Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition on Nutrient Content and Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of Wheat Soils in Loess Plateau

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0365

Abstract

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus levels on total nutrient content, available nutrient content and ecological stoichiometry in agricultural soils, the authors analyzed the relationships between soil environmental factors, carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content, and the ecological stoichiometry of total and available nutrients to elucidate the impact of different fertilizer levels on the dynamic balance of soil nutrients in agricultural fields. We selected spring wheat farmland soils in Loess Plateau as our research subject and conducted N and P addition experiments in 2017. The experimental treatments included a control group (CK), low nitrogen (LN), medium nitrogen (MN), high nitrogen (HN), low phosphorus (LP), medium phosphorus (MP) and high phosphorus (HP), totaling seven treatments. The results showed that: (1) nitrogen addition significantly increased the content of ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO₃^--N) in the soil, while phosphorus addition significantly decreased the NH₄⁺-N and NO₃^--N content (P<0.05). The addition of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients had no significant effect on total nitrogen (TN) content (P>0.05). (2) N addition significantly increased soil C/N, C/P, N/P, C/AP and AN/AP ratios, and significantly decreased soil C/AN ratio (P<0.05). P addition significantly decreased soil C/N, C/P, N/P, C/AP and AN/AP ratios, and increased soil C/AN ratio (P<0.05). (3) Soil C/N and C/AN showed a significant negative correlation (P<0.05), while C/P and C/AP, N/P and AN/AP showed a significant positive correlation. In conclusion, available nutrient content and available ecological stoichiometry in agricultural soils in loess plateau region are more sensitive to N and P nutrient additions.

Key words: soil nutrients, ecological stoichiometry, loess plateau, principal component analysis

LI Zhiqiang, QI Peng, WANG Yazhi, WANG Xiaojiao, GAN Run, XUE Jianglong, LI Guoshan. Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition on Nutrient Content and Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of Wheat Soils in Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 95-102.

Figures/Tables 5

References 41

[1]	王洪义, 丁睿, 王智慧, 等. 氮、磷添加对草地不同冠层植物叶片和根系生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8):37-45. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020093
[2]	LI L, LIU B, GAO X, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus addition differentially affect plant ecological stoichiometry in desert grassland[J]. Scientific reports, 2019, 9(1):18673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55275-8 pmid: 31822795
[3]	候宁, 黑杰, 金强, 等. 福州滨海地区菜地和果园土壤碳、氮、磷含量及其生态化学计量学特征[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(2):954-964.
[4]	陈云, 李玉强, 王旭洋, 等. 中国典型生态脆弱区生态化学计量学研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10):4213-4225.
[5]	刘帅楠, 李广, 吴江琪, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同土地类型下土壤养分特征——基于生态化学计量学[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3):200-207. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020146
[6]	JIANG W, GONG L, YANG L, et al. Dynamics in C, N, and P stoichiometry and microbial biomass following soil depth and vegetation types in low mountain and hill region of China[J]. Scientific reports. 2021, 11(1):19631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99075-5 pmid: 34608213
[7]	李培玺. 巢湖湿地典型植物群落植物-土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2020.
[8]	文旻, 胡启武, 阳文静, 等. 氮、磷添加对鄱阳湖典型苔草湿地土壤养分和植物生物量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(6):1669-1676.
[9]	舒韦维, 卢立华, 李华, 等. 林分密度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(11):4521-4530.
[10]	NIKLAS K J, OWENS T, REICH P B, et al. Nitrogen/phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth[J]. Ecology letters, 2005, 8(6):636-642. doi: 10.1111/ele.2008.8.issue-6 URL
[11]	刘姝萱, 安慧, 张馨文, 等. 氮磷添加对荒漠草原土壤养分含量及生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 44(5):2724-2734.
[12]	姚易寒, 张少博, 周家树, 等. 氮磷添加对毛竹林土壤有机碳矿化及其激发效应的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(4):1088-1100.
[13]	XU H, QU Q, LI G, et al. Impact of nitrogen addition on plant-soil-enzyme C-N-P stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2022, 170:108714. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108714 URL
[14]	LI X, WANG H, GAN S, et al. Eco-stoichiometric alterations in paddy soil ecosystem driven by phosphorus application[J]. PLoS one, 2013, 8(5):e61141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061141 URL
[15]	GONG X, DANG K, LV S, et al. Interspecific competition and nitrogen application alter soil ecoenzymatic stoichiometry, microbial nutrient status, and improve grain yield in broomcorn millet/mung bean intercropping systems[J]. Field crops research, 2021, 270:108227. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108227 URL
[16]	SUN Y, WANG C, CHEN H Y H, et al. Responses of C:N stoichiometry in plants, soil, and microorganisms to nitrogen addition[J]. Plant and soil, 2020, 456(1-2):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04717-8
[17]	王雅芝. 氮磷肥对陇中旱作土壤-植物生态化学计量特征的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021.
[18]	郝明德, 来璐, 王改玲, 等. 黄土高原塬区旱地长期施肥对小麦产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003(11):1893-1896.
[19]	刘姝萱, 安慧, 张馨文, 等. 氮磷添加对荒漠草原植物-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(21):8773-8783.
[20]	齐鹏, 王晓娇, 郭高文, 等. 深松耕对玉米根茎叶氮磷比及地上生物量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(17):82-89.
[21]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[22]	LUO R, KUZYALOV Y, ZHU B, et al. Phosphorus addition decreases plant lignin but increases microbial necromass contribution to soil organic carbon in a subalpine forest[J]. Global change biology, 2022, 28(13):4194-4210. doi: 10.1111/gcb.v28.13 URL
[23]	陈正发, 史东梅, 金慧芳, 等. 基于土壤管理评估框架的云南坡耕地耕层土壤质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(3):256-267.
[24]	焦亚鹏. 不同氮磷配施对黄土高原旱作农业区典型农田土壤磷素形态的影响研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2020.
[25]	WANG L, SUN J, KANG J, et al. Influence of nitrogen addition on the changes in nitrogen and carbon fractions in soil profiles of wheat fields[J]. Land degradation & development, 2021, 32(8):2540-2553. doi: 10.1002/ldr.v32.8 URL
[26]	CHEN D, LAN Z, HU S, et al. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on belowground communities in grassland: Relative role of soil nitrogen availability vs. soil acidification[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2015, 89:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.028 URL
[27]	陈磊, 朱广宇, 刘玉林, 等. 黄土高原人工油松林土壤碳氮对短期氮添加的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(4):346-352.
[28]	LIU X, ZHANG Y, HAN W, et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China[J]. Nature, 2013, 494:459-462. doi: 10.1038/nature11917
[29]	武均. 不同管理措施下陇中黄土高原旱作农田土壤生态化学计量学特征研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018.
[30]	JIANG J, WANG Y, LIU F, et al. Antagonistic and additive interactions dominate the responses of belowground carbon-cycling processes to nitrogen and phosphorus additions[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2021, 156:108216. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108216 URL
[31]	冯继广, 张秋芳, 袁霞, 等. 氮磷添加对土壤有机碳的影响:进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8):855-870. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0358
[32]	曾泉鑫, 张秋芳, 林开淼, 等. 酶化学计量揭示5年氮添加加剧毛竹林土壤微生物碳磷限制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2):521-528. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202102.038
[33]	牛玉斌, 余海龙, 王攀, 等. 氮磷添加对荒漠草原植物群落多样性和土壤C∶N∶P生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(22):8462-8471.
[34]	魏金明, 姜勇, 符明明, 等. 水、肥添加对内蒙古典型草原土壤碳、氮、磷及pH的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(8):1642-1646.
[35]	WANG Y, REN Z, MA P, et al. Effects of grassland degradation on ecological stoichiometry of soil ecosystems on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020, 722:137910. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137910 URL
[36]	AI Z, ZHANG J, LIU H, et al. Soil nutrients influence the photosynthesis and biomass in invasive Panicum virgatum on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Plant and soil, 2017, 418(1-2):153-164. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3286-x URL
[37]	刘旭阳, 陈晓旋, 陈优阳, 等. 福州不同农田土地利用类型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):348-355.
[38]	葛楠楠, 石芸, 杨宪龙, 等. 黄土高原不同土壤质地农田土壤碳、氮、磷及团聚体分布特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5):1626-1632. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201705.021
[39]	LI J H, ZHANG R, CHENG B H, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on decomposition and accumulation of soil organic carbon in alpine meadows on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Land degradation & development, 2021, 32(3):1467-1477. doi: 10.1002/ldr.v32.3 URL
[40]	雷跻初, 刘小伟, 邓军, 等. 渭北旱塬不同年限撂荒地土壤酶活性及其化学计量变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(1):44-52.
[41]	贾恒义, 彭琳, 彭祥林, 等. 黄土高原地区土壤养分资源分区及其评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 1994(3):22-28.

土壤因子	PC₁	PC₂	公因子方差	因子权重/%
AN/AP	0.99	0.079	0.987	8.14
C/AP	0.993	0.015	0.986	8.13
TN	-0.175	0.977	0.985	8.12
AP	0.984	0.109	0.980	8.08
NO₃^--N	0.981	0.129	0.979	8.08
C/TP	0.982	0.007	0.965	7.96
C/AN	-0.963	0.013	0.928	7.65
SOC	0.946	0.179	0.927	7.65
C/TN	0.955	-0.106	0.924	7.62
TN/TP	0.936	0.074	0.881	7.27
TP	-0.919	0.182	0.878	7.24
AN	-0.917	0.165	0.868	7.16
NH₄⁺-N	0.913	0.033	0.835	6.89
初始特征值	11.024	1.10
贡献率/%	84.801	8.48
累计贡献率/%	84.801	96.546

土壤因子	PC₁	PC₂	公因子方差	因子权重/%
AN/AP	0.99	0.079	0.987	8.14
C/AP	0.993	0.015	0.986	8.13
TN	-0.175	0.977	0.985	8.12
AP	0.984	0.109	0.980	8.08
NO₃^--N	0.981	0.129	0.979	8.08
C/TP	0.982	0.007	0.965	7.96
C/AN	-0.963	0.013	0.928	7.65
SOC	0.946	0.179	0.927	7.65
C/TN	0.955	-0.106	0.924	7.62
TN/TP	0.936	0.074	0.881	7.27
TP	-0.919	0.182	0.878	7.24
AN	-0.917	0.165	0.868	7.16
NH₄⁺-N	0.913	0.033	0.835	6.89
初始特征值	11.024	1.10
贡献率/%	84.801	8.48
累计贡献率/%	84.801	96.546