Effect of Low-temperature and Low-light Induced Water-soluble Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Autumn and Winter Cropped Sand-cultivated Tomatoes

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0729

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effect of applying amino acid water-soluble fertilizer containing low temperature and low light induced resistance on the growth and yield of autumn and winter stubble sand-cultivated tomato, the experiment was set up with five treatments, including CK₀ without fertilizer, CK conventional fertilizer, T₁ low concentration, T₂ medium concentration, and T₃ high concentration. Fertilization was applied at three stages of tomato growth, and tomato indexes were determined. The results showed that as the concentration of water-soluble fertilizer increased, the growth trend of tomato was vigorous, and the vitamin C, soluble sugar, titratable acid, and sugar-acid ratio of T₂ treatment were 7.74%, 2.77%, 14.71%, and 20.50% higher, respectively, compared with T₁.The concentration of inter-cellular CO₂ of tomato leaves in T₂ and T₃ treatments was substantially reduced compared with that of CK, and the maximal light and capacity of T₂ treatment was increased by 50%, and T₂ treatment had the highest yield, indicating that dilution of 1600 times could promote the improvement of facility tomato yield. In conclusion, the use of amino acid water-soluble fertilizer in tomato planting facilities in autumn and winter seasons can be diluted 1600 times, which can not only improve the nutrient content of the crop, but also ensure the normal operation of tomato photosynthesis and increase the yield.

Key words: low-temperature, low-light induced water-soluble fertilizer, tomato, photosynthesis, nutritional quality, yield

TIAN Subo, CHEN Wei’an, GUO Yanchun, LIN Guiyu, ZHU Haiyan, MENG Delai, WEI Hong, LI Jinyu, XIN Xiaofei, QI Ye, WANG Kaiyan, LI Yingjie, TANG Yangang. Effect of Low-temperature and Low-light Induced Water-soluble Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Autumn and Winter Cropped Sand-cultivated Tomatoes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(28): 24-29.

Figures/Tables 5

References 29

[1]	冷启兴, 钱晓红, 闫鹏, 等. 设施大棚沙培番茄生产技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(11):79-80.
[2]	梅丹娜, 须晖, 李天来, 等. 不同氮肥施用量对日光温室人工营养基质肥力及番茄产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2008(3):572-575.
[3]	El-GIZAWY A M, GOMAA H M, EL-HABBASHA K M, et al. Effect of different shading levels on tomato plants 1. Growth, flowering and chemical composition[J]. Acta horticulturae, 1993, 323:341-348.
[4]	王伟香, 张锐敏, 孙艳, 等. 外源褪黑素对硝酸盐胁迫条件下黄瓜幼苗抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(4):695-703. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0172
[5]	束胜, 汤园园, 罗佳音, 等. 外源24-表油菜素内酯对亚低温弱光胁迫下番茄叶片碳同化和抗氧化代谢的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(8):1295-1304.
[6]	陈清, 张强, 常瑞雪, 等. 我国水溶性肥料产业发展趋势与挑战[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6):1642-1650.
[7]	张宝帅, 李建峰, 李雪. 施用含氨基酸水溶肥对草莓产量形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2020(6):12-13.
[8]	马雪莲, 郑险峰, 王朝辉, 等. 康力丰氨基酸水溶肥在设施番茄上的施用效果研究[J]. 西北园艺(综合), 2020(5):57-58.
[9]	宁志怨, 钱小强, 伊兴凯, 等. 氨基酸水溶肥对促进草莓产量、品质及生长特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(12):2565-2567. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20201237
[10]	徐国益, 贾凤芹, 王平勇, 等. 不同浓度含氨基酸水溶肥对小果型西瓜根际土壤环境及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2022, 35(3):36-42.
[11]	王红梅, 廖玲玲, 瞿洁, 等. 氨基酸水溶肥在小白菜上的应用效果初探[J]. 上海农业科技, 2021(5):100-101.
[12]	HEUVELINK E. Effect of fruit load on dry matter partitioning in tomato[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 1997, 69(1/2):51-59.
[13]	黄忠阳, 刘庆叶, 戎茸, 等. 化肥减施条件下中微量元素肥配施氨基酸水溶肥对西瓜生长和品质的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2019(22):62-64.
[14]	陈伟, 陈謇, 应霄, 等. 叶面喷施含氨基酸水溶肥在草莓上的施用效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(2):239-242. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20200210
[15]	郭鲁宏, 张文华. 多肽α-氨基酸微量元素水溶肥在柑橘上的应用研究[J]. 四川农业科技, 2020(6):43-45.
[16]	圣亚男, 杨延杰, 陈丽平. 叶面喷施氨基酸水溶肥对生菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2019(4):29-31.
[17]	FALKENGREN G U, MANSSON K F, OLSSON M O. Uptake capacity of amino acids by ten grasses and forbs in relation to soil acidity and nitrogen availability[J]. Environmental and experimental botany, 2000, 44(3):207-219.
[18]	NOLAN R A. Effects of an altered developmental pattern on amino acid uptake for a protoplast isolate of the fungus Entomophaga aulicae under mass-fermentation conditions[J]. Canadian journal of microbiology, 1986, 32(11):855-860.
[19]	陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安. 叶绿素荧光动力学及其在植物抗逆生理研究中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2006(1):51-55.
[20]	林世青, 许春辉, 张其德, 等. 叶绿素荧光动力学在植物抗性生理学、生态学和农业现代化中的应用[J]. 植物学通报, 1992(1):1-16.
[21]	陈曼, 袁溢, 黄敏, 等. 甘氨酸络合钼肥对黄瓜幼苗光合生理特性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018, 30(6):25-30.
[22]	JI B, JIAO D. Relationships between sensitivities to chilling and high light and unsaturation of thylakoid membrane lipids in indica and japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Acta botanica scinca, 2002, 44(2):139-146.
[23]	师生波, 李和平, 王学英, 等. 高山植物唐古特山莨菪和唐古特大黄对强太阳辐射光能的利用和耗散特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007(1):129-137. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0016
[24]	李萍, 单守明, 李映龙, 等. 叶面喷施氨基酸钙对盐碱地‘北玺’葡萄光合作用和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2021(12):22-26.
[25]	张妮, 程云霞, 张攀, 等. 氮肥减施与氨基酸肥料替代对制干辣椒生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(11):89-93.
[26]	寇伟锋, 刘兆普, 陈铭达, 等. 不同浓度海水对油葵幼苗光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006(1):73-77.
[27]	吴玉群, 史振声, 李荣华, 等. 植物氨基酸液肥对甜玉米产量及生理指标的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2006(5):130-133.
[28]	MOSA W F A, ALI H M, ABDELSALAM N R. The utilization of tryptophan and glycine amino acids as safe alternatives to chemical fertilizers in apple orchards[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021, 28(2):1983-1991.
[29]	段春慧, 申明, 张治平, 等. 氨基酸肥料对大豆叶片光合作用与产量的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2012, 35(4):15-20.

处理	株高/cm	茎粗/mm	叶长/cm	叶宽/cm	根长/cm
CK₀	72.32d	5.94d	15.22d	10.78d	80.73c
CK	96.41c	7.98c	20.15c	13.14c	84.64c
T₁	147.92b	9.68ab	27.83b	18.25b	139.19b
T₂	174.23a	10.40a	32.13a	20.30a	155.24a
T₃	166.92a	8.91bc	31.42a	22.84a	154.72a

处理	株高/cm	茎粗/mm	叶长/cm	叶宽/cm	根长/cm
CK₀	72.32d	5.94d	15.22d	10.78d	80.73c
CK	96.41c	7.98c	20.15c	13.14c	84.64c
T₁	147.92b	9.68ab	27.83b	18.25b	139.19b
T₂	174.23a	10.40a	32.13a	20.30a	155.24a
T₃	166.92a	8.91bc	31.42a	22.84a	154.72a

处理	果形指数	可溶性固形物/%	硬度/(kg/cm²)	维生素C/%	可溶性糖/%	可滴定酸/%	糖酸比
CK₀	1.03c	7.04c	2.01c	22.59c	6.87d	0.47a	14.62d
CK	1.06c	7.38c	2.63b	23.65c	7.91c	0.36ab	21.97c
T₁	1.28a	8.33b	3.68b	24.95c	8.31b	0.34ab	24.44c
T₂	1.18b	8.17bc	4.35a	26.88b	8.54b	0.29b	29.45b
T₃	1.11b	8.67a	4.12a	27.91a	9.04a	0.26b	34.80a

处理	果形指数	可溶性固形物/%	硬度/(kg/cm²)	维生素C/%	可溶性糖/%	可滴定酸/%	糖酸比
CK₀	1.03c	7.04c	2.01c	22.59c	6.87d	0.47a	14.62d
CK	1.06c	7.38c	2.63b	23.65c	7.91c	0.36ab	21.97c
T₁	1.28a	8.33b	3.68b	24.95c	8.31b	0.34ab	24.44c
T₂	1.18b	8.17bc	4.35a	26.88b	8.54b	0.29b	29.45b
T₃	1.11b	8.67a	4.12a	27.91a	9.04a	0.26b	34.80a

处理	Fv/Fm	ΦPSII	NPQ	qP	ETR
CK₀	0.56c	0.35c	0.39c	0.63c	35.67c
CK	0.64bc	0.55b	0.43bc	0.77b	46.89c
T₁	0.76b	0.62b	0.55b	0.71b	49.71b
T₂	0.84a	0.77a	0.66a	0.76b	66.48a
T₃	0.84a	0.71a	0.64a	0.89a	57.29b