Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 102-110.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0198
Previous Articles Next Articles
LV Yiying1(), CAI Yongzhan2(
), BAI Tao2, HAN Xiaonv3, LIU Dongmei2, LI Zhu’an2, WANG Ruibao2, CHEN Xiaolong4, WANG Qiyu1, LIN Dengzhi1, YU Lei1, HUANG Feiyan1(
)
Received:
2022-03-24
Revised:
2022-05-11
Online:
2023-03-05
Published:
2023-03-15
LV Yiying, CAI Yongzhan, BAI Tao, HAN Xiaonv, LIU Dongmei, LI Zhu’an, WANG Ruibao, CHEN Xiaolong, WANG Qiyu, LIN Dengzhi, YU Lei, HUANG Feiyan. Biological Characteristics and Laboratory Virulence Determination of Tobacco Black Shank Bacteria in Qujing City[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 102-110.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0198
供试药剂 | 有效成分/% | 剂型 | 生产厂家 |
---|---|---|---|
氟吗啉 | 30 | 悬浮剂 | 沈阳科创化学品有限公司 |
氟菌·霜霉威 | 68.75 | 悬浮剂 | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 |
噁霜·锰锌 | 64 | 可湿性粉剂 | 先正达(苏州)作物保护有限公司 |
霜脲氰 | 80 | 水分散粒剂 | 陕西美邦药业集团股份有限公司 |
丙森锌 | 70 | 可湿性粉剂 | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 |
百菌清 | 75 | 可湿性粉剂 | 先正达(苏州)作物保护有限公司 |
三乙膦酸铝 | 80 | 可湿性粉剂 | 利民化学有限责任公司 |
噻菌铜 | 20 | 悬浮剂 | 浙江龙湾化工有限公司 |
供试药剂 | 有效成分/% | 剂型 | 生产厂家 |
---|---|---|---|
氟吗啉 | 30 | 悬浮剂 | 沈阳科创化学品有限公司 |
氟菌·霜霉威 | 68.75 | 悬浮剂 | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 |
噁霜·锰锌 | 64 | 可湿性粉剂 | 先正达(苏州)作物保护有限公司 |
霜脲氰 | 80 | 水分散粒剂 | 陕西美邦药业集团股份有限公司 |
丙森锌 | 70 | 可湿性粉剂 | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 |
百菌清 | 75 | 可湿性粉剂 | 先正达(苏州)作物保护有限公司 |
三乙膦酸铝 | 80 | 可湿性粉剂 | 利民化学有限责任公司 |
噻菌铜 | 20 | 悬浮剂 | 浙江龙湾化工有限公司 |
药剂 | 设定浓度/(μg/mL) | 抑菌率/% | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | EC50/(μg/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30%氟吗啉 | 1 | 68.4444 | y=5.3831+0.4879x | 0.9463 | 0.1640 |
0.5 | 56.2222 | ||||
0.25 | 51.1111 | ||||
0.125 | 46.6667 | ||||
0.0625 | 44.6667 | ||||
68.75%氟菌·霜霉威 | 16 | 94 | y=4.2162+2.1295x | 0.9771 | 2.3339 |
8 | 85 | ||||
4 | 79 | ||||
2 | 55 | ||||
1 | 24 | ||||
64%噁霜·锰锌 | 15.36 | 94 | y=4.3381+1.7854x | 0.9865 | 2.3481 |
7.68 | 82 | ||||
3.84 | 62 | ||||
1.92 | 44 | ||||
0.96 | 17 | ||||
80%霜脲氰 | 25.6 | 86.8889 | y=4.3255+1.1994x | 0.9840 | 3.6510 |
6.4 | 64.6667 | ||||
1.6 | 24.8889 | ||||
0.4 | 9.1111 | ||||
0.1 | 5.1111 | ||||
70%丙森锌 | 8 | 52.29 | y=3.7250+1.2763x | 0.9690 | 10.5900 |
4 | 27.74 | ||||
2 | 14.57 | ||||
1 | 9.38 | ||||
0.5 | 6.18 | ||||
75%百菌清 | 20 | 55.68 | y=4.0260+0.8468x | 0.9780 | 15.1900 |
10 | 45.50 | ||||
5 | 40.11 | ||||
2.5 | 24.35 | ||||
1.25 | 17.56 | ||||
80%三乙膦酸铝 | 320 | 94 | y=-2.9827+3.7660x | 0.9951 | 132.7366 |
240 | 80 | ||||
180 | 68 | ||||
135.84 | 55 | ||||
101.28 | 34 | ||||
20%噻菌铜 | 6400 | 51.29 | y=0.6280+1.1293x | 0.9761 | 7962.0000 |
3200 | 33.53 | ||||
1600 | 17.84 | ||||
800 | 12.27 | ||||
400 | 9.38 |
药剂 | 设定浓度/(μg/mL) | 抑菌率/% | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | EC50/(μg/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30%氟吗啉 | 1 | 68.4444 | y=5.3831+0.4879x | 0.9463 | 0.1640 |
0.5 | 56.2222 | ||||
0.25 | 51.1111 | ||||
0.125 | 46.6667 | ||||
0.0625 | 44.6667 | ||||
68.75%氟菌·霜霉威 | 16 | 94 | y=4.2162+2.1295x | 0.9771 | 2.3339 |
8 | 85 | ||||
4 | 79 | ||||
2 | 55 | ||||
1 | 24 | ||||
64%噁霜·锰锌 | 15.36 | 94 | y=4.3381+1.7854x | 0.9865 | 2.3481 |
7.68 | 82 | ||||
3.84 | 62 | ||||
1.92 | 44 | ||||
0.96 | 17 | ||||
80%霜脲氰 | 25.6 | 86.8889 | y=4.3255+1.1994x | 0.9840 | 3.6510 |
6.4 | 64.6667 | ||||
1.6 | 24.8889 | ||||
0.4 | 9.1111 | ||||
0.1 | 5.1111 | ||||
70%丙森锌 | 8 | 52.29 | y=3.7250+1.2763x | 0.9690 | 10.5900 |
4 | 27.74 | ||||
2 | 14.57 | ||||
1 | 9.38 | ||||
0.5 | 6.18 | ||||
75%百菌清 | 20 | 55.68 | y=4.0260+0.8468x | 0.9780 | 15.1900 |
10 | 45.50 | ||||
5 | 40.11 | ||||
2.5 | 24.35 | ||||
1.25 | 17.56 | ||||
80%三乙膦酸铝 | 320 | 94 | y=-2.9827+3.7660x | 0.9951 | 132.7366 |
240 | 80 | ||||
180 | 68 | ||||
135.84 | 55 | ||||
101.28 | 34 | ||||
20%噻菌铜 | 6400 | 51.29 | y=0.6280+1.1293x | 0.9761 | 7962.0000 |
3200 | 33.53 | ||||
1600 | 17.84 | ||||
800 | 12.27 | ||||
400 | 9.38 |
[1] |
陈瑞泰, 朱贤朝, 王智发, 等. 全国16个主产烟省(区)烟草侵染性病害调研报告[J]. 中国烟草科学, 1997(4):3-9.
|
[2] |
李梅云. 云南省烟草疫霉生理小种的初步鉴定[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(5):54-59.
|
[3] |
孟建玉, 汪汉成, 贾蒙骜, 等. 贵州省烟草黑胫病菌对甲霜灵的抗药性[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(5):168-171.
|
[4] |
李斌, 杨益芬, 龚国淑. 四川省烟草黑胫病菌生理小种的分离鉴定[J]. 烟草科技, 2012(10):81-84.
|
[5] |
高文华, 李江美. 烟草黑胫病防治研究进展[J]. 热带农业科技, 2020, 43(1):50-54.
|
[6] |
常栋, 顾建国, 贾方方, 等. 烟草黑胫病不同植物源生防菌的筛选及防效测定[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(3):84-90.
|
[7] |
邱睿, 王海涛, 李成军, 等. 烟草病虫害绿色防控技术研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(11):8-13.
|
[8] |
张凯, 谢利丽, 武云杰, 等. 烟草黑胫病的发生及综合防治研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2015, 17(4):62-70.
|
[9] |
高文华, 李江美. 烟草黑胫病防治研究进展[J]. 热带农业科技, 2020, 43(1):50-54.
|
[10] |
朱流红, 安启菲, 吴轶凡, 等. 烟草黑胫病菌对7种杀菌剂的敏感性[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2016, 35(1):18-22.
|
[11] |
刘绍文, 熊霞, 柏连阳, 等. 几种杀菌剂对烟草黑胫病的田间药效试验[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2007(7):25-26,56.
|
[12] |
夏贤仁, 曾嵘, 包开荣, 等. 几种杀菌剂防治烟草黑胫病试验[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2007(2):20-21,143.
|
[13] |
李锡宏, 梅东海, 谭军, 等. 几种杀菌剂防治烟草黑胫病试验初报[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2006(6):755-756.
|
[14] |
武霖通, 丁伟, 余祥文, 等. 烟草黑胫病防治的关键施药技术研究[J]. 植物医生, 2018, 31(3):53-56.
|
[15] |
薛超群, 牟文君, 奚家勤, 等. 烤烟不同间作对烟草黑胫病防控效果的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(3):77-79.
|
[16] |
李伟, 黄建明, 张静, 等. 3个烤烟品种生理指标与黑胫病抗性差异研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(10):120-124.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15080014 |
[17] |
曾乙心, 金福财, 熊正兴, 等. 4个烟草品种的烟草黑胫病潜育期[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(8):1473-1476.
|
[18] |
余波. 不同药剂对陆良县烟草黑胫病的防治效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(3):100-101.
|
[19] |
杨庆焱. 不同药剂对烟草黑胫病的防治效果对比分析[J]. 河南农业, 2019(11):19-21.
|
[20] |
杨应美, 卢灿华, 盖晓彤, 等. 烟草黑胫病不同菌株对不同药剂的抗性评价[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(6):55-58,120.
|
[21] |
刘行风, 刘东, 陶磊, 等. 黑龙江省黄瓜链格孢叶斑病病原鉴定及生物学特性研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2021(8):80-86.
|
[22] |
沈会芳, 林壁润, 孙光明, 等. 海南菠萝心腐病菌烟草疫霉的生物学特性研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(2):92-94,237.
|
[23] |
李蕊倩. 西葫芦根腐病病原菌(Phytophthora nicotianae)的生物学特性研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 2008, 36(12):74-76.
|
[24] |
秦小芳, 霍行, 周琼, 等. 白及疫病病原菌的生物学特性及侵染特性测定[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2020(8):47-51.
|
[25] |
刘畅, 向立刚, 汪汉成, 等. 温度对烟草黑胫病菌致病力及代谢表型的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(3):669-678.
|
[26] |
赵辉, 王喜英, 刘国权, 等. 烟草黑胫病发生因素及综合防治研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2020(11):99-103.
|
[1] | ZHENG Tongtong, WANG Ning, LI Jin, RONG Hua, LEI Bin, GUO Qingyuan. Pathogen Identification and Biological Characteristics of Wheat Fusarium Leaf Blight [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 90-98. |
[2] | ZHONG Junwen, WANG Zhenghao, MA Lijuan, SHI Xiangdong, DING Songshuang. Research Progress of Air-curing Tobacco Modulation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 146-152. |
[3] | DU Caiyan, WU Di, LI Jiakui, BAI Jiyuan, DAI Kuai, LI Jiarui, HE Yuhua, LI Jiangzhou. Nitrogen Application Rate Affects Soil Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss and Tobacco Nitrogen Utilization in the Fuxian Lake Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 80-87. |
[4] | CHEN Zhenlu, PAN Xiaoying, LU Yusheng, HUANG Zhenrui, GU Wenjie, GUO Junjie, WEI Bin, ZENG Yuling, LIU Yixuan, HE Jingwei, LI Jiqin. Effects of Organic-inorganic Compound Conditioner on Acidified Soil Properties and Tobacco Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 28-34. |
[5] | GUO Guocai, WANG Guangjun, ZHANG Kai, GUO Zhaoliang, LIANG Zhihui. Reproductive Biology and Hatching Mode of Cherax quadricarinatu: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 117-122. |
[6] | HUANG Hao, XIE Jin, YUAN Wenbin, WANG Chuliang, CHEN Kunhua, ZENG Fandong, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. Effects of Different Organic Materials on Root Characteristics and Accumulation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 51-57. |
[7] | LI Dongxue, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, BU Lingduo, WANG Ruizhi, LIU Hao, LU Dianjun, WANG Huoyan, CHEN Xiaoqin. Nutrient Content of Tobacco Leaves and Root Zone Soil Affected by Citrate Soluble Potassium Fertilizer in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 67-73. |
[8] | GUAN Luohao, YANG Xin, LI Chao, ZHANG Yanling, ZHANG Guangfu, LI Yongliang, ZHOU Hanping, WANG Guangshan, ZHONG Shuai, DAI Huaxin. Influence of Remained Leaves on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Tengchong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 10-15. |
[9] | HUNAG Lei, LI Yimeng, ZHONG Shuai, JIN Baofeng, GAO Jinjun, WANG Xiaoyuan, GUAN Luohao, WANG Chuliang, HUANG Wanting, LI Min. Changes of Physical and Chemical Indexes of Tobacco Leaves Sealed with Hypoxia After Unsealing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 107-112. |
[10] | HAN Min, YANG Pengwu, HE Yuqin, HU Xueqiong, ZHU Yong. Prediction of the Disaster Risk of Overcast and Rainy Days on Flue-cured Tobacco Planting in Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 69-75. |
[11] | XU Zhiqiang, LIU Huabing, ZHANG Xiaobing, ZHAO Yanping, ZHONG Yongjian, GU Chao, LI Zheng. Nitrogen Metabolism and Secondary Metabolism of Different Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties at Maturity Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(36): 42-47. |
[12] | YAN Fangfang, KONG Chuixu, ZHANG Yingjie, MAO Min, JIAN Lianjun, WANG Rong. Biological Control of Tobacco Root-knot Nematode Disease by Penicillium purpurogenum K1 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 103-108. |
[13] | HOU Jianlin, LI Sijun, HE Mingyu, XIAO Hanqian, XIANG Tiejun, HUANG Jie, LI Wujin, XIAO Yansong, JIANG Zhimin, XU Junhua, DENG Xiaohua. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, Yield and Quality of Paddy-tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 39-43. |
[14] | XU Xiaomei, LI Ying, HENG Zhou, XU Xiaowan, LI Tao, WANG Hengming. CaWRKY Transcription Factors Induced by Phytophthora capsici: Screening and Signal Pathway Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 22-31. |
[15] | ZHANG Zhiling, LIN Haibin, WANG Xinwang, LIN Long, CHEN Xingfeng, GAO Weimin, LIN Zubin, CHEN Qingwen. The Correlation Between the Starch Content and the Appearance Quality and Sensory Quality of Fujian Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 136-141. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||