栽培与施肥措施耦合对石漠化地区酸化土壤玉米产能提升的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0784

中国农学通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (15): 78-87.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0784

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤 • 上一篇下一篇

栽培与施肥措施耦合对石漠化地区酸化土壤玉米产能提升的影响

徐晓健¹(), 何道文², 范博³, 赵宝义³, 黄鼐², 雷宝坤³(), 毛妍婷³()

¹ 昆明学院，昆明 650214
² 西畴县农业农村和科学技术局，云南文山 663599
³ 云南省农业科学院农业环境资源研究所，昆明 650205

收稿日期:2024-12-16 修回日期:2025-03-26 出版日期:2025-06-12 发布日期:2025-05-29
通讯作者:
毛妍婷，女，1982年出生，云南昆明人，研究员，博士，主要从事植物营养和农业环境保护研究。通信地址：650205 云南省昆明市盘龙区北京路延长线2238号，Tel：0871-65894459，E-mail：ytmaokm@163.com。
雷宝坤，男，1976年出生，云南曲靖人，研究员，博士，主要从事植物营养和农业环境保护研究。通信地址：650205 云南省昆明市盘龙区北京路延长线2238号，Tel：0871-65894459，E-mail：bklei@163.com。
作者简介:
徐晓健，男，1995年出生，河北沧州人，在读硕士研究生，主要从事农业环境保护研究。通信地址：650214 云南省昆明市经济技术开发区浦新路2号，Tel：0871-65098689，E-mail：1557431160@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划“滇南中低产田酸化阻控与产能提升技术示范及推广应用”(2022YFD1901504-06); 科技人才与平台计划 “中青年学术和技术带头人后备人才项目”(202405AC350095); 高层次科技人才及创新团队选拔专项“云南省农田面源污染防控创新团队”(202405AS350023); 云南省农业基础研究联合专项“长期施用有机肥对蔬菜不同耕层磷的转化及超累积机制”(202301BD070001-046)

Effect of Cultivation and Fertilization Coupling on Maize Productivity Improvement of Acidified Soil in Rocky Desertification Areas

XU Xiaojian¹(), HE Daowen², FAN Bo³, ZHAO Baoyi³, HUANG Nai², LEI Baokun³(), MAO Yanting³()

¹ Kunming University, Kunming 650214
² Xichou County Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Science and Technology, Wenshan, Yunnan 663599
³ Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205

Received:2024-12-16 Revised:2025-03-26 Published:2025-06-12 Online:2025-05-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究不同栽培与施肥措施耦合对石漠化地区酸化土壤产能的影响，为石漠化地区酸化土壤改良，作物增产提供依据。于2023年在云南省文山壮族苗族自治州西畴县木者村开展土壤酸化改良试验，供试作物玉米品种为‘大天2416’、大豆品种为‘奎鲜5号’，设置不施肥(NK)、施化肥(CK)、玉米与大豆间作栽培(INT)、栽培与施肥措施耦合技术集成(TI)共4种处理，研究栽培与施肥措施耦合对土壤改良、玉米产量、玉米氮素、干物质积累与分配以及环境因子对玉米产量的影响。结果表明：TI、INT、NK和CK处理在收获期的土壤pH分别为pH 6.12、6.03、6.02、5.97；TI、INT、CK和NK的玉米籽粒产量分别为10321.44、9760.92、8116.14、5732.18 kg/hm²，TI和INT显著(P<0.05)提高玉米单位面积产量，NK显著(P<0.05)降低玉米产量；INT、TI和CK的籽粒氮素占地上部氮素比例分别为50.25%、50.91%和57.39%；INT、TI和CK的籽粒干物质占地上部干物质比例分别为49.19%、51.40%与54.13%；INT、TI和CK的氮素分配比例与干物质分配比例趋势相同。作物不同阶段影响作物产量因素不同，玉米苗期影响产量的因子为硝态氮含量、土壤pH、铵态氮含量，其解释度分别为76.4%、7.8%和6.6%，玉米营养生长旺盛阶段影响产量的因子为有效磷含量、速效钾含量，其解释度分别为76.9%和12.4%，玉米生殖生长阶段影响产量因子速效钾含量解释度为59.6%。研究发现在石漠化地区：（1）玉米大豆间作可以提高单位面积玉米产量，栽培与施肥措施耦合通过提高干物质向籽粒分配比例进一步提升产量并且明显提升土壤pH；（2）间作会使玉米植株地上部营养器官氮转移比例降低，对籽粒氮积累的贡献率减弱，与间作相比，栽培与施肥措施耦合可以提高玉米植株地上部营养器官氮转移比例及对籽粒氮积累的贡献率；（3）作物不同时期对肥料需求不同，玉米苗期对土壤pH、铵态氮及硝态氮含量敏感，玉米营养生长旺盛阶段对土壤有效磷、速效钾含量敏感，玉米生殖生长阶段对土壤速效钾含量敏感。

关键词: 土壤酸化, 石漠化, 栽培措施, 施肥措施, 玉米, 氮素利用率, 玉米大豆间作

Abstract:

The study aimed to explore the impact of the coupling of different cultivation and fertilization measures on the corn productivity of acidified soil in rocky desertification areas, providing a basis for the improvement of acidified soil and crop yield increase in rocky desertification areas. In 2023, a soil acidification improvement experiment was carried out in Muzhe Village, Xichou County, Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province. The experiment included the following treatments: (1) fertilization measures: no fertilization (NK), chemical fertilizer (CK); (2) cultivation measures: intercropping of maize and soybean (INT); (3) coupling of cultivation and fertilization measures: technology integration (TI). There were 3 categories with 4 treatment measures in total to study the impact of the coupling of cultivation and fertilization measures on soil improvement, maize yield, maize nitrogen, dry matter accumulation and distribution, as well as the impact of environmental factors on maize yield. The results showed that at the harvest stage, the soil pH of TI, INT, NK and CK treatments were pH 6.12, 6.03, 6.02 and 5.97, respectively. The maize grain yields of TI, INT, CK and NK treatments were 10321.44, 9760.92, 8116.14 and 5732.18 kg/hm², respectively. The TI and INT significantly (P<0.05) increased the maize yield per unit area, while no fertilization significantly (P<0.05) decreased the maize yield. The proportion of grain nitrogen in above-ground nitrogen for INT, TI, and CK treatments was 50.25%, 50.91% and 57.39%, respectively. The proportion of grain dry matter in above-ground dry matter for INT, TI, and CK treatments was 49.19%, 51.40% and 54.13%, respectively. The trends of nitrogen distribution ratio and dry matter distribution ratio were the same for INT, TI, and CK treatments. The factors affecting crop yield were different at different growth stages of the crop. At the maize seedling stage, the factors affecting yield were nitrate nitrogen content, soil pH and ammonium nitrogen content, with explanatory degrees of 76.4%, 7.8% and 6.6%, respectively. At the vigorous vegetative growth stage of maize, the factors affecting yield were available phosphorus content and available potassium content, with explanatory degrees of 76.9% and 12.4%, respectively. At the reproductive growth stage of maize, the available potassium content, as a factor affecting yield, had an explanatory degree of 59.6%. The following conclusions could be drawn: (1) maize-soybean intercropping could increase the maize yield per unit area. The coupling of cultivation and fertilization measures could further increase the yield by increasing the proportion of dry matter distributed to grains, and could significantly increase the soil pH. (2) Intercropping would reduce the nitrogen transfer ratio of the above-ground vegetative organs of maize plants and weaken the contribution rate to grain nitrogen accumulation. Compared with intercropping, the coupling of cultivation and fertilization measures could increase the nitrogen transfer ratio of the above-ground vegetative organs of maize plants and the contribution rate to grain nitrogen accumulation. (3) Crops had different fertilizer requirements at different growth stages. Maize was sensitive to soil pH, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen content at the seedling stage; it was sensitive to soil available phosphorus and available potassium content at the vigorous vegetative growth stage, and it was sensitive to soil available potassium content at the reproductive growth stage.

Key words: soil acidification, rocky desertification, cultivation measures, fertilization measures, maize, nitrogen utilization efficiency, intercropping of maize and soybean

徐晓健, 何道文, 范博, 赵宝义, 黄鼐, 雷宝坤, 毛妍婷. 栽培与施肥措施耦合对石漠化地区酸化土壤玉米产能提升的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(15): 78-87.

XU Xiaojian, HE Daowen, FAN Bo, ZHAO Baoyi, HUANG Nai, LEI Baokun, MAO Yanting. Effect of Cultivation and Fertilization Coupling on Maize Productivity Improvement of Acidified Soil in Rocky Desertification Areas[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(15): 78-87.

图/表 9

处理	有机肥			生物炭			化肥施用量			N总量	P₂O₅总量	K₂O总量
处理	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	N总量	P₂O₅总量	K₂O总量
NK	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
CK	0	0	0	0	0	0	285.0	90.0	90.0	285.0	90.0	90.0
INT	0	0	0	0	0	0	285.0	90.0	90.0	285.0	90.0	90.0
TI	74.0	31.1	45.0	0.7	0.7	2.9	210.3	58.2	42.1	285.0	90.0	90.0

表1. 各处理养分含量施用情况 kg/hm2

处理	籽粒产量	玉米轴产量	秸秆产量	地上生物量
NK	5732.18 ±14.44 c	2006.67 ±36.56 d	3830.27 ±471.06 c	11569.12 ±426.55 c
CK	8116.14 ±265.54 b	2719.34 ±101.35 c	4157.17 ±266.54 c	14992.65 ±547.04 b
INT	9760.92 ±532.02 a	3359.40 ±69.8 b	6721.40 ±152.87 a	19841.71 ±730.6 a
TI	10321.44 ±710.79 a	3573.39 ±29.63 a	6185.90 ±82.89 b	20080.73 ±760.03 a

表2. 玉米地上生物量 kg/hm2

图1. 玉米田耕作层土壤pH变化

图2. 耕作层土壤养分含量变化

图3. 不同处理产量指标与环境因子的RDA分析（6月份）土壤硝态氮含量对玉米产量解释度：76.4%，P=0.002；土壤酸碱度(pH)对玉米产量解释度：7.8%，P =0.026；土壤铵态氮含量对玉米产量解释度：6.6%，P =0.008。标号1、2、3分别代表的处理的3次重复

图4. 不同处理产量指标与环境因子的RDA分析（7月份）土壤有效磷含量对玉米产量解释度：76.9%，P=0.002；土壤速效钾含量对玉米产量解释度：12.4%，P=0.002。标号1、2、3分别代表的处理的3次重复

图5. 不同处理产量指标与环境因子的RDA分析（9月份）土壤速效钾含量对玉米产量解释度：59.6%，P=0.002。标号1、2、3分别代表的处理的3次重复

图6. 玉米氮素分配情况 A：氮素积累图；B：玉米成熟期各部分氮积累百分比；C：玉米各部分氮浓度

处理	氮肥偏生产力/(kg/kg)	氮素收获指数/%	氮肥表观回收率/%	氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg)
NK	—	53.60 ±2.08 b	—	—
CK	28.48 ±0.93 b	57.39 ±2.71 a	21.46 ±1.81 b	8.36 ±0.88 b
INT	34.25 ±1.87 a	50.25 ±1.91 b	50.10 ±2.46 a	14.14 ±1.82 a
TI	36.22 ±2.49 a	50.91 ±0.76 b	51.71 ±3.7 a	16.10 ±2.47 a

表3. 不同处理对玉米氮素吸收利用的影响

参考文献 34

[1]	裴琳婧, 张思颖, 朱叶琳, 等. 干旱胁迫下丛枝菌根真菌对玉米生长和抗旱性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2024(8):1731-1742.
[2]	万思琦, 袁媛, 伏成秀, 等. 云南玉米产业发展现状与影响因素分析[J]. 中国种业, 2024(9):19-24.
[3]	刘禹池, 岳丽杰, 卢庭启, 等. 不同调酸措施对西南山地酸化土壤改良及玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(1):191-198.
[4]	肖特, 崔阔澍, 黄文娟, 等. 玉米/大豆带状套作种间根系互作效应与水分利用效率[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022(12):2758-2771.
[5]	FANG G, MARTIN K V I, WOPKE V D W. Simulating potential growth in a relay-strip intercropping system: model description, calibration and testing[J]. Field crops research, 2017,200:122-142.
[6]	JACQUES F P, KRISTA L J, LUIS L M, et al. A review of the impact of maize-legume intercrops on the diversity and abundance of entomophagous and phytophagous insects[J]. Peerj, 2023,11:e15640.
[7]	JAMAL N, MUNIR A, HARUN G, et al. Maize/soybean intercropping increases nutrient uptake, crop yield and modifies soil physio-chemical characteristics and enzymatic activities in the subtropical humid region based in Southwest China[J]. Bmc plant biology, 2024, 24(1). Doi:10.1186/s12870-024-05061-0.
[8]	RAZIEL A O, MICHAEL J C, JERRY L H, et al. Maize and soybean root front velocity and maximum depth in Iowa, USA[J]. Field crops research, 2018,215:122-131.
[9]	DAI J, QIU W, WANG N Q, et al. From leguminosae/gramineae intercropping systems to see benefits of intercropping on iron nutrition[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2019,10:605-611.
[10]	LI X F, WANG Z G, BAO X G, et al. Long-term increased grain yield and soil fertility from intercropping[J]. Springer science and business media Llc, 2021, 4(11):943-950.
[11]	CELINE L, MATTHIEU N B, OLIVIER C, et al. Increased soil pH and dissolved organic matter after a decade of organic fertilizer application mitigates copper and zinc availability despite contamination[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020,709:135927.
[12]	LIU W B, TANG Y X, MA J W, et al. Effects of biochar and inorganic amendments on soil fertility, tea yield, and quality in both Pb-Cd-contaminated and acidified tea plantations[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2023, 23(9):3275-3284.
[13]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2000:150.
[14]	普布仓决, 王金平, 姚丽茹, 等. 减氮下不同肥料配施对麦玉复种体系作物氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(5):820-833.
[15]	ZHANG Y, DUAN Y, NIE J Y, et al. A lack of complementarity for water acquisition limits yield advantage of oats/vetch intercropping in a semi-arid condition[J]. Agricultural water management, 2019,225:105778.
[16]	BANIK P, SHARMA R C. Yield and resource utilization efficiency in baby corn-legume-intercropping system in the eastern plateau of India[J]. Journal of sustainable agriculture, 2009, 33(4):379-395.
[17]	常换换, 苏友波, 范茂攀, 等. 红壤坡耕地玉米大豆间作的根际微生态效应[J]. 山西农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2022(2):21-28.
[18]	王秀领, 闫旭东, 徐玉鹏, 等. 玉米-大豆间作复合体系光合特性研究[J]. 河北农业科学, 2012, 16(4):33-35,59.
[19]	张洪芳. 不同氮肥类型对玉米养分吸收、分配和土壤性质的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2024.
[20]	丛艳霞, 赵明, 董志强, 等. 乙霉合剂对春玉米干物质积累和茎秆形态的调控[J]. 作物杂志, 2008(4):68-71.
[21]	覃潇敏, 潘浩男, 肖靖秀, 等. 玉米/大豆间作体系中供磷水平对玉米磷吸收及根系生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(2):116-122.
[22]	LI L, DAVID T, HANS L, et al. Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture[J]. New phytologist, 2014, 203(1):63-69. pmid: 25013876
[23]	RAY K, BANERJEE H, DUTTA S, et al. Macronutrient management effects on nutrient accumulation, partitioning, remobilization, and yield of hybrid maize cultivars[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2020,11. Doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.01307.
[24]	王士红, 杨中旭, 史加亮, 等. 增密减氮对棉花干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3):395-407. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94074
[25]	NIELSEN H H, JENSEN E S. Facilitative root interactions in intercrops[J]. Plant and soil, 2005, 274(1-2):237-250.
[26]	许波, 许海涛, 冯晓曦, 等. 玉米与大豆间作对干物质累积分配、产量相对竞争及土地当量比的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2024, 70(5):27-36.
[27]	张晓娜, 陈平, 庞婷, 等. 玉米/豆科间作种植模式对作物干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2017, 35(4):484-490.
[28]	陈磊, 宋书会, 云鹏, 等. 连续三年减施氮肥对潮土玉米生长及根际土壤氮素供应的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(9):1482-1494.
[29]	王旭敏, 雒文鹤, 刘朋召, 等. 节水减氮对夏玉米干物质和氮素积累转运及产量的调控效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(15):3183-3197. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.15.004
[30]	WANG J J, HUSSAIN S, SUN X, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate under straw incorporation on photosynthesis, productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022,13:23-33.
[31]	姜佰文, 董雯昕, 王春宏, 等. 减氮配施液体牛粪对寒地玉米花后期干物质积累和养分吸收转运规律的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2021, 52(9):29-38.
[32]	李章海, 朱凯, 彭宇, 等. 不同原料堆制有机肥腐殖酸的化学组成与结构特征[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016(3):40-44.
[33]	WANG S B, HU K L, FENG P Y, et al. Determining the effects of organic manure substitution on soil pH in Chinese vegetable fields: a meta-analysis[J]. Springer science and business media Llc, 2023, 23(1):118-130.
[34]	李思佳. 改性生物炭对Cd、Pb污染土壤的修复效果及机理研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2024.

栽培与施肥措施耦合对石漠化地区酸化土壤玉米产能提升的影响

Effect of Cultivation and Fertilization Coupling on Maize Productivity Improvement of Acidified Soil in Rocky Desertification Areas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	张宇羽, 王香宁, 曾雪娇, 官洁, 张毅, 李冰, 蔡艳. 控释氮肥与尿素配施对川东套作春玉米氮素吸收与利用的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(8): 25-30.
[2]	薛远赛, 王锡久, 邹士国, 张守福, 刘光亚, 韩伟, 孙显. 复合寡糖对山东典型作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(8): 50-56.
[3]	李梦寒, 胡文平, 董鑫, 普布桑珠, 宗巴吉. 种植密度和收获时期对林芝市粮饲通用型玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(7): 9-14.
[4]	李相花, 范彩英, 徐芹, 侯剑, 王慧, 刘艳艳, 王恒, 刘光亚, 韩伟. 不同玉米大豆种植模式对作物产量、经济效益与土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(6): 22-28.
[5]	李文宗, 许一凡, 陈建华, 胡超, 王贞, 黄雅敏. 富铁锌高叶酸玉米的创制及加工贮藏方法的探究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(5): 135-142.
[6]	孙广涛, 包桂荣, 邰继承, 萨如拉, 刘乃嘉, 于淼, 李安宁. 玉米花生间作对作物及土壤特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(5): 7-12.
[7]	陈朝辉, 魏廷邦. 水肥耦合对玉米光合作用、干物质积累量和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(4): 1-9.
[8]	游宇, 林显凤, 江云, 张良, 张云梅, 唐冬梅, 余洪洁, 熊忠伟. 四川盐源玉米种植肥料利用率与经济效益分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(2): 17-22.
[9]	刘春晓, 汪黎明, 董瑞, 刘铁山. 种植密度对籽粒机收玉米‘鲁单608’生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(2): 23-27.
[10]	陈海龙, 陈朝辉, 魏廷邦. 氮肥减量与有机肥配施对玉米干物质积累及产量的调控机理[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(2): 7-16.
[11]	王越, 费雯丽, 程军, 沈历都, 邹岫明, 阿迪力·阿里木. 沈阳市玉米不同生育阶段气象要素变化趋势及气象产量预测模型[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(15): 95-101.
[12]	刘大欣, 金岩, 张国福, 李志勇, 苗旺, 刘震, 高兴祥, 李玉凤. 大豆玉米带状复合种植病虫草害防治技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(15): 131-137.
[13]	何昊晨, 卫欣茹, 杨武杰, 周长安, 王延玲, 王梅, 姚远, 杨久涛, 李明丽, 韩乾, 刘鑫. 大豆玉米带状复合种植不同田间配置对大豆农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(15): 15-22.
[14]	张玲, 杨玉辉, 周怡诺, 杨东旭. 内蒙古突泉县春玉米大斑病气象风险预报技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(12): 88-93.
[15]	刘萍, 毕海滨, 杨云峰, 卓玛, 赵晴晴, 文廷刚, 陈昱利. 植物生长调节剂对间作大豆生长发育及抗倒伏的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(11): 16-21.