Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 19-25.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0455
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-07-10
Revised:
2024-10-15
Online:
2025-04-25
Published:
2025-04-24
CAI Jinhua. Wheat Germplasm Resources in Wheat-growing Area of Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River: Yield and Quality Traits and Correlation Analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 19-25.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0455
小麦种质资源 | 有效穗/(万/hm2) | 生育期/d | 株高/cm | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1355 | 454.5 | 202 | 91.6 | 40.0 | 37.8 | 6001.5 |
1356 | 463.5 | 199 | 80.0 | 36.1 | 41.2 | 6289.5 |
1357 | 471.0 | 198 | 89.0 | 35.3 | 41.4 | 6154.5 |
1358 | 502.5 | 200 | 91.8 | 34.6 | 43.2 | 6034.5 |
1359 | 460.5 | 200 | 84.0 | 38.2 | 39.6 | 6144.0 |
1360 | 429.0 | 197 | 89.0 | 36.6 | 42.4 | 6214.5 |
1361 | 487.5 | 201 | 85.9 | 38.9 | 38.8 | 6331.5 |
1362 | 472.5 | 197 | 84.0 | 35.5 | 42.4 | 6202.5 |
1363 | 436.5 | 199 | 80.0 | 34.1 | 42.7 | 5679.0 |
1364 | 465.0 | 199 | 93.0 | 36.1 | 37.9 | 5703.0 |
1365 | 468.0 | 201 | 82.9 | 37.7 | 43.0 | 6025.5 |
1366 | 456.0 | 201 | 89.4 | 39.4 | 39.5 | 5796.0 |
1367 | 453.0 | 200 | 87.7 | 38.9 | 40.9 | 5932.5 |
1368 | 483.0 | 198 | 90.0 | 35.1 | 42.4 | 5943.0 |
1369 | 481.5 | 201 | 82.3 | 36.9 | 41.5 | 6274.5 |
1370 | 439.5 | 199 | 91.0 | 32.6 | 47.1 | 6073.5 |
1371 | 456.0 | 197 | 84.0 | 36.7 | 41.8 | 6120.0 |
1372 | 465.0 | 197 | 79.0 | 34.4 | 41.5 | 5961.0 |
1373 | 427.5 | 199 | 91.0 | 35.7 | 42.6 | 5964.0 |
1374 | 442.5 | 197 | 89.0 | 36.2 | 41.6 | 6295.5 |
1375 | 457.5 | 198 | 91.0 | 35.0 | 41.8 | 6012.0 |
1376 | 468.0 | 198 | 82.0 | 35.5 | 39.9 | 6097.5 |
1377 | 471.0 | 198 | 82.0 | 36.0 | 39.7 | 5970.0 |
1378 | 472.5 | 197 | 82.0 | 36.7 | 40.1 | 6169.5 |
1379 | 442.5 | 197 | 83.0 | 36.5 | 40.1 | 5905.5 |
1380 | 495.0 | 202 | 86.6 | 36.7 | 39.8 | 6079.5 |
1381 | 495.0 | 200 | 83.8 | 38.8 | 38.0 | 6109.5 |
1382 | 502.5 | 200 | 83.7 | 35.9 | 38.8 | 6066.0 |
1383 | 441.0 | 199 | 78.0 | 38.3 | 41.7 | 6142.5 |
1384 | 460.5 | 199 | 86.0 | 36.5 | 40.2 | 5850.0 |
1385 | 450.0 | 198 | 81.0 | 37.5 | 40.8 | 6213.0 |
1386 | 469.5 | 195 | 73.0 | 33.1 | 41.5 | 5724.0 |
1387 | 469.5 | 202 | 81.9 | 38.0 | 40.7 | 6073.5 |
1388 | 451.5 | 200 | 85.7 | 38.4 | 40.9 | 5926.5 |
1389 | 481.5 | 197 | 76.0 | 38.5 | 37.0 | 6126.0 |
最大值 | 502.50 | 202.00 | 93.00 | 40.00 | 47.10 | 6331.50 |
最小值 | 427.50 | 195.00 | 73.00 | 32.60 | 37.00 | 5679.00 |
平均值 | 464.06 | 198.91 | 84.87 | 36.58 | 40.87 | 6045.86 |
标准差 | 19.46 | 1.74 | 4.85 | 1.76 | 1.92 | 166.40 |
变异系数/% | 4.19 | 0.87 | 5.72 | 4.82 | 4.70 | 2.75 |
小麦种质资源 | 有效穗/(万/hm2) | 生育期/d | 株高/cm | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1355 | 454.5 | 202 | 91.6 | 40.0 | 37.8 | 6001.5 |
1356 | 463.5 | 199 | 80.0 | 36.1 | 41.2 | 6289.5 |
1357 | 471.0 | 198 | 89.0 | 35.3 | 41.4 | 6154.5 |
1358 | 502.5 | 200 | 91.8 | 34.6 | 43.2 | 6034.5 |
1359 | 460.5 | 200 | 84.0 | 38.2 | 39.6 | 6144.0 |
1360 | 429.0 | 197 | 89.0 | 36.6 | 42.4 | 6214.5 |
1361 | 487.5 | 201 | 85.9 | 38.9 | 38.8 | 6331.5 |
1362 | 472.5 | 197 | 84.0 | 35.5 | 42.4 | 6202.5 |
1363 | 436.5 | 199 | 80.0 | 34.1 | 42.7 | 5679.0 |
1364 | 465.0 | 199 | 93.0 | 36.1 | 37.9 | 5703.0 |
1365 | 468.0 | 201 | 82.9 | 37.7 | 43.0 | 6025.5 |
1366 | 456.0 | 201 | 89.4 | 39.4 | 39.5 | 5796.0 |
1367 | 453.0 | 200 | 87.7 | 38.9 | 40.9 | 5932.5 |
1368 | 483.0 | 198 | 90.0 | 35.1 | 42.4 | 5943.0 |
1369 | 481.5 | 201 | 82.3 | 36.9 | 41.5 | 6274.5 |
1370 | 439.5 | 199 | 91.0 | 32.6 | 47.1 | 6073.5 |
1371 | 456.0 | 197 | 84.0 | 36.7 | 41.8 | 6120.0 |
1372 | 465.0 | 197 | 79.0 | 34.4 | 41.5 | 5961.0 |
1373 | 427.5 | 199 | 91.0 | 35.7 | 42.6 | 5964.0 |
1374 | 442.5 | 197 | 89.0 | 36.2 | 41.6 | 6295.5 |
1375 | 457.5 | 198 | 91.0 | 35.0 | 41.8 | 6012.0 |
1376 | 468.0 | 198 | 82.0 | 35.5 | 39.9 | 6097.5 |
1377 | 471.0 | 198 | 82.0 | 36.0 | 39.7 | 5970.0 |
1378 | 472.5 | 197 | 82.0 | 36.7 | 40.1 | 6169.5 |
1379 | 442.5 | 197 | 83.0 | 36.5 | 40.1 | 5905.5 |
1380 | 495.0 | 202 | 86.6 | 36.7 | 39.8 | 6079.5 |
1381 | 495.0 | 200 | 83.8 | 38.8 | 38.0 | 6109.5 |
1382 | 502.5 | 200 | 83.7 | 35.9 | 38.8 | 6066.0 |
1383 | 441.0 | 199 | 78.0 | 38.3 | 41.7 | 6142.5 |
1384 | 460.5 | 199 | 86.0 | 36.5 | 40.2 | 5850.0 |
1385 | 450.0 | 198 | 81.0 | 37.5 | 40.8 | 6213.0 |
1386 | 469.5 | 195 | 73.0 | 33.1 | 41.5 | 5724.0 |
1387 | 469.5 | 202 | 81.9 | 38.0 | 40.7 | 6073.5 |
1388 | 451.5 | 200 | 85.7 | 38.4 | 40.9 | 5926.5 |
1389 | 481.5 | 197 | 76.0 | 38.5 | 37.0 | 6126.0 |
最大值 | 502.50 | 202.00 | 93.00 | 40.00 | 47.10 | 6331.50 |
最小值 | 427.50 | 195.00 | 73.00 | 32.60 | 37.00 | 5679.00 |
平均值 | 464.06 | 198.91 | 84.87 | 36.58 | 40.87 | 6045.86 |
标准差 | 19.46 | 1.74 | 4.85 | 1.76 | 1.92 | 166.40 |
变异系数/% | 4.19 | 0.87 | 5.72 | 4.82 | 4.70 | 2.75 |
相关系数 | 有效穗X1 | 生育期X2 | 株高X3 | 穗粒数X4 | 千粒重X5 | 籽粒产量Y | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗X1 | 1 | 0.2597* | -0.1097 | 0.0481 | -0.3826 | 0.1707 | 0.3268 |
生育期X2 | 0.2597* | 1 | 0.3264* | 0.5318** | -0.1877 | 0.0401 | 0.8192 |
株高X3 | -0.1097 | 0.3264* | 1 | 0.0213 | 0.1595 | -0.0587 | 0.7378 |
穗粒数X4 | 0.0481 | 0.5318** | 0.0213 | 1 | -0.6264** | 0.2277 | 0.1884 |
千粒重X5 | -0.3826* | -0.1877 | 0.1595 | -0.6264** | 1 | 0.0299 | 0.8644 |
相关系数 | 有效穗X1 | 生育期X2 | 株高X3 | 穗粒数X4 | 千粒重X5 | 籽粒产量Y | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗X1 | 1 | 0.2597* | -0.1097 | 0.0481 | -0.3826 | 0.1707 | 0.3268 |
生育期X2 | 0.2597* | 1 | 0.3264* | 0.5318** | -0.1877 | 0.0401 | 0.8192 |
株高X3 | -0.1097 | 0.3264* | 1 | 0.0213 | 0.1595 | -0.0587 | 0.7378 |
穗粒数X4 | 0.0481 | 0.5318** | 0.0213 | 1 | -0.6264** | 0.2277 | 0.1884 |
千粒重X5 | -0.3826* | -0.1877 | 0.1595 | -0.6264** | 1 | 0.0299 | 0.8644 |
变量 | 直接通径系数(Py) | 间接通径系数 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | ||
有效穗X1 | 0.4916 | -0.1061 | 0.0404 | -0.2551 | |
生育期X2 | -0.4086 | 0.1277 | 0.4462 | -0.1252 | |
穗粒数X3 | 0.8390 | 0.0236 | -0.2173 | -0.4177 | |
千粒重X4 | 0.6668 | -0.1881 | 0.0767 | -0.5255 |
变量 | 直接通径系数(Py) | 间接通径系数 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | ||
有效穗X1 | 0.4916 | -0.1061 | 0.0404 | -0.2551 | |
生育期X2 | -0.4086 | 0.1277 | 0.4462 | -0.1252 | |
穗粒数X3 | 0.8390 | 0.0236 | -0.2173 | -0.4177 | |
千粒重X4 | 0.6668 | -0.1881 | 0.0767 | -0.5255 |
小麦种质资源 | 容重/(g/L) | 粗蛋白含量/% | 湿面筋含量/% | 吸水量/(mL/100 g) | 面团形成时间/min | 面团稳定时间/min | 硬度指数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1355 | 778 | 13.23 | 28.2 | 60.7 | 3.3 | 8.4 | 69.2 | ||||||
1356 | 778 | 12.17 | 23.3 | 52.7 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 46.6 | ||||||
1357 | 760 | 12.05 | 23.6 | 57.2 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 65.5 | ||||||
1358 | 802 | 13.01 | 28.3 | 56.2 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 46.9 | ||||||
1359 | 780 | 11.38 | 22.5 | 50.5 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 41.2 | ||||||
1360 | 772 | 12.52 | 26.3 | 57.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 63.3 | ||||||
1361 | 808 | 12.60 | 27.1 | 58.6 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 66.9 | ||||||
1362 | 785 | 12.85 | 25.5 | 53.9 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 20.8 | ||||||
1363 | 764 | 11.80 | 22.8 | 53.1 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 50.1 | ||||||
1364 | 784 | 13.47 | 26.4 | 54.2 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 52.6 | ||||||
1365 | 798 | 13.11 | 28.3 | 54.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 48.4 | ||||||
1366 | 758 | 12.15 | 26.8 | 60.7 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 67.8 | ||||||
1367 | 754 | 11.48 | 23.3 | 58.4 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 65.1 | ||||||
1368 | 790 | 12.02 | 24.3 | 56.1 | 2.0 | 6.2 | 61.7 | ||||||
1369 | 793 | 11.80 | 23.8 | 58.2 | 2.7 | 7.1 | 65.5 | ||||||
1370 | 782 | 12.37 | 22.3 | 57.3 | 1.9 | 6.0 | 63.9 | ||||||
1371 | 780 | 11.40 | 22.9 | 57.0 | 2.0 | 4.1 | 62.3 | ||||||
1372 | 782 | 10.91 | 20.0 | 56.7 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 62.9 | ||||||
1373 | 780 | 12.58 | 24.2 | 53.7 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 49.6 | ||||||
1374 | 770 | 11.65 | 21.3 | 52.8 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 47.1 | ||||||
1375 | 760 | 12.85 | 26.1 | 52.9 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 44.1 | ||||||
1376 | 765 | 11.26 | 20.0 | 52.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 44.3 | ||||||
1377 | 773 | 11.23 | 21.3 | 52.6 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 44.1 | ||||||
1378 | 759 | 11.18 | 19.2 | 51.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 43.8 | ||||||
1379 | 756 | 13.17 | 27.3 | 57.6 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 64.5 | ||||||
1380 | 770 | 13.15 | 28.3 | 52.6 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 53.6 | ||||||
1381 | 782 | 13.03 | 28.6 | 51.5 | 1.5 | 5.1 | 52.2 | ||||||
1382 | 794 | 13.45 | 28.8 | 56.2 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 52.7 | ||||||
1383 | 790 | 12.11 | 24.4 | 54.9 | 1.7 | 5.5 | 61.6 | ||||||
1384 | 772 | 12.20 | 22.7 | 54.2 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 46.0 | ||||||
1385 | 772 | 13.27 | 25.9 | 53.1 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 46.2 | ||||||
1386 | 778 | 12.56 | 23.3 | 52.7 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 48.0 | ||||||
1387 | 781 | 14.02 | 30.1 | 53.5 | 3.5 | 7.4 | 49.3 | ||||||
1388 | 800 | 12.45 | 25.5 | 53.6 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 51.2 | ||||||
1389 | 780 | 11.96 | 25.0 | 57.3 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 59.8 | ||||||
最大值 | 808.00 | 14.02 | 30.10 | 60.70 | 4.80 | 8.40 | 69.20 | ||||||
最小值 | 754.00 | 10.91 | 19.20 | 50.50 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 20.80 | ||||||
平均 | 778.00 | 12.36 | 24.79 | 55.05 | 2.40 | 4.12 | 53.68 | ||||||
标准差 | 13.70 | 0.78 | 2.80 | 2.65 | 0.94 | 1.70 | 10.35 | ||||||
变异系数/% | 1.76 | 6.28 | 11.29 | 4.82 | 39.31 | 41.16 | 19.28 |
小麦种质资源 | 容重/(g/L) | 粗蛋白含量/% | 湿面筋含量/% | 吸水量/(mL/100 g) | 面团形成时间/min | 面团稳定时间/min | 硬度指数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1355 | 778 | 13.23 | 28.2 | 60.7 | 3.3 | 8.4 | 69.2 | ||||||
1356 | 778 | 12.17 | 23.3 | 52.7 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 46.6 | ||||||
1357 | 760 | 12.05 | 23.6 | 57.2 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 65.5 | ||||||
1358 | 802 | 13.01 | 28.3 | 56.2 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 46.9 | ||||||
1359 | 780 | 11.38 | 22.5 | 50.5 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 41.2 | ||||||
1360 | 772 | 12.52 | 26.3 | 57.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 63.3 | ||||||
1361 | 808 | 12.60 | 27.1 | 58.6 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 66.9 | ||||||
1362 | 785 | 12.85 | 25.5 | 53.9 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 20.8 | ||||||
1363 | 764 | 11.80 | 22.8 | 53.1 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 50.1 | ||||||
1364 | 784 | 13.47 | 26.4 | 54.2 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 52.6 | ||||||
1365 | 798 | 13.11 | 28.3 | 54.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 48.4 | ||||||
1366 | 758 | 12.15 | 26.8 | 60.7 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 67.8 | ||||||
1367 | 754 | 11.48 | 23.3 | 58.4 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 65.1 | ||||||
1368 | 790 | 12.02 | 24.3 | 56.1 | 2.0 | 6.2 | 61.7 | ||||||
1369 | 793 | 11.80 | 23.8 | 58.2 | 2.7 | 7.1 | 65.5 | ||||||
1370 | 782 | 12.37 | 22.3 | 57.3 | 1.9 | 6.0 | 63.9 | ||||||
1371 | 780 | 11.40 | 22.9 | 57.0 | 2.0 | 4.1 | 62.3 | ||||||
1372 | 782 | 10.91 | 20.0 | 56.7 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 62.9 | ||||||
1373 | 780 | 12.58 | 24.2 | 53.7 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 49.6 | ||||||
1374 | 770 | 11.65 | 21.3 | 52.8 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 47.1 | ||||||
1375 | 760 | 12.85 | 26.1 | 52.9 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 44.1 | ||||||
1376 | 765 | 11.26 | 20.0 | 52.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 44.3 | ||||||
1377 | 773 | 11.23 | 21.3 | 52.6 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 44.1 | ||||||
1378 | 759 | 11.18 | 19.2 | 51.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 43.8 | ||||||
1379 | 756 | 13.17 | 27.3 | 57.6 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 64.5 | ||||||
1380 | 770 | 13.15 | 28.3 | 52.6 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 53.6 | ||||||
1381 | 782 | 13.03 | 28.6 | 51.5 | 1.5 | 5.1 | 52.2 | ||||||
1382 | 794 | 13.45 | 28.8 | 56.2 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 52.7 | ||||||
1383 | 790 | 12.11 | 24.4 | 54.9 | 1.7 | 5.5 | 61.6 | ||||||
1384 | 772 | 12.20 | 22.7 | 54.2 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 46.0 | ||||||
1385 | 772 | 13.27 | 25.9 | 53.1 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 46.2 | ||||||
1386 | 778 | 12.56 | 23.3 | 52.7 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 48.0 | ||||||
1387 | 781 | 14.02 | 30.1 | 53.5 | 3.5 | 7.4 | 49.3 | ||||||
1388 | 800 | 12.45 | 25.5 | 53.6 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 51.2 | ||||||
1389 | 780 | 11.96 | 25.0 | 57.3 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 59.8 | ||||||
最大值 | 808.00 | 14.02 | 30.10 | 60.70 | 4.80 | 8.40 | 69.20 | ||||||
最小值 | 754.00 | 10.91 | 19.20 | 50.50 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 20.80 | ||||||
平均 | 778.00 | 12.36 | 24.79 | 55.05 | 2.40 | 4.12 | 53.68 | ||||||
标准差 | 13.70 | 0.78 | 2.80 | 2.65 | 0.94 | 1.70 | 10.35 | ||||||
变异系数/% | 1.76 | 6.28 | 11.29 | 4.82 | 39.31 | 41.16 | 19.28 |
相关系数 | 容重 X1 | 粗蛋白含量 X2 | 湿面筋含量 X3 | 面团吸水量 X4 | 面团形成时间 X5 | 面团稳定时间 X6 | 硬度指数 X1 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
容重X1 | 1 | 0.2709* | 0.3330* | 0.0706 | 0.2025* | 0.3871* | -0.0198 | 0.9100 |
粗蛋白含量X2 | 0.2709* | 1 | 0.8891** | 0.0510 | 0.4715** | 0.3488* | -0.0717 | 0.6824 |
湿面筋含量X3 | 0.3330* | 0.8891** | 1 | 0.2518* | 0.6595** | 0.5107** | 0.1276 | 0.4652 |
面团吸水量X4 | 0.0706 | 0.0510 | 0.2518* | 1 | 0.5438** | 0.5118** | 0.7825** | 0.0000 |
面团形成时间X5 | 0.2025* | 0.4715** | 0.6595** | 0.5438** | 1 | 0.5443** | 0.3327* | 0.0508 |
面团稳定时间X6 | 0.3871* | 0.3488* | 0.5107** | 0.5118** | 0.5443** | 1 | 0.4370* | 0.0087 |
相关系数 | 容重 X1 | 粗蛋白含量 X2 | 湿面筋含量 X3 | 面团吸水量 X4 | 面团形成时间 X5 | 面团稳定时间 X6 | 硬度指数 X1 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
容重X1 | 1 | 0.2709* | 0.3330* | 0.0706 | 0.2025* | 0.3871* | -0.0198 | 0.9100 |
粗蛋白含量X2 | 0.2709* | 1 | 0.8891** | 0.0510 | 0.4715** | 0.3488* | -0.0717 | 0.6824 |
湿面筋含量X3 | 0.3330* | 0.8891** | 1 | 0.2518* | 0.6595** | 0.5107** | 0.1276 | 0.4652 |
面团吸水量X4 | 0.0706 | 0.0510 | 0.2518* | 1 | 0.5438** | 0.5118** | 0.7825** | 0.0000 |
面团形成时间X5 | 0.2025* | 0.4715** | 0.6595** | 0.5438** | 1 | 0.5443** | 0.3327* | 0.0508 |
面团稳定时间X6 | 0.3871* | 0.3488* | 0.5107** | 0.5118** | 0.5443** | 1 | 0.4370* | 0.0087 |
变量 | 直接系数 (Py) | 间接通径系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | ||
容重X1 | -0.1078 | -0.0804 | 0.0938 | 0.0535 | -0.0377 | 0.0587 | |
粗蛋白含量X2 | -0.2967 | -0.0292 | 0.2504 | 0.0386 | -0.0877 | 0.0529 | |
湿面筋含量X3 | 0.2816 | -0.0359 | -0.2638 | 0.1908 | -0.1226 | 0.0775 | |
面团吸水量X4 | 0.7578 | -0.0076 | -0.0151 | 0.0709 | -0.1011 | 0.0777 | |
面团形成时间X5 | -0.1859 | -0.0218 | -0.1399 | 0.1857 | 0.4121 | 0.0826 | |
面团稳定时间X6 | 0.1518 | -0.0417 | -0.1035 | 0.1438 | 0.3878 | -0.1012 |
变量 | 直接系数 (Py) | 间接通径系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | ||
容重X1 | -0.1078 | -0.0804 | 0.0938 | 0.0535 | -0.0377 | 0.0587 | |
粗蛋白含量X2 | -0.2967 | -0.0292 | 0.2504 | 0.0386 | -0.0877 | 0.0529 | |
湿面筋含量X3 | 0.2816 | -0.0359 | -0.2638 | 0.1908 | -0.1226 | 0.0775 | |
面团吸水量X4 | 0.7578 | -0.0076 | -0.0151 | 0.0709 | -0.1011 | 0.0777 | |
面团形成时间X5 | -0.1859 | -0.0218 | -0.1399 | 0.1857 | 0.4121 | 0.0826 | |
面团稳定时间X6 | 0.1518 | -0.0417 | -0.1035 | 0.1438 | 0.3878 | -0.1012 |
[1] |
金善宝. 中国小麦学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1996:1.
|
[2] |
蔡金华, 杨阳, 单延博, 等. 35份小麦种质资源品质性状的主成分和聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(5):758-760,763.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20170510 |
[3] |
蔡金华. 小麦种质资源农艺性状的相关性及聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(6):1316-1319.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230184 |
[4] |
于晶. 寒地冬小麦东农冬麦1号抗寒机理研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2009.
|
[5] |
刘晓宇. 紫糯全麦产品开发[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014.
|
[6] |
蔡金华, 陈爱大, 温明星, 等. 施氮量和种植密度对镇麦168子粒产量与品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 201319(6):1312-1320.
|
[7] |
蔡金华, 陈爱大, 李东升, 等. 不同施氮条件下镇麦168籽粒产量与构成因素的相关性研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(10):73-75.
|
[8] |
蔡金华, 陈伟. 江苏淮南麦区主栽小麦品种产量及其构成因素的通径分析[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(8):1-5.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjasb18110012 |
[9] |
郝晨阳, 王兰芬, 张学勇, 等. 我国育成小麦品种的遗传多样性演变[J]. 中国科学C辑:生命科学, 2005, 35(5):408-415.
|
[10] |
王亚娟, 张秋芳, 任志龙, 等. 小麦优异种质资源农艺性状综合鉴定与评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2004, 24(4):119-122.
|
[11] |
王绘艳, 史雨刚, 马昊翔, 等. 30份春小麦品系主要农艺性状的聚类分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(18):60-64.
|
[12] |
李玉发, 何中国, 刘洪欣, 等. 东北早熟区春小麦品质与产量性状间的关系研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2007(1):5-7.
|
[13] |
宋佳静, 陈杰, 白冬, 等. 33份小麦新品系的产量和品质性状及其相关性分析[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(3):1-6.
|
[14] |
陈华萍, 魏育明, 郑有良. 四川省的小麦地方品种品质分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2006, 7(1):89-94.
|
[15] |
曹俊梅, 周安定, 吴新元, 等. 新疆近年中晚熟冬小麦新品系产量和品质性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(4):659-663.
|
[16] |
王光禄, 刘志宏, 程倩倩, 等. 94份国外小麦种质材料的主要农艺性状分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(5):577-582.
|
[17] |
唐启义. DPS数据处理系统[M]. 第5版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.
|
[18] |
姚金保, 陆维忠, 马鸿翔, 等. ‘宁麦20’丰产性、稳产性及产量构成因素分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2013, 25(7):1-3.
|
[19] |
姚盟, 张玲丽, 冯毅, 等. 黄淮麦区小麦新品系主要农艺性状变异分析[J]. 种子, 2015, 34(9):66-70.
|
[20] |
李志波, 王睿辉, 张茶, 等. 河北省小麦品种基于农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2009, 10(3):436-442.
|
[21] |
田纪春, 邓志英, 胡瑞波, 等. 不同类型超级小麦产量构成因素及籽粒产量的通径分析[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(11):1699-1705.
|
[22] |
杨洪强, 吴少辉, 牛鑫, 等. 旱地小麦新品种“洛旱6号”高产稳产分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2008, 20(7):112-113.
|
[23] |
黄大龙. 早熟高产抗病小麦新品种龙溪6号产量构成因素分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2001, 23(5):108-110.
|
[24] |
孙致良, 吴兆苏. 小麦目标品质性状和籽粒产量间的关系[J]. 莱阳农学院学报, 1990, 7(3):166-169.
|
[25] |
李冬, 张新忠, 芦静, 等. 基因型和环境对新疆冬小麦主要品质性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2009, 46(1):112-117.
|
[26] |
韩启秀, 于经川, 张善勇, 等. 山东省小麦区试参试品系产量与品质性状分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2008(3):7-10.
|
[27] |
兰涛, 潘洁, 姜东, 等. 生态环境和播期对小麦籽粒产量及品质性状同相关性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2005, 25(4):72-78.
|
[28] |
张一铎, 胡立芹, 张明, 等. 405份CIMMYT引进小麦种质的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(5):961-967.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.05.006 |
[29] |
傅晓艺, 史占良, 赵彦坤, 等. 2009—2015年河北省审定小麦品种的聚类及产量分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(9):23-26.
|
[1] | DONG Linlin, YAN Kai, SHENG Xuewen, LU Changying, SHI Linlin, WANG Haihou, WU Zhenggui. Spectral Characteristics of Soil Water-soluble Organic Carbon Affected by Cultivation Methods During Rice Growth Period [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 99-106. |
[2] | LI Yangyang, CHEN Shuaimin, XU Minghong, CHI Chang, MA Wei, WANG Yinping, SONG Yan, FAN Zuowei, WU Haiyan. Effects of Microbial Product Coupling Urea on Straw Decomposition Rate and Yield of Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 18-24. |
[3] | TIAN Cuiling, TIAN Jialiang. Effect of Spraying Alginate Enhancing Solution at Different Growth Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 25-31. |
[4] | REN Qingguo, WU Guangjun, LIN Ping, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Yongshan, HAI Tao. Study of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Cultivar ‘Hemai 26’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 32-37. |
[5] | JIANG Yongqiang, WU Yao, FANG Zhongjian, YE Guangying, HUI Jun’ai, ZHOU Rong, WANG Zaihua. Influence of LED Light Quality on Growth and Quality of Tissue Culture Plantets of Dendrobium officinale and D. nobile [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 65-72. |
[6] | HUANG Wenyin, ZHANG Baige, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, LI Jing, CHEN Lei, ZHAO Junhong, LUO Mouxiong, SONG Zhao. Effect of Exogenous Inositol on Yield and Quality of Tomatoes Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 73-80. |
[7] | XU Jie, ZHANG Ya, LI Pingzhao, XU Lei, CHENG Yanxun, WEN Fangping. Research on Heavy Metal Sources and Environmental Evaluation of Soil in Yuanmou, Central Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 81-90. |
[8] | WANG Feng, ZHU Shijun, YING Hong, CHAI Weigang, DAI Yaolu, YUAN Qing, JIN Shuquan. Effect of Organic Amendment Combined with Moderate Deep Ploughing on Productivity Improvement of Hilly Reclaimed Rice Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 91-98. |
[9] | WANG Junjiang, YIN Yuanhong, LU Chusheng, LU Zhanhua, CAI Haoyang, YE Qunhuan, LIAO Jiahui, LU Yusheng, LIANG Kaiming, FU Youqiang. Effect of Irrigation on Rice Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency During Critical Growth Period Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 1-10. |
[10] | LI Lin, YAN Yun, KANG Jiangfei, MENG Qihan, FANG Shefa, CHEN Yingmin, GUO Jianqiu. The Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Growth Process, Photosynthetic Characteristics, Agronomic Traits, Yield, and Quality of ‘Luodou 1304’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 11-18. |
[11] | QIN Jiao, YAO Dandan, PEI Shuaishuai, GUO Shuhong, FENG Zhiyong, QIN Meng, TIAN Hongling. Advances in Common Chinese Zokor, Myospalax fontanieri (Rodentia: Spalacidae) in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 111-115. |
[12] | XUE Yuansai, WANG Xijiu, ZOU Shiguo, ZHANG Shoufu, LIU Guangya, HAN Wei, SUN Xian. Effect of Compound Oligosaccharides on Yield of Typical Crops in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 50-56. |
[13] | MA Zhuo, ZHOU Hanbing, ZHAO Manxing, ZHANG Xia, WANG Xin, MA Danni. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Nutrient Absorption, Yield and Quality of Apples in Yan’an Mountain Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 63-68. |
[14] | WANG Cheng, LI Guorui, DI Jianjun, LUO Rui, LI Mingjing, HUANG Fenglan. Effects of Castor Bean Microbial Enzyme Biological Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 69-75. |
[15] | YANG Ying, FAN Li, YANG Zhichao, CAO Xinbo, GE Jingping. Application of COS and Microbial Metabolites in Agricultural Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 83-89. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||