a | 40.23±1.02a | 37.18±0.76c | 10369.62±310.00c |
| GL_SF_LT | 60.43±4.36ab | 8.76±0.95ab | 822.33±11.68b | 35.47±1.52bc | 41.08±0.93b | 11990.93±756.42a | |
| GL_SF_HT | 60.91±4.21a | 8.81±0.61a | 778.67±30.66c | 34.18±1.26c | 43.70±1.22a | 11627.50±638.65ab | |
| 阎良 | YL_WSF | 60.57±4.96ab | 7.50±0.50bc | 741.33±9.02a | 31.81±0.34c | 43.45±0.49c | 10248.68±227.88c |
| YL_SF_LT | 63.44±2.61a | 8.55±0.87a | 681.67±16.07c | 38.41±1.34a | 45.09±0.15ab | 11809.05±564.80a | |
| YL_SF_HT | 50.39±3.30c | 7.35±0.58c | 751.33±17.04ab | 34.35±0.90b | 45.19±0.83a | 11659.99±247.13ab |
| [1] |
刘雪宁, 李玲玲, 谢军红, 等. 耕作措施对旱作春小麦籽粒糖代谢特征和产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2021, 56(5):92-100.
|
| [2] |
孟令斌, 郑永照, 岳杨, 等. 不同耕作措施对土壤特性影响研究进展[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(2):164-166.
|
| [3] |
鞠梦倩, 王杰, 李心月, 等. 不同耕作方式与秸秆还田对土壤全氮和小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2025(4):97-106.
|
| [4] |
魏萌涵, 孟自力. 化肥减量下耕作方式和施用秸秆腐熟剂对小麦产量和土壤养分的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(15):68-73.
|
| [5] |
李晓莎, 武宁, 刘玲, 等. 不同秸秆还田和耕作方式对夏玉米农田土壤呼吸及微生物活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(6):1765-1771.
|
| [6] |
盖子涵, 崔志超, 张仁政, 等. 耕作措施与秸秆还田对麦田土壤腐殖质、铁氧化物及小麦产量的影响研究[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2024,(3):18-20.
|
| [7] |
赵雯馨, 黄明, 李友军, 等. 夏闲季不同耕作方式对豫西旱地小麦旗叶生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2023, 41(5):175-185.
|
| [8] |
闫秋艳, 董飞, 贾亚琴, 等. 耕作方式对旱地麦田土壤蓄水变化特征及小麦产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):222-228.
|
| [9] |
张超博, 邱洁雅, 王敏, 等. 桂北柑橘园土壤化学性状研究[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(6):1187-1195.
|
| [10] |
黄亮亮, 张慧琴, 劳丽燕, 等. 电导率在土壤盐分检测中的研究进展[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2018, 40(11):77-78,91.
|
| [11] |
张广东, 尚志伟, 赵梦迪, 等. 石屏县植烟土壤pH空间分布特征及其潜在调控因素分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(12):80-87.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0251 |
| [12] |
刘燕. 《土壤质量全氮的测定凯氏法》的方法改进[J]. 化工管理, 2020(14):45-46.
|
| [13] |
王军, 满秀玲. 去除凋落物和草毡层对寒温带典型森林土壤氮素的短期影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39(4):1-9.
|
| [14] |
刘美芳, 赖红兰, 刘祥. 电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定农业土壤样品中的有效磷[J]. 产品可靠性报告, 2023(12):61-62.
|
| [15] |
樊会敏, 许明祥, 李彬彬, 等. 渭北地区农田土壤物理性质对土壤剖面盐分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(4):198-204.
|
| [16] |
陈鲜妮, 米倩, 徐晓峰. 局域尺度麦田土壤微生物群落构建过程及其驱动因素[J]. 土壤, 2023, 55(4):812-820.
|
| [17] |
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010139 URL |
| [18] |
MONARD, GANTNER, STENLID. Utilizing ITS1 and ITS2 to study environmental fungal diversity using pyrosequencing[J]. FEMS microbiology ecology, 2013, Apr,84(1):165-175.
|
| [19] |
李连燚, 王世纪, 姜桂英, 等. 轮耕促进豫北潮土区小麦根系生长和产量增加[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(18):3626-3641.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.18.009 |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
聂浩亮, 杨军芳, 杨云马, 等. 长期秸秆深翻还田及养分管理对潮土有机碳矿化影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2024, 40(18):70-80.
|
| [24] |
喇乐鹏. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对薄层黑土理化性质和玉米产量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2021.
|
| [25] |
王秋菊, 刘峰, 焦峰, 等. 盐化草甸土和黑土型水田土壤连续深耕改土效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(22):152-158.
|
| [26] |
杨文辉, 罗灏程, 董二伟, 等. 长期不同施肥和深翻对玉米高粱轮作体系作物钾利用及土壤钾形态的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(12):2390-2403.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.12.010 |
| [27] |
郎漫, 钟文, 张君岳, 等. 秸秆和畜禽粪便添加对黑土氮初级转化和固持特征的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2025, 31(6):1086-1094.
|
| [28] |
doi: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00162 URL |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60948-2 |
| [33] |
陈丹阳, 李汉全, 张炳火, 等. 两株解磷细菌的解磷活性及作用机制研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(3):410-418.
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
裘智杰, 索萌, 王照贝, 等. 被孢霉在可持续农业生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(4):762-768.
|
| [36] |
司亚坤. 被孢霉属真菌介导潮土团聚体形成与磷周转的机制及应用[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2024.
|
| [37] |
高禾苗, 任爱天, 张绍聪, 等. 西藏高原不同树龄核桃林土壤细菌多样性及其影响因素分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(11):100-109.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
史永佳, 陈义轩, 张爱佳, 等. 生物炭与功能菌配施协同促进设施樱桃番茄连作土壤质量提升及养分吸收[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2025, 31(6):1134-1150.
|
| [1] | CHEN Baozhu, HUANG Jichuan, Xu Yanggui, PENG Yiping, Li Zhuxian, LIANG Jianyi, ZHONG Wenliang, YAN Yuwei, TU Yuting. Effects of Different Crop Rotation Patterns on Soil Microbial Ecology in Late Flowering Cabbage Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 93-102. |
| [2] | LIU Wu, ZOU Qingxian, ZHANG Foyi, ZHONG Jialin, FAN Yulu, LIU Wei, WANG Qiong. Study on Community Composition and Diversity of Soil Fauna in Urban Forest in Nanchang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 80-88. |
| [3] | LI Tingyu, SHEN Yi, TONG Junfei, LU Shunfeng, LI Qin, GUO Song, YANG Weijun. Effects of Biochar Application and Reducing Irrigation Amount on Soil Agglomeration Structure and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(36): 110-116. |
| [4] | XU Jianming, WANG Yanhong, LIU Zhongzhen, ZHENG Xiaodong. Effect of Returning Organic Materials on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Rice Yield in Paddy Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(36): 95-101. |
| [5] | LIU Xiaodong, LI Yuping, JIANG Peiqing, LI Ke, SUN Fengyi, DAI Yili, LIU Jing, XU Bian. Effects of Intercropping Between Forest and Grass on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Soil Microbial Status in Southwestern Region of Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(35): 64-69. |
| [6] | SONG Jinhao, HAO Wanyi, JIANG Wenting, CHEN Guoliang. Effects of Grass Mulching on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Jujube Orchard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(33): 102-110. |
| [7] | YING Hong, ZHU Shijun, JIN Shuquan, WANG Feng, ZHOU Jinbo. Effects of Long-term Non-grain Production on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Topsoil in Ningbo Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(27): 75-82. |
| [8] | LI Huajian, DENG Guojun, LUO Zhenyuan, NONG Quandong, LI Chunqing, NONG Bin, CHEN Biqin, HU Xiaozhang, LIU Na, WEN Heming. Effects of Intercropping Patterns on Physicochemical Properties of Red Soil and Soybean Qualities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(26): 8-14. |
| [9] | ZHU Shuai, LI Shiyong, JIANG Boyu, ZHAO Wenyi, ZHAO Maojie, CHEN Yimin, SUI Yueyu, JIAO Xiaoguang. Effect of Freeze-thaw Cycles on Distribution of Soil Aggregates and Their Organic Carbon Content in Arable Mollisol [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(23): 53-59. |
| [10] | HONG Facai, ZOU Qianmei, ZHANG Min, CHEN Jiangzheng, XU Jun, LI Hanmei, WANG Ge, WANG Na, BAI Yuxiang, ZHOU Peng, DU Yu, ZHENG Shaogeng, ZENG Hao, KANG Zheng, LI Jie. Effect of Agents on Control of Root Knot Nematode Disease and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(22): 131-136. |
| [11] | SHI Bo, XIE Yuanyuan, GUAN Feng, YANG Xuetong, ZHANG Jingyun, WANG Kai, WAN Xinjian. Analysis on Population Fluctuation of Rhizosphere Microorganism of Resistant and Susceptible Bitter Gourd [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(22): 118-124. |
| [12] | ZHENG Wei, YUAN Longzhen, WANG Jianhua, YANG Yao, WU Chuanguang, HUANG Ying, YOU Ping, XUE Xiaohui. Culturable Microorganism Diversity and Physicochemical Properties of Soil in the Reclamation Area of Coal Mine Wasteland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 81-87. |
| [13] | TANG Weidong, WEI Linyuan, KANG Caizhou, WANG Duoze, QIU Xiaona, ZHANG Weixing, ZHANG Xiaojuan. Soil Physicochemical Properties of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Plantations of Different Ages in Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 93-98. |
| [14] | KOU Peiwen, LIU Changle, XU Yike, SONG Zhongxing, LI Bo, ZHANG Yongsheng, HUANG Wenjing, TANG Zhishu. Characteristics of Rhizosphere Microbial Community of Three Medicinal Plants in Eastern Inner Mongolia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 58-67. |
| [15] | SONG Ge, SHI Feng. Humic Substances Involved in Plant Abiotic Stress Response: A Review on the Mechanism [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(15): 59-68. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||