Benefit Comparative Analysis of“Grass-cattle”Circular Agriculture Model

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110103

Abstract

Abstract: The authors took the circular agriculture research base in Jinjing Town of Changsha County in Hunan Province as an example, analyzed the comparative benefits of“only cattle”,“grass-cattle”and“grasscattle-fertilizer”model. The results showed that compared with“only cattle”model, the gross output value, net output value and profit of“grass-cattle-fertilizer”model increased by 18.3%, 76.7% and 88.4%, respectively. The results of cost and investment analysis showed that cost use ratio, utilization efficiency, investment use ratio and investment results of“grass-cattle-fertilizer”model were the best, then was“grass-cattle”model and“only cattle”model was the worst. Analysis of labor input showed that the labor cost of“grass-cattlefertilizer” and“grass-cattle”accounted for 26.8% and 25.9% of the total cost, which were 57.7% and 56.2% higher than that of“only cattle”model, and it indicated that the labor cost of“grass-cattle-fertilizer”and “grass-cattle”was relatively high, it was imperative to accelerate the application of mechanization technology. Compared with“only cattle”model, the total output value and net output value of“grass-cattle-fertilizer” model increased by 1.2 times and 4.3 times, after deducting labor cost, the net return of“grass- cattle-fertilizer”model increased by 8.60 times and 1.16 times compared with that of“only cattle”and“grasscattle” model. Therefore, the clarification of“grass- cattle- fertilizer”model could not only prevent the environmental pollution caused by the wastes in cattle farms effectively, but also have better economic benefits.

邹冬生,肖和艾,, and . Benefit Comparative Analysis of“Grass-cattle”Circular Agriculture Model[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(14): 147-152.

References

高旺盛, 陈源泉, 梁龙. 论发展循环农业的基本原理与技术体系[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2007, 28(6): 731–334.
尹昌斌, 唐华俊, 周颖. 循环农业内涵、发展途径与政策建议[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2006, 27(1): 6–10.
[3]唐华俊. 我国循环农业发展模式与战略对策[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2008, 10(1): 6–11.
[4]马世忠, 李述刚, 任葳. 草田轮作系统能量价值流的初步研究[J]. 新疆环境保护, 1994, 16(4): 78–82.
[5]蔡文春, 杨德刚, 杨永平. 干旱区绿洲农业生态经济系统结构与功能分析—以塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘的墨玉县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(7): 28–32.
[6]邹冬生, 余铁桥. 农业生态学[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1995.
[7]邓小华, 陈冬林, 陈晖. 不同栽培方式对鲜食糯玉米产量的影响及经济效益综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, (4): 145–147．
[8]王乐. 湖南省稻田典型种植模式的经济效益分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(2): 509–512．
[9]郭显光. 改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1998, (12): 98–102．
[10]蒋碧, 吴喜慧, 于小玲,等. 关中平原秸秆还田农业生产模式的价值流分析[J]. 生态经济: 学术版, 2012, (2): 19–23.
[11]刘梦, 冉清红, 王华静. 自贡市稻田种植模式的经济效益分析[J]. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 38(2): 292–299.
[12]Zandstra H G, Price E G, Litainger J A, et al. A Methodology for On-Farm Cropping System Research [M]. Philippines: The International Rice Research Institute Mamila, 1981．
[13]钟珍梅, 翁伯琦, 黄勤楼, 等. 基于能值理论的循环复合农业生态系统发展评价–以福建省福清星源循环农业产业示范基地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(18): 5755–5762.
_{[14]钟珍梅}_,_翁伯琦_,_黄勤楼_,_等_. _{以牧草为纽带的循环农业能值分析}_[J]._{福建农业学报}_,_2013,₂₈₍₉_):₉₂₅_–_930.
[15]Watcharatewinkul Y, Puttanlek C, Rungsardthong V, et al. Pasting properties of a heat-moisture treated canna starch in relation to its structural characteristics[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2009, 75(3): 505–511.
[16]Zuo JY, Kai K, Mawson R, et al. The pasting properties of onicated waxy rice starch suspensions[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2009, 16(4): 462–468.
[17]Blaszczak W, Bidzinska E, Dyrek K, et al. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on the formation of radicals in maize starches with diffenert amylose content[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2008, 74: 914–921.
[18]孙育峰, 张鹏飞, 陈博, 等. 基于畜禽粪便制有机肥工艺的种养结合生态农业系统能值分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(12): 253–255.
[19]周栋良. 两型农业生产体系实证研究–以湖南省为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2010, 29(4): 108–111.
[20]毛晓丹, 冯中朝. 湖北省农业循环经济发展水平评价及障碍因素诊断[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2013, 34(5): 597–601.
[21]杜红梅, 傅知凡. 湖南农业循环经济发展评价体系及实证分析[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(6): 168–175.