Field Control Effect of Different Pesticides and Adjuvants on Tuta absoluta

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0462

Abstract

Abstract:

There are few studies on the effectiveness of pesticides against tomato leaf miner in China, and it is difficult to select pesticide for emergency control in the field due to the differences of control efficacy of the same pesticide. We compared the effect of 9 different pesticdes, 4 formulations and 2 adjuvants in 19 treatments against tomato leaf miner in the field by plant spraying using the random block method. The results at 1, 3 d after the spraying showed that the control effect of different pesticides was 30% chlorfenapyr-chlorantraniliprole nano-SE> 60 g/L spinetoram SC> 5% broflanilide SC> 10% chlorfenapyr SC> 5% chlorantraniliprole SC> 5% emamectin benzoate ME> 32000 IU/mg Bacillus thuringiensis G033A WP. The control effect of 5% emamectin benzoate ME and 5% emamectin benzoate nano-SE is close，the control effect of 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis PS3 WP is close to B. thuringiensis G033A WP. The control effect on tomato leaf miner at 7 d was mostly the same as that at 1, 3 d after spraying pesticides, only the control effect of two pesticides of the same active ingredients of B. thuringiensis at 7 d after the spraying were superior to that of two pesticides of the same active ingredients of emamectin benzoate. The overall control effect of the same agent and adjuvants combination, from high to low, was pesticide+ nonionic alcohol ether adjuvants> pesticide+ lecithin adjuvants> pesticide. Except for B. thuringiensis, 7 d post-dose effect of which was significantly higher than that of 1 d and 3 d after spraying, the 7 d effect of other agents showed a decreasing trend compared with that of 1 d and 3 d. The effect of different treatment of 30% chlorfenapyr-chlorantraniliprole nano-SE was all higher than 89.96%, with the best, rapid and persistent efficacy. The effect of 60 g/L spinetoram SC, 5% broflanilide SC, 10% chlorfenapyr SC was significantly better than that of 5% chlorantraniliprole SC, and the effect of 5% chlorantraniliprole SC was significantly better than that of 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis G033A WP, 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis PS3 WP and 5% emamectin benzoate nano-SE, 5% emamectin benzoate ME on the tomato leaf miner. 30% chlorfenapyr-chlorantraniliprole nano-SE, 60 g/L spinetoram SC, 5% broflanilide SC, 10% chlorfenapyr SC, 5% chlorantraniliprole SC, 5% emamectin benzoate nano-SE, 5% emamectin benzoate ME, 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis G033A WP and 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis PS3 WP can be used alternatively for the control of tomato leaf miner, and the addition of adjuvants can significantly improve the control effect of pesticides.

Key words: tomato leaf miner, insecticides, adjuvants, formulations, field control effect, rapid efficacy, persistent efficacy

WANG Shuaiyu, WANG Yin, FU Sirui, WEI Shujun, CHEN Jincui, CAO Jinjuan, LI Jin, ZHANG Aihuan, LI Lin. Field Control Effect of Different Pesticides and Adjuvants on Tuta absoluta[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 152-157.

Figures/Tables 1

References 21

[1]	DESNEUX N, WAJNBERG E, WYCKHUYS K A G, et al. Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: Ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control[J]. Journal of pest science, 2010, 83:197-215.
[2]	张桂芬, 马德英, 刘万学, 等. 中国新发现外来入侵害虫——南美番茄潜叶蛾(鳞翅目:麦蛾科)[J]. 生物安全学报, 2019, 28(3):200-203.
[3]	ZHANG G F, XIAN X Q, ZHANG Y B, et al. Outbreak of the South American tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, in the Chinese mainland: Geographic and potential host range expansion[J]. Pest management science, 2021, 77(12):5475-5488.
[4]	BIONDI A, GUEDES R N C, WAN F H, et al. Ecology, worldwide spread, and management of the invasive south American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta: Past, present, and future[J]. Annual review of entomology, 2018, 63(1):239-258
[5]	张桂芬, 刘万学, 万方浩, 等. 世界毁灭性检疫害虫番茄潜叶蛾的生物生态学及危害与控制[J]. 生物安全学报, 2018, 27(3):155-163.
[6]	ACHARYA R, BARMAN A K, SHARMA S R, et al. Biology, distribution, and management of invasive South American tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera; Gelechiidae), in Asia[J]. Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology, 2023, 114(4):e22056.
[7]	ZHU J, CHEN R, LIU J, et al. Presence of multiple genetic mutations related to insecticide resistance in Chinese field samples of two Phthorimaea pest species[J]. Insects, 2024, 15(3):194.
[8]	王少丽, 史彩华, 徐丹丹, 等. 入侵性南美番茄潜叶蛾高效药剂筛选及其抗性基因突变检测[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2021(11):33-36.
[9]	尹艳琼, 郑丽萍, 李峰奇, 等. 云南弥渡县番茄潜叶蛾的发生情况及田间防治效果[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 43(3):559-566.
[10]	张桂芬, 张毅波, 张杰, 等. 苏云金芽胞杆菌G033A对新发南美番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):175-183. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2020.02.003
[11]	杨石有, 张蕊, 李宏琳, 等. 3种喷雾助剂对5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC防治番茄潜叶蛾的增效作用[J]. 植物保护, 2024, 50(1):311-315.
[12]	智亨. 叶面黏附性农药载药系统的构建与黏附机制的探究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
[13]	徐鹏飞, 康廷浩, 张园, 等. 卵磷脂桶混助剂的特性及其在防治稻飞虱中对氟啶虫胺腈的协同增效作用[J]. 农药学学报, 2019, 21(2):227-232.
[14]	农业部农药检定所. GB/T 17980.13—2000,农药田间药效试验准则(一)杀虫剂防治十字花科蔬菜的鳞翅目幼虫[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[15]	袁伟宁, 魏玉红, 牛丽敏, 等. 甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐对3种鳞翅目害虫与赤眼蜂的毒力[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(26):148-152. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18070110
[16]	谢显彪, 沈云峰, 孟继枝, 等. 100 g/L溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC防治玉米草地贪夜蛾的田间药效评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(33):128-133. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0990
[17]	宋璐璐, 艾大朋, 巨修练, 等. 新型双酰胺类杀虫剂——溴虫氟苯双酰胺[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(4):671-681.
[18]	BACCI L, DA SILVA É M, MARTINS J C, et al. The seasonal dynamic of Tuta absoluta in Solanum lycopersicon cultivation: Contributions of climate, plant phenology, and insecticide spraying[J]. Pest management science, 2021, 77(7):3187-3197.
[19]	ZHENG Y, LIU Y, ZHANG J, et al. Dual role of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: Induce plant growth and control tomato leafminer Phthorimaea absoluta[J]. Pest management science, 2023, 79(11):4557-4568.
[20]	SARMAH N, KALDIS A, TANING C N T, et al. dsRNA-Mediated pest management of Tuta absoluta is compatible with its biological control agent Nesidiocoris tenuis[J]. Insects, 2021, 12(4):274.
[21]	LISI F, CAVALLARO C, PITRUZZELLO M F, et al. Compatibility of bioinsecticides with parasitoids for enhanced integrated pest management of Drosophila suzukii and Tuta absoluta[J]. Insects, 2024, 15(7):467.

处理	药剂用量	药前虫数/头	药后1 d		药后3 d		药后7 d
处理	药剂用量	药前虫数/头	虫数/头	防效/%	虫数/头	防效/%	虫数/头	防效/%
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME	300 mL/hm²	68.33	34.67	52.07±0.40i	34.33	55.10±1.62i	40.67	51.46±0.68i
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	300 mL/hm²	69.67	30.67	58.33±1.10h	29.33	62.30±1.85h	33.00	61.31±1.20h
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME+ (脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚JFC+ 顺丁烯二酸二仲辛酯磺酸钠)3000倍液	300 mL/hm²	72.00	26.67	64.95±1.33g	27.67	65.67±0.55gh	28.00	68.24±1.57f
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE	300 mL/hm²	76.00	39.33	51.00±0.90i	40.67	52.28±1.49i	42.67	54.09±1.11i
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	300 mL/hm²	71.67	33.00	56.41±0.48h	30.33	62.04±2.09h	35.00	60.14±0.45h
30%虫螨·氯苯纳米SE	300 mL/hm²	72.33	7.67	89.96±0.93ab	7.00	91.34±0.36ab	7.00	92.04±0.96a
30%虫螨·氯苯纳米SE+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	300 mL/hm²	72.00	4.67	93.86+0.52a	5.00	93.79+0.16a	6.00	93.26±1.18a
60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC	900 mL/hm²	75.67	16.00	79.88±2.00e	15.33	81.79±1.54de	18.00	80.46±1.88cd
60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	900 mL/hm²	74.67	11.67	85.22±0.55cd	10.67	87.24±0.40bc	14.33	84.31±1.89bc
5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC	375 mL/hm²	75.33	18.33	76.99±0.56ef	16.33	80.57±0.84def	18.00	80.51±0.65cd
5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	375 mL/hm²	73.67	12.00	84.49±1.41cd	10.67	87.08±0.54bc	13.67	84.92±0.79b
10%虫螨腈SC	600 mL/hm²	73.00	16.67	78.27±1.34ef	16.67	79.35±2.26ef	24.33	72.52±3.01e
10%虫螨腈SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	600 mL/hm²	69.33	11.67	84.15±1.23d	12.33	84.14±0.88cd	17.67	79.17±1.17d
10%虫螨腈SC+(脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚JFC+ 顺丁烯二酸二仲辛酯磺酸钠)3000倍液	600 mL/hm²	69.33	8.33	88.65±0.15bc	7.33	90.54±0.96ab	8.00	90.55±0.89a
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	600 mL/hm²	72.00	24.67	67.64±1.52f	24.67	69.38±0.93g	30.00	65.98±1.55fg
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	600 mL/hm²	75.33	20.33	74.18±2.98f	19.67	76.83±1.96f	24.00	74.01±1.19e
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC+(脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚JFC+ 顺丁烯二酸二仲辛酯磺酸钠)3000倍液	600 mL/hm²	73.00	18	76.56±1.29ef	17.00	79.11±79.11ef	17.67	80.17±80.17cd
32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033AWP	3000 g/hm²	76.33	57.5	5.03±0.18j	69.67	18.49±18.49j	34.33	63.30±63.30gh
32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌PS3 WP	3000 g/hm²	73.00	73.33	4.96±0.22j	65.67	19.31±19.31j	33.67	62.26±62.26gh
清水对照	450 L/hm²	69.33	73.33	—	77.67	—	85.00	—

处理	药剂用量	药前虫数/头	药后1 d		药后3 d		药后7 d
处理	药剂用量	药前虫数/头	虫数/头	防效/%	虫数/头	防效/%	虫数/头	防效/%
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME	300 mL/hm²	68.33	34.67	52.07±0.40i	34.33	55.10±1.62i	40.67	51.46±0.68i
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	300 mL/hm²	69.67	30.67	58.33±1.10h	29.33	62.30±1.85h	33.00	61.31±1.20h
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME+ (脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚JFC+ 顺丁烯二酸二仲辛酯磺酸钠)3000倍液	300 mL/hm²	72.00	26.67	64.95±1.33g	27.67	65.67±0.55gh	28.00	68.24±1.57f
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE	300 mL/hm²	76.00	39.33	51.00±0.90i	40.67	52.28±1.49i	42.67	54.09±1.11i
5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	300 mL/hm²	71.67	33.00	56.41±0.48h	30.33	62.04±2.09h	35.00	60.14±0.45h
30%虫螨·氯苯纳米SE	300 mL/hm²	72.33	7.67	89.96±0.93ab	7.00	91.34±0.36ab	7.00	92.04±0.96a
30%虫螨·氯苯纳米SE+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	300 mL/hm²	72.00	4.67	93.86+0.52a	5.00	93.79+0.16a	6.00	93.26±1.18a
60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC	900 mL/hm²	75.67	16.00	79.88±2.00e	15.33	81.79±1.54de	18.00	80.46±1.88cd
60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	900 mL/hm²	74.67	11.67	85.22±0.55cd	10.67	87.24±0.40bc	14.33	84.31±1.89bc
5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC	375 mL/hm²	75.33	18.33	76.99±0.56ef	16.33	80.57±0.84def	18.00	80.51±0.65cd
5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	375 mL/hm²	73.67	12.00	84.49±1.41cd	10.67	87.08±0.54bc	13.67	84.92±0.79b
10%虫螨腈SC	600 mL/hm²	73.00	16.67	78.27±1.34ef	16.67	79.35±2.26ef	24.33	72.52±3.01e
10%虫螨腈SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	600 mL/hm²	69.33	11.67	84.15±1.23d	12.33	84.14±0.88cd	17.67	79.17±1.17d
10%虫螨腈SC+(脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚JFC+ 顺丁烯二酸二仲辛酯磺酸钠)3000倍液	600 mL/hm²	69.33	8.33	88.65±0.15bc	7.33	90.54±0.96ab	8.00	90.55±0.89a
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	600 mL/hm²	72.00	24.67	67.64±1.52f	24.67	69.38±0.93g	30.00	65.98±1.55fg
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC+ 3%卵磷脂·维生素E SE 5000倍液	600 mL/hm²	75.33	20.33	74.18±2.98f	19.67	76.83±1.96f	24.00	74.01±1.19e
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC+(脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚JFC+ 顺丁烯二酸二仲辛酯磺酸钠)3000倍液	600 mL/hm²	73.00	18	76.56±1.29ef	17.00	79.11±79.11ef	17.67	80.17±80.17cd
32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033AWP	3000 g/hm²	76.33	57.5	5.03±0.18j	69.67	18.49±18.49j	34.33	63.30±63.30gh
32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌PS3 WP	3000 g/hm²	73.00	73.33	4.96±0.22j	65.67	19.31±19.31j	33.67	62.26±62.26gh
清水对照	450 L/hm²	69.33	73.33	—	77.67	—	85.00	—