干旱胁迫下水稻转录因子表达变化

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18100015

中国农学通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 108-114.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18100015

所属专题：生物技术；水稻；农业气象

干旱胁迫下水稻转录因子表达变化

朱长保¹, 徐辰峰², 刘仁梅²

1.金湖县植保植检站江苏淮安;2.金湖县农业技术推广中心江苏淮安

收稿日期:2018-10-08 修回日期:2018-11-16 接受日期:2018-11-25 出版日期:2019-02-22 发布日期:2019-02-22
通讯作者: 刘仁梅
基金资助:
江苏现代农业技术体系建设项目“江苏（金湖）现代农业（稻麦）科技综合示范基地”(JATS[2018]125)。

Expression Change of Transcription Factors of Rice Under Drought Stress

Received:2018-10-08 Revised:2018-11-16 Accepted:2018-11-25 Online:2019-02-22 Published:2019-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究是探索在干旱应激下水稻转录因子的变化及可能的调控机制。本研究整合GEO数据库中关于水稻耐旱研究的基因芯片数据，通过TAC软件对基因芯片数据分析筛选出差异基因，利用在线数据库DAVID 6.8 和Plant TF DB筛选出相应的转录因子。敏感品种有9个转录因子表达方向一致（同时上调表达的有7个转录因子，下调的有2个转录因子），耐旱品种有34个转录因子表达方向一致（同时上调表达的有23个转录因子，下调表达的有11个转录因子）。敏感品种和耐旱品种间有8个表达方向一致的重叠转录因子。干旱胁迫会显著影响转录因子的表达，不同水稻品种中，这些转录因子的表达既有较强的品种特异性，也有部分相似性。水稻可通过诱导和抑制转录因子的表达，来提高自身抗旱能力。

关键词: 钾肥, 钾肥, 减量分期施用, 莴笋, 产量, 品质

Abstract: To investigate the change of transcription factors’response to drought stress in rice and their potential regulatory mechanism, the data of gene chips on drought resistance of rice from GEO database were integrated. The differential genes were screened out by analyzing the data of gene chips with TAC software. And the relative transcription factors were selected with online database DAVID 6.8 and Plant TF DB. 9 transcription factor genes (7 up- regulated and 2 down- regulated at the transcription level) in droughtsusceptible varieties and 34 (23 up-regulated and 11 down-regulated at the transcription level) in droughttolerant varieties had the same direction of expression. Between drought-susceptible varieties and droughttolerant varieties, 8 overlapping transcription factors had the same direction of expression. Drought stress affected the expression of transcription factors obviously. In different varieties, these transcription factors had strong variety specificity, and some similarity. Rice can improve the drought resistance by inducing and inhibiting the expression of transcription factors.

中图分类号:

Q786 S511.03

朱长保,徐辰峰,刘仁梅. 干旱胁迫下水稻转录因子表达变化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(6): 108-114.

参考文献

[1] 徐靖,唐清杰,朱红林,等. 水稻(Oryza satica L.)干旱胁迫响应转录因子研究进展. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2015, 34 (11):2525-2531.
[2] Miura K, IkedaSSM, Matsubara AS,et al. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nature Genetics, 2010,42S(6)S:545-549.
[3] Liu C T, Wu Y B, Wang X P. bZIP transcription factor OsbZIP52/RISBZ5: a potential negative regulator of cold and drought stress response in rice. Planta, 2012, 235(6): 1157-1169.
[4] You J, Zong W, Hu H H,et al. A Stress-Responsive NAC1-Regulated Protein Phosphatase Gene Rice Protein Phosphatase18 Modulates Drought and Oxidative Stress Tolerance through Abscisic Acid-Independent Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging in Rice. Plant Physiology, 2014, 166(4): 2100-2114.
[5] Xiao J, Cheng H T, Li X H,et al. Rice WRKY13 Regulates Cross Talk between Abiotic and Biotic Stress Signaling Pathways by Selective Binding to Different cis-Elements. Plant Physiology, 2013, 163(4): 1868-1882.
[6] Feng L, Gao Z R,Xiao G Q, et al. Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor-Like Kinase FON1 Regulates Drought Stress and Seed Germination by Activating the Expression of ABA-Responsive Genes in Rice. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2014, 32(6): 1158-1168.
[7] Yang S, Vanderbeld B, Wan J, et al. Narrowing down the targets: towards successful genetic engineering of drought-tolerant crops. Molecular Plant, 2010, 3 (3):469-490.
[8] Hadiart T, Tran L S. Progress studies of drought responsive genes in rice. Plant Cell Reports, 2011,30(3): 297-310.
[9] 刘永巍,田红刚,李春光,等. 水稻抗旱研究进展. 北方水稻S, 2015,45S(2)S:76-80.
[10] Lee D K, Jung H, Jang G P, et al. Overexpression of the OsERF71 transcription factor alters rice root structure and drought resistance.SPlant Physiology, 2016, 172(1): 575-588.
[11] JishaSV, Lavanya D, Jyothilakshmi V,et al. Overexpression of an AP2/ERF type transcription factor OsEREBP1 confers biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in Rice. PLoS ONE,S2015. 10(6): e0127831.
[12] Li C, Ng K Y, Fan L M,et al. MYB transcription factors, active players in abiotic stress signaling. Environmental Experimental Botany, 2015, 114S:80-91.
[13] Zong W, Tang N, Yang J, et al. Feedback Regulation of ABA Signaling and Biosynthesis by a bZIP Transcription Factor Targets Drought-Resistance-Related Genes. Plant Physiology, 2016, 171(4): 2810-2825.
[14] Jin S J, Youn S K, Mark C, et al. OsNAC5 overexpression enlarges root diameter in rice plants leading to enhanced drought tolerance and increased grain yield in the field. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2013, 11(1): 101-114.
[15] Tania S, Duarte D, André M,et al.OsRMC, a negative regulator of salt stress response in rice, is regulated by two AP2/ERF transcription factors. Plant Molecular Biology, 2013, 82(4-5): 439-455.
[16] Chen H, Chen W, Zhou J L, et al. Basic leucine zipper transcription factor OsbZIP16 positively regulates drought resistance in rice. Plant Science, 2012,( 193): 8-17.
[17] Xiong H Y, Li J J, Liu P L, et al. Overexpression of OsMYB48-1, a novel MYB-related transcription factor, enhances drought and salinity tolerance in rice.SPLoS ONE, 2014, 9(3): e92913.
[18] Huang L, Hong Y B, Zhang H J, et al. Rice NAC transcription factor ONAC095 plays opposite roles in drought and cold stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biology, 2016, 16: 203-241.
[19] 刘文文, 李文学. 植物bHLH转录因子研究进展. 生物技术进展,2013 (1):7-11.
[20] Todaka D, Nakashima K, Maruyama K,et al. Rice phytochrome-interacting factor-like protein OsPIL1 functions as a key regulator of internode elongation and induces a morphological response to drought stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012,109(39): 15947-15952.
[21] 孙滨,占小登,曹立勇,等. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子的研究进展. 农业生物技术学报, 2017,(11)S:1860-1869.
[22] Lu Jing, Ju H P, Zhou G X, et al. An EAR-motif-containing ERF transcription factor affects herbivore-induced signaling, defense and resistance in rice. The Plant Journal, 2011, 68(4): 583-596.
[23] 刘梦佳,李海峰. 水稻WRKY转录因子家族研究进展. 河南农业科学, 2016,45S(3)S:1-8.
[24] Shen H S, Liu C T, Zhang Y, et al. OsWRKY30 is activated by MAP kinases to confer drought tolerance in rice. Plant Molecular Biology, 2012, 80(3): 241-253.
[25] Raineri J, Wang S H, Peleg Z, et al. The rice transcription factor OsWRKY47 is a positive regulator of the response to water deficit stress. Plant Molecular Biology, 2015, 88(4-5): 401-413.

干旱胁迫下水稻转录因子表达变化

Expression Change of Transcription Factors of Rice Under Drought Stress

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	周冬冬, 张军, 葛梦婕, 刘忠红, 朱晓欢, 李春燕. 不同氮肥处理对稻茬晚播小麦‘淮麦36’产量、氮素利用率和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 1-7.
[2]	高文瑞, 孙艳军, 韩冰, 费聪, 王显生, 徐刚. 弱光对西瓜果实品质及蔗糖代谢的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 56-61.
[3]	金梅娟, 佘旭东, 沈明星, 陆长婴, 陶玥玥, 王海候. 稻田构建垄型土槽耦合基质栽培草莓的生产效应研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 71-76.
[4]	马猛, 王克华, 曲亮, 窦套存, 郭军, 王星果, 胡玉萍, 卢建. 不同品种肉鸡屠宰性能、胸肌肉品质和成分测定及分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 137-142.
[5]	王福玉, 陈贵菊, 孙雷明, 黄玲, 邵敏敏, 赵凯, 杨本洲, 张玉丹, 闫璐, 王霖. 耕作方式与施氮量互作对小麦生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 20-26.
[6]	陈英花, 白如霄, 王娟, 张新疆, 刘玲慧, 刘小龙, 冯国瑞, 危常州. 叶面喷施烯效唑和硼对塔额盆地甜菜产量和含糖率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 41-48.
[7]	李兴华, 王欢, 张盛, 蔡星星, 周强, 周楠. 氮肥用量与运筹方式对晚籼稻产量及花后干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 6-13.
[8]	王强强, 杨自辉, 郭树江, 张剑挥, 王多泽. 灌水量对民勤干旱沙区骏枣生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 71-74.
[9]	周小红. 基于多元回归分析的农作物产量估测模型研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 152-156.
[10]	秦乃群, 马巧云, 高敬伟, 杨璞, 蔡金兰, 郝迎春, 李艳梅, 冀洪策, 廖祥政. 沼渣施用对花生小麦轮作作物产量及土壤养分和重金属含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 58-63.
[11]	武志斌, 黄超, 雷媛, 敬峰, 刘战东. 不同产量水平下冬小麦水肥利用特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 64-71.
[12]	王一凡, 劳晓璨, 余丽萍, 叶海龙. 水稻‘甬优15’分期播种的气象条件适宜性试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 106-109.
[13]	郑碧霞, 戢小梅, 李长林, 龚林忠, 方林川. 不同复合保鲜处理对‘夏黑’果实贮藏效果的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 135-143.
[14]	彭程, 邓林萍, 蒙万聪, 常晓晓, 张增文, 罗贱良, 邱继水, 陆育生. 套袋对柰李果实外观及香气物质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 45-51.
[15]	李冬雪, 王一柳, 郇威威, 卜令铎, 王睿智, 刘浩, 卢殿君, 王火焰, 陈小琴. 枸溶性钾肥对玉溪烟叶及根区土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 67-73.