Study  of  Ecological  Optimum  Population  of  Liaocheng  Based  on  Ecological  Footprint  Model

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15040069

Abstract

Abstract: The paper studied the moderate ecological carrying capacity of economic and population development in Liaocheng City in order to maintain the sustainable development and ecological security. The ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity from 2006 to 2011 were calculated by models, the differences between the ecological optimum population (EOP) and the actual conditions were analyzed. The results showed that: the actual population of Liaocheng City was in an increase trend from 2006 to 2011, but EOP was declining. Liaocheng faced the problems of being over- populated and ecological deficit, with a relatively large contradiction between man and land. The paper reflected the unreasonable relationship of ecology, population and economy in this region, and put forward the optional ways for sustainable development of Liaocheng City.

CLC Number:

X171.1

References

[1]Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on The Earth[M]. GabrlolaIsland: New SocietyPublishers, 2000.
[2]Erb K H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926－2000: A variation on ecological footprint assessments[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3):247-259.
[3]Vanvuuren D P, Smeets E M W. Ecological footprints of Benin,Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands[J]. Ecological Economics,2000, 34: 115-130.
[4]蔡运龙.自然资源学原理[M].2版.北京：科学出版社,2007:205.
[5]裴雪姣,宋迎昌.基于生态承载力的楠溪江流域生态旅游开发分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(1):21-26.
[6]汪运波,肖建红.基于生态足迹成分法的海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2014,24(8):149-155.
[7]Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Erb K H. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines and South Korea for 1961-1999:Comparing the conventional approach to an“actual land area”approach[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 22(3): 261-269.
[8]姚争,冯长春,阚俊杰.基于生态足迹理论的低碳校园研究—以北京大学生态足迹为例[J].资源科学, 2011,33(6):1163-1170.
[9]周静,管卫华.基于生态足迹方法的南京可持续发展研究[J].生态学报,2012,32(20):6471-6480.
[10]张风丽,龚新蜀.基于生态足迹模型的新疆绿洲生态经济协调发展能力研究[J].科技管理研究,2014,10:219-223.
[11]董宏林,金波,杜慧颖.基于全球生态足迹模型的生态适度人口研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(24):14744-14746,15115.
[12]汪运波,肖建红.基于生态足迹成分法的海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境.2014,24(8):149-155.
[13]苗红萍,王晓伟.基于生态足迹的哈萨克斯坦土地可持续利用研究[J].世界农业,2014,423(7):55-59.
[14]禹洋春,刁承泰,施开放,等.基于耕地生态足迹的重庆市耕地生态压力变化研究[J].广东农业科学,2014,4:227-232,236.
[15]李敏,张小洪,李远伟,等.基于能值的污水处理系统环境影响分析[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(2):488-496.
[16]刘衍君,汤庆新,张保华,等.基于ArcGIS的聊城市耕地土壤重金属污染现状与评价[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,40(4):567-571.
[17]王岩,肖燕,张保华,等.聊城市耕地土壤有机氯农药残留与农业功能定位研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(2):193-198.
[18]刘宇辉,彭希哲.中国历年生态足迹计算与发展可持续性评估[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(10): 2257-2262.1.
[19]魏媛.基于生态足迹的西南喀斯特山区生态适度人口研究—以贵阳市为例[J]. 中国农学通报,201l,27(14):175-180.
[20]SENBEL M, MCDANIELS T, DOWLATABADI H. The ecological footprint: A non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America[J]. Global Environ Change, 2003, 13: 83-100.
[21]戚颖颖,陶玉龙.生态足迹视角下的适度人口规模研究:以上海市为例[J].中国外资,2014(1):141-143.
[22]蔺海明,颉鹏.甘肃民勤绿洲农业地区生态足迹的动态研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(5): 827-832.
[23]李成英.基于“国家公顷”生态足迹的青海省适度人口规模透析[J].生态经济,2014,30(8):101-104.
[24]陈勇,茆长宝,程琳.基于地区生态足迹差异的生态适度人口研究[J].生态环境学报,2009,l8(2):560-566.
[25]徐坡,韩新海.基于生态足迹的陕西省适度人口研究[J].地下水,2011,33(3):177-181.
[26]徐中民,程国栋,邱国玉.可持续性评价的 ImPACTS 等式[J].地理学报,2005,60(2):198-208,566.
[27]陈成忠,林振山,梁仁君.基于生态足迹方法的中国生态可持续性分析[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(2):230-236.

Study of Ecological Optimum Population of Liaocheng Based on Ecological Footprint Model

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

For authors

For reviewers

Reader center

Contact us

[1]	ZHAO Ying, WANG Fei. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of CH₄ and CO₂ Emissions in Baiyangdian Wetland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 63-70.
[2]	Xu Meng, Wang Qinggui, Yan Guoyong, Xing Yajuan. Warming and Nitrogen Application: Effects on Decomposition of Leaf Litter in the Less Khingan Mountains [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(14): 46-53.
[3]	Ding Lizhi, Xing Yajuan, Yan Guoyong, Wang Qinggui. Fine Roots in Northern Forests: Response to Atmospheric N Deposition Increase and Temperature Rise [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(11): 63-73.
[4]	. Association Analysis of Soil Microorganism and Plant Species Diversity under the Climate Change [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(20): 111-117.
[5]	. Effects of Environmental Factors on Plant Species Diversity: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(13): 83-89.
[6]	. Research Progress of Forest Dynamic Succession Model [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(13): 43-49.
[7]	. Research Progress of Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Soil Nitrogen Budget in Boreal Forests [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(12): 98-107.
[8]	. Research Progress of Plant Economic Spectrum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(10): 88-94.
[9]	. Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of Temperate Forest Leaves: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(10): 95-100.
[10]	. Exogenous Carbon and Nitrogen: Effects on Plant Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(5): 54-60.
[11]	. Response of Fine Root to Nitrogen Deposition and Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration in Boreal Forest [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(30): 84-90.
[12]	Mao Jinhua,Xing Yajuan,Ma Hongyu and Wang Qinggui. Research Progress of Nitrogen Deposition Effect on Plant Growth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(29): 42-48.
[13]	. Research Progress of Nitrogen Deposition Effect on Soil Microorganism in Boreal Forest [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(28): 111-116.
[14]	Guo Liang,Wang Qinggui and Xing Yajuan. Response of Forest Ecosystem Soil Carbon Pool to Nitrogen Deposition:A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(32): 81-87.
[15]	. Interaction Effects of Soil Microbial Carbon and Nitrogen: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(23): 65-71.