Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (33): 128-133.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0990
Previous Articles Next Articles
XIE Xianbiao(), SHEN Yunfeng(
), MENG Jizhi, ZHAO Guoan, XIAO Wenxiang
Received:
2022-11-28
Revised:
2023-03-12
Online:
2023-11-25
Published:
2023-11-22
XIE Xianbiao, SHEN Yunfeng, MENG Jizhi, ZHAO Guoan, XIAO Wenxiang. Field Efficacy Evaluation of Broflanilide 100 g/L SC on Control of Spodoptera frugiperda in Maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 128-133.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0990
分级 | 症状 | 代表指数 |
---|---|---|
0级 | 叶片没有可见损伤 | 0 |
1级 | 少数叶片针孔损伤 | ≤11.11 |
2级 | 不足1/3的叶片上有小的圆形小孔或窗口状和/或小孔损坏 | ≤22.22 |
3级 | 不足1/3的叶片上有小于1 cm长的孔洞或窗口状 | ≤33.33 |
4级 | 叶片上有1~3 cm长的洞或窗口状,在不到1/3的叶子上大于1 cm。或不超过一个大于3 cm的孔 | ≤44.44 |
5级 | 有一些大于3 cm的细长孔和一些小洞约占不足1/3的叶片 | ≤55.56 |
6级 | 一些大于3 cm的细长孔和许多小洞约占叶片的1/2 | ≤66.67 |
7级 | 各种尺寸和形状的孔大约占叶片的1/2 | ≤77.78 |
8级 | 叶片上有许多大小和形状各异的孔 | ≤88.89 |
9级 | 大多数叶片几乎完全被破坏和植物生长点被破坏 | ≤100 |
分级 | 症状 | 代表指数 |
---|---|---|
0级 | 叶片没有可见损伤 | 0 |
1级 | 少数叶片针孔损伤 | ≤11.11 |
2级 | 不足1/3的叶片上有小的圆形小孔或窗口状和/或小孔损坏 | ≤22.22 |
3级 | 不足1/3的叶片上有小于1 cm长的孔洞或窗口状 | ≤33.33 |
4级 | 叶片上有1~3 cm长的洞或窗口状,在不到1/3的叶子上大于1 cm。或不超过一个大于3 cm的孔 | ≤44.44 |
5级 | 有一些大于3 cm的细长孔和一些小洞约占不足1/3的叶片 | ≤55.56 |
6级 | 一些大于3 cm的细长孔和许多小洞约占叶片的1/2 | ≤66.67 |
7级 | 各种尺寸和形状的孔大约占叶片的1/2 | ≤77.78 |
8级 | 叶片上有许多大小和形状各异的孔 | ≤88.89 |
9级 | 大多数叶片几乎完全被破坏和植物生长点被破坏 | ≤100 |
处理 | 药前 虫口 数/头 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | ||||||
A150 | 146.67 | 90.45 | 91.98 b | 85.00 | 88.29 b | 72.05 | 81.16 b | 34.55 | 64.98 b | 2.96 | 51.21 b | ||||
A225 | 136.00 | 94.85 | 95.67 a | 88.46 | 90.99 a | 75.22 | 83.30 b | 47.79 | 72.07 a | 27.45 | 63.53 a | ||||
A300 | 182.33 | 95.24 | 96.00 a | 90.13 | 92.29 a | 79.71 | 86.32 a | 49.54 | 73.01 a | 31.81 | 65.72 a | ||||
B300 | 177.00 | 97.74 | 98.10 a | 89.27 | 91.62 a | 74.01 | 82.48 b | 35.03 | 65.24 b | 1.69 | 50.58 b | ||||
C180 | 122.00 | 96.72 | 97.24 a | 90.98 | 92.96 a | 80.33 | 86.74 a | 50.82 | 73.69 a | 28.69 | 64.15 a | ||||
CK | 153.00 | -18.95 | — | -28.10 | — | -48.37 | — | -86.93 | — | -98.91 | — |
处理 | 药前 虫口 数/头 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | ||||||
A150 | 146.67 | 90.45 | 91.98 b | 85.00 | 88.29 b | 72.05 | 81.16 b | 34.55 | 64.98 b | 2.96 | 51.21 b | ||||
A225 | 136.00 | 94.85 | 95.67 a | 88.46 | 90.99 a | 75.22 | 83.30 b | 47.79 | 72.07 a | 27.45 | 63.53 a | ||||
A300 | 182.33 | 95.24 | 96.00 a | 90.13 | 92.29 a | 79.71 | 86.32 a | 49.54 | 73.01 a | 31.81 | 65.72 a | ||||
B300 | 177.00 | 97.74 | 98.10 a | 89.27 | 91.62 a | 74.01 | 82.48 b | 35.03 | 65.24 b | 1.69 | 50.58 b | ||||
C180 | 122.00 | 96.72 | 97.24 a | 90.98 | 92.96 a | 80.33 | 86.74 a | 50.82 | 73.69 a | 28.69 | 64.15 a | ||||
CK | 153.00 | -18.95 | — | -28.10 | — | -48.37 | — | -86.93 | — | -98.91 | — |
处理 | 药前 虫口数/头 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/% | 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | ||||||
A150 | 142.33 | 84.54 | 84.73 b | 77.52 | 78.00 b | 69.56 | 71.32 b | 53.63 | 61.44 b | 43.09 | 49.21 b | ||||
A225 | 98.67 | 87.84 | 87.98 a | 85.13 | 85.45 a | 80.06 | 81.22 a | 65.88 | 71.63 a | 60.47 | 64.72 a | ||||
A300 | 124.33 | 88.20 | 88.34 a | 86.06 | 86.36 a | 81.50 | 82.57 a | 68.63 | 73.92 a | 60.85 | 65.06 a | ||||
B300 | 178.00 | 90.26 | 90.38 a | 81.28 | 81.68 b | 72.47 | 74.06 b | 52.81 | 60.76 b | 37.08 | 43.85 c | ||||
C180 | 87.00 | 88.51 | 88.64 a | 86.59 | 86.87 a | 81.61 | 82.67 a | 67.82 | 73.24 a | 59.00 | 63.41 a | ||||
CK | 304.33 | -1.21 | — | -2.19 | — | -6.13 | — | -20.26 | — | -12.05 | — |
处理 | 药前 虫口数/头 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/% | 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | 虫口 减退率/% | 防效/% | ||||||
A150 | 142.33 | 84.54 | 84.73 b | 77.52 | 78.00 b | 69.56 | 71.32 b | 53.63 | 61.44 b | 43.09 | 49.21 b | ||||
A225 | 98.67 | 87.84 | 87.98 a | 85.13 | 85.45 a | 80.06 | 81.22 a | 65.88 | 71.63 a | 60.47 | 64.72 a | ||||
A300 | 124.33 | 88.20 | 88.34 a | 86.06 | 86.36 a | 81.50 | 82.57 a | 68.63 | 73.92 a | 60.85 | 65.06 a | ||||
B300 | 178.00 | 90.26 | 90.38 a | 81.28 | 81.68 b | 72.47 | 74.06 b | 52.81 | 60.76 b | 37.08 | 43.85 c | ||||
C180 | 87.00 | 88.51 | 88.64 a | 86.59 | 86.87 a | 81.61 | 82.67 a | 67.82 | 73.24 a | 59.00 | 63.41 a | ||||
CK | 304.33 | -1.21 | — | -2.19 | — | -6.13 | — | -20.26 | — | -12.05 | — |
处理 | 第1次施药情况 | 第2次施药情况 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | ||
A150 | 28.11 b | 20.12 b | 26.47 b | 34.32 b | 56.21 b | 31.45 b | 21.47 b | 18.25 b | 24.12 b | 45.45 b | |
A225 | 27.50 b | 16.56 a | 19.26 a | 26.11 a | 37.13 a | 23.17 a | 14.15 a | 12.55 a | 19.24 a | 27.14 a | |
A300 | 26.36 b | 15.22 a | 18.66 a | 25.52 a | 34.26 a | 22.33 a | 12.06 a | 11.47 a | 19.19 a | 24.33 a | |
B300 | 22.50 a | 18.89 b | 29.72 b | 33.89 b | 57.46 b | 30.26 b | 20.47 b | 17.39 b | 23.36 b | 47.27 b | |
C180 | 24.25 ab | 14.36 a | 18.14 a | 26.08 a | 35.24 a | 23.12 a | 11.67 a | 11.00 a | 18.65 a | 25.12 a | |
CK | 30.28 b | 36.94 c | 43.89 c | 51.33 c | 61.52 b | 63.54 c | 66.78 c | 68.14 c | 77.61 c | 82.58 c |
处理 | 第1次施药情况 | 第2次施药情况 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | 药后14 d | 药后21 d | ||
A150 | 28.11 b | 20.12 b | 26.47 b | 34.32 b | 56.21 b | 31.45 b | 21.47 b | 18.25 b | 24.12 b | 45.45 b | |
A225 | 27.50 b | 16.56 a | 19.26 a | 26.11 a | 37.13 a | 23.17 a | 14.15 a | 12.55 a | 19.24 a | 27.14 a | |
A300 | 26.36 b | 15.22 a | 18.66 a | 25.52 a | 34.26 a | 22.33 a | 12.06 a | 11.47 a | 19.19 a | 24.33 a | |
B300 | 22.50 a | 18.89 b | 29.72 b | 33.89 b | 57.46 b | 30.26 b | 20.47 b | 17.39 b | 23.36 b | 47.27 b | |
C180 | 24.25 ab | 14.36 a | 18.14 a | 26.08 a | 35.24 a | 23.12 a | 11.67 a | 11.00 a | 18.65 a | 25.12 a | |
CK | 30.28 b | 36.94 c | 43.89 c | 51.33 c | 61.52 b | 63.54 c | 66.78 c | 68.14 c | 77.61 c | 82.58 c |
处理 | 2次施药总量(有效成分)/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照增产/% |
---|---|---|---|
A150 | 30 | 7879.95 b | 43.02 |
A225 | 45 | 8667.45 a | 57.31 |
A300 | 60 | 8761.80 a | 59.02 |
B300 | 30 | 7724.10 b | 40.19 |
C180 | 90 | 8702.70 a | 57.95 |
CK | — | 5509.80 c | — |
处理 | 2次施药总量(有效成分)/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照增产/% |
---|---|---|---|
A150 | 30 | 7879.95 b | 43.02 |
A225 | 45 | 8667.45 a | 57.31 |
A300 | 60 | 8761.80 a | 59.02 |
B300 | 30 | 7724.10 b | 40.19 |
C180 | 90 | 8702.70 a | 57.95 |
CK | — | 5509.80 c | — |
[1] |
姜玉英, 刘杰, 谢茂昌, 等. 2019年我国草地贪夜蛾扩散规律观测[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(6):10-19.
|
[2] |
谢显彪, 沈云峰, 杨祚斌, 等. 6种药剂拌沙撒芯对干旱地区玉米草地贪夜蛾的防治效果[J]. 现代农药, 2022, 21(6):62-65.
|
[3] |
李强, 门兴元, 景春, 等. 我国草地贪夜蛾应急防控研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(6):21-27.
|
[4] |
李永平, 郭永旺. 24种药剂防治草地贪夜蛾筛选试验[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(9):85-89.
|
[5] |
王家哲, 袁冬贞, 杨艺炜, 等. 5种药剂对草地贪夜蛾的室内毒力测定和田间防效研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(12):119-123.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0565 |
[6] |
王文豪, 陈莉, 侯艳红, 等. 甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐对草地贪夜蛾卵及幼虫有效浓度的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(1):134-137.
|
[7] |
林璐璐, 钟永志, 张光玲, 等. 6种药剂对安徽省草地贪夜蛾的防治效果[J]. 农药, 2020, 59(7):528-531.
|
[8] |
郑群, 王勇庆, 谭煜婷, 等. 乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂对草地贪夜蛾的生物活性及田间防效[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(6):1169-1174.
|
[9] |
高祖鹏, 郭井菲, 何康来, 等. 乙基多杀菌素对草地贪夜蛾幼虫的毒力及对其解毒酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶活性的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2020, 63(5):558-564.
|
[10] |
董利霞, 芮昌辉, 谭晓伟, 等. 棉铃虫对甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐的抗性遗传力[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(3):195-199.
|
[11] |
赵金凤, 邱良妙, 丁雪玲, 等. 草地贪夜蛾对甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐和虱螨脲的抗性风险评估[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(4):88-93.
|
[12] |
doi: 10.1653/024.095.0232 URL |
[13] |
doi: 10.1093/jee/toy372 URL |
[14] |
王欢欢, 吕圣兰, 赵瑞, 等. 草地贪夜蛾幼虫对常用杀虫剂相对敏感基线的建立[J]. 昆虫学报, 2021, 64(12):1427-1432.
|
[15] |
宋璐璐, 艾大朋, 巨修练, 等. 新型双酰胺类杀虫剂——溴虫氟苯双酰胺[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(4):671-681.
|
[16] |
陈敏, 李凌云, 栾炳辉, 等. 溴虫氟苯双酰胺对甘蓝小菜蛾和菜青虫的防治效果[J]. 农药, 2020, 59(4):300-302.
|
[17] |
齐浩亮, 崔丽, 王芹芹, 等. 溴虫氟苯双酰胺对小菜蛾的毒力及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(1):112-116.
|
[18] |
郑庆伟. 溴虫氟苯双酰胺对西瓜蓟马防效理想且安全[J]. 农药市场信息, 2019(2):46.
|
[19] |
王洪涛, 曲恒华, 王英姿, 等. 新型杀虫剂溴虫氟苯双酰胺对2种茶园主要害虫的田间药效评价[J]. 农药, 2018, 57(9):696-698.
|
[20] |
王果红, 刘光华, 熊艺霖, 等. 10%溴虫氟苯双酰胺悬浮剂防治甘蓝黄曲条跳甲试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021, 12:116-117,127.
|
[21] |
徐赛. 溴虫氟苯双酰胺对水稻主要害虫的生物活性及其在水稻环境中的残留[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2018:1-43.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
吴明峰, 龙楚云, 柳爱平, 等. 新型双酰胺类化合物的杀虫/螨活性研究[J]. 精细化工中间体, 2022, 52(1):17-20.
|
[24] |
柳爱平, 黄明智, 吴明峰, 等. 溴虫氟苯双酰胺(Broflanilide)的合成与生物活性[J]. 精细化工中间体, 2020, 50(6):16-20.
|
[25] |
孙娟, 孟水强, 刘幽良. 甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐的产业史和发展前景[J]. 世界农药, 2010, 32(增刊):50-51.
|
[26] |
邱水林, 陆致平. 6%乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂防治甘蓝夜蛾类害虫田间药效试验[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2011, 3:52-53.
|
[27] |
华乃震. 绿色环保生物杀虫剂多杀霉素和乙基多杀菌素的述评[J]. 农药, 2015, 54(1):1-5.
|
[28] |
赵胜园, 杨现明, 杨学礼, 等. 8种农药对草地贪夜蛾的田间防治效果[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(4):74-78.
|
[29] |
罗振亚, 林少源, 全林发, 等. 6种杀虫剂对广东玉米草地贪夜蛾的田间应用评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(12):124-130.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0618 |
[30] |
李钊, 沈雪玲, 孙石凤, 等. 7种药剂对草地贪夜蛾的田间防效[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2020, 41(1):43-47.
|
[31] |
杨凤丽, 宓盛, 马海荣. 乙基多杀菌素等10种药剂对草地贪夜蛾的防效[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(11):2295-2297.
|
[32] |
王风良, 姜春义, 张海波, 等. 10%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC对草地贪夜蛾的控制效果[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(4):363-368.
|
[1] | CHI Yanyan, LIN Shaoyuan, CHEN Bingxu, XU Shu. Toxicity and Field Efficacy of Tetraniliprole Against Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 111-115. |
[2] | XIA Lijuan, XU Zhonghuai, DONG Xuejuan, WAN Li. Bacillus velezensis: Toxicity and Field Efficacy Against Cucumber Powdery Mildew and Its Safety Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 111-115. |
[3] | YUAN Yulin, LV Jianping, GAO Yixin, DENG Zhongjian, ZHANG Yuan. Predication of Potential Distribution of Spodoptera frugiperda ( J. E. Smith) in Yunnan Province under Climate Change [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 119-127. |
[4] | SONG Xiaobing, CUI Yiping, CHEN Xia, PENG Aitian, LING Jinfeng, HUANG Feng. Control Effect of 5 New Compound Fungicides on Pitaya Canker [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(31): 147-151. |
[5] | LI Fang, ZHANG Juefeng, ZHONG Haiying, CHEN Jianming. Screening and Field Application Evaluation of Chemicals for Zizania latifolia Diseases Prevention and Control [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(25): 122-129. |
[6] | CHEN Siyu. Evaluation on the Field Effect of Releasing Trichogramma chilonis Ishii to Control the Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(20): 109-112. |
[7] | REN Xuexiang, JING Maofeng, SU Xianyan, CHI Yu, CHEN Haoliang, ZHONG Yongzhi, YE Zhenghe. Repellent Effect of Rhizobium on Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 128-132. |
[8] | HUANG Yuan, LIN Jun, SHUI Jing, HE Liye, GU Xiaohong, JIA Min, LIU Xuemei, ZHOU Yan, LIU Yang, WANG Xiaoqin, ZHANG Zhidong. Dynamic Monitoring of Sorghum Lepidoptera Pest Occurrence by Using Sex Pheromone Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(13): 135-140. |
[9] | WANG Jiazhe, YUAN Dongzhen, YANG Yiwei, WEN Yaodong, WEI Peiyao, CHEN Zhijie, LI Yingmei, ZHANG Feng, ZHANG Qi, HONG Bo. Indoor Toxicity Determination and Field Control Efficacy Test of Five Insecticides Against Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 119-123. |
[10] | Guo Zhixiang, He Chengxing, Pu Chunxiao, Chen Fushou, Shang Hui, Fan Huacai, Bai Tingting, Zeng Li. Spodoptera frugiperda: Host Selection and Effect on Its Growth and Development [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 139-144. |
[11] | Hu Rongping, Shi Jun, Lin Lijin, Yang Dongsheng, Ye Huili, Chen Cheng, Fan Zhonghan, Chen Song, Chen Qingdong. Efficient Bactericides for Kiwifruit Canker: Screening and Field Application Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(6): 112-116. |
[12] | Zhang Jiemei, Zhang Renjun, Yao Zhengping, Wu Jinhu, Wang Liang, Hou Zhengxue, Yang Zhuang, Yin Honghui, Chen Suiyun. Screening of Biocontrol Bacteria Against Tobacco Bacterial Wilt and Evaluation of the Field Control Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 131-136. |
[13] | Li Weiwei, Liu Jiani, Gui Furong, He Shuqi, Chen Quanyan, He Guiwu, Chen Bin. Challenges and Prevention Countermeasures of Alien Invasion in China —Spodoptera frugiperda as an Example [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 120-126. |
[14] | Zhang Xiuxia, Zhao Fangbin, Bai Tingting, Mao Xiaohong, Zhang Ansheng. Several Insecticides to Spodoptera exigua: Indoor Toxicity and Field Efficacy [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 127-131. |
[15] | Zhang Xiuxia, Chen Xin, Mao Xiaohong, Li Jiaojiao, Zhang Ansheng. Toxicity Test and Field Efficacy of Four Pesticides to Tetranychus urticae Koch [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(1): 139-143. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||