盐碱胁迫下植物响应机制的研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0775

中国农学通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (33): 78-85.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0775

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤 • 上一篇下一篇

盐碱胁迫下植物响应机制的研究进展

肖雯丽¹^,²(), 王含瑞¹^,², 王梦亮¹, 王俊红¹()

¹ 山西大学应用化学研究所，太原 030006
² 山西大学中医药现代研究中心，太原 030006

收稿日期:2023-11-09 修回日期:2024-01-15 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-11-23
通讯作者:
王俊红，男，1977年出生，山西忻州人，副教授，研究生，主要从事植物营养和土壤微生物研究。通信地址：030006 山西省太原市小店区坞城路92号山西大学应用化学研究所，Tel：0351-7018390，E-mail：wangjunh@sxu.edu.cn。
作者简介:
肖雯丽，女，1999年出生，四川成都人，硕士，研究方向：植物胁迫生理学。通信地址：030006 山西省太原市小店区坞城路92号山西大学应用化学研究所，Tel：0351-7018390，E-mail：1825899361@qq.com。
基金资助:
山西省科技重大专项计划“有机旱作技术体系构建与示范应用”(202101140601026-8); 国家重点研发计划“有机旱作农业新产品新装备研发与应用”(2021YFD1901105-2); 大田粮食作物生物配肥山西省高校协同创新中心(晋教科[2016]5号)

Mechanisms of Plant Response to Saline-alkali Stress: A Review

XIAO Wenli¹^,²(), WANG Hanrui¹^,², WANG Mengliang¹, WANG Junhong¹()

¹ Institute of Applied Chemistry, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006
² Modern Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006

Received:2023-11-09 Revised:2024-01-15 Published:2024-11-25 Online:2024-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

盐碱胁迫会引起植物出现水分亏缺、细胞膜透性发生变化、代谢紊乱以及蛋白合成受阻等现象，导致作物减产或死亡，是植物生长发育过程中面临的非生物胁迫之一，寻找降低盐碱胁迫危害的有效方法和提高植物耐盐碱能力的策略，对盐碱地综合利用具有重要意义。本文归纳了近年来盐碱胁迫下植物遭受的危害和植物适应性机制最新研究，总结了植物响应盐碱的生理及分子机制，分析了盐碱胁迫下植物以积累渗透调节物质、增加抗氧化酶活性、离子区隔等为主要调控方式的生理机制和以信号传导、转录因子调控、耐盐碱相关基因表达等为主的分子机制，指出了植物适应盐碱环境方面的发展趋势和亟待解决的问题，以期为耐盐碱植物种质的筛选与培育提供一定的理论依据。

关键词: 盐碱胁迫, 生理响应, 信号转导途径, 分子机制, 渗透调节物质, 抗氧化酶活性

Abstract:

Saline-alkali stress is one of the abiotic stresses in the process of plant growth and development, which can cause water deficit, changes in cell membrane permeability, metabolic disorders and blockage of protein synthesis in plants, resulting in crop yield reduction or death. Finding effective methods to reduce the harm of saline-alkali stress and strategies to improve the saline tolerance of plants are of great significance to the comprehensive utilization of saline land. In this paper, the latest researches on the damage and adaptive mechanism of plants under saline-alkali stress in recent years were summarized, and the physiological and molecular mechanisms of plants responding to saline-alkali stress were summed up. Furthermore, the physiological mechanisms of plants under saline-alkali stress were analyzed, which were mainly regulated by accumulating osmotic substances, increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and ionic compartmentalization, etc., and the molecular mechanisms were mainly regulated by signal transduction, transcription factor regulation and the expression of plant salt-tolerance-related gene, etc. This study pointed out the trends and urgent problems in the development of plant adaptation to saline-alkali environments, with a view to providing a certain theoretical basis for the selection and cultivation of saline and alkali tolerant plants.

Key words: saline-alkali stress, physiological response, pathways of signal transduction, molecular mechanism, osmotic substances, activity of antioxidant enzymes

肖雯丽, 王含瑞, 王梦亮, 王俊红. 盐碱胁迫下植物响应机制的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(33): 78-85.

XIAO Wenli, WANG Hanrui, WANG Mengliang, WANG Junhong. Mechanisms of Plant Response to Saline-alkali Stress: A Review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(33): 78-85.

图/表 3

参考文献 102

[1]	朱建峰, 崔振荣, 吴春红, 等. 我国盐碱地绿化研究进展与展望[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(4):70-75.
[2]	SUDHIR P, MURTHY S D S. Effects of salt stress on basic processes of photosynthesis[J]. Photosynthetica, 2004, 42(4):481-486.
[3]	刘弈媺, 于洋, 方军. 盐碱胁迫及植物耐盐碱分子机制研究[J]. 土壤与作物, 2018, 7(2):201-211.
[4]	张金林, 李惠茹, 郭姝媛, 等. 高等植物适应盐逆境研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12):220-236. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015233
[5]	齐琪, 马书荣, 徐维东. 盐胁迫对植物生长的影响及耐盐生理机制研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(8):2741-2746.
[6]	洪鑫. 盐碱胁迫对甜菜生长及光合特性的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2014.
[7]	JUNGKLANG J, USUI K, MATSUMOTO H. Differences in physiological responses to NaCl between salt-tolerant Sesbania rostrata Brem. & Oberm. and non-tolerant Phaseolus vulgaris L.[J]. Weed biology management, 2003, 3(1):21-27.
[8]	刘铎, 白爽, 李平, 等. 硅调控植物耐盐碱机制研究进展[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(12):1507-1513.
[9]	廖婕, 任慧敏, 柳参奎, 等. 盐碱胁迫下植物生理和钙信号通路分子机制的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(6):2041-2047.
[10]	杨莎, 侯林琳, 郭峰, 等. 盐胁迫下外源Ca²⁺对花生生长发育、生理及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3):894-900. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201703.016
[11]	孟繁昊, 王聪, 徐寿军. 盐胁迫对植物的影响及植物耐盐机理研究进展[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(3):315-318,373.
[12]	李素芝. 过氧化氢与谷胱甘肽在亚精胺调节番茄盐碱耐性中的作用[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2020.
[13]	BHATTARAI S, BISWAS D, FU Y B, et al. Morphological, physiological, and genetic responses to salt stress in alfalfa: a review[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(4):577.
[14]	杜秀敏, 殷文璇, 赵彦修, 等. 植物中活性氧的产生及清除机制[J]. 生物工程学报, 2001(2):121-125.
[15]	ZHU J K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants[J]. Annual review of plant biology, 2002, 53(7):247-273.
[16]	高海波, 张富春. 藜科盐生植物的形态特征与耐盐分子机理研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2008(4):22-26.
[17]	吴欣欣, 白天惠, 张乐, 等. 泌盐盐生植物的泌盐机理研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(12):2526-2532.
[18]	ADAMS P, THOMAS J C, VERNON D M, et al. Distinct cellular and organismic responses to salt stress[J]. Plant and cell physiology, 1992, 33(12):1215-1223.
[19]	罗子敬, 孙宇涵, 卢楠, 等. 杨树耐盐机制及转基因研究进展[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(3):482-492. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.03.0482
[20]	ZHU J K. Cell signaling under salt, water and cold stresses[J]. Current opinion in plant biology, 2001, 4(5):401-406. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00192-8 pmid: 11597497
[21]	ZULFIQAR F, AKRAM N A, ASHRAF M. Osmoprotection in plants under abiotic stresses: new insights into a classical phenomenon[J]. Planta, 2019, 251(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03293-1 pmid: 31776765
[22]	刘薇, 孙桢, 姚苏焱, 等. 红芽香椿脂质过氧化及渗透调节特征对不同中性盐胁迫及恢复期的响应[J]. 农业科学研究, 2022, 43(2):13-17.
[23]	朱永兴, 郭生虎, 关雅静. 盐胁迫下玉米自交系几个生理指标的变化[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(23):48-50.
[24]	赵艳艳. 棉花盐胁迫响应基因GhMYB73和GhSCL4的功能验证[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2020.
[25]	崔秀敏, 王秀峰, 许衡. 甜椒对不同程度水分胁迫-复水的生理生化响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005(5):225-229.
[26]	ASHRAF M, HARRIS P J C. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants[J]. Plant science, 2004, 166(1):3-16.
[27]	YANG Y Q, GUO Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses[J]. New phytologist foundation, 2018, 217(2):523-539.
[28]	曹海顺. 黄瓜和南瓜嫁接组合响应盐胁迫的转录组分析及CmoNAC1基因功能研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2020.
[29]	吕丙盛. 水稻(Oryza sativa L.)应对盐碱胁迫的生理及分子机制研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所), 2014.
[30]	汪军成. 盐生草盐分区隔化耐盐机制研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2017.
[31]	MAATHUIS F J M. Physiological functions of mineral macronutrients[J]. Current opinion in plant biology, 2009, 12(3):250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.003 pmid: 19473870
[32]	MAATHUIS F J M, AHMAD I, PATISHTAN J. Regulation of Na⁺ fluxes in plants[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2014, 5(9):467.
[33]	滕祥勇, 李鹏志, 林秀云, 等. 碱性盐胁迫对水稻苗期矿质离子吸收与分配的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2022, 47(1):11-16.
[34]	黎远东, 江海霞, 谢丽琼. 植物盐胁迫适应性机制研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(6):1585-1593. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20220518003
[35]	QUINTERO F J, MARTINEZ-ATIENZA J, VILLALTA I, et al. Activation of the plasma membrane Na/H antiporter salt-overly-sensitive 1 (SOS1) by phosphorylation of an auto-inhibitory C-terminal domain[J]. PNAS, 2011, 108(6):2611-2616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018921108 pmid: 21262798
[36]	CHEONG Y H, SUNG S J, KIM B G, et al. Constitutive overexpression of the calcium sensor CBL5 confers osmotic or drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. Molecules and cells, 2010, 29(2):159-165.
[37]	LI J, XIE B, LIU Y, et al. Changes to intracellular Ca²⁺ and its sensors triggered by NaCl stress in pears[J]. Russian journal of plant physiology, 2020, 67(6):1144-1151.
[38]	RAO X L, ZHANG X H, LI R J, et al. A calcium sensor-interacting protein kinase negatively regulates salt stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Functional plant biology, 2011, 38(6):441-450.
[39]	张涛. 干旱和盐胁迫对花楸幼苗生理生化特性的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
[40]	ZHAO C Z, ZHANG H, SONG C P, et al. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity[J]. Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2020, 1(1):100017.
[41]	王晚霞, 高立杨, 张瑞, 等. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐碱胁迫下垂丝海棠光合及生理特性的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(9):1479-1490.
[42]	刘萍, 王彦, 程丽君, 等. 盐碱胁迫对合欢种子萌发及酶活性影响[J]. 滨州学院学报, 2018, 34(2):51-55.
[43]	盖玉红, 董宝池, 魏健. 盐生和非盐生植物对混合盐碱胁迫的生理生化指标的响应[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2013, 35(2):132-136,153.
[44]	El MOUKHTARI A, CABASSA-HOURTON C, FARISSI M, et al. How does proline treatment promote salt stress tolerance during crop plant development?[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2020, 11(7):1127.
[45]	刘建新, 刘瑞瑞, 刘秀丽, 等. 不同时期喷施NaHS对盐碱胁迫下裸燕麦叶片渗透调节物质和抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(11):3620-3632.
[46]	张融雪, 孙玥, 苏京平, 等. 植物褪黑素研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2021, 11(3):297-303. doi: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2020.0148
[47]	赵野, 刘威, 王贺, 等. 外源CaCl₂对盐胁迫下西伯利亚白刺活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(5):1105-1112.
[48]	海霞, 米俊珍, 赵宝平, 等. 外源亚精胺对盐胁迫下燕麦幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2021, 41(6):1003-1011.
[49]	DAS S K, PATRA J K, THATOI H. Antioxidative response to abiotic and biotic stresses in mangrove plants: a review[J]. International review of hydrobiology, 2016, 101(1-2):3-19.
[50]	毛恋, 芦建国, 江海燕. 植物响应盐碱胁迫的机制[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(10):3441-3448.
[51]	杜秉昊. 紫花苜蓿MsbZIP11基因抗盐碱的功能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2021.
[52]	CHANDLER P M, ROBERTSON M. Gene expression regulated by abscisic acid and its relation to stress tolerance[J]. Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology, 1994, 45:113-114.
[53]	SHINOZAKI K, YAMAGUCHI-SHINOZAKI K. Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response[J]. Plant physiology, 1997, 115(2):327-334. doi: 10.1104/pp.115.2.327 pmid: 12223810
[54]	KIM T E, KIM S K, HAN T J, et al. ABA and polyamines act independently in primary leaves of cold-stressed tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)[J]. Physiologia plantarum, 2002, 115(3):370-376.
[55]	LIU J, JIANG M Y, ZHOU Y F, et al. Production of polyamines is enhanced by endogenous abscisic acid in maize seedlings subjected to salt stress[J]. Journal of integrative plant biology, 2005, 47(11):1326-1334. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00183.x
[56]	KRZYWINSKA E, KULIK A, BUCHOLC M, et al. Protein phosphatase type 2C PP2CA together with ABI1 inhibits SnRK2.4 activity and regulates plant responses to salinity[J]. Plant signaling & behavior, 2016, 11(12):e1253647.
[57]	KRZYWINSKA E, BUCHOLC M, KULIK A, et al. Phosphatase ABI1 and okadaic acid-sensitive phosphoprotein phosphatases inhibit salt stress-activated SnRK2.4 kinase[J]. BMC plant biology, 2016, 16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0817-1 pmid: 27297076
[58]	HU W, YAN Y, SHI H, et al. The core regulatory network of the abscisic acid pathway in banana: genome-wide identification and expression analyses during development, ripening, and abiotic stress[J]. BMC plant biology, 2017, 17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1093-4 pmid: 28851274
[59]	LIN Z, LI Y, WANG Y B, et al. Initiation and amplification of SnRK2 activation in abscisic acid signaling[J]. Nature communications, 2021, 12(1):2456. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22812-x pmid: 33911084
[60]	ZHANG J H, JIA W S, YANG J C, et al. Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses[J]. Field crops research, 2006, 97(1):111-119.
[61]	裴丽丽, 郭玉华, 徐兆师, 等. 植物逆境胁迫相关蛋白激酶的研究进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(5):1052-1061.
[62]	XU P, ZHANG X, SU H, et al. Genome-wide analysis of PYL-PP2C-SnRK2s family in Camellia sinensis[J]. Bioengineered, 2020, 11(1):103-115.
[63]	刘妍君. 水稻钙依赖性蛋白激酶OsCPK9互作蛋白的筛选和鉴定水稻钙依赖性蛋白激酶OsCPK9互作蛋白的筛选和鉴定[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020.
[64]	赵书平, 谈宏斌, 鹿丹, 等. 植物蛋白激酶介导的非生物胁迫和激素信号转导途径的研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(2):358-366.
[65]	冀小敏. 葡萄VvMAPK9在盐胁迫响应中的功能研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020.
[66]	赵怀玉, 林鸿宣. 植物响应盐碱胁迫的分子机制[J]. 土壤与作物, 2020, 9(2):103-113.
[67]	陈丹丹, 陈明, 薛飞洋, 等. 盐响应信号途径SOS与植物K⁺吸收关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(24):4967-4977. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.24.002
[68]	蔡晓锋, 胡体旭, 叶杰, 等. 植物盐胁迫抗性的分子机制研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2015, 34(3):134-141.
[69]	魏志园, 王宇, 司增志, 等. 盐碱胁迫下野生大豆CBL-CIPK通路表达分析[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(8):1783-1793. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.08.1783
[70]	LIU Z Y, XIE Q J, TANG F F, et al. The ThSOS3 Gene Improves the salt tolerance of transgenic Tamarix hispida and Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, 11:597480.
[71]	KAMEI A, UMEZAWA T, SEKI M, et al. Analysis of gene expression profile in vegetative tissue of Arabidopsis salt overly sensitive mutants, sos2-1 and sos3-1[J]. Plant and cell physiology, 2003, 44:S46-S46.
[72]	张国嘉, 侯蕾, 王庆国, 等. 花生AhSOS2基因的克隆及功能初探[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(3):405-415.
[73]	李健, 王逸茹, 张凌霄, 等. 玉米ZmCIPK24-2基因在盐胁迫应答中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9):1351-1358. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.03008
[74]	MAHAJAN S, PANDEY G K, TUTEJA N. Calcium- and salt-stress signaling in plants: shedding light on SOS pathway[J]. Archives of biochemistry biophysics, 2008, 471(2):146-158.
[75]	马风勇, 石晓霞, 许兴, 等. 拟南芥SOS基因家族与植物耐盐性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(21):121-125.
[76]	SHI H, KIM Y, GUO Y, et al. The arabidopsis SOS5 locus encodes a putative cell surface adhesion protein and is required for normal cell expansion[J]. The plant cell, 2003, 15(1):19-32.
[77]	ZHU J, LEE B H, DELLINGER M, et al. A cellulose synthase-like protein is required for osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. The plant journal, 2010, 63(1):128-140.
[78]	丁忠杰. 拟南芥WRKY转录因子在非生物胁迫响应中的功能研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
[79]	刘晨, 徐浩博, 斯钰阳, 等. 基于转录组学的植物响应盐胁迫调控机制研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4):870-878. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.04.24
[80]	张欢, 靳娟, 樊丁宇, 等. 高温胁迫下酸枣WRKY转录因子的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(12):3878-3893.
[81]	杜超. WRKY转录因子家族在植物响应逆境胁迫中的功能及应用[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(7):1287-1300.
[82]	石文艳. 大豆WRKY转录因子GmWRKY12的功能解析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
[83]	王如月, 文武武, 赵恩华, 等. 紫花苜蓿MsWRKY11基因的克隆及其耐盐功能分析[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11):157-169. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020426
[84]	TANG Y, BAO X, ZHI Y, et al. Overexpression of a MYB family gene, OsMYB6, increases drought and salinity stress tolerance in transgenic rice[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2019, 10(2):168.
[85]	宗兴风, 刘栓栓, 刘豪, 等. 梭梭HaNAC2的表达分析和抗逆功能鉴定[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(8):1317-1325.
[86]	MIJITI M, WANG Y, WANG L, et al. Tamarix hispida NAC transcription factor ThNAC4 confers salt and drought stress tolerance to transgenic tamarix and Arabidopsis[J]. Plants (basel, switzerland), 2022, 11(19):2647.
[87]	WANG J Y, WANG J P, HE Y. A Populus euphratica NAC protein regulating Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Gene, 2013, 521(2):265-273.
[88]	张小红, 彭琼, 鄢铮. 盐胁迫下不同甘薯品种的转录组测序分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5):1432-1444. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24143
[89]	FUKUSHIMA E, ARATA Y, ENDO T, et al. Improved salt tolerance of transgenic tobacco expressing apoplastic yeast-derived invertase[J]. Plant ＆ cell physiology, 2001, 42(2):245-249.
[90]	ZHANG Q, LIU Y, JIANG Y, et al. OsASR6 enhances salt stress tolerance in rice[J]. International journal of molecular science, 2022, 23(16):9340.
[91]	ZHAO Y, HE Y Y, WANG X X, et al. Proline metabolism regulation in Spartina alterniflora and SaP5CS2 gene positively regulates salt stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Journal of plant interactions, 2022, 17(1):632-642.
[92]	DAI W, WANG M, GONG X, et al. The transcription factor FcWRKY40 of Fortunella crassifolia functions positively in salt tolerance through modulation of ion homeostasis and proline biosynthesis by directly regulating SOS2 and P5CS1 homologs[J]. New phytologist foundation, 2018, 219(3):972-989.
[93]	DOU M, FAN S, YANG S, et al. Overexpression of amrosea1 gene confers drought and salt tolerance in rice[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2016, 18(1):2.
[94]	GUAN R, QU Y, GUO Y, et al. Salinity tolerance in soybean is modulated by natural variation in GmSALT3[J]. The plant journal, 2014, 80(6):937-950. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12695 pmid: 25292417
[95]	QIN H, WANG Y, WANG J, et al. Knocking down the expression of GMPase Gene OsVTC1-1 decreases salt tolerance of rice at seedling and reproductive stages[J]. Plos one, 2016, 11(12):e0168650.
[96]	ZHANG Y, FANG Q, ZHENG J, et al. GmLecRlk, a lectin receptor-like protein kinase, contributes to salt stress tolerance by regulating salt-responsive genes in soybean[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2022, 23(3):1030.
[97]	ZHAO Q, HE L, WANG B, et al. Overexpression of a multiprotein bridging factor 1 gene DgMBF1improves the salinity tolerance of chrysanthemum[J]. International journal of molecular science, 2019, 20(10):2453.
[98]	XING B, GU C, ZHANG T, et al. Functional study of BpPP2C1 revealed its role in salt stress in Betula platyphylla[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, 11:617635.
[99]	PENG X, DING X, CHANG T, et al. Overexpression of a vesicle trafficking gene, OsRab7, enhances salt tolerance in rice[J/OL]. The scientific world journal, 2014,http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/483526.
[100]	JIANG Z, SONG G, SHAN X, et al. Association analysis and identification of ZmHKT1;5 variation with salt-stress tolerance[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2018, 9:1485. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01485 pmid: 30369939
[101]	XU C, LUO M, SUN X, et al. SiMYB19 from foxtail millet (Setaria italica) confers transgenic rice tolerance to high salt stress in the field[J]. International journal of molecular science, 2022, 23(2):756.
[102]	CHE B, CHENG C, FANG J, et al. The recretohalophyte tamarix TrSOS1 gene confers enhanced salt tolerance to transgenic hairy root composite cotton seedlings exhibiting virus-induced gene silencing of GhSOS1[J]. International journal of molecular science, 2019, 20(12):2930.

基因	基因功能	基因来源	参考文献
SaP5CS2	提高脯氨酸含量，降低活性氧含量，正向调控植物耐盐能力	互花米草 (Spartina alterniflora)	[91]
FcWRKY40	调控SOS2和P5CS1同系物，维持离子稳态和脯氨酸生物合成，正向调控植物耐盐能力	金橘核 (Fortunella crassifolia)	[92]
AmROSEA1	调控参与应激信号转导、激素信号通路、离子稳态和去除过氧化物酶的基因，调节植物耐盐能力	金鱼草 (Antirrhinum majus)	[93]
GmSALT3	限制Na⁺过度积累，增强大豆耐盐能力	大豆(Glycine max)	[94]
OsVTC1-1	增加抗坏血酸的生物合成，清除过量ROS，提高水稻耐盐性	水稻(Oryza sativa)	[95]
GmLecRlk	增强ROS清除能力，提高大豆耐盐性	大豆(Glycine max)	[96]
DgMBF1	促进抗氧化物质和渗透物质合成，上调Na⁺/K⁺稳态相关基因的表达水平，提高植物耐盐能力	大花石斛 (Dendranthema grandiflorum)	[97]
BpPP2C1	调控脱落酸信号通路、类黄酮生物合成通路和氧化应激，响应盐碱胁迫	白桦树(Betula platyphylla)	[98]
OsRab7	促进渗透物质合成，增加根尖囊泡数量，增强植物耐盐性	水稻(Oryza sativa)	[99]
ZmHKT1;5	维持Na⁺/K⁺平衡和增加抗氧化活性，提高植物耐盐性	玉米(Zea mays)	[100]
SiMYB19	调控ABA合成和信号转导通路相关基因，增强植物耐盐能力	谷子(Setaria italica)	[101]
TrSOS1	维持Na⁺和K⁺稳态，增强植物耐盐性	柽柳(Tamarix chinensis)	[102]

基因	基因功能	基因来源	参考文献
SaP5CS2	提高脯氨酸含量，降低活性氧含量，正向调控植物耐盐能力	互花米草 (Spartina alterniflora)	[91]
FcWRKY40	调控SOS2和P5CS1同系物，维持离子稳态和脯氨酸生物合成，正向调控植物耐盐能力	金橘核 (Fortunella crassifolia)	[92]
AmROSEA1	调控参与应激信号转导、激素信号通路、离子稳态和去除过氧化物酶的基因，调节植物耐盐能力	金鱼草 (Antirrhinum majus)	[93]
GmSALT3	限制Na⁺过度积累，增强大豆耐盐能力	大豆(Glycine max)	[94]
OsVTC1-1	增加抗坏血酸的生物合成，清除过量ROS，提高水稻耐盐性	水稻(Oryza sativa)	[95]
GmLecRlk	增强ROS清除能力，提高大豆耐盐性	大豆(Glycine max)	[96]
DgMBF1	促进抗氧化物质和渗透物质合成，上调Na⁺/K⁺稳态相关基因的表达水平，提高植物耐盐能力	大花石斛 (Dendranthema grandiflorum)	[97]
BpPP2C1	调控脱落酸信号通路、类黄酮生物合成通路和氧化应激，响应盐碱胁迫	白桦树(Betula platyphylla)	[98]
OsRab7	促进渗透物质合成，增加根尖囊泡数量，增强植物耐盐性	水稻(Oryza sativa)	[99]
ZmHKT1;5	维持Na⁺/K⁺平衡和增加抗氧化活性，提高植物耐盐性	玉米(Zea mays)	[100]
SiMYB19	调控ABA合成和信号转导通路相关基因，增强植物耐盐能力	谷子(Setaria italica)	[101]
TrSOS1	维持Na⁺和K⁺稳态，增强植物耐盐性	柽柳(Tamarix chinensis)	[102]

盐碱胁迫下植物响应机制的研究进展

Mechanisms of Plant Response to Saline-alkali Stress: A Review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 102

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	江珊, 吴龙英, 赵宝生, 黄佳惠, 蒋宇喆, 焦元, 黄进. 植物耐受高温胁迫的分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(9): 132-138.
[2]	张红磊, 邓欣, 姜艳芳, 李思琴, 刘泽发, 党建成, 王亚楠. 锑对甜瓜种子萌发及幼苗生理特征的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(31): 23-29.
[3]	高婧, 秦梦凡, 李坤, 李武. 玉米双胚遗传机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(29): 1-7.
[4]	高敬文, 郭子燕, 王峰. 盐碱胁迫下作物氮素吸收利用的响应机理及调控措施研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(24): 44-50.
[5]	姬燕, 张文明, 刘继智, 韩旭妍, 李梅. 5种固氮菌对不同盐碱土玉米生长与抗逆酶活性的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(18): 14-21.
[6]	孟嘉楠, 段海燕. 稻米品质研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(16): 1-6.
[7]	袁伟玲, 陈卫芳, 刘志雄, 陈磊夫, 吴润. 硒对硼毒害下萝卜幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(16): 36-42.
[8]	李荣田, 李双语燕, 孟丽君, 刘长华, 詹俊辉. 水稻锌稳态调控基因和分子机制的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(32): 22-32.
[9]	彭洁, 刘引, 武荣花, 冯慧, 镡媛, 杨一鹏, 张华. 重瓣花及其分子机制的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(19): 65-72.
[10]	张晓艳, 边境, 赵越, 王晓楠, 孙宇峰. 苏打盐碱胁迫对汉麻生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(13): 1-7.
[11]	卢倩倩, 冯琳骄, 王爽, 古力扎提·包尔汗, 褚韧, 周龙. 复合盐碱胁迫对鲜食葡萄生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 62-70.
[12]	武迪, 张锋, 隋春莹, 师君慧, 万雪洁, 刘义国, 韩伟, 师长海. 外源活性物质对小麦苗期抗逆性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 14-19.
[13]	梁培鑫, 唐榕, 郭晨荔, 郭睿, 何皇成, 王腾飞, 刘建国. 油莎豆对自然盐碱胁迫的生长及生理响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 1-8.
[14]	银珊珊, 周国彦, 顾博文, 武春成, 闫立英, 谢洋. 褪黑素引发对干旱胁迫下黄瓜幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(19): 30-36.
[15]	任金兰. 盐碱胁迫下外源H₂O₂对毛白杨生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(7): 43-48.