Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (36): 89-96.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0026
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIN Baigui1(), ZHONG Wenliang2, HUANG Jichuan2(
)
Received:
2022-12-23
Revised:
2023-03-03
Online:
2023-12-25
Published:
2023-12-20
LIN Baigui, ZHONG Wenliang, HUANG Jichuan. Investigation on Soil Fertility of Paddy Field in Yingde City[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(36): 89-96.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0026
级别 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 级 | >40 | >2 | >150 | >40 | >200 |
2级 | 30~40 | 1.5~2 | 120~150 | 20~39 | 150~199 |
3级 | 20~30 | 1~1.5 | 90~119 | 10~19 | 100~149 |
4级 | 10~20 | 0.75~1 | 60~89 | 5~9 | 50~99 |
5级 | 6~10 | 0.5~0.75 | 30~59 | 3~4 | 30~49 |
6级 | <6 | <0.5 | <30 | <3 | <30 |
级别 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 级 | >40 | >2 | >150 | >40 | >200 |
2级 | 30~40 | 1.5~2 | 120~150 | 20~39 | 150~199 |
3级 | 20~30 | 1~1.5 | 90~119 | 10~19 | 100~149 |
4级 | 10~20 | 0.75~1 | 60~89 | 5~9 | 50~99 |
5级 | 6~10 | 0.5~0.75 | 30~59 | 3~4 | 30~49 |
6级 | <6 | <0.5 | <30 | <3 | <30 |
指标 | 取样年份 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 标准差SD | 变异系数/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 2017 | 4.50 | 6.80 | 5.79a | 0.50 | 8.67 | ||||
2018 | 3.80 | 8.10 | 5.94a | 0.96 | 16.20 | |||||
2019 | 3.90 | 7.60 | 5.87a | 0.90 | 15.38 | |||||
2020 | 3.80 | 8.10 | 5.97a | 1.13 | 18.98 | |||||
有机质/(g/kg) | 2017 | 6.24 | 55.70 | 24.24a | 9.73 | 40.12 | ||||
2018 | 6.74 | 58.70 | 23.55a | 9.76 | 41.46 | |||||
2019 | 4.99 | 57.80 | 24.93a | 10.66 | 42.77 | |||||
2020 | 6.20 | 55.60 | 23.41a | 10.14 | 43.32 | |||||
全氮/(g/kg) | 2017 | 0.40 | 3.73 | 1.52a | 0.65 | 42.87 | ||||
2018 | 0.39 | 4.00 | 1.49a | 0.65 | 43.62 | |||||
2019 | 0.32 | 3.76 | 1.61a | 0.71 | 43.76 | |||||
2020 | 0.32 | 3.41 | 1.49a | 0.67 | 44.81 | |||||
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 2017 | 54.00 | 443.00 | 133.67a | 52.56 | 39.32 | ||||
2018 | 37.00 | 328.00 | 133.14a | 48.75 | 36.62 | |||||
2019 | 35.00 | 269.00 | 139.56a | 47.05 | 33.72 | |||||
2020 | 39.00 | 325.00 | 135.84a | 50.84 | 37.43 | |||||
有效磷/(mg/kg) | 2017 | 4.40 | 567.00 | 48.99b | 55.79 | 113.89 | ||||
2018 | 4.70 | 309.00 | 56.06ab | 52.44 | 93.54 | |||||
2019 | 4.50 | 273.50 | 65.25a | 56.27 | 86.24 | |||||
2020 | 3.00 | 260.00 | 60.09a | 49.54 | 82.44 | |||||
速效钾/(mg/kg) | 2017 | 10.00 | 248.00 | 84.11a | 49.55 | 58.91 | ||||
2018 | 19.00 | 434.00 | 95.98a | 65.83 | 68.59 | |||||
2019 | 17.00 | 400.00 | 93.71a | 60.08 | 64.11 | |||||
2020 | 15.00 | 427.00 | 91.37a | 63.47 | 69.47 |
指标 | 取样年份 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 标准差SD | 变异系数/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 2017 | 4.50 | 6.80 | 5.79a | 0.50 | 8.67 | ||||
2018 | 3.80 | 8.10 | 5.94a | 0.96 | 16.20 | |||||
2019 | 3.90 | 7.60 | 5.87a | 0.90 | 15.38 | |||||
2020 | 3.80 | 8.10 | 5.97a | 1.13 | 18.98 | |||||
有机质/(g/kg) | 2017 | 6.24 | 55.70 | 24.24a | 9.73 | 40.12 | ||||
2018 | 6.74 | 58.70 | 23.55a | 9.76 | 41.46 | |||||
2019 | 4.99 | 57.80 | 24.93a | 10.66 | 42.77 | |||||
2020 | 6.20 | 55.60 | 23.41a | 10.14 | 43.32 | |||||
全氮/(g/kg) | 2017 | 0.40 | 3.73 | 1.52a | 0.65 | 42.87 | ||||
2018 | 0.39 | 4.00 | 1.49a | 0.65 | 43.62 | |||||
2019 | 0.32 | 3.76 | 1.61a | 0.71 | 43.76 | |||||
2020 | 0.32 | 3.41 | 1.49a | 0.67 | 44.81 | |||||
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 2017 | 54.00 | 443.00 | 133.67a | 52.56 | 39.32 | ||||
2018 | 37.00 | 328.00 | 133.14a | 48.75 | 36.62 | |||||
2019 | 35.00 | 269.00 | 139.56a | 47.05 | 33.72 | |||||
2020 | 39.00 | 325.00 | 135.84a | 50.84 | 37.43 | |||||
有效磷/(mg/kg) | 2017 | 4.40 | 567.00 | 48.99b | 55.79 | 113.89 | ||||
2018 | 4.70 | 309.00 | 56.06ab | 52.44 | 93.54 | |||||
2019 | 4.50 | 273.50 | 65.25a | 56.27 | 86.24 | |||||
2020 | 3.00 | 260.00 | 60.09a | 49.54 | 82.44 | |||||
速效钾/(mg/kg) | 2017 | 10.00 | 248.00 | 84.11a | 49.55 | 58.91 | ||||
2018 | 19.00 | 434.00 | 95.98a | 65.83 | 68.59 | |||||
2019 | 17.00 | 400.00 | 93.71a | 60.08 | 64.11 | |||||
2020 | 15.00 | 427.00 | 91.37a | 63.47 | 69.47 |
区域 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
英东 | 5.29c | 22.89b | 1.41b | 129.4a | 73.9a | 110.5a |
英中 | 5.94b | 24.36a | 1.54a | 137.1a | 58.3ab | 83.2b |
英西北 | 6.01b | 25.11a | 1.63a | 142.1a | 52.0b | 89.9b |
英西南 | 6.41a | 22.98b | 1.47b | 128.5a | 45.5b | 81.3b |
区域 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
英东 | 5.29c | 22.89b | 1.41b | 129.4a | 73.9a | 110.5a |
英中 | 5.94b | 24.36a | 1.54a | 137.1a | 58.3ab | 83.2b |
英西北 | 6.01b | 25.11a | 1.63a | 142.1a | 52.0b | 89.9b |
英西南 | 6.41a | 22.98b | 1.47b | 128.5a | 45.5b | 81.3b |
pH | 有机质 | 全氮 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 1.0000 | |||||
有机质 | 0.3160*** | 1.0000 | ||||
全氮 | 0.3789*** | 0.9443*** | 1.0000 | |||
碱解氮 | 0.2311*** | 0.8004*** | 0.8228*** | 1.0000 | ||
有效磷 | -0.3873*** | -0.1812*** | -0.1817*** | -0.0718 | 1.0000 | |
速效钾 | -0.1635*** | 0.0914** | 0.1132** | 0.1875*** | 0.4402*** | 1.0000 |
pH | 有机质 | 全氮 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 1.0000 | |||||
有机质 | 0.3160*** | 1.0000 | ||||
全氮 | 0.3789*** | 0.9443*** | 1.0000 | |||
碱解氮 | 0.2311*** | 0.8004*** | 0.8228*** | 1.0000 | ||
有效磷 | -0.3873*** | -0.1812*** | -0.1817*** | -0.0718 | 1.0000 | |
速效钾 | -0.1635*** | 0.0914** | 0.1132** | 0.1875*** | 0.4402*** | 1.0000 |
[1] |
程国峰, 黄达, 赵冬丽, 等. 河南省潮土区土壤肥力现状分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27):101-105.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0916 |
[2] |
武红亮, 王士超, 闫志浩, 等. 近30年我国典型水稻土肥力演变特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(6):1416-1424.
|
[3] |
毛伟, 李文西, 陈明, 等. 近30年扬州市耕地土壤肥力变异特征及其驱动因素分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(11):1998-2009.
|
[4] |
任雪菲, 黄道友, 罗尊长, 等. 洞庭湖区农田土壤肥力因子的演变及其原因分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(3):691-696.
|
[5] |
黄继川, 彭智平, 徐培智, 等. 广东省水稻土有机质和氮、磷、钾肥力调查[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(6):70-73.
|
[6] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[7] |
广东省土壤普查办公室. 广东土壤[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993.
|
[8] |
袁志发, 周静芋. 试验设计与分析[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
|
[9] |
陈伟, 魏虹, 李昌晓, 等. 三峡库区不同土地利用方式土壤肥力变化——以汝溪河流域为例[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 38(1):96-100.
|
[10] |
唐琨, 朱伟文, 周文新, 等. 土壤pH对植物生长发育影响的研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2013, 27(2):207-212.
|
[11] |
尹逊霄, 华珞, 张振贤, 等. 土壤中磷素的有效性及其循环转化机制研究[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(3):95-101.
|
[12] |
于天一, 孙秀山, 石程仁, 等. 土壤酸化危害及防治技术研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(11):3137-3143.
|
[13] |
李春越, 王益,
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.13.009 |
[14] |
黄运湘, 曾希柏, 张杨珠, 等. 湖南省丘岗茶园土壤的酸化特征及其对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(3):633-638.
|
[15] |
周飞, 许熔熔, 陈余平, 等. 余姚市耕地土壤养分状况及其变化特征研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(7):117-121.
|
[16] |
张述强, 姚志龙. 旱地果园土壤有机质对氮素含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(17):45-50.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0539 |
[17] |
彭智平, 赵秉强, 黄继川. 广东省作物专用复混肥料农艺配方[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2014.
|
[18] |
都江雪, 柳开楼, 黄晶, 等. 中国稻田土壤有效磷时空演变特征及其对磷平衡的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(2):476-486.
|
[19] |
林碧珊, 苏少青. 广东省稻田土壤肥力演变状况及分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008, 14(11):70-71.
|
[20] |
程金, 张思文, 黄文卿, 等. 福建省耕地土壤pH空间分布及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(12):90-101.
|
[21] |
符昌武, 王祖富, 宋家庆, 等. 不同海拔高度植烟土壤磷素特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J]. 中国农技推广, 2020, 36(11):78-81.
|
[22] |
张超博, 邱洁雅, 王敏, 等. 桂北柑橘园土壤化学性状研究[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(6):1187-1195.
|
[1] | YANG Tai, YU Huiying, LU Liming, FU Haiyan, LI Guoliang, DAI Wenlong, LIU Chunguang, YANG Fengshan, MA Yukun. Endophytic Bacteria from Maize Seed with Growth-promoting Potential: Isolation, Identification and Optimization of Fermentation Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 16-23. |
[2] | ZHANG Zhong, MA Quanlin, ZHANG Dekui, WEI Linyuan, CHEN Fang, QI Fujun. Effects of Exogenous Hormone on Seed Germination of Agriophyllum squarrosum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 40-44. |
[3] | WANG Haiying, HAN Dejun, LI Xiaorui. A High Throughput Tomato Genomic DNA Extraction Method and Its Application in SNP Genotyping [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 45-51. |
[4] | CHEN Gaolin, MAI Yongxin, ZHANG Dongqing, LV Mengyu, LI Xia. Antibiotic Removal Mechanism in Constructed Wetland: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 63-70. |
[5] | WU Chupeng, SHENG Jiandong, HU Yutong, CHENG Zhihui, YANG Pengfei. Soil Quality Evaluation of Oasis Cotton Fields in Shaya County of Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 71-78. |
[6] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[7] | LV Yiying, CAI Yongzhan, BAI Tao, HAN Xiaonv, LIU Dongmei, LI Zhu’an, WANG Ruibao, CHEN Xiaolong, WANG Qiyu, LIN Dengzhi, YU Lei, HUANG Feiyan. Biological Characteristics and Laboratory Virulence Determination of Tobacco Black Shank Bacteria in Qujing City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 102-110. |
[8] | SHAO Xuehua, KUANG Shizi, HUANG Jianhui, OUYANG Jiamin, WAN Yan, LAI Duo. Effects of On-tree Storage on the Fruit Quality of Phyllanthus emblica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 140-145. |
[9] | ZHONG Junwen, WANG Zhenghao, MA Lijuan, SHI Xiangdong, DING Songshuang. Research Progress of Air-curing Tobacco Modulation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 146-152. |
[10] | YANG Xiaoxia, YAN Jiakun. Effects of Drought Stress on Root Phenotype of Foxtail Millet Seedlings of Varieties of Different Decades [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 24-32. |
[11] | HUANG Wenjing, YANG Shuhua, GE Hong, KOU Yaping, ZHAO Xin, JIA Ruidong, CHEN Jiren. Research of AMF on the Growth and Development of Ornamental Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 55-63. |
[12] | ZHENG Wei, YUAN Longzhen, WANG Jianhua, YANG Yao, WU Chuanguang, HUANG Ying, YOU Ping, XUE Xiaohui. Culturable Microorganism Diversity and Physicochemical Properties of Soil in the Reclamation Area of Coal Mine Wasteland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 81-87. |
[13] | ZHU Xiaoyue, FANG Yan, SHANGGUAN Zhouping. Mechanism and Technology of Soil Fertility Cultivation in Loess Desert: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 95-101. |
[14] | YAO Hemin, TANG Mei, GONG Xuehua, JIN Mengjun, YANG Chengde. Screening, Identification and Functional Determination of Endophytic Bacteria from Forage Grass at Alpine Grassland in Qinghai Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 124-128. |
[15] | ZHOU Jie, QI Chuandong, TANG Chun, GUO Fengling, QIN Zhushan, CAI Xiaodong, WU Jinping. Application Effect of Ethephon, Medium Trace Element and Functional Fertilizer on Ginger [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 72-76. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||