Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (22): 17-23.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0639
Previous Articles Next Articles
RONG Lei1(), XUE Zhiqin1, DENG Chenxiao1, LUO Kun2, GAO Chongliang2, LI Shenghai2, WANG Yijie2, WANG Yanni2, CAI Xianjie3, YAN Ding3, YU Lei1, HUANG Feiyan1(
), HAN Tianhua2(
)
Received:
2023-09-12
Revised:
2024-01-10
Online:
2024-07-28
Published:
2024-07-28
RONG Lei, XUE Zhiqin, DENG Chenxiao, LUO Kun, GAO Chongliang, LI Shenghai, WANG Yijie, WANG Yanni, CAI Xianjie, YAN Ding, YU Lei, HUANG Feiyan, HAN Tianhua. Ecological Adaptability and Comprehensive Evaluation of Tobacco Leaf Yield and Quality of 7 Tobacco Varieties in Lijiang Tobacco Planting Area of Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(22): 17-23.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0639
处理 | 处理1 | 处理2 | 处理3 | 处理4 | 处理5 | 处理6 | 处理7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复1 | 云烟87(CK) | 秦烟96 | 云烟116 | 云烟121 | NC71 | CC27 | PVH1452 |
重复2 | 秦烟96 | 云烟121 | 云烟87(CK) | NC71 | PVH1452 | 云烟116 | CC27 |
重复3 | PVH1452 | 云烟116 | NC71 | CC27 | 云烟121 | 秦烟96 | 云烟87(CK) |
处理 | 处理1 | 处理2 | 处理3 | 处理4 | 处理5 | 处理6 | 处理7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复1 | 云烟87(CK) | 秦烟96 | 云烟116 | 云烟121 | NC71 | CC27 | PVH1452 |
重复2 | 秦烟96 | 云烟121 | 云烟87(CK) | NC71 | PVH1452 | 云烟116 | CC27 |
重复3 | PVH1452 | 云烟116 | NC71 | CC27 | 云烟121 | 秦烟96 | 云烟87(CK) |
品种 | 播种期(月/日) | 移栽期(月/日) | 团棵期(月/日) | 现蕾期(月/日) | 脚叶成熟期(月/日) | 顶叶成熟期(月/日) | 大田生育期/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/11 | 7/11 | 7/26 | 9/2 | 111 |
秦烟96 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/13 | 7/14 | 7/28 | 9/3 | 112 |
云烟121 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/10 | 7/12 | 7/26 | 9/2 | 111 |
云烟116 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/10 | 7/10 | 7/25 | 9/1 | 110 |
PVH1452 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/11 | 7/12 | 7/27 | 9/4 | 113 |
CC27 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/12 | 7/13 | 7/28 | 9/3 | 112 |
云烟87(CK) | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/11 | 7/11 | 7/27 | 9/4 | 113 |
品种 | 播种期(月/日) | 移栽期(月/日) | 团棵期(月/日) | 现蕾期(月/日) | 脚叶成熟期(月/日) | 顶叶成熟期(月/日) | 大田生育期/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/11 | 7/11 | 7/26 | 9/2 | 111 |
秦烟96 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/13 | 7/14 | 7/28 | 9/3 | 112 |
云烟121 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/10 | 7/12 | 7/26 | 9/2 | 111 |
云烟116 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/10 | 7/10 | 7/25 | 9/1 | 110 |
PVH1452 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/11 | 7/12 | 7/27 | 9/4 | 113 |
CC27 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/12 | 7/13 | 7/28 | 9/3 | 112 |
云烟87(CK) | 3/7 | 5/14 | 6/11 | 7/11 | 7/27 | 9/4 | 113 |
品种 | 株高/cm | 有效叶数/片 | 节距/cm | 茎围/cm | 最大叶面积/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 94.00±4.47d | 18.78±1.39ab | 4.79±0.55b | 7.43±0.47b | 1395.93±225.89bcd |
秦烟96 | 122.45±10.61b | 16.44±1.24c | 6.81±0.81a | 9.14±0.97a | 1731.47±375.84a |
云烟121 | 110.11±12.36c | 17.89±1.36b | 5.43±0.82b | 7.28±0.79bc | 1515.41±220.02abc |
云烟116 | 93.89±9.61d | 18.67±1.58ab | 5.27±0.73b | 6.51±0.55c | 1192.64±140.13d |
PVH1452 | 101.06±12.81cd | 18.67±1.58ab | 4.73±0.63b | 7.14±0.80bc | 1350.37±273.29bcd |
CC27 | 94.67±9.66d | 19.22±0.97ab | 4.79±0.42b | 7.54±0.57b | 1321.07±170.27cd |
云烟87(CK) | 142.00±8.19a | 20.00±0.88a | 6.93±0.55a | 7.87±0.23b | 1631.54±120.86ab |
品种 | 株高/cm | 有效叶数/片 | 节距/cm | 茎围/cm | 最大叶面积/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 94.00±4.47d | 18.78±1.39ab | 4.79±0.55b | 7.43±0.47b | 1395.93±225.89bcd |
秦烟96 | 122.45±10.61b | 16.44±1.24c | 6.81±0.81a | 9.14±0.97a | 1731.47±375.84a |
云烟121 | 110.11±12.36c | 17.89±1.36b | 5.43±0.82b | 7.28±0.79bc | 1515.41±220.02abc |
云烟116 | 93.89±9.61d | 18.67±1.58ab | 5.27±0.73b | 6.51±0.55c | 1192.64±140.13d |
PVH1452 | 101.06±12.81cd | 18.67±1.58ab | 4.73±0.63b | 7.14±0.80bc | 1350.37±273.29bcd |
CC27 | 94.67±9.66d | 19.22±0.97ab | 4.79±0.42b | 7.54±0.57b | 1321.07±170.27cd |
云烟87(CK) | 142.00±8.19a | 20.00±0.88a | 6.93±0.55a | 7.87±0.23b | 1631.54±120.86ab |
品种 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 下等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 4313.50 | 22.16 | 95587.16 | 76.56 | 16.09 | 7.35 |
秦烟96 | 3765.50 | 22.29 | 83933.00 | 75.10 | 16.25 | 8.65 |
云烟121 | 4007.25 | 21.88 | 87678.63 | 75.07 | 17.33 | 7.60 |
云烟116 | 4272.75 | 22.88 | 97760.52 | 75.49 | 17.61 | 6.90 |
PVH1452 | 3825.00 | 22.16 | 84762.00 | 75.65 | 16.67 | 7.68 |
CC27 | 4047.75 | 22.69 | 91843.45 | 77.54 | 15.13 | 7.33 |
云烟87(CK) | 4254.00 | 22.60 | 96140.40 | 77.53 | 16.16 | 6.31 |
品种 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 下等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 4313.50 | 22.16 | 95587.16 | 76.56 | 16.09 | 7.35 |
秦烟96 | 3765.50 | 22.29 | 83933.00 | 75.10 | 16.25 | 8.65 |
云烟121 | 4007.25 | 21.88 | 87678.63 | 75.07 | 17.33 | 7.60 |
云烟116 | 4272.75 | 22.88 | 97760.52 | 75.49 | 17.61 | 6.90 |
PVH1452 | 3825.00 | 22.16 | 84762.00 | 75.65 | 16.67 | 7.68 |
CC27 | 4047.75 | 22.69 | 91843.45 | 77.54 | 15.13 | 7.33 |
云烟87(CK) | 4254.00 | 22.60 | 96140.40 | 77.53 | 16.16 | 6.31 |
品种 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 烟碱/% | 总氮/% | 氯离子/% | 钾离子/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 32.91bc | 22.08ab | 2.40ab | 1.70b | 0.29b | 2.14b | 9.33c | 0.72c | 8.39ab | 0.79 |
秦烟96 | 37.91ab | 25.84a | 1.57d | 1.69b | 0.23b | 2.16b | 16.88a | 1.09a | 11.02ab | 0.52 |
云烟121 | 35.84abc | 24.92ab | 2.15bc | 1.79ab | 0.52a | 2.12b | 12.51abc | 0.86bc | 4.16b | 0.67 |
云烟116 | 34.67abc | 23.68ab | 2.84a | 1.87a | 0.23b | 2.19b | 8.56c | 0.67c | 12.35ab | 0.65 |
PVH1452 | 35.25abc | 23.96ab | 2.43ab | 1.85a | 0.34b | 2.06b | 10.45bc | 0.78c | 7.18b | 0.75 |
CC27 | 31.36c | 20.41b | 2.45ab | 1.89a | 0.19b | 2.48a | 8.56c | 0.78c | 17.56a | 0.78 |
云烟87(CK) | 39.82a | 26.92a | 1.76cd | 1.81ab | 0.18b | 1.83c | 15.75ab | 1.05ab | 10.64ab | 0.50 |
品种 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 烟碱/% | 总氮/% | 氯离子/% | 钾离子/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC71 | 32.91bc | 22.08ab | 2.40ab | 1.70b | 0.29b | 2.14b | 9.33c | 0.72c | 8.39ab | 0.79 |
秦烟96 | 37.91ab | 25.84a | 1.57d | 1.69b | 0.23b | 2.16b | 16.88a | 1.09a | 11.02ab | 0.52 |
云烟121 | 35.84abc | 24.92ab | 2.15bc | 1.79ab | 0.52a | 2.12b | 12.51abc | 0.86bc | 4.16b | 0.67 |
云烟116 | 34.67abc | 23.68ab | 2.84a | 1.87a | 0.23b | 2.19b | 8.56c | 0.67c | 12.35ab | 0.65 |
PVH1452 | 35.25abc | 23.96ab | 2.43ab | 1.85a | 0.34b | 2.06b | 10.45bc | 0.78c | 7.18b | 0.75 |
CC27 | 31.36c | 20.41b | 2.45ab | 1.89a | 0.19b | 2.48a | 8.56c | 0.78c | 17.56a | 0.78 |
云烟87(CK) | 39.82a | 26.92a | 1.76cd | 1.81ab | 0.18b | 1.83c | 15.75ab | 1.05ab | 10.64ab | 0.50 |
[1] |
蔡宪杰, 闫鼎, 韩天华. 基于“中华”品牌的丽江烟叶生产标准化体系构建[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2021:96-98.
|
[2] |
段树苍, 陈茂建, 李成杰, 等. 丽江金沙江区域特色优质烟叶开发研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(8):4857-4859,4880.
|
[3] |
周泽庆. 丽江优质特色烟叶的相关因素分析[J]. 农产品加工, 2009(11):64-66.
|
[4] |
孙计平, 吴照辉, 李雪君, 等. 21世纪中国烤烟种植区域及主栽品种变化分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(3):86-92.
|
[5] |
朱海, 梁盟, 宋文静, 等. 气候因子对烤烟质量风格特色的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(5):63-69.
|
[6] |
龚婷, 查宏波, 黄韡, 等. 不同光质处理对云烟87生长及品质的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(1):29-34.
|
[7] |
杨祖恒, 冯骏, 夏贤仁, 等. 不同施氮量对云烟105产质量及经济效益的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(11):42-47.
|
[8] |
贾保顺, 邢雪霞, 符新妍, 等. 不同烤烟品种在南阳烟区的生态适应性研究[J]. 天津农业科学, 2018, 24(11):46-50.
|
[9] |
王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏. 中国烟草种植区划[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010:36-37.
|
[10] |
汤浒. 宜宾烟叶质量综合评价研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2018.
|
[11] |
张永安, 马彩娟, 刘立博, 等. 烤烟外观质量数字化方法与感官质量相关性分析[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(4):48-52.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20191200307 |
[12] |
冉法芬, 裴洲洋, 朱启法, 等. 基于指数和法的皖南烤烟主要化学成分协调性分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(Z1):24-27.
|
[13] |
杨祝军, 胡亚杰, 梁桂广, 等. 不同烟区K326烟叶外观质量及感官质量对比分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2023, 43(8):16-19.
|
[14] |
云南省烟草科学研究所. 云南烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007:53.
|
[15] |
郜红娟, 蔡广鹏, 张新鼎, 等. 我国烤烟生产比较优势时空演变[J]. 烟草科技, 2018, 51(2):25-33.
|
[16] |
顾本文, 胡雪琼, 吉文娟, 等. 云南植烟区生态气候类型区划[J]. 西南农业学报, 2007, 20(4):772-776.
|
[17] |
杨坤, 杨焕文, 李佛琳, 等. 丽江烟区生态条件及烤烟化学成分分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2011(1):94-99.
|
[18] |
王博, 杨焕文, 李佛琳, 等. 丽江市植烟土壤养分丰缺状况评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2011, 26(3):382-388.
|
[19] |
刘涛, 曹建敏, 郭存, 等. 不同烤烟品种化学成分及致香物质差异分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2023, 44(2):74-82.
|
[20] |
马文广, 周义和, 刘相甫, 等. 我国烤烟品种的发展现状及对策展望[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2018, 24(1):116-122.
|
[21] |
李雪君, 吴疆, 吴家静, 等. 烤烟新品种渠首1号对低氮胁迫的响应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(14):80-85.
|
[22] |
赵志明. 云南丽江适宜烤烟品种筛选研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2008.
|
[23] |
马斌, 陈锦霞, 黄光祥, 等. 烤烟品种云烟207和云烟121在丽江烟区的适应性分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(9):21-25.
|
[24] |
刘魁. 烤烟品种综合评价方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
|
[25] |
刘晓恒, 杨柳. 基于DPSIR-TOPSIS和GM(1,1)模型的贵州省土地生态安全评价与预测[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(15):292-297.
|
[26] |
黄媛, 李瑜玲, 高欣娜, 等. 基于模糊Borda法评价昼夜温差对番茄秧苗生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(14):219-224.
|
[27] |
任可, 李天福, 杨雪彪, 等. 云南德宏烤烟品种KRK26烟叶质量特征分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(10):2438-2444.
|
[28] |
陈义强, 范坚强, 包可翔, 等. 移栽期及施氮量对津引品种KRK26质量风格特色的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(27):13294-13296.
|
[29] |
杨维良. 烤烟KRK26品种在通海烟区海拔适应性及关键栽培技术研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2012.
|
[1] | SHEN Yi, YAN Ding, CAI Xianjie, NI Xia, LI Dewen, WEI Qili, ZUO Weibiao, XIA Wenkai, GUI Longfeng, ZHAO Shengchun, LIU Zhenning, LUO Qipeng. Effect of Combination of Soil Conditioner and Foliar Potassium Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(12): 33-37. |
[2] | ZHANG Zhuanyong, SHEN Zhong, HUANG He, JI Zeshun, HU Jiatian, WANG Huayu, MA Wubiao, MA Xiang, WANG Luoping, YAN Hui, YU Fengtang. Adaptability of Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties to Different Meteorological Conditions in Zhaotong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 94-100. |
[3] | LI Xiancai, ZHANG Xiaolong, PAN Yihong, ZHENG Shifang, SUN Yonghua, ZHOU Fangfang, LEI Fuhou, CAO Jiayuan. Combined Application of Different Proportions of Slow-release Fertilizer and Compound Fertilizer for Tobacco: Effects on Soil Fertility and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 47-53. |
[4] | Liang Yongjin, Shang Haili, Pan Wenzheng, Zhao Xuetong, Li Dewen, Li Jianyun, Zhang Qi. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on Growth and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco ‘K326’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(23): 45-51. |
[5] | Yang Jian, Li Kun, Wang Long, Wang Suke, Su Yanli, Xue Huabai. Ecological Adaptability and Cultivation Area of Pyrus communis in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(16): 97-101. |
[6] | Xiong Weiliang, Zhang Yingjie, Yang Peng, Tang Lili, Feng Wenlong, Zhang Minmin, Yuan Jiafu, Xu Xiangyu. Chemical Fertilizer Reduction and Basal Application of Controlled Release Fertilizer After Green Manure Turned Down: Effects on Tobacco Yield and Quality and Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(7): 29-36. |
[7] | Ma Cunjin, Ren Shiwei, Zheng Lei, Chen Jianqiu. Effects of Different Dosages of Silicon-Calcium-Potassium-Magnesium Fertilizer on Root Development and Tobacco Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(31): 7-12. |
[8] | Zhang Jiemei, Zhang Renjun, Yao Zhengping, Wu Jinhu, Wang Liang, Hou Zhengxue, Yang Zhuang, Yin Honghui, Chen Suiyun. Screening of Biocontrol Bacteria Against Tobacco Bacterial Wilt and Evaluation of the Field Control Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 131-136. |
[9] | Wang Hao, He Guoqiang, Wang Shusheng, Wu Zhijuan, Yao Yuan, Jin Kang. Effects of Turn-over Green Manure on the Quality and Economic Value of Flue-cured Tobacco in Heilongjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(17): 42-50. |
[10] | . Ecological Adaptability of Evergreen Conifers in Taiyuan City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(26): 47-51. |
[11] | 高远,,位慧琴,吴照辉,俎建民,梁涛 and 郭芳阳. Effect of Bast-fiber Film Mulching on Growth, Yield and Quality of Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(16): 34-38. |
[12] | . The Classification Criteria and Ecological Adaptability of Large-spike Type Wheat Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(15): 20-24. |
[13] | . Economic Value and Landscape Ecological Value of Oil Tree Peony: Research Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(10): 66-71. |
[14] | . Different Dosages of Silicon Calcium Potassium Magnesium Fertilizer Affect Soil Nutrients and Tobacco Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(10): 25-29. |
[15] | . A Comparative Study on Leaf Traits and Anatomical Structures of‘Gold Delicious’Apple Collected from Different Habitats [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(6): 91-96. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||