Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1-7.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18120051
Zhao Ruohan1, Chen Hongwei1, Ou Xingqi1,2, Liu Jinjin1, Jia Gai1, Yao Sumei1, Liu Mingjiu1,2, Huang Ling1,2()
Received:
2018-12-13
Revised:
2019-03-03
Online:
2020-04-15
Published:
2020-04-28
Contact:
Huang Ling
E-mail:hling0801@hist.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Zhao Ruohan, Chen Hongwei, Ou Xingqi, Liu Jinjin, Jia Gai, Yao Sumei, Liu Mingjiu, Huang Ling. Effect of Nitrogen Levels on Oxidase Activities in Leaves and Roots of Winter Wheat[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(11): 1-7.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18120051
处理 | MDA/(nmol/mg) | WSP/(g/L) | T-AOC/(U/mL) | SOD/(U/mg) | POD/(U/mg) | CAT/(U/mg) | APX/(g/L) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 | N0 | 0.86a | 13.42c | 0.25e | 3.33a | 7.44a | 0.49e | 31872a |
N1 | 0.73a | 15.93b | 0.29de | 2.92b | 6.69b | 0.80b | 25550c | |
N2 | 0.52b | 18.39a | 0.39cd | 2.62c | 5.83d | 0.65d | 21965d | |
N3 | 0.42bc | 16.45b | 0.52c | 2.29d | 5.72d | 0.85c | 22576d | |
N4 | 0.45bc | 15.82b | 0.67b | 3.40a | 5.08e | 0.89bc | 22616d | |
N5 | 0.34cd | 15.79b | 0.80b | 3.46a | 6.23c | 0.97b | 29313b | |
N6 | 0.24d | 15.73b | 1.27a | 3.33a | 6.16c | 1.12a | 29348b | |
F值 | 17.0** | 36.2** | 62.0** | 37.1** | 161.2** | 49.8** | 57.6** | |
根系 | N0 | 0.94a | 2.59e | 0.37f | 5.92d | 39.93a | 2.16e | 47860a |
N1 | 0.67b | 3.28d | 0.54e | 8.82c | 31.72bc | 2.70d | 38634b | |
N2 | 0.41c | 4.96a | 1.07d | 10.10b | 28.94c | 3.32b | 39066b | |
N3 | 0.33c | 4.56b | 1.10d | 11.41a | 27.29c | 4.39a | 32133c | |
N4 | 0.25cd | 3.74c | 1.47c | 11.56a | 26.71c | 4.17a | 31592c | |
N5 | 0.10d | 3.55cd | 1.98b | 11.43a | 28.12c | 3.16bc | 14083d | |
N6 | 0.06d | 3.78c | 2.71a | 12.02a | 35.87ab | 2.91cd | 13466d | |
F值 | 29.4** | 308.0** | 42.5** | 91.2** | 10.3** | 52.7** | 742.3** |
处理 | MDA/(nmol/mg) | WSP/(g/L) | T-AOC/(U/mL) | SOD/(U/mg) | POD/(U/mg) | CAT/(U/mg) | APX/(g/L) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 | N0 | 0.86a | 13.42c | 0.25e | 3.33a | 7.44a | 0.49e | 31872a |
N1 | 0.73a | 15.93b | 0.29de | 2.92b | 6.69b | 0.80b | 25550c | |
N2 | 0.52b | 18.39a | 0.39cd | 2.62c | 5.83d | 0.65d | 21965d | |
N3 | 0.42bc | 16.45b | 0.52c | 2.29d | 5.72d | 0.85c | 22576d | |
N4 | 0.45bc | 15.82b | 0.67b | 3.40a | 5.08e | 0.89bc | 22616d | |
N5 | 0.34cd | 15.79b | 0.80b | 3.46a | 6.23c | 0.97b | 29313b | |
N6 | 0.24d | 15.73b | 1.27a | 3.33a | 6.16c | 1.12a | 29348b | |
F值 | 17.0** | 36.2** | 62.0** | 37.1** | 161.2** | 49.8** | 57.6** | |
根系 | N0 | 0.94a | 2.59e | 0.37f | 5.92d | 39.93a | 2.16e | 47860a |
N1 | 0.67b | 3.28d | 0.54e | 8.82c | 31.72bc | 2.70d | 38634b | |
N2 | 0.41c | 4.96a | 1.07d | 10.10b | 28.94c | 3.32b | 39066b | |
N3 | 0.33c | 4.56b | 1.10d | 11.41a | 27.29c | 4.39a | 32133c | |
N4 | 0.25cd | 3.74c | 1.47c | 11.56a | 26.71c | 4.17a | 31592c | |
N5 | 0.10d | 3.55cd | 1.98b | 11.43a | 28.12c | 3.16bc | 14083d | |
N6 | 0.06d | 3.78c | 2.71a | 12.02a | 35.87ab | 2.91cd | 13466d | |
F值 | 29.4** | 308.0** | 42.5** | 91.2** | 10.3** | 52.7** | 742.3** |
处理 | 根干重/g | 冠干重/g | 根冠比 | 根系活力/[μg/(g·h)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 0.1388d | 0.1584e | 0.878a | 25.2f |
N1 | 0.1560cd | 0.1999d | 0.780a | 51.3e |
N2 | 0.1738c | 0.2462c | 0.707b | 55.3e |
N3 | 0.1955b | 0.3525b | 0.564c | 62.8d |
N4 | 0.2038ab | 0.3556b | 0.573c | 76.8c |
N5 | 0.2126ab | 0.4396a | 0.484d | 86.2b |
N6 | 0.2215a | 0.4554a | 0.488d | 92.6a |
F值 | 22.5** | 136.5** | 36.1** | 280.7** |
处理 | 根干重/g | 冠干重/g | 根冠比 | 根系活力/[μg/(g·h)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 0.1388d | 0.1584e | 0.878a | 25.2f |
N1 | 0.1560cd | 0.1999d | 0.780a | 51.3e |
N2 | 0.1738c | 0.2462c | 0.707b | 55.3e |
N3 | 0.1955b | 0.3525b | 0.564c | 62.8d |
N4 | 0.2038ab | 0.3556b | 0.573c | 76.8c |
N5 | 0.2126ab | 0.4396a | 0.484d | 86.2b |
N6 | 0.2215a | 0.4554a | 0.488d | 92.6a |
F值 | 22.5** | 136.5** | 36.1** | 280.7** |
因子 | 叶片 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDA | WSP | T-AOC | SOD | POD | CAT | APX | ||
根系 | MDA | 0.986** | -0.451 | -0.841* | -0.123 | 0.704 | -0.881** | 0.215 |
WSP | -0.528 | 0.921** | 0.126 | -0.691 | -0.702 | 0.193 | -0.784* | |
T-AOC | -0.920** | 0.178 | 0.982** | 0.371 | -0.424 | 0.879** | 0.146 | |
SOD | -0.948** | 0.550 | 0.733 | -0.069 | -0.825* | 0.860* | -0.434 | |
POD | 0.467 | -0.680 | -0.022 | 0.355 | 0.827* | -0.324 | 0.788* | |
CAT | -0.534 | 0.503 | 0.156 | -0.438 | -0.899** | 0.348 | -0.783* | |
APX | 0.896** | -0.142 | -0.909** | -0.349 | 0.354 | -0.924** | -0.185 |
因子 | 叶片 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDA | WSP | T-AOC | SOD | POD | CAT | APX | ||
根系 | MDA | 0.986** | -0.451 | -0.841* | -0.123 | 0.704 | -0.881** | 0.215 |
WSP | -0.528 | 0.921** | 0.126 | -0.691 | -0.702 | 0.193 | -0.784* | |
T-AOC | -0.920** | 0.178 | 0.982** | 0.371 | -0.424 | 0.879** | 0.146 | |
SOD | -0.948** | 0.550 | 0.733 | -0.069 | -0.825* | 0.860* | -0.434 | |
POD | 0.467 | -0.680 | -0.022 | 0.355 | 0.827* | -0.324 | 0.788* | |
CAT | -0.534 | 0.503 | 0.156 | -0.438 | -0.899** | 0.348 | -0.783* | |
APX | 0.896** | -0.142 | -0.909** | -0.349 | 0.354 | -0.924** | -0.185 |
因子 | 叶片 | 根系 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDA | WSP | T-AOC | SOD | POD | CAT | APX | MDA | WSP | T-AOC | SOD | POD | CAT | APX | ||
根干重 | -0.979** | 0.300 | 0.883** | 0.190 | -0.678 | 0.904** | -0.136 | -0.983** | 0.395 | 0.922** | 0.943** | -0.473 | 0.547 | -0.913** | |
冠干重 | -0.961** | 0.191 | 0.901** | 0.244 | -0.555 | 0.906** | 0.009 | -0.957** | 0.295 | 0.933** | 0.889** | -0.384 | 0.454 | -0.953** | |
根冠比 | 0.973** | -0.311 | -0.838* | -0.128 | 0.656 | -0.895** | 0.144 | 0.976** | -0.410 | -0.885** | -0.944** | 0.522 | -0.574 | 0.917** | |
根系活力 | -0.946** | 0.322 | 0.887** | 0.271 | -0.625 | 0.950** | -0.103 | -0.973** | 0.326 | 0.929** | 0.926** | -0.454 | 0.430 | -0.942** |
因子 | 叶片 | 根系 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDA | WSP | T-AOC | SOD | POD | CAT | APX | MDA | WSP | T-AOC | SOD | POD | CAT | APX | ||
根干重 | -0.979** | 0.300 | 0.883** | 0.190 | -0.678 | 0.904** | -0.136 | -0.983** | 0.395 | 0.922** | 0.943** | -0.473 | 0.547 | -0.913** | |
冠干重 | -0.961** | 0.191 | 0.901** | 0.244 | -0.555 | 0.906** | 0.009 | -0.957** | 0.295 | 0.933** | 0.889** | -0.384 | 0.454 | -0.953** | |
根冠比 | 0.973** | -0.311 | -0.838* | -0.128 | 0.656 | -0.895** | 0.144 | 0.976** | -0.410 | -0.885** | -0.944** | 0.522 | -0.574 | 0.917** | |
根系活力 | -0.946** | 0.322 | 0.887** | 0.271 | -0.625 | 0.950** | -0.103 | -0.973** | 0.326 | 0.929** | 0.926** | -0.454 | 0.430 | -0.942** |
[1] | 赵会贤, 汪沛洪, 郭蔼光 , 等. 水分胁迫对小麦幼苗抗氧化物质含量的影响及其与抗旱性关系[J]. 西北农业学报, 2003,1(3):37-40. |
[2] |
Sgherri C, Milone, M T A, Clijsters H, et al. Antioxidative enzymes in two wheat cultivars, differently sensitive to drought and subjected to subsymptomatic copper doses[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001,158(11):1439-1447.
doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00543 URL |
[3] | 郭丽, 贾秀领, 张凤路 , 等. 定位水氮组合对冀5265小麦叶片硝酸还原酶、可溶性蛋白及产量的影响[J]. 华北农业学报, 2010,25(1):180-184. |
[4] | 郭天财, 宋晓, 马冬云 , 等. 施氮水平对冬小麦旗叶光合特性的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2007,33(12):1977-1981. |
[5] |
蔡瑞国, 张敏, 戴忠民 , 等. 施氮水平对优质小麦旗叶光合特性和籽粒生长发育响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(1):49-55.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2006.0109 URL |
[6] |
邓小燕, 王小春, 文钰 , 等. “麦/玉/豆”模式下氮肥运筹对玉米碳氮代谢的响[J]. 草业学报, 2012,21(4):52-61.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20120407 URL |
[7] | 李卫民, 周凌云, 徐梦雄 . 氮水胁迫对环境与小麦植株的生理特性之间的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2002,39(3):397-403. |
[8] |
李双双, 李晶, 陈龙涛 , 等. 施氮量对春小麦根系生长及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2013,33(1):141-145.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2013.01.024 URL |
[9] | 丁晓青, 樊子菡, 沈益新 . 紫花苜蓿苗期根系生长的水分胁迫损伤及氮磷的修复生长作用[J]. 草业学报, 2017,26(5):92-99. |
[10] |
时振振, 李胜, 马绍英 , 等. 不同品种小麦抗氧化系统对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2015,24(7):68-78.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2014342 URL |
[11] |
Nenovaa V, Bogoevab I . Separate and combined effects of excess copper and Fusarium culmorum infection on growth and antioxidative enzymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2014,9(1):259-266.
doi: 10.1080/17429145.2013.820359 URL |
[12] | Zhang L X, Li S X, Zhang H , et al. Nitrogen Rates and Water Stress Effects on Production, Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidative Enzyme Activities in Two Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes[J]. J. Agronomy & Crop Science, 2007,193:387-397. |
[13] | Wang X S, Wei Z W, Liu D L , et al. Effects of NaCl and silicon on activities of antioxidative enzymes in roots, shoots and leaves of alfalfa[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011,10(4):545-549. |
[14] |
Moloi M J, Van der westhuizen A J . Antioxidative enzymes and the Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) resistance response in wheat (Triticum aestivum)[J]. Plant Biology, 2008,10(3):403-407.
doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00042.x URL pmid: 18426488 |
[15] |
Jiang M, Zhang J . Effect of abscisicacid on active oxygen species, antioxidative defence system and oxidativedamage in leaves of maize seedlings[J]. Plant Cell Physiology. 2001,42:1265-1273.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce162 URL pmid: 11726712 |
[16] | Vasconcelos A C F, Zhang X Z, Ervin E H . et al. Enzymatic antioxidant responses to biostimulants inmaize and soybean subjected to drought[J]. Scince Agricola, 2009,66:395-402. |
[17] |
王贺正, 张均, 吴金芝 , 等. 不同氮素水平对小麦旗叶生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013,22(4):69-79.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20130408 URL |
[18] | 谭晓荣, 胡韬纲, 戴媛 , 等. 不同干旱方式对小麦幼苗可溶性蛋白含量及总抗氧化力的影响[J].河南工业大学学报:自然科学版,2008(01):42-47. |
[19] | 王艳哲, 刘秀位, 孙宏勇 , 等. 水氮调控对冬小麦根冠比和水分利用效率的影响研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013,21(3):282-289. |
[20] | 任书杰, 张雷明, 张岁岐 , 等. 氮素营养对小麦根冠协调生长的调控[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003,23(3):395-400. |
[21] | 吴雅薇, 李强, 豆攀 , 等. 低氮胁迫对不同耐低氮玉米品种苗期伤流液性状及根系活力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(2):278-288. |
[22] | 王秀波, 上官周平 . 干旱胁迫下氮素对不同基因型小麦根系活力和生长的调控[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017,37(6):820-827. |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[3] | HONG Bo, ZHANG Ze, ZHANG Qiang, MA Yiru, YI Xiang, LV Xin. The Nitrogen Content in Cotton Leaves: Estimation Based on Digital Image [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 49-55. |
[4] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[5] | HUANG Hao, XIE Jin, YUAN Wenbin, WANG Chuliang, CHEN Kunhua, ZENG Fandong, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. Effects of Different Organic Materials on Root Characteristics and Accumulation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 51-57. |
[6] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[7] | LI Dongxue, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, BU Lingduo, WANG Ruizhi, LIU Hao, LU Dianjun, WANG Huoyan, CHEN Xiaoqin. Nutrient Content of Tobacco Leaves and Root Zone Soil Affected by Citrate Soluble Potassium Fertilizer in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 67-73. |
[8] | LI Lu, BAO Xinyi, CHEN Zhiyong. Study on Tissue Culture Technique of Saintpantia ionantha [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 58-62. |
[9] | BAI Wei, HU Yang, HU Qingqing, CUI Jinli, ZHANG Baoying, YANG Sumei. Effect of Main Cultivation Factors on Yield of Oil Sunflower in North Hebei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 17-22. |
[10] | WANG Yan, ZHU Kaidi, SUN Hongren, ZHANG Jiping, LV Yucai, WANG Jian. Abundance-deficiency Index of Soil Nutrients and Appropriate Fertilizer Application Rates for Apple Planting in China: A Preliminary Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 69-78. |
[11] | LI Hongmei, QUAN Wenting, ZHANG Shuyu. The Impact of Climate Warming on Heat Resources Before the Turning Green Stage of Winter Wheat in Central and Northern Shaanxi Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 53-61. |
[12] | XIAO Yang, LI Qingrong, XING Dongxu, YANG Qiong. Effects of High Temperature Stress on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Gene Expression in Larvae of Silkworm Varieties with Different Tolerance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 111-118. |
[13] | XU Lingqing, LI Jiajia, CHANG Xiao, ZHANG Yunlong, LIU Dali. The Mechanism of Soil Nitrogen Mineralization: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 97-101. |
[14] | YAN Fangfang, KONG Chuixu, ZHANG Yingjie, MAO Min, JIAN Lianjun, WANG Rong. Biological Control of Tobacco Root-knot Nematode Disease by Penicillium purpurogenum K1 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 103-108. |
[15] | TIAN Yutong, HAN Zhiwei, ZHAO Ran, TIAN Yongzhu, LUO Guangfei, YANG Miao. Effects of Typical Land Use Types on Soil Nitrogen Characteristics in Karst Agricultural Areas of Southwest China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 89-96. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||