Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 97-105.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0451
Previous Articles Next Articles
PANG Yinghua1(), GU Wanfan1(
), JIN Xin1, ZHANG Zhouna2, JIN Yahui3, ZHENG Hongfu1
Received:
2023-06-12
Revised:
2023-10-08
Online:
2024-03-25
Published:
2024-03-22
PANG Yinghua, GU Wanfan, JIN Xin, ZHANG Zhouna, JIN Yahui, ZHENG Hongfu. Soil Nutrient Status and Fertility Quality Evaluation of Jingshan Tea Garden in Yuhang District of Hangzhou City[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 97-105.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0451
采样点 | Ⅰ(优质) | Ⅱ(良好) | Ⅲ(一般) |
---|---|---|---|
pH | 4.5~5.5 | 4.0~4.5或5.5~ 6.5 | <4.0或>6.5 |
有机质/(g/kg) | > 15 | 10~15 | < 10 |
全氮/(g/kg) | > 1.0 | 0.8~1.0 | < 0.8 |
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | >100 | 50~100 | <50 |
有效磷/(mg/kg) | >10 | 5~10 | <5 |
速效钾/(mg/kg) | >120 | 80~120 | <80 |
采样点 | Ⅰ(优质) | Ⅱ(良好) | Ⅲ(一般) |
---|---|---|---|
pH | 4.5~5.5 | 4.0~4.5或5.5~ 6.5 | <4.0或>6.5 |
有机质/(g/kg) | > 15 | 10~15 | < 10 |
全氮/(g/kg) | > 1.0 | 0.8~1.0 | < 0.8 |
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | >100 | 50~100 | <50 |
有效磷/(mg/kg) | >10 | 5~10 | <5 |
速效钾/(mg/kg) | >120 | 80~120 | <80 |
地点 | pH | OM/(g/kg) | TN/(g/kg) | AN/(mg/kg) | AP/(mg/kg) | AK/(mg/kg) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
镇街 | 村 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | |||||
闲林 | 西溪源 | 4.36 | Ⅱ | 32.4 | Ⅰ | 1.74 | Ⅰ | 185 | Ⅰ | 25.3 | Ⅰ | 71 | Ⅲ | |||||
万景 | 4.36 | Ⅱ | 18.7 | Ⅰ | 0.89 | Ⅱ | 52 | Ⅱ | 50.1 | Ⅰ | 221 | Ⅰ | ||||||
云栖1 | 4.45 | Ⅱ | 46.8 | Ⅰ | 1.58 | Ⅰ | 201 | Ⅰ | 124.5 | Ⅰ | 73 | Ⅲ | ||||||
云栖2 | 4.18 | Ⅱ | 17.9 | Ⅰ | 1.12 | Ⅰ | 52 | Ⅱ | 71.5 | Ⅰ | 207 | Ⅰ | ||||||
桦树 | 5.18 | Ⅰ | 26.9 | Ⅰ | 1.20 | Ⅰ | 110 | Ⅰ | 0.9 | Ⅲ | 335 | Ⅰ | ||||||
中泰 | 双联 | 4.00 | Ⅱ | 54.3 | Ⅰ | 2.81 | Ⅰ | 317 | Ⅰ | 151.8 | Ⅰ | 275 | Ⅰ | |||||
泰峰 | 4.44 | Ⅱ | 42.7 | Ⅰ | 2.31 | Ⅰ | 231 | Ⅰ | 53.6 | Ⅰ | 128 | Ⅰ | ||||||
白云 | 7.53 | Ⅲ | 47.7 | Ⅰ | 2.76 | Ⅰ | 144 | Ⅰ | 67.6 | Ⅰ | 147 | Ⅰ | ||||||
枫岭1 | 3.79 | Ⅲ | 51.1 | Ⅰ | 2.88 | Ⅰ | 273 | Ⅰ | 45.4 | Ⅰ | 423 | Ⅰ | ||||||
枫岭2 | 3.99 | Ⅲ | 51.9 | Ⅰ | 2.68 | Ⅰ | 345 | Ⅰ | 10.4 | Ⅰ | 151 | Ⅰ | ||||||
瓶窑 | 石濑1 | 5.98 | Ⅱ | 27.2 | Ⅰ | 1.56 | Ⅰ | 105 | Ⅰ | 24.6 | Ⅰ | 256 | Ⅰ | |||||
石濑2 | 4.18 | Ⅱ | 45.1 | Ⅰ | 2.49 | Ⅰ | 276 | Ⅰ | 76.7 | Ⅰ | 277 | Ⅰ | ||||||
石濑3 | 5.43 | Ⅰ | 16.3 | Ⅰ | 1.37 | Ⅰ | 159 | Ⅰ | 10.6 | Ⅰ | 273 | Ⅰ | ||||||
石濑4 | 3.93 | Ⅲ | 43.0 | Ⅰ | 2.56 | Ⅰ | 244 | Ⅰ | 191.9 | Ⅰ | 237 | Ⅰ | ||||||
塘埠 | 5.44 | Ⅰ | 48.9 | Ⅰ | 2.47 | Ⅰ | 179 | Ⅰ | 55.1 | Ⅰ | 220 | Ⅰ | ||||||
径山 | 求是1 | 6.43 | Ⅱ | 32.6 | Ⅰ | 1.75 | Ⅰ | 182 | Ⅰ | 90.6 | Ⅰ | 336 | Ⅰ | |||||
求是2 | 5.72 | Ⅱ | 35.9 | Ⅰ | 2.44 | Ⅰ | 189 | Ⅰ | 17.5 | Ⅰ | 198 | Ⅰ | ||||||
双溪 | 5.09 | Ⅰ | 32.0 | Ⅰ | 2.05 | Ⅰ | 177 | Ⅰ | 9.0 | Ⅱ | 249 | Ⅰ | ||||||
径山1 | 5.30 | Ⅰ | 20.5 | Ⅰ | 1.17 | Ⅰ | 78 | Ⅱ | 336.1 | Ⅰ | 111 | Ⅱ | ||||||
径山2 | 5.40 | Ⅰ | 38.1 | Ⅰ | 2.06 | Ⅰ | 100 | Ⅱ | 80.1 | Ⅰ | 97 | Ⅱ | ||||||
平山 | 3.68 | Ⅲ | 61.9 | Ⅰ | 2.91 | Ⅰ | 207 | Ⅰ | 111.1 | Ⅰ | 159 | Ⅰ | ||||||
漕桥 | 4.01 | Ⅱ | 24.3 | Ⅰ | 1.31 | Ⅰ | 103 | Ⅰ | 70.5 | Ⅰ | 94 | Ⅱ | ||||||
四岭1 | 4.07 | Ⅱ | 61.0 | Ⅰ | 3.37 | Ⅰ | 178 | Ⅰ | 125.0 | Ⅰ | 252 | Ⅰ | ||||||
四岭2 | 4.22 | Ⅱ | 49.9 | Ⅰ | 2.48 | Ⅰ | 160 | Ⅰ | 75.0 | Ⅰ | 162 | Ⅰ | ||||||
四岭3 | 5.46 | Ⅰ | 17.4 | Ⅰ | 1.17 | Ⅰ | 164 | Ⅰ | 20.5 | Ⅰ | 135 | Ⅰ | ||||||
黄湖 | 赐壁 | 4.39 | Ⅱ | 21.9 | Ⅰ | 1.19 | Ⅰ | 144 | Ⅰ | 13.0 | Ⅰ | 124 | Ⅰ | |||||
清波 | 4.50 | Ⅰ | 42.0 | Ⅰ | 2.41 | Ⅰ | 188 | Ⅰ | 55.2 | Ⅰ | 163 | Ⅰ | ||||||
王位山1 | 4.06 | Ⅱ | 65.5 | Ⅰ | 2.92 | Ⅰ | 265 | Ⅰ | 4.9 | Ⅲ | 117 | Ⅱ | ||||||
王位山2 | 5.58 | Ⅱ | 23.3 | Ⅰ | 2.02 | Ⅰ | 93 | Ⅱ | 457.6 | Ⅰ | 388 | Ⅰ | ||||||
鸬鸟 | 太平山1 | 4.88 | Ⅰ | 46.2 | Ⅰ | 2.94 | Ⅰ | 251 | Ⅰ | 12.6 | Ⅰ | 319 | Ⅰ | |||||
太平山2 | 4.88 | Ⅰ | 16.6 | Ⅰ | 0.91 | Ⅱ | 66 | Ⅱ | 3.0 | Ⅲ | 228 | Ⅰ | ||||||
山沟沟 | 4.35 | Ⅱ | 35.8 | Ⅰ | 1.35 | Ⅰ | 97 | Ⅱ | 6.5 | Ⅱ | 321 | Ⅰ | ||||||
太公堂1 | 3.95 | Ⅲ | 35.3 | Ⅰ | 1.93 | Ⅰ | 145 | Ⅰ | 42.5 | Ⅰ | 625 | Ⅰ | ||||||
太公堂2 | 3.97 | Ⅲ | 103.0 | Ⅰ | 1.90 | Ⅰ | 421 | Ⅰ | 33.0 | Ⅰ | 207 | Ⅰ | ||||||
百丈 | 溪口1 | 4.41 | Ⅱ | 39.4 | Ⅰ | 1.59 | Ⅰ | 195 | Ⅰ | 42.0 | Ⅰ | 105 | Ⅱ | |||||
溪口2 | 4.38 | Ⅱ | 61.3 | Ⅰ | 2.81 | Ⅰ | 187 | Ⅰ | 13.4 | Ⅰ | 264 | Ⅰ |
地点 | pH | OM/(g/kg) | TN/(g/kg) | AN/(mg/kg) | AP/(mg/kg) | AK/(mg/kg) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
镇街 | 村 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | 测值 | 级别 | |||||
闲林 | 西溪源 | 4.36 | Ⅱ | 32.4 | Ⅰ | 1.74 | Ⅰ | 185 | Ⅰ | 25.3 | Ⅰ | 71 | Ⅲ | |||||
万景 | 4.36 | Ⅱ | 18.7 | Ⅰ | 0.89 | Ⅱ | 52 | Ⅱ | 50.1 | Ⅰ | 221 | Ⅰ | ||||||
云栖1 | 4.45 | Ⅱ | 46.8 | Ⅰ | 1.58 | Ⅰ | 201 | Ⅰ | 124.5 | Ⅰ | 73 | Ⅲ | ||||||
云栖2 | 4.18 | Ⅱ | 17.9 | Ⅰ | 1.12 | Ⅰ | 52 | Ⅱ | 71.5 | Ⅰ | 207 | Ⅰ | ||||||
桦树 | 5.18 | Ⅰ | 26.9 | Ⅰ | 1.20 | Ⅰ | 110 | Ⅰ | 0.9 | Ⅲ | 335 | Ⅰ | ||||||
中泰 | 双联 | 4.00 | Ⅱ | 54.3 | Ⅰ | 2.81 | Ⅰ | 317 | Ⅰ | 151.8 | Ⅰ | 275 | Ⅰ | |||||
泰峰 | 4.44 | Ⅱ | 42.7 | Ⅰ | 2.31 | Ⅰ | 231 | Ⅰ | 53.6 | Ⅰ | 128 | Ⅰ | ||||||
白云 | 7.53 | Ⅲ | 47.7 | Ⅰ | 2.76 | Ⅰ | 144 | Ⅰ | 67.6 | Ⅰ | 147 | Ⅰ | ||||||
枫岭1 | 3.79 | Ⅲ | 51.1 | Ⅰ | 2.88 | Ⅰ | 273 | Ⅰ | 45.4 | Ⅰ | 423 | Ⅰ | ||||||
枫岭2 | 3.99 | Ⅲ | 51.9 | Ⅰ | 2.68 | Ⅰ | 345 | Ⅰ | 10.4 | Ⅰ | 151 | Ⅰ | ||||||
瓶窑 | 石濑1 | 5.98 | Ⅱ | 27.2 | Ⅰ | 1.56 | Ⅰ | 105 | Ⅰ | 24.6 | Ⅰ | 256 | Ⅰ | |||||
石濑2 | 4.18 | Ⅱ | 45.1 | Ⅰ | 2.49 | Ⅰ | 276 | Ⅰ | 76.7 | Ⅰ | 277 | Ⅰ | ||||||
石濑3 | 5.43 | Ⅰ | 16.3 | Ⅰ | 1.37 | Ⅰ | 159 | Ⅰ | 10.6 | Ⅰ | 273 | Ⅰ | ||||||
石濑4 | 3.93 | Ⅲ | 43.0 | Ⅰ | 2.56 | Ⅰ | 244 | Ⅰ | 191.9 | Ⅰ | 237 | Ⅰ | ||||||
塘埠 | 5.44 | Ⅰ | 48.9 | Ⅰ | 2.47 | Ⅰ | 179 | Ⅰ | 55.1 | Ⅰ | 220 | Ⅰ | ||||||
径山 | 求是1 | 6.43 | Ⅱ | 32.6 | Ⅰ | 1.75 | Ⅰ | 182 | Ⅰ | 90.6 | Ⅰ | 336 | Ⅰ | |||||
求是2 | 5.72 | Ⅱ | 35.9 | Ⅰ | 2.44 | Ⅰ | 189 | Ⅰ | 17.5 | Ⅰ | 198 | Ⅰ | ||||||
双溪 | 5.09 | Ⅰ | 32.0 | Ⅰ | 2.05 | Ⅰ | 177 | Ⅰ | 9.0 | Ⅱ | 249 | Ⅰ | ||||||
径山1 | 5.30 | Ⅰ | 20.5 | Ⅰ | 1.17 | Ⅰ | 78 | Ⅱ | 336.1 | Ⅰ | 111 | Ⅱ | ||||||
径山2 | 5.40 | Ⅰ | 38.1 | Ⅰ | 2.06 | Ⅰ | 100 | Ⅱ | 80.1 | Ⅰ | 97 | Ⅱ | ||||||
平山 | 3.68 | Ⅲ | 61.9 | Ⅰ | 2.91 | Ⅰ | 207 | Ⅰ | 111.1 | Ⅰ | 159 | Ⅰ | ||||||
漕桥 | 4.01 | Ⅱ | 24.3 | Ⅰ | 1.31 | Ⅰ | 103 | Ⅰ | 70.5 | Ⅰ | 94 | Ⅱ | ||||||
四岭1 | 4.07 | Ⅱ | 61.0 | Ⅰ | 3.37 | Ⅰ | 178 | Ⅰ | 125.0 | Ⅰ | 252 | Ⅰ | ||||||
四岭2 | 4.22 | Ⅱ | 49.9 | Ⅰ | 2.48 | Ⅰ | 160 | Ⅰ | 75.0 | Ⅰ | 162 | Ⅰ | ||||||
四岭3 | 5.46 | Ⅰ | 17.4 | Ⅰ | 1.17 | Ⅰ | 164 | Ⅰ | 20.5 | Ⅰ | 135 | Ⅰ | ||||||
黄湖 | 赐壁 | 4.39 | Ⅱ | 21.9 | Ⅰ | 1.19 | Ⅰ | 144 | Ⅰ | 13.0 | Ⅰ | 124 | Ⅰ | |||||
清波 | 4.50 | Ⅰ | 42.0 | Ⅰ | 2.41 | Ⅰ | 188 | Ⅰ | 55.2 | Ⅰ | 163 | Ⅰ | ||||||
王位山1 | 4.06 | Ⅱ | 65.5 | Ⅰ | 2.92 | Ⅰ | 265 | Ⅰ | 4.9 | Ⅲ | 117 | Ⅱ | ||||||
王位山2 | 5.58 | Ⅱ | 23.3 | Ⅰ | 2.02 | Ⅰ | 93 | Ⅱ | 457.6 | Ⅰ | 388 | Ⅰ | ||||||
鸬鸟 | 太平山1 | 4.88 | Ⅰ | 46.2 | Ⅰ | 2.94 | Ⅰ | 251 | Ⅰ | 12.6 | Ⅰ | 319 | Ⅰ | |||||
太平山2 | 4.88 | Ⅰ | 16.6 | Ⅰ | 0.91 | Ⅱ | 66 | Ⅱ | 3.0 | Ⅲ | 228 | Ⅰ | ||||||
山沟沟 | 4.35 | Ⅱ | 35.8 | Ⅰ | 1.35 | Ⅰ | 97 | Ⅱ | 6.5 | Ⅱ | 321 | Ⅰ | ||||||
太公堂1 | 3.95 | Ⅲ | 35.3 | Ⅰ | 1.93 | Ⅰ | 145 | Ⅰ | 42.5 | Ⅰ | 625 | Ⅰ | ||||||
太公堂2 | 3.97 | Ⅲ | 103.0 | Ⅰ | 1.90 | Ⅰ | 421 | Ⅰ | 33.0 | Ⅰ | 207 | Ⅰ | ||||||
百丈 | 溪口1 | 4.41 | Ⅱ | 39.4 | Ⅰ | 1.59 | Ⅰ | 195 | Ⅰ | 42.0 | Ⅰ | 105 | Ⅱ | |||||
溪口2 | 4.38 | Ⅱ | 61.3 | Ⅰ | 2.81 | Ⅰ | 187 | Ⅰ | 13.4 | Ⅰ | 264 | Ⅰ |
肥力指标 | 范围 | 平均值 | 标准偏差 | 变异系数/% | 肥力指标分布频率 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | Ⅲ | |||||
pH | 3.68~7.53 | 4.72 | 0.84 | 17.83 | 10 | 19 | 7 |
OM/(g/kg) | 16.3~103 | 39.9 | 17.89 | 44.88 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
TN/(g/kg) | 0.89~3.37 | 2.03 | 0.69 | 34.16 | 34 | 2 | 0 |
AN/(mg/kg) | 52~421 | 180 | 82.97 | 46.21 | 29 | 7 | 0 |
AP/(mg/kg) | 0.9~457.6 | 71.6 | 93.01 | 129.82 | 31 | 2 | 3 |
AK/(mg/kg) | 71~625 | 221 | 113.56 | 51.44 | 29 | 5 | 2 |
肥力指标 | 范围 | 平均值 | 标准偏差 | 变异系数/% | 肥力指标分布频率 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | Ⅲ | |||||
pH | 3.68~7.53 | 4.72 | 0.84 | 17.83 | 10 | 19 | 7 |
OM/(g/kg) | 16.3~103 | 39.9 | 17.89 | 44.88 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
TN/(g/kg) | 0.89~3.37 | 2.03 | 0.69 | 34.16 | 34 | 2 | 0 |
AN/(mg/kg) | 52~421 | 180 | 82.97 | 46.21 | 29 | 7 | 0 |
AP/(mg/kg) | 0.9~457.6 | 71.6 | 93.01 | 129.82 | 31 | 2 | 3 |
AK/(mg/kg) | 71~625 | 221 | 113.56 | 51.44 | 29 | 5 | 2 |
肥力指标 | 特征根 | 主成分提取 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征根 | 方差解释率/% | 累积/% | 特征根 | 方差解释率/% | 累积/% | ||
pH | 2.574 | 42.905 | 42.905 | 2.574 | 42.905 | 42.905 | |
OM | 1.118 | 18.631 | 61.536 | 1.118 | 18.631 | 61.536 | |
TN | 0.948 | 15.804 | 77.340 | 0.948 | 15.804 | 77.340 | |
AN | 0.831 | 13.843 | 91.183 | — | — | — | |
AP | 0.332 | 5.538 | 96.721 | — | — | — | |
AK | 0.197 | 3.279 | 100.000 | — | — | — |
肥力指标 | 特征根 | 主成分提取 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征根 | 方差解释率/% | 累积/% | 特征根 | 方差解释率/% | 累积/% | ||
pH | 2.574 | 42.905 | 42.905 | 2.574 | 42.905 | 42.905 | |
OM | 1.118 | 18.631 | 61.536 | 1.118 | 18.631 | 61.536 | |
TN | 0.948 | 15.804 | 77.340 | 0.948 | 15.804 | 77.340 | |
AN | 0.831 | 13.843 | 91.183 | — | — | — | |
AP | 0.332 | 5.538 | 96.721 | — | — | — | |
AK | 0.197 | 3.279 | 100.000 | — | — | — |
[1] |
吴玉红, 田霄鸿, 同延安, 等. 基于主成分分析的土壤肥力综合指数评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(1):173-180.
|
[2] |
李旭东. 贵州喀斯特高原人口分布的自然环境因素——Ⅱ多元回归分析与地带性研究[J]. 西华师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 95(1):66-72.
|
[3] |
窦磊, 周永章, 王旭日, 等. 针对土壤重金属污染评价的模糊数学模型的改进及应用[J]. 土壤通报, 2007, 226(1):101-105.
|
[4] |
陈峰, 蒋新, 唐访良, 等. 层次分析法与地理信息系统在农田土壤重金属污染评价中的应用[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2012, 34(7):6-8,14.
|
[5] |
沈润平, 丁国香, 魏国栓, 等. 基于人工神经网络的土壤有机质含量高光谱反演[J]. 土壤学报, 2009, 46(3):391-397.
|
[6] |
白奕. 多指标综合评价的主成分分析模型及原理[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1998(2):109-110.
|
[7] |
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.058 URL |
[8] |
沈建国. 余杭耕地质量与管理[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2014:4.
|
[9] |
张钊, 金明康, 黄鑫榕, 等. 安溪铁观音茶园土壤养分状况与肥力评价价[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(3):1-10.
|
[10] |
柳书俊, 姚新转, 赵德刚, 等. 湄潭茶园土壤养分特征及肥力质量评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11):33-45.
|
[11] |
刘娟, 张乃明, 邓洪. 勐海县茶园土壤养分状况及肥力质量评价[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(1):79-86.
|
[12] |
任艳芳, 何俊瑜, 张艳超, 等. 贵州省开阳茶园土壤养分状况与肥力质量评价[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(4):668-674.
|
[13] |
杨亚军. 中国茶树栽培学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2005.
|
[14] |
颜明娟, 林琼, 吴一群, 等. 不同施氮措施对茶叶品质及茶园土壤环境的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(3):452-456.
|
[15] |
王海斌, 陈晓婷, 丁力, 等. 福建省安溪县茶园土壤酸化对茶树产量及品质的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(6):1398-1403.
|
[16] |
穆聪, 黄梓璨, 苏达, 等. 铁观音茶园土壤酸化与交换性镁的现状[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021, 292(2):39-43.
|
[17] |
张玲玉, 赵学强, 沈仁芳. 土壤酸化及其生态效应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(6):1900-1908.
|
[18] |
张杰, 陈鑫, 高芳芳, 等. 增施生物有机肥对红芸豆产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, 202(3):161-166.
|
[19] |
李相楹, 张珍明, 张清海, 等. 茶园土壤氮磷钾与茶叶品质关系研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(23):56-60.
|
[20] |
范晓晖, 陈慕松, 刘文婷, 等. 茶园土壤质量现状及改良措施研究进展[J]. 中国茶叶, 2023, 45(4):19-24.
|
[1] | YANG Han, HUANG Zhimou, QU Heping, CHAI Shasha, LI Yuwei, ZHAO Qingchun, QIN Xiaoyin. Effects of Optimal Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Utilization and Soil Fertility of Edible Sweet Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 63-67. |
[2] | ZHAO Weijin, XIE Yiyan, YANG Dehai, LI Xiancai, SUN Yonghua, ZHENG Shifang, PENG Ren, YANG Yan, MA Junjie, LI Xiaoting. Difference of Physical Characteristics of ‘KRK26’ Upper Tobacco Leaves and Correlation with Soil Nutrients in Dali [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 71-76. |
[3] | MA Danni, SHENG Jiandong, ZHANG Kun, MAO Jiefei, CHANG Song, WANG Yaofeng. Effect of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 42-51. |
[4] | LI Zhiqiang, QI Peng, WANG Yazhi, WANG Xiaojiao, GAN Run, XUE Jianglong, LI Guoshan. Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition on Nutrient Content and Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of Wheat Soils in Loess Plateau [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 95-102. |
[5] | LIU Lu, XU Wenzhao, WANG Linchuang, YIN Lian, ZHANG Xuelian, LUO Dexu, SUN Yudong, ZHAO Jianfeng. Quality Evaluation of Different Varieties of Small Fruit Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 50-57. |
[6] | ZHOU Xiansheng, LI Xiaoyang, LIU Zhiguang, ZHOU Xiaoyu, QIU Chengyu, ZHUANG Zhilin, CAO Jianmin. Relationship Between Sensory Quality and Chemical Component of Flue-cured Tobacco in Shandong Province and Establishment of Quality Prediction Models [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 128-134. |
[7] | LIAO Heting, ZHENG Yao, WANG Ning, AN Shuwei, Gu Lingling, CHEN Jiazhang. Analysis of Plankton Community Structure Characteristics of Lotus Root-Crayfish Culture Model in Different Areas of Northern Jiangsu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 156-164. |
[8] | SHEN Jianguo, SU Guijun, LOU Ling, HE Linhai, HU Kangying. Effects of Salt Washing Methods on Soil Salinity and Nutrient Content and Vegetable Growth in Facility Agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 69-73. |
[9] | XIE Kunhao, SHI Aokun, DI Qinghua, CHEN Ru, LI Yansu, YU Xianchang, CHEN Shuangchen, HE Chaoxing. Effects of Vegetable Residue Compost on Ginger Yield and Soil Environment in Root Zone [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 87-91. |
[10] | ZHANG Jiajia, ZHANG Yue, LI Huawei, LI Hui. Analysis of Soil Nutrient Status in Yellow River Floodplain of Henan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 76-82. |
[11] | ZHOU Fangfang, YAGN Ce, CAI Xianjie, DONG Pingping, MA Aiguo, LIU Wenrui, NONG Zhengbin, LI Weifu, WANG Liyuan, YAN Ding. Effects of Previous Crops on Nutrients in Tobacco Planting Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(36): 83-88. |
[12] | LIN Baigui, ZHONG Wenliang, HUANG Jichuan. Investigation on Soil Fertility of Paddy Field in Yingde City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(36): 89-96. |
[13] | LIU Futong, ZHENG Meiying, WANG Hui, LI Maosen, ZHAO Peiyan, ZHENG Bangxi, HE Wenqin, YAO Feng, REN Tianbao. Analysis of Nutrient Status and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Tobacco Planting Soil in Hanzhong of Qinling Mountains based on ArcGIS [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 103-110. |
[14] | PAN Qiuling, LI Fang, JIANG Zhixin, HUANG Jianchang, SONG Wenpei, MA Huanji, LI Juan, LI Caiqin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Sanhua Plum Fruits by Texture Analyzer [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(34): 136-142. |
[15] | CHEN Zhenlu, PAN Xiaoying, LU Yusheng, HUANG Zhenrui, GU Wenjie, GUO Junjie, WEI Bin, ZENG Yuling, LIU Yixuan, HE Jingwei, LI Jiqin. Effects of Organic-inorganic Compound Conditioner on Acidified Soil Properties and Tobacco Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 28-34. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||