流域生态水文过程与植被响应研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0199

中国农学通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 66-71.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0199

所属专题：农业生态

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇下一篇

流域生态水文过程与植被响应研究进展

张寒(), 王琳()

中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院/海洋环境与生态教育部重点实验室,山东青岛 266100

收稿日期:2020-06-22 修回日期:2020-08-30 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-03-16
通讯作者: 王琳
作者简介:张寒,男,1992年出生,山东聊城人,博士,研究方向：景观生态与水环境。通信地址：266100 山东省青岛市崂山区松岭路238号中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院,E-mail： zhanghan199282@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然基金项目“石羊河流域下游干涸湖底风蚀特征及盐尘运动规律研究”(31760238);国家自然基金项目“民勤绿洲边缘退/弃耕地风蚀特征及其对沙尘暴物质的贡献研究”(31460219);甘肃省国际合作项目“绿洲边缘退/弃耕地生态恢复及风沙活动防治研究与示范”(144WCGA171)

Review of Watershed Eco-hydrological Processes and Vegetation Responses

Zhang Han(), Wang Lin()

College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao Shandong 266100

Received:2020-06-22 Revised:2020-08-30 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-16
Contact: Wang Lin

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态水文学是流域水资源管理的理论基础。流域生态过程与水文过程间的关系是当前生态水文学研究的重点之一,也是实现生态文明建设的重要科学举措。植被对流域的生态水文过程有着密切联系。流域内的植被不仅提供减少空气污染和能源消耗、改善水质等生态服务,还通过截留、蒸散、下渗等作用维持流域内水资源与土壤资源之间的动态平衡。流域内土地、气候和水文资源等条件也直接影响植被的生长分布及演替;本研究基于生态水文学理论,从植被变化对流域生态修复作用和水文响应等方面,系统总结了植被对流域生态水文过程的研究方法及影响,并探讨了相关生态水文模型的优势与不足,最后指出解决流域生态过程与水文过程的失衡问题是今后亟需加强的研究方向。

关键词: 植被, 生态水文过程, 生态水文模型, 流域

Abstract:

Ecological hydrology is the theoretical basis of river basin water resources management. The relationship between ecological and hydrological process is a research emphasis of eco-hydrology, which is a scientific method to realize the ecological civilization construction. There is a close relationship between vegetation and eco-hydrological processes. Vegetation in the basin can alleviate air pollution, reduce energy consumption and improve water quality. In addition, it can maintain the dynamic balance between water resources and soil resources in the basin through interception, evapotranspiration and infiltration. Similarly, the conditions of land, climate and water resources can directly affect the growth, distribution and succession of vegetation. Based on the theory of eco-hydrology, in terms of the effect of vegetation on watershed ecological restoration and the response of vegetation to watershed hydrology, we systematically summarized the impacts of vegetation on the ecological and hydrological processes and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of relevant ecological and hydrological models. Finally, we pointed out that it is an urgent research direction to solve the imbalance between the ecological process and hydrological process.

Key words: vegetation, eco-hydrological processes, eco-hydrological model, watershed

中图分类号:

X321

张寒, 王琳. 流域生态水文过程与植被响应研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(8): 66-71.

Zhang Han, Wang Lin. Review of Watershed Eco-hydrological Processes and Vegetation Responses[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(8): 66-71.

参考文献 96

[1]	Rodriguez I. Ecohydrology: a hydrological perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics[J]. Water Resources Research, 2000,36(1):3-9. doi: 10.1029/1999WR900210 URL
[2]	李守波. 黑河下游地下水波动带地下水时空动态GIS辅助模拟研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2007.
[3]	Turnbull L, Wilcox B P, Belnap J, et al. Understanding the role of ecohydrological feedbacks in ecosystem state change in drylands[J]. Ecohydrology, 2012,5(2):174-183. doi: 10.1002/eco.265 URL
[4]	Fu B J, Wang S, Liu Y, et al. Hydrogeomorphic Ecosystem Responses to Natural and Anthropogenic Changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2017,45(1):223-243. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020552 URL
[5]	夏露. 基于绿水理论的砚瓦川流域生态水文过程对变化环境的响应[D]. 西安:西安理工大学, 2019.
[6]	程国栋, 李新. 流域科学及其集成研究方法[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2015,45(06):811-819.
[7]	Schaeffer A, 陈忠礼, Ebel M, 等. 植物在修复、固定和重建水生、陆生生态系统中的应用[J]. 重庆师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2012,29(3):1-3.
[8]	曾琳. 区域发展对生态系统的影响分析模型及其应用[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2015.
[9]	敦越, 杨春明, 袁旭, 等. 流域生态系统服务研究进展[J]. 生态经济, 2019,35(7):179-183.
[10]	齐延凯, 孟顺龙, 范立民, 裘丽萍, 宋超, 郑尧, 李丹丹, 张聪, 陈家长. 湖泊生态修复技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(26):84-93.
[11]	Goebel P C, Palik B J, Pregitzer K S. Plant diversity contributions of riparian areas in watersheds of the Northern Lake States, USA[J]. Ecological Applications. 2003,13(6):1595-1609. doi: 10.1890/01-5314 URL
[12]	Daniel A A, Klaus D, Daniel M. Using satellite imagery to assess impacts of soil and water conservation measures: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Tana-Beles watershed[J]. Ecological Economics, 2020,169:106512. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106512 URL
[13]	Xu W, Cai Y, Rong Q, et al. Agricultural non-point source pollution management in a reservoir watershed based on ecological network analysis of soil nitrogen cycling[J]. Environmental Science And Pollution Research International, 2018,25(9):9071-9084. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1092-x URL pmid: 29335873
[14]	Tian Y W. Landscape Ecology Researches on the Regulation of Non-point Source Pollution in Agroforestry Watershed[J]. Journal of Landscape Research, 2015,7(6):49-52.
[15]	赵钟楠, 张越, 袁勇, 等. 基于生态系统的河流管理进展及对流域综合规划的启示[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2019(11):1-3,23.
[16]	孙雪, 于格, 刘汝海, 等. 海河南系子牙河流域湿地生态系统健康评价研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报:自然科学版, 2019,49(11):120-132.
[17]	田义超, 白晓永, 黄远林, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的赤水河流域生态补偿标准核算[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019,50(11):312-322.
[18]	Espeland E K, Emery N C, Mercer K L, et al. Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,54(1):102-115. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12739 URL
[19]	ülo M, Hayakawa Y, Kuusemets V. Purification processes, ecological functions, planning and design of riparian buffer zones in agricultural watersheds[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005,24(5):421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.015 URL
[20]	郭二辉, 孙然好, 陈利顶. 河岸植被缓冲带主要生态服务功能研究的现状与展望[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011,30(8):1830-1837.
[21]	Sarah K, Paul W, Jack C. Local ecology and geographic ranges of plants in the Bishop Creek watershed of the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 2004,31(10):1637-1657. doi: 10.1111/jbi.2004.31.issue-10 URL
[22]	周妍妍, 朱敏翔, 郭晓娟, 等. 疏勒河流域气候变化和人类活动对植被NPP的相对影响评价[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(14):5127-5137.
[23]	郭继凯, 吴秀芹, 董贵华, 等. 基于MODIS/NDVI的塔里木河流域植被覆盖变化驱动因素相对作用分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2017,34(3):621-629.
[24]	Isabelle M, Marion D, Martine O, et al. Responses of riparian plant communities and water quality after 8 years of passive ecological restoration using a BACI design[J]. Hydrobiologia. 2016,781(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2349-3 URL
[25]	Ajaz Ahmed M A, Abd-Elrahman A, Escobedo F J, et al. Spatially-explicit modeling of multi-scale drivers of aboveground forest biomass and water yield in watersheds of the Southeastern United States[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017,199:158-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.013 URL pmid: 28531796
[26]	Robert C, Alexey V, Roelof B, et al. Integrated Ecological Economic Modeling of the Patuxent River Watershed, Maryland[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2002,72(2):203-231. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0203:IEEMOT]2.0.CO;2 URL
[27]	Wang L X. RS and GIS Aided Study on Tempo-spatial Differences of Ecological Water Requirement at Landscape Scale in Weihe Sub-watershed[J]. Revista de la Facultad de Ingenieria, 2017,32(16):932-941.
[28]	Ren Z P, Li Z B, Liu X L, et al. Comparing watershed afforestation and natural revegetation impacts on soil moisture in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018,8(1):2972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21362-5 URL pmid: 29445237
[29]	Gautam S, Mbonimpa E, Kumar S, et al. Simulating Runoff from Small Grazed Pasture Watersheds Located at North Appalachian Experimental Watershed in Ohio[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2018,71(3):363-369.
[30]	王海平, 冯仲科, 孙赫, 等. 北京市永定河流域土地利用/覆盖变化研究[J]. 林业调查规划, 2011,36(03):15-20.
[31]	胡承江, 李雄. 1979—2013年北京市永定河流域平原城市段核心区域植被盖度演变分析[J]. 中国园林, 2015,31(09):12-16.
[32]	Sheremetov R T, Sheremetova S A. The effect of the hydrothermal conditions of the Tom River Basin on the ecological structure of flora[J]. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2017,10(2):119-130. doi: 10.1134/S1995425517020111 URL
[33]	Zhang J R. Ecological Allocation of Plants in Ecological Restoration of the Danjiang River Basin[J]. 气象与环境研究;英文版, 2019,10(3):33-36.
[34]	张家荣, 刘建林. 丹江流域生态修复中植物的生态配置[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(11):213-215.
[35]	Bradley B Walters, Human ecological questions for tropical restoration: experiences from planting native upland trees and mangroves in the Philippines[J]. Forest Ecology and Management. 1997,99(1-2):275-290. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00211-9 URL
[36]	Fu A H, Chen Y N, Li W H. Water use strategies of the desert riparian forest plant community in the lower reaches of Heihe River Basin, China[J]. 中国科学:地球科学(英文版), 2014,57(6):1293-1305.
[37]	Sun X P, Zhang Y L, Shen Y, et al. Exploring ecosystem services and scenario simulation in the headwaters of Qiantang River watershed of China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019,26(34):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3003-1 URL
[38]	Wagner P D, Bhallamudi S M, Narasimhan B, et al. Comparing the effects of dynamic versus static representations of land use change in hydrologic impact assessments[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2019,122:103987.
[39]	曹丽娟, 张冬峰, 张勇, 等. 土地利用变化对长江流域气候及水文过程影响的敏感性研究[J]. 大气科学, 2010,34(4):726-736.
[40]	史晓亮. 基于SWAT模型的滦河流域分布式水文模拟与干旱评价方法研究[D]. 长春:中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所), 2013.
[41]	Vaibhav G, Bhaskar R N, Praveen K T, et al. Human-induced land use land cover change and its impact on hydrology[J]. HydroResearch, 2019,1:48-56.
[42]	Gao Y Q, Chen J H, Luo H, et al. Prediction of hydrological responses to land use change[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019: 134998.
[43]	Birhanu A, Masih I, Van d Z P, et al. Impacts of land use and land cover changes on hydrology of the Gumara catchment, Ethiopia[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2019,112:165-174.
[44]	Maryam A, Seyed H S, Rainer D, et al. Changes in watershed hydrological behavior due to land use comanagement scenarios[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019,557:124001
[45]	Yalew S G, Pilz T, Schweitzer C, et al. Coupling land-use change and hydrologic models for quantification of catchment ecosystem services[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018,109:315-328.
[46]	郝振纯, 苏振宽. 土地利用变化对海河流域典型区域的径流影响[J]. 水科学进展, 2015,26(04):491-499.
[47]	Marian A O, Leonard K A, David D W. The impact of climate and land-use changes on the hydrological processes of Owabi catchment from SWAT analysis[J]. Journal of Hydrology:Regional Studies, 2019,25:100620.
[48]	Nikita S, Prabhat K S D, Shyam B D. A Comparison of SWAT Model Calibration Techniques for Hydrological Modeling in the Ganga River Watershed[J]. Engineering, 2018,4(5):643-652.
[49]	李朝月, 方海燕. 基于SWAT模型的寿昌江流域产沙模拟及影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):127-135,142.
[50]	陈英瑾. 乡村景观特征评估与规划[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2012.
[51]	温远光, 刘世荣. 我国主要森林生态系统类型降水截留规律的数量分析[J]. 林业科学, 1995(4):289-298.
[52]	刘昌明, 夏军, 郭生练, 等. 黄河流域分布式水文模型初步研究与进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2004(4):495-500.
[53]	陈军锋, 李秀彬. 土地覆被变化的水文响应模拟研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004(05):833-836.
[54]	王友生. 北京山区典型小流域土地利用/森林覆被变化的水文生态响应研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2013.
[55]	Rujner H, Leonhardt G, Marsalek, J. High-resolution modelling of the grass swale response to runoff inflows with Mike SHE[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018,562:411-422.
[56]	Mirela-A S, Ana V. Applicability of MIKE SHE to Simulate Hydrology in Argesel River Catchment[J]. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2015,6:517-524.
[57]	Spyridon P, Fotios M. Hydrological simulation of Sperchios River basin in Central Greece using the MIKE SHE model and geographic information systems[J]. Applied Water Science, 2017,7(2):591-599.
[58]	宋文龙, 杨胜天, 路京选, 等. 黄河中游大尺度植被冠层截留降水模拟与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(1):80-89.
[59]	Gash J H C, Wright I R, Lloyd C R. Comparative estimates of interception loss from three coniferous forests in Great Britain[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1980,48(1-2):89-105. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(80)90068-2 URL
[60]	Teklehaimanot Z, Jarvis P G, Ledger D C. Rainfall interception and boundary layer conductance in relation to tree spacing[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1991,123(3-4):261-278.
[61]	Viville D, Biron P, Granier A. Interception in a mountainous declining spruce stand in the Strengbach catchment (Vosges, France)[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1993,144(1-4):273-282. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(93)90175-9 URL
[62]	Gavazzi M J, Sun G, McNulty S G, et al. Canopy Rainfall Interception Measured over Ten Years in a Coastal Plain Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Plantation[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2016,59(2):601-610.
[63]	Fan Y, Meijide A, Lawrence D M, et al. Reconciling Canopy Interception Parameterization and Rainfall Forcing Frequency in the Community Land Model for Simulating Evapotranspiration of Rainforests and Oil Palm Plantations in Indonesia[J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2019,11(3):732-751.
[64]	Guo J K, Yu B Q, Zhang Y, et al. Predicted models for potential canopy rainfall interception capacity of landscape trees in Shanghai, China[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2017,136(3):387-400.
[65]	Van Stan J T, Levia D F, Jenkins R B. Forest Canopy Interception Loss Across Temporal Scales: Implications for Urban Greening Initiatives[J]. Professional Geographer, 2015,67(1):41-51.
[66]	杨永刚, 肖洪浪, 赵良菊, 等. 流域生态水文过程与功能研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011,31(5):1242-1246.
[67]	周玲, 张丽, 许君一, 等. 基于SEBAL模型的漓江流域蒸散量变化分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015,22(4):332-337.
[68]	颜红, 马龙生, 韦小茶, 等. 基于MOD16产品的涟江流域蒸散量时空变化特征[J]. 人民珠江, 2019,40(9):62-67.
[69]	黄明斌, 刘贤赵. 黄土高原森林植被对流域径流的调节作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002(9):1057-1060.
[70]	程根伟, 余新晓, 赵玉涛, 等. 贡嘎山亚高山森林带蒸散特征模拟研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2003(1):23-27.
[71]	张淑兰, 于澎涛, 张海军, 等. 泾河流域上游土石山区和黄土区森林覆盖率变化的水文影响模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(4):1068-1078.
[72]	徐飞, 贾仰文, 牛存稳, 等. 五台山清水河流域植被垂直带水循环过程研究[J]. 水利学报, 2019,50(9):1155-1164.
[73]	王蔚华, 邹松兵, 肖洪浪, 等. 内陆河流域生态-水文本体的构建方法及应用[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014,36(5):1280-1287.
[74]	Brown S M, Petrone R M, Chasmer L, et al. Atmospheric and soil moisture controls on evapotranspiration from above and within a Western Boreal Plain aspen forest[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2014,28(15):4449-4462.
[75]	Rachmayani R, Prange M, Schulz M. North African vegetation--precipitation feedback in early and mid-holo-cene climate simulations with CCSM3-DGVM[J]. Climate of the Past, 2015,11(2):175-185.
[76]	Dereje, B, Nedaw D. Groundwater Recharge Estimation Using WetSpass Modeling in Upper Bilate Catchment, Southern Ethiopia[J]. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science, 2019,11(1):37-51.
[77]	Carlos L. Pérez Díaz, Tarendra L, Peter R. Evaluation of MODIS land surface temperature with in-situ snow surface temperature from CREST-SAFE[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017,38(16):4722-4740.
[78]	刘青娥, 夏军, 陈晓宏. 潮河流域TOPMODEL模型网格尺度研究[J]. 水文, 2008,28(3):29-32.
[79]	Zhang L, Dawes W R, Hatton T.J, et al. Estimation of soil moisture and groundwater recharge using the TOPOG_IRM model[J]. Water Resources Research, 1999,35(1):149-161.
[80]	Ye T, Marcolini G, Disse M, et al. A multi-objective approach to improve SWAT model calibration in alpine catchments[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018,559:347-360
[81]	Da Silva R M, Dantas J C, De Araújo B J, et al. Hydrological simulation in a tropical humid basin in the cerrado biome using the SWAT model[J]. Hydrology Research, 2018,49(3):908-923.
[82]	马全. 基于MIKE SHE模型的湟水流域干旱评估预报模型研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2014.
[83]	Beven K J, Kirkby M J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/ Un modèle à base physique de zone d\"appel variable de l\"hydrologie du basin versant[J]. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 1979,24(1):43-69.
[84]	王婕, 宋晓猛, 张建云, 等. 中小尺度流域洪水模型模拟比较研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2019(7):72-76.
[85]	屈海晨, 胡艳阳, 刘晓东. 不同水文模型在滦河流域对比运用研究[J]. 海河水利, 2015(1):44-47.
[86]	董晓红, 于澎涛, 王彦辉, 等. 分布式生态水文模型TOPOG在温带山地小流域的应用——以祁连山排露沟小流域为例[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007,20(4):477-484.
[87]	孙庆艳. 华北土石山区典型流域森林植被水文生态过程响应研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2008.
[88]	马良. 长白山龙岗火山群区典型小流域生态系统水文过程模拟研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学, 2012.
[89]	Chisato F, Kazuhide N, Yukihiro G, et al. Takashi Matsui. Study of MPI measurement conditions and MPI characteristic in BIF[J]. Optical Fiber Technology, 2013,19(5):378-382.
[90]	郭军庭, 张志强, 王盛萍, 等. 应用SWAT模型研究潮河流域土地利用和气候变化对径流的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(6):1559-1567.
[91]	Ma, L, He C G, Bian H F, et al. MIKE SHE modeling of ecohydrological processes: Merits, applications, and challenges[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016,96:137-149.
[92]	王盛萍, 张志强, 孙阁, 等. 基于MIKESHE模型的潮河流域土地利用与降水变化对水文的影响评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012,28(3):320-325.
[93]	Thomas V, Mohsen T, Victor N, et al. Climate change impact on river flows and catchment hydrology: a comparison of two spatially distributed models[J]. Hydrological Prochydrological Processesrnesses, 2013,27(25):1-14.
[94]	Gayan N W, Babak F, Anil G, et al. A Comprehensive Land-Use/Hydrological Modeling System for Scenario Simulations in the Elbow River Watershed, Alberta, Canada[J]. Environmental Management, 2013,53(2):357-381. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0220-8 URL pmid: 24363162
[95]	万鹏, 丁文静. 关于流域综合整治系统化方案编制的思考[J]. 中国给水排水, 2019,35(11):113-117,124.
[96]	张瑞. 湖南津市毛里湖牌楼岗溪植被恢复的生态水文效应模拟研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2018.

流域生态水文过程与植被响应研究进展

Review of Watershed Eco-hydrological Processes and Vegetation Responses

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 96

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	薛文瑞, 杨自辉, 张永, 郭树江, 王强强, 张剑挥. 民勤荒漠绿洲植被覆盖对地下水和降水变化的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 102-109.
[2]	朱小聪. 汾河流域植被生产力时空变异特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 86-93.
[3]	胡馨月, 孙倩, 古丽古丽·灭迪力哈孜. 新疆布尔津县五年间归一化植被指数时空演变[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 6-11.
[4]	汪欢欢, 杨琴, 蒲红梅, 何进, 程华, 韩敏, 赵学春, 王志伟, 金宝成. 照片样线法大豆植被覆盖度测量精度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 111-118.
[5]	王楚珏, 李昂, 李璐骥. 基于灰水足迹不好产出的黄河流域农业用水效率评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 105-112.
[6]	佟帆, 魏琳, 刘绪军, 任宪平, 李志飞, 王平, 郝燕芳. 东北黑土区植被配置的土壤抗冲性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(2): 44-51.
[7]	张永超, 解德宏, 张翠仙, 陈于福, 柏天琦, 易怀锋, 尼章光, 章勇, 王美存. 红河流域杧果种质资源主要数量性状变异与概率分级[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(16): 68-73.
[8]	罗丹, 毛忠安, 张庭瑜, 常庆瑞. 延河流域耕层土壤养分空间变异及与地形因子的相关性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(12): 79-87.
[9]	卜祥, 张永福, 梁田田, 王建国. 基于MODIS数据2001—2019年NDVI时空变化及驱动力分析——以阿克苏地区为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(11): 75-83.
[10]	李陈, 郭龙, 马中文, 武升, 吴支行, 马友华. 芜湖市化肥减量增效与农田氮磷流失控制技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(1): 100-105.
[11]	郭岩, 何毅, 张立峰, 邱丽莎, 张国强, 张志华. 2000—2017年中亚地区植被变化遥感监测[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(8): 123-131.
[12]	季贞希, 崔玉涛, 陈昊东, 陈缘, 代军, 张彪, 周俊, 李美, 陈有君, 王弢, 胡小康. 氮肥施用量对甜玉米糖分含量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(6): 30-36.
[13]	魏玉涛, 刘明欢, 刘可, 普薇如. 多尺度土壤水监测研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 140-145.
[14]	王玮玮, 许彦红, 杨俊灵, 罗儒剑, 普猛. 纳板河流域国家级自然保护区主要森林植被类型健康评价研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 32-39.
[15]	纪树志. 极旱荒漠区湿地植被动态变化监测——以甘肃敦煌阳关国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 105-109.