Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 139-143.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18100055
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhang Xiuxia, Chen Xin, Mao Xiaohong, Li Jiaojiao, Zhang Ansheng()
Received:
2018-10-17
Revised:
2018-12-28
Online:
2020-01-05
Published:
2020-01-07
Contact:
Zhang Ansheng
E-mail:zhangansheng2003@163.com
CLC Number:
Zhang Xiuxia, Chen Xin, Mao Xiaohong, Li Jiaojiao, Zhang Ansheng. Toxicity Test and Field Efficacy of Four Pesticides to Tetranychus urticae Koch[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(1): 139-143.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18100055
药剂名称 | 回归方程 | 斜率(SE) | LC50/(mg/L) | 95%置信/(mg/L) | R2 | 相对毒力倍数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5%依维菌素乳油 | Y=7.006+3.474X | 3.474±0.0.349 | 0.01 | 0.021~0.054 | 0.962 | 2700.8 |
20%甲氰菊酯乳油 | Y=-3.604+2.826X | 2.826±0.253 | 18.847 | 59.472~93.035 | 0.984 | 1.433 |
2.5%高效氯氟氰菊酯水乳剂 | Y=-1.201+0.915X | 0.915±0.093 | 20.498 | 705.034~3080.026 | 0.954 | 1.318 |
22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 | Y=-4.747+1.573X | 1.573±0.239 | 1041.379 | 6170.315~35784.459 | 0.926 | 0.026 |
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | Y=-3.180+2.222X | 2.222±0.151 | 27.008 | 102.018~264.111 | 0.971 | 1 |
药剂名称 | 回归方程 | 斜率(SE) | LC50/(mg/L) | 95%置信/(mg/L) | R2 | 相对毒力倍数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5%依维菌素乳油 | Y=7.006+3.474X | 3.474±0.0.349 | 0.01 | 0.021~0.054 | 0.962 | 2700.8 |
20%甲氰菊酯乳油 | Y=-3.604+2.826X | 2.826±0.253 | 18.847 | 59.472~93.035 | 0.984 | 1.433 |
2.5%高效氯氟氰菊酯水乳剂 | Y=-1.201+0.915X | 0.915±0.093 | 20.498 | 705.034~3080.026 | 0.954 | 1.318 |
22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 | Y=-4.747+1.573X | 1.573±0.239 | 1041.379 | 6170.315~35784.459 | 0.926 | 0.026 |
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | Y=-3.180+2.222X | 2.222±0.151 | 27.008 | 102.018~264.111 | 0.971 | 1 |
制剂 | 有效成分 用量/ (g/hm2) | 虫口 基数/ 头 | 药后1 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | ||||||
0.5%依维 菌素乳油 | 18 | 3746 | 74.27 | 75.72 aA | 91.26 | 92.74 aA | 95.13 | 96.70 aA | 97.71 | 98.65 aA | |||
9 | 3848 | 68.17 | 69.72 bAB | 88.47 | 90.43 bB | 89.25 | 92.71 bB | 94.15 | 96.56 bB | ||||
4.5 | 3822 | 60.28 | 62.21 cB | 79.00 | 82.56 cC | 83.70 | 88.95 cC | 84.92 | 91.14 cC | ||||
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | 22.5 | 3527 | 70.35 | 71.79 abA | 78.35 | 82.02 cC | 82.92 | 88.42 cC | 75.06 | 85.35 dD | |||
空白对照 | 3624 | -5.12 | — | -20.42 | — | -47.48 | — | -70.17 | — |
制剂 | 有效成分 用量/ (g/hm2) | 虫口 基数/ 头 | 药后1 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | ||||||
0.5%依维 菌素乳油 | 18 | 3746 | 74.27 | 75.72 aA | 91.26 | 92.74 aA | 95.13 | 96.70 aA | 97.71 | 98.65 aA | |||
9 | 3848 | 68.17 | 69.72 bAB | 88.47 | 90.43 bB | 89.25 | 92.71 bB | 94.15 | 96.56 bB | ||||
4.5 | 3822 | 60.28 | 62.21 cB | 79.00 | 82.56 cC | 83.70 | 88.95 cC | 84.92 | 91.14 cC | ||||
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | 22.5 | 3527 | 70.35 | 71.79 abA | 78.35 | 82.02 cC | 82.92 | 88.42 cC | 75.06 | 85.35 dD | |||
空白对照 | 3624 | -5.12 | — | -20.42 | — | -47.48 | — | -70.17 | — |
制剂 | 有效成分 用量/ (g/hm2) | 虫口 基数/ 头 | 药后1 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | ||||||
20%甲氰 菊酯乳油 | 120 | 3853 | 50.62 | 52.83 bB | 88.13 | 91.33 aA | 93.91 | 96.41 aA | 91.08 | 95.44 aA | |||
90 | 3523 | 42.31 | 44.90 cC | 80.16 | 85.51 cB | 88.10 | 92.99 bB | 84.08 | 91.85 bB | ||||
72 | 3531 | 35.53 | 38.41 dD | 76.54 | 82.87 dC | 83.91 | 90.52 cC | 78.92 | 89.21 cC | ||||
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | 22.5 | 3528 | 69.37 | 70.74 aA | 80.41 | 85.70 bB | 79.39 | 87.86 dD | 64.46 | 81.80 dD | |||
空白对照 | 3424 | -4.69 | — | -36.95 | — | -69.77 | — | --95.30 | — |
制剂 | 有效成分 用量/ (g/hm2) | 虫口 基数/ 头 | 药后1 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | ||||||
20%甲氰 菊酯乳油 | 120 | 3853 | 50.62 | 52.83 bB | 88.13 | 91.33 aA | 93.91 | 96.41 aA | 91.08 | 95.44 aA | |||
90 | 3523 | 42.31 | 44.90 cC | 80.16 | 85.51 cB | 88.10 | 92.99 bB | 84.08 | 91.85 bB | ||||
72 | 3531 | 35.53 | 38.41 dD | 76.54 | 82.87 dC | 83.91 | 90.52 cC | 78.92 | 89.21 cC | ||||
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | 22.5 | 3528 | 69.37 | 70.74 aA | 80.41 | 85.70 bB | 79.39 | 87.86 dD | 64.46 | 81.80 dD | |||
空白对照 | 3424 | -4.69 | — | -36.95 | — | -69.77 | — | --95.30 | — |
制剂 | 有效成分 用量/ (g/hm2) | 虫口 基数/ 头 | 药后1 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | ||||||
2.5%高效氯氟氰菊酯水乳剂 | 22.5 | 3467 | 72.09 | 76.19 aA | 80.67 | 85.37 aA | 80.24 | 87.93 aA | 74.44 | 86.44 aA | |||
11.25 | 3598 | 66.10 | 71.07 bB | 77.33 | 82.84 bB | 75.58 | 85.09 bB | 69.63 | 83.88 bB | ||||
5.625 | 3642 | 62.89 | 68.34 cB | 74.95 | 81.04 cB | 71.36 | 82.52 cC | 62.38 | 80.03 dC | ||||
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | 22.5 | 3478 | 65.12 | 70.24 bcB | 76.39 | 82.13 bcB | 76.07 | 85.39 bB | 66.95 | 82.46 cB | |||
空白对照 | 3549 | -17.20 | — | -32.12 | — | -63.79 | — | -88.42 | — |
制剂 | 有效成分 用量/ (g/hm2) | 虫口 基数/ 头 | 药后1 d | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | 虫口 减退率/ % | 更正 防效/ % | ||||||
2.5%高效氯氟氰菊酯水乳剂 | 22.5 | 3467 | 72.09 | 76.19 aA | 80.67 | 85.37 aA | 80.24 | 87.93 aA | 74.44 | 86.44 aA | |||
11.25 | 3598 | 66.10 | 71.07 bB | 77.33 | 82.84 bB | 75.58 | 85.09 bB | 69.63 | 83.88 bB | ||||
5.625 | 3642 | 62.89 | 68.34 cB | 74.95 | 81.04 cB | 71.36 | 82.52 cC | 62.38 | 80.03 dC | ||||
25 g/L联苯菊酯乳油 | 22.5 | 3478 | 65.12 | 70.24 bcB | 76.39 | 82.13 bcB | 76.07 | 85.39 bB | 66.95 | 82.46 cB | |||
空白对照 | 3549 | -17.20 | — | -32.12 | — | -63.79 | — | -88.42 | — |
[1] |
Van Leeuwen T, Vontas J, Tsagkarakou A A , et al. Acaricide resis tance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: A review[J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2010,40(8):563-572.
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.05.008 URL |
[2] | 赵玉伟, 周玉书, 任健 . 二斑叶螨和朱砂叶螨对常用杀螨剂的敏感性比较[J]. 农药, 2006,45(6):418-419. |
[3] | 姬秀枝, 杨麦生, 谢麦香 . 蔬菜二斑叶螨的危害及防治[J]. 中国果菜, 2007(05):36. |
[4] | 周晓肖, 江景勇, 邱莉萍 , 等. 乙唑螨腈对草莓二斑叶螨的控制作用[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017,58(11):2003-2005. |
[5] | 胡桂萍, 郑雪芳, 尤民生 , 等. 植物内生菌的研究进展[J]. 福建农业学报, 2010,25(2):226-234. |
[6] | 何劲, 雷帮星, 宋贞富 , 等. 石斛内生细菌DEB-2对5种辣椒病原真菌的抑制作用[J]. 植物保护学报, 2014,41(2):157-162. |
[7] | 孟和生, 王开运, 姜兴印 , 等. 二斑叶螨发生危害特点及防治对策[J]. 昆虫知识, 2001,38(1):52-54. |
[8] | 刘庆娟, 于毅, 刘永杰 , 等. 二斑叶螨的发生与防治研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2011(09):99-101. |
[9] | 宫亚军, 石宝才, 王泽华 , 等. 新型杀螨剂-联苯肼酯对二斑叶螨的毒力测定及田间防效[J]. 农药, 2013,52(03):225-227,233. |
[10] | 唐小凤, 王少丽, 张友军 , 等. 二斑叶螨对阿维菌素的抗药性及抗性基因的PASA检测技术[J]. 植物保护学报, 2014,41(01):67-73. |
[11] | 谭福杰 . 农业害虫抗药性测定方法[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1987,4(增刊):107-122. |
[12] | 孟和生, 王开运, 姜兴印 , 等. 桔全爪螨对常用杀螨剂的抗药性测定[J]. 农药, 2000,39(2):26-28. |
[13] | FAO. Revised method for spider mites and their eggs (e.g. Tetraychus spp. and Panonychus ulmi Koch)[J]. FAO Plant Production and Protection, 1980,21:49-54. |
[14] | 刘刚 . 依维菌素[J]. 湖南农业, 2007(02):22. |
[15] | 王佩圣, 王桂莲, 王继青 , 等. 0.5%依维菌素EC防治大白菜小菜蛾药效试验[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2001(05):38. |
[16] | 贝亚维, 陈笑芸, 顾秀慧 , 等. 依维菌素和阿维菌素对小菜蛾和美洲斑潜蝇田间防治效果比较[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2001(06):19-21. |
[17] | 匡海源, 程立生 . 关于区分朱砂叶螨和二斑叶螨两个近似种的研究[J]. 昆虫学报, 1990,33(1):109-116. |
[18] | 牛永浩, 周长勇, 花蕾 , 等. 4种杀螨剂对二斑叶螨实验种群的致毒作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报:农业科学版, 2008,26(3):251-253. |
[19] | 程立生, 潘俊松 . 几种杀螨剂对二斑叶螨和朱砂叶螨的毒力测定[J]. 植物保护, 1994,20(4):18-19. |
[20] | 赵卫东, 王开运, 姜兴印 , 等. 二斑叶螨对阿维菌素、哒螨灵和甲氰菊酯的抗性选育及其解毒酶活力变化[J]. 昆虫学报, 2003,46(6):788-792. |
[21] | 任健, 周玉书, 赵玉伟 , 等. 二斑叶螨对阿维菌素的抗药性预测研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(2):337-338. |
[22] | 喻国泉, 李冠雄, 王爱平 . 几种杀螨剂对二斑叶螨的药效试验[J]. 植物检疫, 1997,11(4):207-211. |
[23] | 张安盛, 刘庆娟, 庄乾营 , 等. 3种杀螨剂对日光温室二斑叶螨的室内毒力和田间防效[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014,42(10):135-137. |
[24] | 周兴隆 . 二斑叶螨对阿维菌素、螺螨酯及甲氰菊酯的多重抗性研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2015. |
[25] | 刘庆娟, 刘永杰, 于毅 , 等. 二斑叶螨对七种杀螨剂的抗药性测定及其机理研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2012,49(2):376-381. |
[26] | 解晓军, 尹哲, 王璐 , 等. 6种杀螨剂对番荔枝二斑叶螨防治试验[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2015,36(10):42-44,51. |
[1] | LI Zhuoli, XU Jianhui, LI Qidong, LIANG Yajie, ZHANG Lixiang. Research Progress of Botanical Insecticides [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 97-104. |
[2] | WANG Jiazhe, YUAN Dongzhen, YANG Yiwei, WEN Yaodong, WEI Peiyao, CHEN Zhijie, LI Yingmei, ZHANG Feng, ZHANG Qi, HONG Bo. Indoor Toxicity Determination and Field Control Efficacy Test of Five Insecticides Against Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 119-123. |
[3] | Shen Youming, Liu Mingyu, Nie Jiyun, Kuang Lixue, Zhang Jianyi, Xu Guofeng. Correlation Analysis of Pesticide Registration and Usage in Apple Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(10): 126-135. |
[4] | Hu Rongping, Shi Jun, Lin Lijin, Yang Dongsheng, Ye Huili, Chen Cheng, Fan Zhonghan, Chen Song, Chen Qingdong. Efficient Bactericides for Kiwifruit Canker: Screening and Field Application Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(6): 112-116. |
[5] | Zhang Jiemei, Zhang Renjun, Yao Zhengping, Wu Jinhu, Wang Liang, Hou Zhengxue, Yang Zhuang, Yin Honghui, Chen Suiyun. Screening of Biocontrol Bacteria Against Tobacco Bacterial Wilt and Evaluation of the Field Control Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 131-136. |
[6] | Zhang Xiuxia, Zhao Fangbin, Bai Tingting, Mao Xiaohong, Zhang Ansheng. Several Insecticides to Spodoptera exigua: Indoor Toxicity and Field Efficacy [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 127-131. |
[7] | . Toxicity Test and Field Efficacy of 3 Biological Insecticides to Bemisia tabaci on Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(20): 99-103. |
[8] | . Effect of Foliar Fertilizers (Insecticides) on Yield and Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(35): 127-129. |
[9] | . Indoor Toxicity Bioassay of 5 Insecticides to Opisina arenosella Walker [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(13): 191-195. |
[10] | . Evaluation of Field Control Efficiency of Ten Kinds of Insecticides on the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (St?l) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(16): 266-271. |
[11] | . Effect of Three Bioassay Methods on Toxicity of Insecticides Against Larvae of Thrips hawaiiensis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(13): 309-312. |
[12] | . Field Efficacy Test of Fluopyram on Cucurbits and Strawberry Powdery Mildew [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(13): 281-284. |
[13] | . Isolation of Actinomycetes from Diaoluo Mountain and Control Effects Test against Banana Wilt in the Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(13): 97-102. |
[14] | . Field Efficacy of Eugenol against Phytophthora Blight [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(19): 283-286. |
[15] | . Progress in the Studies on Synthetic pyrethroid insecticides Microbial Remediation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(16): 194-200. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||