Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (34): 107-112.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1064
Previous Articles Next Articles
LUO Zhiming(), QIN Wei, YIN Jiong, LI Yinhu, ZHANG Rongyue, LI Jun
Received:
2021-11-08
Revised:
2022-09-29
Online:
2022-12-05
Published:
2022-11-25
CLC Number:
LUO Zhiming, QIN Wei, YIN Jiong, LI Yinhu, ZHANG Rongyue, LI Jun. Tolerance of Sugarcane Germplasm to Sugarcane Thrips[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 107-112.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1064
品种 | 蓟马数/(头/株) | 虫害指数/% | 卷叶率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
成虫 | 若虫 | 合计 | |||
云蔗14-1215 | 32.80d | 31.60a | 64.40b | 24.44e | 16.67f |
云蔗14-1289 | 36.00c | 28.00a | 64.00b | 20.00ef | 6.67g |
云蔗14-1208 | 29.80d | 0.20e | 30.00d | 44.44c | 46.67d |
云蔗14-1010 | 60.40a | 20.20b | 80.60a | 73.33a | 100.00a |
云蔗13-1821 | 34.20cd | 4.80d | 39.00c | 35.56d | 36.67e |
云蔗13-1182 | 41.20c | 4.20d | 45.40c | 53.33b | 86.67b |
云蔗15-507 | 15.60e | 0.60e | 16.20e | 13.33f | 3.33g |
云蔗12-1185 | 50.20b | 12.20c | 62.40b | 46.67c | 63.33c |
云蔗11-3898 | 10.20fg | 0.40e | 10.60e | 26.67e | 13.33f |
云蔗15-1692 | 5.60g | 0.00f | 5.60f | 42.22c | 43.33d |
云蔗15-1679 | 10.00fg | 1.60de | 11.60e | 15.56f | 3.33g |
粤糖93-159 | 40.60c | 30.60a | 71.20ab | 55.56b | 83.33b |
品种 | 蓟马数/(头/株) | 虫害指数/% | 卷叶率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
成虫 | 若虫 | 合计 | |||
云蔗14-1215 | 32.80d | 31.60a | 64.40b | 24.44e | 16.67f |
云蔗14-1289 | 36.00c | 28.00a | 64.00b | 20.00ef | 6.67g |
云蔗14-1208 | 29.80d | 0.20e | 30.00d | 44.44c | 46.67d |
云蔗14-1010 | 60.40a | 20.20b | 80.60a | 73.33a | 100.00a |
云蔗13-1821 | 34.20cd | 4.80d | 39.00c | 35.56d | 36.67e |
云蔗13-1182 | 41.20c | 4.20d | 45.40c | 53.33b | 86.67b |
云蔗15-507 | 15.60e | 0.60e | 16.20e | 13.33f | 3.33g |
云蔗12-1185 | 50.20b | 12.20c | 62.40b | 46.67c | 63.33c |
云蔗11-3898 | 10.20fg | 0.40e | 10.60e | 26.67e | 13.33f |
云蔗15-1692 | 5.60g | 0.00f | 5.60f | 42.22c | 43.33d |
云蔗15-1679 | 10.00fg | 1.60de | 11.60e | 15.56f | 3.33g |
粤糖93-159 | 40.60c | 30.60a | 71.20ab | 55.56b | 83.33b |
耐害性等级 | 数量/个 | 虫害指数/% | 卷叶率/% | 品种 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | 3 | [0,24.44) | [0,13.33) | 云蔗135-507、云蔗15-1679、云蔗14-1289 |
2级 | 2 | [24.44,35.56) | [13.33,36.67) | 云蔗11-3898、云蔗14-1215 |
3级 | 4 | [35.56,53.33) | [36.67,83.33) | 云蔗14-1208、云蔗15-1692、云蔗13-1821、云蔗12-1185 |
4级 | 3 | [53.33,100) | [83.33,100) | 粤糖93-159、云蔗13-1182、云蔗14-1010 |
耐害性等级 | 数量/个 | 虫害指数/% | 卷叶率/% | 品种 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | 3 | [0,24.44) | [0,13.33) | 云蔗135-507、云蔗15-1679、云蔗14-1289 |
2级 | 2 | [24.44,35.56) | [13.33,36.67) | 云蔗11-3898、云蔗14-1215 |
3级 | 4 | [35.56,53.33) | [36.67,83.33) | 云蔗14-1208、云蔗15-1692、云蔗13-1821、云蔗12-1185 |
4级 | 3 | [53.33,100) | [83.33,100) | 粤糖93-159、云蔗13-1182、云蔗14-1010 |
品种 | 耐害等级 | SOD/(U/g) | PAL/(U/g) | PPO/(U/g) | POD/(U/g) | CAT/(U/g) | MDA/(nmol/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云蔗15-507 | 1级 | 1387.6188b | 49.2081a | 161.3247a | 359.1728a | 128.2854c | 23.3932a |
云蔗14-1289 | 1级 | 1363.4945b | 37.6204b | 118.4266c | 227.0714c | 138.3568b | 22.0720b |
云蔗13-1821 | 3级 | 1428.3592a | 37.3675b | 135.7193b | 198.9988d | 103.4893d | 18.1226c |
云蔗12-1185 | 3级 | 1211.8970c | 27.8170c | 102.4033d | 204.1824d | 83.8893e | 15.7436d |
云蔗13-1182 | 4级 | 1199.8896d | 47.9011a | 49.7209e | 228.6472c | 144.5797b | 24.7089a |
云蔗14-1010 | 4级 | 1135.9713e | 49.7594a | 29.2858f | 294.8869b | 179.5817a | 23.4784a |
品种 | 耐害等级 | SOD/(U/g) | PAL/(U/g) | PPO/(U/g) | POD/(U/g) | CAT/(U/g) | MDA/(nmol/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云蔗15-507 | 1级 | 1387.6188b | 49.2081a | 161.3247a | 359.1728a | 128.2854c | 23.3932a |
云蔗14-1289 | 1级 | 1363.4945b | 37.6204b | 118.4266c | 227.0714c | 138.3568b | 22.0720b |
云蔗13-1821 | 3级 | 1428.3592a | 37.3675b | 135.7193b | 198.9988d | 103.4893d | 18.1226c |
云蔗12-1185 | 3级 | 1211.8970c | 27.8170c | 102.4033d | 204.1824d | 83.8893e | 15.7436d |
云蔗13-1182 | 4级 | 1199.8896d | 47.9011a | 49.7209e | 228.6472c | 144.5797b | 24.7089a |
云蔗14-1010 | 4级 | 1135.9713e | 49.7594a | 29.2858f | 294.8869b | 179.5817a | 23.4784a |
SOD | PAL | PPO | POD | CAT | MDA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫害指数 | -0.8665 | 0.1631 | -0.9173 | -0.1908 | 0.4147 | 0.0611 |
SOD | -0.1672 | 0.9025 | 0.0142 | -0.4281 | -0.1832 | |
PAL | -0.3060 | 0.7259 | 0.8148 | 0.9144 | ||
PPO | 0.1413 | -0.6189 | -0.3455 | |||
POD | 0.4790 | 0.5912 | ||||
CAT | 0.8502 |
SOD | PAL | PPO | POD | CAT | MDA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫害指数 | -0.8665 | 0.1631 | -0.9173 | -0.1908 | 0.4147 | 0.0611 |
SOD | -0.1672 | 0.9025 | 0.0142 | -0.4281 | -0.1832 | |
PAL | -0.3060 | 0.7259 | 0.8148 | 0.9144 | ||
PPO | 0.1413 | -0.6189 | -0.3455 | |||
POD | 0.4790 | 0.5912 | ||||
CAT | 0.8502 |
[1] | 黄应昆, 李文凤. 现代甘蔗病虫草害原色图谱[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011:11-12. |
[2] | 黄诚华, 黄冬发, 潘雪红, 等. 噻虫嗪防治甘蔗蓟马的药效试验[J]. 中国糖料, 2010(4):35-36. |
[3] | LESLIE G W, MOODLEY S. Progress in the use of insecticides for the control of the sugarcane thrips Fulmekiola serrata (Kobus) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in South Africa[J]. Proceedings of South African sugar technologists’ association, 2009, 82:437-440. |
[4] | LESLIE G W, MOODLEY S. Developments in the use of insecticides for the control of the sugarcane thrips Fulmekiola serrata (Kobus) in South Africa[J]. Proceedings of South African sugar technologists’ association, 2011, 84:310-313. |
[5] | 罗志明, 尹炯, 李俊, 等. 5种杀虫剂对甘蔗蓟马的田间防治效果[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2021, 50(1):57-60. |
[6] | 余月书, 薛珊, 王芳, 等. 农药诱导害虫再猖獗的研究[J]. 昆虫知识, 2008, 45(1):15-20. |
[7] | 吴进才. 农药诱导害虫再猖獗机制[A].江苏省昆虫学会第十三次会员代表大会暨学术研讨会论文摘要集[C]. 2012. |
[8] | 尹炯, 罗志明, 黄应昆, 等. 甘蔗蓟马种群动态及其在不同品种甘蔗上为害情况[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2015, 52(6):1438-1443. |
[9] | 尹炯, 罗志明, 黄应昆, 等. 甘蔗蓟马在不同甘蔗品种上空间分布型及理论抽样数[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(3):702-707. |
[10] |
LUO Zhiming, WANG Xiaoyan, HUANG Yingkun, et al. Field resistance of different sugarcane varieties to sugarcane thrips (Fulmekiola serratus) in China[J]. Sugar tech, 2019, 21(3):527-531.
doi: 10.1007/s12355-018-0653-8 |
[11] | 俞晓平, 巫国瑞, 胡萃. 作物耐虫性研究概况[J]. 昆虫知识, 1993,(2):121-123. |
[12] | 陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安. 植物耐害性研究方法[J]. 植物学通报, 2005, 22(4):449-445. |
[13] | 谢戌, 李永洪, 宋奇伦. 籼稻‘A232’及其后代对水稻卷叶螟田间耐害性观察[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(15):130-135. |
[14] | 黄水金, 陈琼, 马辉刚, 等. 水稻品种对飞虱的耐害性评价[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2016, 38(1):97-105. |
[15] | 胡桂馨, 师尚礼, 王森山, 等. 不同苜蓿品种对牛角花齿蓟马的耐害性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2009, 17(4):505-509. |
[16] | 寇江涛, 师尚礼, 胡桂馨, 等. 紫花苜蓿对牛角花齿蓟马为害的光合生理响应[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(20):5782-5791. |
[17] |
AHLEMEYER B. BAUERBACH E, PLATH M, et al. Retinoic acid reduces apoptosis and oxidative stress by preservation of SOD protein level[J]. Free radical biology & medicine, 2001, 30(10):1067-1077.
doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00495-6 URL |
[18] | 刘淑宇, 余新, 陈发河. 绿色木霉菌发本地液对核果炭疽菌胞内抗性酶活性的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2013, 30(2):285-290. |
[19] | 黄瑞冬, 马鸿图, 吴琼. 高粱抗蚜虫性状与次生代谢物关系的研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1998, 29(4):287-290. |
[20] | 安玉兴, 许汉亮, 孙东磊, 等. 茉莉酸甲酯诱导甘蔗抗虫性中多酚氧化酶(PPO)活性分析[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2011(6):18-21. |
[21] | 许传俊, 李玲. 植物多酚氧化酶的研究进展[J]. 生命科学研究, 2002, 6(1):45-48. |
[22] | 谢春艳, 宾金华, 陈兆平. 多酚氧化酶及其生理功能[J]. 生物学通报, 1999, 34(6):11-13. |
[23] | 蒋明义, 荆家海. 植物体内羟自由基的产生及其与脂质过氧化作用启动的关系[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1993, 29(4):300-305. |
[24] | 陈建明. 水稻品种对褐飞虱为害的耐性及其生理机制研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2004. |
[25] | 李亚姝. 施钾对苗期紫花苜蓿抗蓟马的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021. |
[26] | 张晓燕, 王森山, 李小龙, 等. 施磷对苜蓿抗蓟马的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 25(5):102-108. |
[27] | 石卫东. 氮、钾及其配施对小麦抗蚜性及若干生化指标的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2011. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||