
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (19): 17-22.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0875
Special Issue: 生物技术
Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Mengdi1(
), CHEN Yingmin1, YAN Yun1, NIU Jijuan2, LI Lin1, KANG Jiangfei1, ZHANG Bao1, ZAI Xiaoyu3, FANG Shefa1, GUO Jianqiu1(
)
Received:2025-10-20
Revised:2026-08-28
Online:2026-10-15
Published:2026-10-15
CLC Number:
HUANG Mengdi, CHEN Yingmin, YAN Yun, NIU Jijuan, LI Lin, KANG Jiangfei, ZHANG Bao, ZAI Xiaoyu, FANG Shefa, GUO Jianqiu. Comprehensive Analysis of Varieties and Yield of Soybean Based on Grey Correlation Degree and GGE Biplot[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(19): 17-22.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0875
| 项目 | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | G6 | G7 | G8 | G9 | G10 | G11 | G12 | G13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值/(kg/hm2) | 4527.56 | 4325.55 | 4518.89 | 4273.55 | 4300.55 | 4258.55 | 4461.56 | 4491.56 | 4006.20 | 4396.89 | 3939.19 | 4787.24 | 4163.54 |
| 最小值/(kg/hm2) | 2740.14 | 2673.47 | 2710.13 | 2610.13 | 3066.82 | 2872.81 | 2905.38 | 2800.14 | 2590.85 | 2603.47 | 2370.12 | 2536.79 | 2523.46 |
| 均值/(kg/hm2) | 3807.54 | 3603.49 | 3524.69 | 3598.46 | 3739.13 | 3495.70 | 3733.62 | 3751.96 | 3202.89 | 3581.31 | 3248.12 | 3745.34 | 3420.25 |
| 标准差 | 769.93 | 641.50 | 862.41 | 640.52 | 508.02 | 518.31 | 643.44 | 681.20 | 621.56 | 671.09 | 543.63 | 778.47 | 668.23 |
| 变异系数/% | 20.22 | 17.80 | 24.47 | 17.80 | 13.59 | 14.83 | 17.23 | 18.16 | 19.41 | 18.74 | 16.74 | 20.79 | 19.54 |
| 项目 | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | G6 | G7 | G8 | G9 | G10 | G11 | G12 | G13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值/(kg/hm2) | 4527.56 | 4325.55 | 4518.89 | 4273.55 | 4300.55 | 4258.55 | 4461.56 | 4491.56 | 4006.20 | 4396.89 | 3939.19 | 4787.24 | 4163.54 |
| 最小值/(kg/hm2) | 2740.14 | 2673.47 | 2710.13 | 2610.13 | 3066.82 | 2872.81 | 2905.38 | 2800.14 | 2590.85 | 2603.47 | 2370.12 | 2536.79 | 2523.46 |
| 均值/(kg/hm2) | 3807.54 | 3603.49 | 3524.69 | 3598.46 | 3739.13 | 3495.70 | 3733.62 | 3751.96 | 3202.89 | 3581.31 | 3248.12 | 3745.34 | 3420.25 |
| 标准差 | 769.93 | 641.50 | 862.41 | 640.52 | 508.02 | 518.31 | 643.44 | 681.20 | 621.56 | 671.09 | 543.63 | 778.47 | 668.23 |
| 变异系数/% | 20.22 | 17.80 | 24.47 | 17.80 | 13.59 | 14.83 | 17.23 | 18.16 | 19.41 | 18.74 | 16.74 | 20.79 | 19.54 |
| 项目 | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值/(kg/hm2) | 4385.89 | 3713.18 | 3156.82 | 3437.10 | 4787.24 | 4526.89 |
| 最小值/(kg/hm2) | 3510.17 | 2694.80 | 2370.12 | 2590.85 | 3939.19 | 3346.84 |
| 均值/(kg/hm2) | 3960.20 | 3216.80 | 2739.88 | 3139.49 | 4294.32 | 4088.92 |
| 标准差 | 274.92 | 343.21 | 237.17 | 243.37 | 250.14 | 372.97 |
| 变异系数/% | 6.94 | 10.67 | 8.66 | 7.75 | 5.82 | 9.12 |
| 项目 | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值/(kg/hm2) | 4385.89 | 3713.18 | 3156.82 | 3437.10 | 4787.24 | 4526.89 |
| 最小值/(kg/hm2) | 3510.17 | 2694.80 | 2370.12 | 2590.85 | 3939.19 | 3346.84 |
| 均值/(kg/hm2) | 3960.20 | 3216.80 | 2739.88 | 3139.49 | 4294.32 | 4088.92 |
| 标准差 | 274.92 | 343.21 | 237.17 | 243.37 | 250.14 | 372.97 |
| 变异系数/% | 6.94 | 10.67 | 8.66 | 7.75 | 5.82 | 9.12 |
| 项目 | 株高/cm | 底荚高/cm | 主茎节数/个 | 有效分枝/个 | 有效荚数/个 | 单株粒数/个 | 单株粒重/g | 百粒重/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 | 104.10 | 24.20 | 18.80 | 3.80 | 75.60 | 140.50 | 24.20 | 23.58 |
| 最小值 | 68.10 | 10.30 | 14.90 | 0.90 | 43.80 | 93.10 | 16.70 | 14.45 |
| 均值 | 88.32 | 17.45 | 17.15 | 2.22 | 56.05 | 111.88 | 21.75 | 19.63 |
| 标准差 | 10.80 | 3.71 | 1.05 | 0.96 | 8.95 | 15.30 | 2.29 | 2.61 |
| 变异系数/% | 12.22 | 21.25 | 6.11 | 43.17 | 15.97 | 13.67 | 10.51 | 13.27 |
| 项目 | 株高/cm | 底荚高/cm | 主茎节数/个 | 有效分枝/个 | 有效荚数/个 | 单株粒数/个 | 单株粒重/g | 百粒重/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 | 104.10 | 24.20 | 18.80 | 3.80 | 75.60 | 140.50 | 24.20 | 23.58 |
| 最小值 | 68.10 | 10.30 | 14.90 | 0.90 | 43.80 | 93.10 | 16.70 | 14.45 |
| 均值 | 88.32 | 17.45 | 17.15 | 2.22 | 56.05 | 111.88 | 21.75 | 19.63 |
| 标准差 | 10.80 | 3.71 | 1.05 | 0.96 | 8.95 | 15.30 | 2.29 | 2.61 |
| 变异系数/% | 12.22 | 21.25 | 6.11 | 43.17 | 15.97 | 13.67 | 10.51 | 13.27 |
| 品种编号 | 株高(X1) | 底荚高(X2) | 主茎节数(X3) | 有效分枝(X4) | 有效荚数(X5) | 单株粒数(X6) | 单株粒重(X7) | 百粒重(X8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 0.911 | 0.729 | 0.838 | 0.641 | 0.807 | 0.774 | 0.914 | 0.745 |
| G2 | 0.956 | 0.955 | 0.939 | 0.334 | 0.947 | 0.934 | 0.773 | 0.738 |
| G3 | 0.914 | 0.972 | 0.900 | 0.443 | 0.921 | 0.763 | 0.833 | 0.852 |
| G4 | 0.766 | 0.473 | 0.981 | 0.423 | 0.733 | 0.939 | 0.811 | 0.882 |
| G5 | 0.664 | 0.510 | 0.891 | 0.712 | 0.659 | 0.653 | 0.759 | 0.959 |
| G6 | 0.631 | 0.877 | 0.849 | 0.746 | 0.872 | 0.987 | 0.627 | 0.594 |
| G7 | 0.585 | 0.935 | 0.668 | 0.604 | 0.714 | 0.789 | 0.898 | 0.767 |
| G8 | 1.000 | 0.435 | 0.886 | 0.519 | 0.542 | 0.633 | 0.844 | 0.566 |
| G9 | 0.752 | 0.684 | 0.750 | 0.470 | 0.895 | 0.937 | 0.975 | 0.786 |
| G10 | 0.974 | 0.666 | 0.885 | 0.421 | 0.689 | 0.925 | 0.802 | 0.766 |
| G11 | 0.803 | 0.678 | 0.761 | 0.413 | 0.735 | 0.822 | 0.817 | 0.548 |
| G12 | 0.731 | 1.000 | 0.908 | 0.650 | 0.761 | 0.642 | 0.763 | 0.988 |
| G13 | 0.727 | 0.659 | 0.849 | 0.421 | 0.626 | 0.675 | 0.728 | 0.974 |
| 品种编号 | 株高(X1) | 底荚高(X2) | 主茎节数(X3) | 有效分枝(X4) | 有效荚数(X5) | 单株粒数(X6) | 单株粒重(X7) | 百粒重(X8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 0.911 | 0.729 | 0.838 | 0.641 | 0.807 | 0.774 | 0.914 | 0.745 |
| G2 | 0.956 | 0.955 | 0.939 | 0.334 | 0.947 | 0.934 | 0.773 | 0.738 |
| G3 | 0.914 | 0.972 | 0.900 | 0.443 | 0.921 | 0.763 | 0.833 | 0.852 |
| G4 | 0.766 | 0.473 | 0.981 | 0.423 | 0.733 | 0.939 | 0.811 | 0.882 |
| G5 | 0.664 | 0.510 | 0.891 | 0.712 | 0.659 | 0.653 | 0.759 | 0.959 |
| G6 | 0.631 | 0.877 | 0.849 | 0.746 | 0.872 | 0.987 | 0.627 | 0.594 |
| G7 | 0.585 | 0.935 | 0.668 | 0.604 | 0.714 | 0.789 | 0.898 | 0.767 |
| G8 | 1.000 | 0.435 | 0.886 | 0.519 | 0.542 | 0.633 | 0.844 | 0.566 |
| G9 | 0.752 | 0.684 | 0.750 | 0.470 | 0.895 | 0.937 | 0.975 | 0.786 |
| G10 | 0.974 | 0.666 | 0.885 | 0.421 | 0.689 | 0.925 | 0.802 | 0.766 |
| G11 | 0.803 | 0.678 | 0.761 | 0.413 | 0.735 | 0.822 | 0.817 | 0.548 |
| G12 | 0.731 | 1.000 | 0.908 | 0.650 | 0.761 | 0.642 | 0.763 | 0.988 |
| G13 | 0.727 | 0.659 | 0.849 | 0.421 | 0.626 | 0.675 | 0.728 | 0.974 |
| [1] |
韩天富, 周新安, 关荣霞, 等. 大豆种业的昨天、今天和明天[J]. 中国畜牧业, 2021(12):29-34.
|
| [2] |
丁俭, 沈舒晗, 李淑英, 等. 基于不同用途大豆的特征品质指标筛选及优势产区品种确定[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(17):11-19.
|
| [3] |
王亚君, 于寒松, 舒坤良. 中国大豆产业发展特点、趋势及对策[J]. 社会科学战线, 2024(4):253-258.
|
| [4] |
王艳殊, 田雨, 张佳楠, 等. 利用大豆四向重组自交系群体定位产量相关性状QTL[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(3):79-86.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190471 |
| [5] |
常世豪, 耿臻, 杨青春, 等. 基于BLUP值的夏大豆产量与农艺性状的相关分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(5):10-15.
|
| [6] |
邓聚龙. 灰色系统与农业[J]. 山西农业科学, 1985(5):34-37.
|
| [7] |
刘录祥, 孙其信, 王士芸. 灰色系统理论应用于作物新品种综合评估初探[J]. 中国农业科学, 1989(3):22-27.
|
| [8] |
赵志强, 朱凌云, 唐福森, 等. 利用灰色关联度分析法评价新疆水稻农艺性状、品质与产量间的关系[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 56(1):167-173.
|
| [9] |
戴宝生, 吕锐玲, 胡亚珂, 等. 不同小麦品种主要性状与产量的灰色关联度分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(12):23-28.
|
| [10] |
屈洋, 王可珍, 刘洋, 等. 大豆产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2019, 65(2):39-41,67.
|
| [11] |
王虹, 贾毛毛, 李金玲, 等. 基于灰色关联度分析法的朝天椒品种综合评价[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2025(1):15-20.
|
| [12] |
李金花, 舒文涛, 常世豪, 等. 1985—2020年河南省审定大豆品种区试产量及品质分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(1):50-59.
|
| [13] |
王淑君, 邢璐. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的谷子区域试验分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2025, 54(8):51-59.
|
| [14] |
严威凯. 双标图分析在农作物品种多点试验中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(11):1805-1819.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01805 |
| [15] |
余博毅, 郭凯凯, 徐玲, 等. 黄淮海夏玉米品种的综合评价分析[J]. 种子, 2025, 44(3):177-182.
|
| [16] |
吴珊珊, 张春原, 毛振武, 等. 基于双标图的京津冀早熟夏玉米品种区域试验综合分析[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(11):74-81.
|
| [17] |
李梦, 周显兵, 刘锋博, 等. 基于GGE双标图的油菜新品种陕油1609丰产稳产适应性分析[J]. 种子, 2023, 42(7):122-128.
|
| [18] |
蒋彤晖, 叶夕苗, 余斌, 等. 甘肃省马铃薯区试品种产量性状和环境鉴别力评价分析[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(6):1262-1272.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.06.1262 |
| [19] |
于沐, 杨海棠, 胡延岭, 等. 花生产量组成的基因型与环境互作及稳定性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(6):55-60.
|
| [20] |
邓丽, 任丽, 郭敏杰, 等. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的花生产量基因型与环境互作效应分析[J]. 种子, 2024, 43(7):91-96.
|
| [21] |
赵明明, 杜付荣, 胡新燕, 等. 江苏省早熟棉花区试品种皮棉产量性状和试验点鉴别力综合分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(20):10-17.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0590 |
| [22] |
陈亚光, 杨雨阳, 昝凯, 等. 黄淮海11个夏大豆品种(系)产量稳定性和适应性分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2024, 43(2):159-166.
|
| [23] |
陈志华, 马荣, 卢静静, 等. 北疆地区不同复种大豆品种农艺性状与产量关联分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2025, 43(3):191-199.
|
| [24] |
舒文涛, 李金花, 耿臻, 等. 黄淮海夏大豆产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(27):48-51.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-0584 |
| [25] |
窦士树, 马海涛, 朱红彩, 等. 河南省夏大豆新品种产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(12):2535-2538.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20201227 |
| [26] |
王秋玲, 郭凌云, 刘艳, 等. 夏大豆单株产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 大豆通报, 2002(6):5-12.
|
| [1] | ZHANG Yulong, ZHOU Lijuan, GUO Song, CHEN Jing, LIN Caixia, WAN Macao. Study on Planting Performance of Eight Highland Barley Varieties in High-altitude Environments [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 9-15. |
| [2] | GUAN Jiyuan, CHEN Zhe, ZHANG Qunying. Effect of Pollination Varieties on Fecundity and Fruit Quality of Blackberries ‘Freedom’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 77-82. |
| [3] | WANG Ping, WANG Lei, XIE Chengjun, SUN Zhenrong, CHEN Juan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Potato Varieties in Longzhong Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 8-16. |
| [4] | YAO Xiang, CHENG Yanan, LIU Ping, CHEN Qiong, HU Xiu. Screening of Water-saving and Drought-tolerant Hedychium Germplasm Based on Photosynthetic Fluorescence and Membership Function Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 97-104. |
| [5] | LI Xingxing, OU Huan, YANG Jian, ZHANG Yongjie, CHEN Juan, LI Chunyan, MA Hui, LIU Rongsen, LI Jinhong. Adaptability Screening Test of Maize Varieties for Spring Sowing in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 1-7. |
| [6] | PAN Dongzan, LIAO Yu, SHAO Xiuhong, LI Jiqin, MA Zhuwen, ZOU Mingmin, GAO Sanji, PAN Xiaoying, HUANG Zhenrui. Research Progress on Physiological, Molecular, and Genetic Improvement of Nitrogen Nutrition in Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 37-47. |
| [7] | ZHANG Xinyao, HUANG Pingjun, GAO Junping, WANG Shuaibin, HE Xinxi, LIU Wanfeng, YANG Xiaonian. Breeding and Characteristics of New Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘Xiangyan 8’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(20): 29-34. |
| [8] | JI Bingyi. Evolution of Main Characteristics of Peanut Varieties Registered in Liaoning Province from 2017 to 2024 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 40-49. |
| [9] | LI Junping, WANG Yuanhong, ZHOU Jun, LIN Li, ZHAO Zixian. Study on Trial-site Representativeness and Variety Adaptability of unnan Maize Hybrid Regional Trials Based on GGE Biplot [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(19): 9-16. |
| [10] | TANG Jin, LU Lei, DAI Zilong. Path Analysis of Fruit Mineral Elements and Main Quality of 8 Early-maturing Apple Varieties in Ili River Valley [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(17): 49-55. |
| [11] | KONG Xiangbin, YANG Hongguang, GUO Wenjuan, LIU Ying, HOU Zhenghong, ZHANG Huijun, LI Xia, YANG Lin, XU Ligong, ZHANG Lianxiao, LU Yuan, QIN Meiling. Introduction and Evaluation of 25 Mini Pumpkin Varieties (Lines) in Kaizhou District of Chongqing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(17): 56-66. |
| [12] | XU Cunfa, SUN Yiwen, WANG Ning, WANG Jialei, YANG Chenye, CHEN Liyang, SHAN Chengjun. Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Varieties of Small Fruit Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 70-76. |
| [13] | ZHOU Bo, TANG Jinchi, LI Jianlong, CHEN Yiyong, ZHANG Man, CUI Yingying, HUANG Xiuxin. Physiological Response of Tea Tree Leaves to Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 67-74. |
| [14] | WANG Min, HAN Shou’an, XIE Hui, LIU Xupeng, TURUP Mahmood, QI Ying, TIELIKE Adilitai, CAIKASIMU Aiermaike, PAN Mingqi, ZHANG Wen. Effects of Gibberellin Rachis Smearing Treatment on Grape Fruit Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 44-49. |
| [15] | YOU Si, JIANG Huyuan, YOU Wei, LIN Cong. Research on Climate Suitability for Soybean Cultivation in Hulunbuir Area from 1991 to 2022 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(36): 119-131. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||