Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (26): 50-55.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0302
Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Min1(), CHEN Xiuhu1, PI Xiaojuan1, GUO Feng1, CHEN Xinmiao1, HU Jiewen2
Received:
2022-04-13
Revised:
2022-06-18
Online:
2022-09-15
Published:
2022-09-09
CLC Number:
YANG Min, CHEN Xiuhu, PI Xiaojuan, GUO Feng, CHEN Xinmiao, HU Jiewen. Migration and Distribution Characteristics of Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Rice Terrace Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 50-55.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0302
营养成分 | 平均值/(mg/kg) | 标准差/(mg/kg) | 变异系数/% | 极差/(mg/kg) | 评定等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 | 21.20 | 3.16 | 14.91 | 10.09 | 中上 |
碱解氮 | 103.3 | 13.67 | 13.23 | 48.36 | 中上 |
速效磷 | 42.84 | 5.42 | 12.66 | 18.54 | 极高 |
速效钾 | 95.25 | 13.91 | 14.60 | 41.75 | 中等 |
营养成分 | 平均值/(mg/kg) | 标准差/(mg/kg) | 变异系数/% | 极差/(mg/kg) | 评定等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 | 21.20 | 3.16 | 14.91 | 10.09 | 中上 |
碱解氮 | 103.3 | 13.67 | 13.23 | 48.36 | 中上 |
速效磷 | 42.84 | 5.42 | 12.66 | 18.54 | 极高 |
速效钾 | 95.25 | 13.91 | 14.60 | 41.75 | 中等 |
采样点 | 各层次梯田土壤碱解氮含量/(mg/kg) | 指数回归分析 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | ||
李屋 | 70.74±1.07 | 72.12±0.34 | 78.28±0.39 | 75.30±0.29 | 80.12±0.52 | 82.10±0.38 | y = 68.92e0.0292x | 0.9233 | |
谢屋 | 82.50±0.68 | 85.10±0.39 | 91.27±0.81 | 87.96±0.97 | 98.75±0.85 | 109.3±0.84 | y = 76.77e0.0519x | 0.9277 | |
下坪 | 69.87±0.42 | 72.56±0.60 | 95.60±0.41 | 97.45±0.81 | 103.74±1.23 | 131.2±0.65 | y = 60.78e0.1213x | 0.9639 | |
风冲口 | 78.60±1.02 | 82.50±0.75 | 90.54±0.51 | 94.68±0.97 | 96.24±0.41 | 156.8±1.30 | y = 65.35e0.1132x | 0.8548 | |
三联 | 80.03±0.91 | 87.69±0.43 | 98.29±0.84 | 109.6±0.77 | 113.7±1.15 | 124.6±1.28 | y = 74.18e0.0886x | 0.9920 | |
楼冲 | 85.32±0.56 | 87.60±0.67 | 90.87±0.57 | 102.9±0.64 | 128.3±0.52 | 123.4±0.72 | y = 74.49e0.089x | 0.9382 | |
老寨 | 84.17±0.45 | 83.60±0.68 | 96.50±0.64 | 102.1±0.42 | 128.3±0.67 | 163.5±0.50 | y = 66.78e0.1332x | 0.9500 | |
新楼 | 90.12±0.95 | 104.0±0.88 | 107.2±0.64 | 105.9±0.96 | 129.2±0.40 | 148.9±1.02 | y = 82.24e0.09x | 0.9437 | |
胡屋 | 92.47±0.82 | 100.8±0.31 | 99.38±0.85 | 109.5±0.53 | 138.4±0.79 | 150.3±0.91 | y = 79.99e0.0993x | 0.9455 | |
上坪 | 106.4±0.98 | 111.2±0.66 | 112.6±0.68 | 122.0±0.62 | 127.7±0.59 | 169.0±0.90 | y = 93.08e0.0802x | 0.8931 | |
平均值 | 84.02 | 88.72 | 96.06 | 100.73 | 114.45 | 135.90 | y = 73.9e0.0919x | 0.9719 | |
标准差 | 10.72 | 12.92 | 9.50 | 12.90 | 18.94 | 27.04 |
采样点 | 各层次梯田土壤碱解氮含量/(mg/kg) | 指数回归分析 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | ||
李屋 | 70.74±1.07 | 72.12±0.34 | 78.28±0.39 | 75.30±0.29 | 80.12±0.52 | 82.10±0.38 | y = 68.92e0.0292x | 0.9233 | |
谢屋 | 82.50±0.68 | 85.10±0.39 | 91.27±0.81 | 87.96±0.97 | 98.75±0.85 | 109.3±0.84 | y = 76.77e0.0519x | 0.9277 | |
下坪 | 69.87±0.42 | 72.56±0.60 | 95.60±0.41 | 97.45±0.81 | 103.74±1.23 | 131.2±0.65 | y = 60.78e0.1213x | 0.9639 | |
风冲口 | 78.60±1.02 | 82.50±0.75 | 90.54±0.51 | 94.68±0.97 | 96.24±0.41 | 156.8±1.30 | y = 65.35e0.1132x | 0.8548 | |
三联 | 80.03±0.91 | 87.69±0.43 | 98.29±0.84 | 109.6±0.77 | 113.7±1.15 | 124.6±1.28 | y = 74.18e0.0886x | 0.9920 | |
楼冲 | 85.32±0.56 | 87.60±0.67 | 90.87±0.57 | 102.9±0.64 | 128.3±0.52 | 123.4±0.72 | y = 74.49e0.089x | 0.9382 | |
老寨 | 84.17±0.45 | 83.60±0.68 | 96.50±0.64 | 102.1±0.42 | 128.3±0.67 | 163.5±0.50 | y = 66.78e0.1332x | 0.9500 | |
新楼 | 90.12±0.95 | 104.0±0.88 | 107.2±0.64 | 105.9±0.96 | 129.2±0.40 | 148.9±1.02 | y = 82.24e0.09x | 0.9437 | |
胡屋 | 92.47±0.82 | 100.8±0.31 | 99.38±0.85 | 109.5±0.53 | 138.4±0.79 | 150.3±0.91 | y = 79.99e0.0993x | 0.9455 | |
上坪 | 106.4±0.98 | 111.2±0.66 | 112.6±0.68 | 122.0±0.62 | 127.7±0.59 | 169.0±0.90 | y = 93.08e0.0802x | 0.8931 | |
平均值 | 84.02 | 88.72 | 96.06 | 100.73 | 114.45 | 135.90 | y = 73.9e0.0919x | 0.9719 | |
标准差 | 10.72 | 12.92 | 9.50 | 12.90 | 18.94 | 27.04 |
采样点 | 各层次梯田土壤速效钾含量/(mg/kg) | 指数回归分析 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | ||
李屋 | 86.74±0.92 | 87.09±0.78 | 92.56±1.16 | 91.85±0.51 | 101.6±0.92 | 99.87±1.15 | y = 82.92e0.0331x | 0.9297 | |
谢屋 | 80.81±0.48 | 86.59±0.78 | 93.65±0.77 | 112.6±0.55 | 125.8±0.94 | 163.1±0.93 | y = 66.20e0.1376x | 0.9760 | |
下坪 | 61.98±0.77 | 80.12±0.59 | 85.17±0.72 | 84.65±0.55 | 98.71±0.94 | 99.78±0.93 | y = 62.26e0.0857x | 0.9242 | |
风冲口 | 67.34±0.53 | 66.87±0.92 | 73.68±0.74 | 72.89±1.13 | 88.54±0.75 | 85.42±1.12 | y = 61.56e0.0577x | 0.9112 | |
三联 | 71.43±0.95 | 77.67±0.43 | 96.62±0.40 | 137.8±1.04 | 142.9±1.17 | 143.3±1.01 | y = 60.80e0.1619x | 0.9488 | |
楼冲 | 67.34±0.93 | 66.87±0.87 | 73.68±0.77 | 80.65±0.78 | 108.7±0.56 | 98.87±0.86 | y = 57.44e0.0991x | 0.9133 | |
老寨 | 62.65±0.80 | 89.27±0.39 | 79.86±0.87 | 100.5±0.74 | 101.8±0.96 | 112.6±0.67 | y = 62.74e0.1015x | 0.8999 | |
新楼 | 73.46±0.71 | 89.65±0.78 | 91.78±0.99 | 154.1±1.04 | 132.4±0.73 | 163.9±1.30 | y = 63.59e0.1628x | 0.9255 | |
胡屋 | 63.49±1.02 | 61.72±0.72 | 80.67±0.82 | 79.60±0.75 | 112.7±0.69 | 121.6±0.74 | y = 50.58e0.1441x | 0.9750 | |
上坪 | 63.04±0.79 | 68.49±0.57 | 64.24±0.65 | 123.5±0.97 | 123.8±0.65 | 146.9±0.85 | y = 47.48e0.1903x | 0.9176 | |
平均值 | 69.83 | 77.43 | 83.19 | 103.81 | 113.70 | 123.53 | y = 61.08e0.1207x | 0.9885 | |
标准差 | 8.39 | 10.67 | 10.61 | 27.38 | 17.07 | 28.75 |
采样点 | 各层次梯田土壤速效钾含量/(mg/kg) | 指数回归分析 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | ||
李屋 | 86.74±0.92 | 87.09±0.78 | 92.56±1.16 | 91.85±0.51 | 101.6±0.92 | 99.87±1.15 | y = 82.92e0.0331x | 0.9297 | |
谢屋 | 80.81±0.48 | 86.59±0.78 | 93.65±0.77 | 112.6±0.55 | 125.8±0.94 | 163.1±0.93 | y = 66.20e0.1376x | 0.9760 | |
下坪 | 61.98±0.77 | 80.12±0.59 | 85.17±0.72 | 84.65±0.55 | 98.71±0.94 | 99.78±0.93 | y = 62.26e0.0857x | 0.9242 | |
风冲口 | 67.34±0.53 | 66.87±0.92 | 73.68±0.74 | 72.89±1.13 | 88.54±0.75 | 85.42±1.12 | y = 61.56e0.0577x | 0.9112 | |
三联 | 71.43±0.95 | 77.67±0.43 | 96.62±0.40 | 137.8±1.04 | 142.9±1.17 | 143.3±1.01 | y = 60.80e0.1619x | 0.9488 | |
楼冲 | 67.34±0.93 | 66.87±0.87 | 73.68±0.77 | 80.65±0.78 | 108.7±0.56 | 98.87±0.86 | y = 57.44e0.0991x | 0.9133 | |
老寨 | 62.65±0.80 | 89.27±0.39 | 79.86±0.87 | 100.5±0.74 | 101.8±0.96 | 112.6±0.67 | y = 62.74e0.1015x | 0.8999 | |
新楼 | 73.46±0.71 | 89.65±0.78 | 91.78±0.99 | 154.1±1.04 | 132.4±0.73 | 163.9±1.30 | y = 63.59e0.1628x | 0.9255 | |
胡屋 | 63.49±1.02 | 61.72±0.72 | 80.67±0.82 | 79.60±0.75 | 112.7±0.69 | 121.6±0.74 | y = 50.58e0.1441x | 0.9750 | |
上坪 | 63.04±0.79 | 68.49±0.57 | 64.24±0.65 | 123.5±0.97 | 123.8±0.65 | 146.9±0.85 | y = 47.48e0.1903x | 0.9176 | |
平均值 | 69.83 | 77.43 | 83.19 | 103.81 | 113.70 | 123.53 | y = 61.08e0.1207x | 0.9885 | |
标准差 | 8.39 | 10.67 | 10.61 | 27.38 | 17.07 | 28.75 |
[1] |
杨秉庚, 蔡思源, 刘宇娟,等. 土壤供保氮能力决定稻田氮肥增产效果和利用率[J]. 土壤学报,DOI: 10.11766/trxb202104070181/2021-07-20. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20210720.0847.002.html.
doi: 10.11766/trxb202104070181/2021-07-20 URL |
[2] | 彭显龙, 匡旭, 李鹏飞,等. 协调水稻产量和品质的植株临界氮浓度的确定[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(1):109-116. |
[3] | 刘晓伟, 王火焰, 朱德进,等. 氮肥施用方式对水稻产量以及氮、磷、钾养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2017, 40(2):203-210. |
[4] | 李仁英, 李霖, 黄利东,等. 不同品种水稻的产量构成因素及其对氮磷吸收的差异研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(6):1418-1424. |
[5] |
VALANI G P, VEZZANI F M, MATIA K, et al. Soil quality: Evaluation of on-farm assessments in relation to analytical index[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 198:104565.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104565 URL |
[6] | 杨文飞, 杜小凤, 顾大路,等. 长期施肥对根系及土壤微生态环境、养分和结构影响综述[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(12):37-44. |
[7] | 李发, 王农, 徐应明,等. 水稻土对磷的吸持能力及环境风险研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(12):4724-4739. |
[8] |
ZHAO Z, LIU G, LIU Q, et al. Distribution Characteristics and Seasonal Variation of Soil Nutrients in the Mun River Basin, Thailand[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(9):1818.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091818 URL |
[9] |
BHUNIA G, Shit K P, POURGHASEMI H R. Soil organic carbon mapping using remote sensing techniques and multivariate regression model[J]. Geocarto International, 2019, 34(2):215-226.
doi: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1381179 URL |
[10] | 李赛慧, 陈丽芬, 王会来,等. 施肥对稻田培肥及水稻浙优21产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(4):676-678. |
[11] | 黄昌勇, 徐建明. 土壤学(第3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2012:8-9. |
[12] | 陈秀虎, 杨敏, 陆远宁,等. 常见叶菜测土配方施肥计算方法的研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(2):11-15. |
[13] | 刘智杰, 黄丽, 李峰,等. 秸秆还田对水稻土黏土矿物组成和钾素释放的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(6):1390-1396. |
[14] | 陈晓群, 孙玉芳, 赵营,等. 不同N、P肥比对水稻产量、养分吸收及稻田水环境的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(7):173-180. |
[15] | 肖淑媛, 徐晓昂, 陈宗顺,等. 洞庭湖南岸南县水稻田土壤肥力因子空间变异特征[J]. 东北农业科学, 2021, 46(5):35-39. |
[16] | 陈防, 刘冬碧, 姜丽娜,等. 中亚热带两种水稻土土壤养分空间变异的对比研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(4):687-691. |
[17] | 鲍士旦, 杨超光, 徐国华,等. 土壤农化分析, 第3版[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:33-91. |
[18] | 孙浩燕, 王森, 李小坤,等. 浅层施肥对水稻苗期养分吸收及土壤养分分布的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(6):1061-1067. |
[19] | 阿迪拉·阿布力米提, 王勇辉.艾比湖湿地不同水淹条件下土壤养分变化研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(2):12-18. |
[20] | 李小坤, 鲁剑巍, 吴礼树. 土壤钾素固定和释放机制研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2008, 47(4):473-477. |
[21] | 胡雅, 张露, 刘金宝. 黄土丘陵沟壑区沟道土壤养分分布特征研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(2):85-88. |
[22] | 詹秋丽, 张黎明, 周碧青,等. 福建耕地土壤磷素富集空间差异及其影响因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(2):274-283 |
[23] | 杨敏, 陈秀虎, 陆远宁,等. 清远市郊菜地土壤营养和叶菜产量状况及施肥建议[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(23):287-290. |
[24] | 夏文建, 冀建华, 刘佳,等. 长期不同施肥红壤磷素特征和流失风险研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(12):1876-1886. |
[25] | 王艳玲, 章永辉, 何园球. 红壤基质组分对磷吸持指数的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(3):552-559. |
[1] | GAO Wei, ZHANG Jun, HAO Xi, LIU Juan, ZANG Xiuwang. Regional Change of Peanut Production in Henan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 22-30. |
[2] | YE Pei, LIU Kequn, SHEN Shuanghe, LIU Kaiwen, LIU Zhixiong, DENG Yanjun. Risk Analysis and Regionalization of Heat Damage During Heading and Flowering Stage of Mid-season Rice in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 110-117. |
[3] | WU Xuanke, WANG Renjun, HUANG Wei, LIU Yongyu, YAO Yuqun. Spatial Distribution of Heat Injury of Grape in Guangxi Based on SURFER Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 118-121. |
[4] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
[5] | TIAN Yutong, HAN Zhiwei, ZHAO Ran, TIAN Yongzhu, LUO Guangfei, YANG Miao. Effects of Typical Land Use Types on Soil Nitrogen Characteristics in Karst Agricultural Areas of Southwest China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 89-96. |
[6] | FANG Keming, XIAO Xin, QIN Leiying, JIANG Lin, WANG Lu, ZHANG Lu, WANG Meiling, ZHANG Ming, LUO Wenhan, JIANG Hong, HUANG Huaxiang, ZHONG Guomin. Study on Fertilizer Reduction and Efficiency Increase for Japonica Rice in South China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 6-11. |
[7] | WANG Lixia, YIN Xiaomin, LIU Yongxia, LIAN Zihao, WANG Bizun, HE Yingdui. Change Characteristics of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Papaya Under Papaya-Leek Intercropping [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 66-76. |
[8] | XU Yongjie, HAN Huabai, PEI Dong. Characteristics and Distribution of Walnut Seed Resources in Bashan Mountains [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 51-55. |
[9] | YANG Miao, TIAN Yongzhu, HAN Zhiwei, LUO Guangfei, ZHAO Ran, TIAN Yutong, XIAO Han. Spatial Distribution and Formation of Phosphorus in Typical Land-use Soils in Karst Agricultural Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 108-117. |
[10] | PAN Xue, CAI Liqun, DONG Bo, NIE Guangyun. The Quality Grade and Nutrient Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Pingchuan District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 118-128. |
[11] | SONG Yunlian, LUO Xinping, ZHANG Yong, ZHENG Jian, WANG Yuequan, GAO Xianyun, ZHANG Huiyun. Major Diseases and Insect Pests of Litchi in Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 114-122. |
[12] | ZHU Jingping, DENG Qiuhong. Migration and Transformation Pathways of Nitrogen in Simulated Paddy Field System with Deep Application of Urea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 66-73. |
[13] | LUO You, XIAO Yang, ZHOU Tingyu, WANG Yue, XIE Chen, LI Dongying, CHEN Xueli. Resource Distribution, New Species and Isolation Methods of Actinobacteria in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 79-84. |
[14] | LIAO Yumeng, LI Zuran, ZU Yanqun, LIU Caixin. Migration Pathways of Heavy Metals in Plants and Influencing Factors: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 63-69. |
[15] | ZHANG Jian, ZHANG Mingkui, XIE Guoxiong. Evolution of Soil Trace Elements with Utilization Time in Coastal Plain in Zhejiang Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 64-69. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||