Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (25): 1-5.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0131
XUN Xianyu1(), XIA Yangyang1, ZHONG Yuehua2, MENG Aihong1, HE Lingling1, ZHANG Junqiang3, MA Hongbo2, WANG Xiaoyun4(
)
Received:
2024-02-20
Revised:
2024-06-24
Online:
2024-09-05
Published:
2024-08-27
XUN Xianyu, XIA Yangyang, ZHONG Yuehua, MENG Aihong, HE Lingling, ZHANG Junqiang, MA Hongbo, WANG Xiaoyun. Effect of Decomposed Chicken Manure Replacing Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Rate and Soil Physicochemical Properties[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(25): 1-5.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0131
处理 | 基肥用量 | 分蘖肥(尿素) | 穗肥(尿素) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
粪肥 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 硫酸钾 | |||
不施肥 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
常规对照 | 0.00 | 219.9 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 150.00 | 210.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 1875.00 | 197.85 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 135.00 | 187.50 |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 3750.00 | 175.95 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 120.00 | 168.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 5625.00 | 153.9 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 105.00 | 147.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 7500.00 | 131.85 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 90.00 | 126.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 9375.00 | 109.95 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 75.00 | 105.00 |
处理 | 基肥用量 | 分蘖肥(尿素) | 穗肥(尿素) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
粪肥 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 硫酸钾 | |||
不施肥 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
常规对照 | 0.00 | 219.9 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 150.00 | 210.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 1875.00 | 197.85 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 135.00 | 187.50 |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 3750.00 | 175.95 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 120.00 | 168.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 5625.00 | 153.9 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 105.00 | 147.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 7500.00 | 131.85 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 90.00 | 126.00 |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 9375.00 | 109.95 | 525.00 | 240.00 | 75.00 | 105.00 |
处理 | 穗数/(万/hm2) | 穗粒数/(个/穗) | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 259.65b | 89.63b | 21.56b | 5017.53c |
常规施肥 | 333.00b | 114.25a | 25.85a | 9834.60ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 351.15ab | 111.37a | 26.18a | 10238.30ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 383.40a | 117.85a | 26.01a | 11751.20a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 361.80a | 105.75a | 26.43a | 10112.30ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 345.60ab | 110.50a | 26.06a | 9953.25ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 299.70b | 110.80a | 23.19b | 7700.70b |
处理 | 穗数/(万/hm2) | 穗粒数/(个/穗) | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 259.65b | 89.63b | 21.56b | 5017.53c |
常规施肥 | 333.00b | 114.25a | 25.85a | 9834.60ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 351.15ab | 111.37a | 26.18a | 10238.30ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 383.40a | 117.85a | 26.01a | 11751.20a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 361.80a | 105.75a | 26.43a | 10112.30ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 345.60ab | 110.50a | 26.06a | 9953.25ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 299.70b | 110.80a | 23.19b | 7700.70b |
处理 | 产值/(元/hm2) | 肥料成本/(元/hm2) | 其他成本/(元/hm2) | 利润/(元/hm2) | 产投比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 15052.60 | 0.00 | 9000.00 | 6052.60 | 1.67 |
常规施肥 | 29514.60 | 3105.00 | 10500.00 | 15909.90 | 2.17 |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 30714.80 | 3169.50 | 10950.00 | 16595.00 | 2.18 |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 35253.50 | 3235.50 | 10950.00 | 21068.10 | 2.48 |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 30336.80 | 3300.00 | 10950.00 | 16086.30 | 2.13 |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 29859.80 | 3411.00 | 10950.00 | 15544.20 | 2.08 |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 23106.60 | 3430.50 | 10950.00 | 8725.50 | 2.16 |
处理 | 产值/(元/hm2) | 肥料成本/(元/hm2) | 其他成本/(元/hm2) | 利润/(元/hm2) | 产投比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 15052.60 | 0.00 | 9000.00 | 6052.60 | 1.67 |
常规施肥 | 29514.60 | 3105.00 | 10500.00 | 15909.90 | 2.17 |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 30714.80 | 3169.50 | 10950.00 | 16595.00 | 2.18 |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 35253.50 | 3235.50 | 10950.00 | 21068.10 | 2.48 |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 30336.80 | 3300.00 | 10950.00 | 16086.30 | 2.13 |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 29859.80 | 3411.00 | 10950.00 | 15544.20 | 2.08 |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 23106.60 | 3430.50 | 10950.00 | 8725.50 | 2.16 |
处理 | 直链淀粉 | 垩白度 |
---|---|---|
不施肥 | 13.28b | 3.29a |
常规施肥 | 13.78b | 3.45a |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 13.80ab | 3.44a |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 13.85ab | 3.41a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 14.06a | 3.40a |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 13.86ab | 3.37a |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 13.56b | 3.40a |
处理 | 直链淀粉 | 垩白度 |
---|---|---|
不施肥 | 13.28b | 3.29a |
常规施肥 | 13.78b | 3.45a |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 13.80ab | 3.44a |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 13.85ab | 3.41a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 14.06a | 3.40a |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 13.86ab | 3.37a |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 13.56b | 3.40a |
处理 | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(mg/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH | 容重/(g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 1.13a | 725.42b | 3.05a | 71.34c | 45.23b | 216.77b | 14.81b | 7.38a | 1.36a |
常规施肥 | 1.16a | 737.14b | 3.16a | 82.39b | 51.05b | 231.67b | 15.74b | 7.36a | 1.36a |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 1.17a | 768.96b | 3.16a | 84.28b | 59.48b | 230.16b | 15.83b | 7.35a | 1.35a |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 1.17a | 812.25a | 3.17a | 89.32b | 77.74a | 245.22ab | 16.02ab | 7.33a | 1.33a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 1.18a | 807.62a | 3.25a | 100.87a | 78.11a | 272.34a | 16.89ab | 7.25a | 1.33a |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 1.18a | 807.18a | 3.18a | 83.16b | 75.40a | 248.51ab | 17.06a | 7.29a | 1.31ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 1.20a | 801.39a | 3.17a | 81.78b | 78.13a | 234.73b | 17.24a | 7.20a | 1.30b |
处理 | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(mg/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH | 容重/(g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 1.13a | 725.42b | 3.05a | 71.34c | 45.23b | 216.77b | 14.81b | 7.38a | 1.36a |
常规施肥 | 1.16a | 737.14b | 3.16a | 82.39b | 51.05b | 231.67b | 15.74b | 7.36a | 1.36a |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 1.17a | 768.96b | 3.16a | 84.28b | 59.48b | 230.16b | 15.83b | 7.35a | 1.35a |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 1.17a | 812.25a | 3.17a | 89.32b | 77.74a | 245.22ab | 16.02ab | 7.33a | 1.33a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 1.18a | 807.62a | 3.25a | 100.87a | 78.11a | 272.34a | 16.89ab | 7.25a | 1.33a |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 1.18a | 807.18a | 3.18a | 83.16b | 75.40a | 248.51ab | 17.06a | 7.29a | 1.31ab |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 1.20a | 801.39a | 3.17a | 81.78b | 78.13a | 234.73b | 17.24a | 7.20a | 1.30b |
处理 | 氮肥利用率 | 磷肥利用率 | 钾肥利用率 |
---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 42.38b | 21.75b | 54.26a |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 44.29ab | 23.48ab | 56.07a |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 49.41a | 25.67a | 60.80a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 50.62a | 24.18ab | 58.13a |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 50.86a | 22.34ab | 55.94a |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 51.37a | 21.06b | 53.33a |
处理 | 氮肥利用率 | 磷肥利用率 | 钾肥利用率 |
---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 42.38b | 21.75b | 54.26a |
鸡粪替代氮肥10% | 44.29ab | 23.48ab | 56.07a |
鸡粪替代氮肥20% | 49.41a | 25.67a | 60.80a |
鸡粪替代氮肥30% | 50.62a | 24.18ab | 58.13a |
鸡粪替代氮肥40% | 50.86a | 22.34ab | 55.94a |
鸡粪替代氮肥50% | 51.37a | 21.06b | 53.33a |
[1] |
杨丽萍, 花劲, 郜微微, 等. 2021年东台市优质高产水稻新品种对比试验[J]. 农业技术通讯, 2022(4):155-158.
|
[2] |
沈连峰, 苗蕾, 韩敏. 河南省淮河流域不同土地利用类型氮磷流失的特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(4):77-80.
|
[3] |
鲍吝智. 水稻施肥肥效与肥料利用率初报[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2013(6):75-76.
|
[4] |
刘高远, 和爱玲, 杜君, 等. 有机肥替代化肥对砂浆黑土区小麦-玉米轮作系统N2O排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(16):3156-3167.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.16.009 |
[5] |
韩上, 武际, 张祥明, 等. 增施有机肥对稻田亚耕层土壤的培肥效应[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(4):334-341.
|
[6] |
吴茜虞, 继永波, 雷宝坤, 等. 粪肥替代对稻田土壤氮素、有机质含量及水稻产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 10(42):267-275.
|
[7] |
汪吉东, 张辉, 张永春, 等. 连续施用不同比例鸡粪氮对水稻土有机质积累及土壤酸化的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(5):1178-1185.
|
[8] |
于春晓, 张丽莉, 杨立杰, 等. 减氮配施抑制剂及鸡粪提高尿素氮在稻田土壤中的转化及利用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(9):1581-1591.
|
[9] |
张金福. 施用鸡粪和化肥对稻麦轮作农田土壤肥力和氮磷迁移的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2009.
|
[10] |
夏光利, 毕军, 张昌爱. 腐熟灭菌鸡粪与不同浓度化肥配施效果研究[J], 中国农学通报, 2004, 20(1):165-166.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
石晓晓, 郑国砥, 高定. 中国畜禽粪便养分资源总量及替代化肥潜力[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(2):403-411.
doi: 10.18402/resci.2021.02.17 |
[14] |
doi: S0269-7491(17)35028-5 pmid: 29753245 |
[15] |
张琳, 吕玉虎, 李亚光, 等. 化肥减量配施鸡粪对土壤肥力及水稻产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(15):143-145.
|
[16] |
刘泰, 王洪媛, 杨波, 等. 粪肥增施对水稻产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(3):545-555.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
刘丽媛, 徐艳, 朱书豪. 有机肥配施对中国农田土壤容重影响的整合分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(5):867-873.
|
[21] |
孙国峰, 王鑫, 盛婧, 等. 长期粪肥还田条件下稻米品质及氮肥利用率[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11):2521-2527.
|
[1] | HE Guohe, CHEN Haibin, DU Jianjun, ZHANG Weili, GUO Lihua, HU Yibo, YAN Zhaohua, ZHANG Jing. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Nutrient Utilization in Western Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 1-8. |
[2] | CHENG Yujing, WANG Xiaoqiu, GE Lijiao, QIU Liang, ZHAI Caijiao, SONG Xudong, ZHANG Zhenliang, WANG Ximeng. Establishment of Evaluation Model for Eating Quality of Waxy Corn [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 157-164. |
[3] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHANG Peng, FAN Xiangyun, YU Guihong, HE Yi, WANG Huadun. Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of New Weak-Gluten Wheat Cultivar ‘Ningmai 36’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 20-24. |
[4] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yangli, YAN Miaomiao, HAO Shuangkui, NIE Song, SUN Jie, CAO Sanchao, WANG Na. Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Density and Nitrogen Application on Population Structure and Grain Quality of ‘Weimai 9’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 25-29. |
[5] | HOU Mengyuan. Cotton Yield Forecast in Shandong Province Based on Meteorological Key Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 37-41. |
[6] | LIU Yu, YAN Shi, ZHAO Kaili, YU Yueyue, HAN Bao, ZHANG Jing, GUO Ning. Recommendation of Appropriate Phosphorus Application Rate for Lettuce in Vegetable Fields with Different Phosphorus Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 55-59. |
[7] | FAN Shanshan, CHEN Juan, WU Changchun, WANG Rui, ZHANG Xingang, CHEN Xiaohui, GAO Fei, WU Wenqiang. Effect of Alginic Acid Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 60-65. |
[8] | DING Hao, GAO Haitao, BI Xiangjun, LI Shengdong. Effects of Different Sowing Methods on Yield Components and Flag Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 9-19. |
[9] | PANG Yinghua, GU Wanfan, JIN Xin, ZHANG Zhouna, JIN Yahui, ZHENG Hongfu. Soil Nutrient Status and Fertility Quality Evaluation of Jingshan Tea Garden in Yuhang District of Hangzhou City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 97-105. |
[10] | YANG Zhiwei, QIAN Aiping, ZHANG Wei, CAO Xiuxia. Effect of Planting Density on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Flax [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 1-5. |
[11] | LUO Li, LI Xiaodan, LIU Xuelu, LIU Xingyu, LI Quanxi, MAO Zixuan, MA Biao. Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in the West Qinling Mountains Based on Land Use Change from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 101-111. |
[12] | YANG Xiaolin, XUE Minfeng, ZHANG Shu, LI Jinbo, LV Liang, CHANG Xiangqian, ZHANG Youhong, GONG Yan. Analysis of Abnormal Growing Phenomena Occurred in Xiangyang District, Hubei Province: Grain-Dropping in Advance and Pole-Withered [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 112-118. |
[13] | ZHANG Shijie, YANG Bo, WANG Bingang, LIU Yun, ZHANG Xifeng, WANG Wenli, WANG Zeli, LI Shan. Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Weibei Loess Tableland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 38-46. |
[14] | ZHANG Zhengzhen, MU Ruirui, WANG Jia, XU Can, CHEN Yongwei, ZHANG Zhansheng, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong. Effect of Potassium Application Rate on Absorption, Transport and Yield of Maize Potassium [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 47-56. |
[15] | YANG Han, HUANG Zhimou, QU Heping, CHAI Shasha, LI Yuwei, ZHAO Qingchun, QIN Xiaoyin. Effects of Optimal Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Utilization and Soil Fertility of Edible Sweet Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 63-67. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||