Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (15): 124-130.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0503
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Yujiao1,2(), YANG Xiurong2(
), LI Yuejiao2, LI Guangsheng2, SUN Shuqin2, LI Zhibin1(
)
Received:
2024-07-27
Revised:
2024-10-15
Online:
2025-05-25
Published:
2025-05-29
ZHAO Yujiao, YANG Xiurong, LI Yuejiao, LI Guangsheng, SUN Shuqin, LI Zhibin. Effects of Varieties, Biocontrol Bacteria and Chemical Agents on Rice Sheath Blight[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(15): 124-130.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0503
编号 | 名称 | 2022年 | 2023年 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
比值(病斑扩展长度/株高) | 抗性 | 比值(病斑扩展长度/株高) | 抗性 | |||
1 | 原稻26 | 0.17 | MR | 0.29 | MR | |
2 | 郑稻25 | 0.20 | MR | 0.39 | S | |
3 | 豫稻24 | 0.32 | S | 0.63 | HS | |
4 | 郑稻22 | 0.16 | MR | 0.15 | R | |
5 | 宛粳608 | 0.26 | MR | 0.15 | R | |
6 | 豫稻27 | 0.18 | MR | 0.34 | S | |
7 | 新稻18 | 0.22 | MR | 0.27 | MR | |
8 | 新粮501 | 0.17 | MR | 0.52 | HS | |
9 | 新直1号 | 0.55 | HS | 0.83 | HS | |
10 | 哈勃110 | 0.47 | HS | 0.51 | HS | |
11 | 新粮早6号 | 0.84 | HS | 0.63 | HS | |
12 | 艺稻608 | 0.32 | S | 0.36 | S | |
13 | 郑稻209 | 0.32 | S | 0.17 | MR | |
14 | 郑稻201 | 0.58 | HS | 0.63 | HS | |
15 | Lemont | 0.32 | S | 0.46 | HS |
编号 | 名称 | 2022年 | 2023年 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
比值(病斑扩展长度/株高) | 抗性 | 比值(病斑扩展长度/株高) | 抗性 | |||
1 | 原稻26 | 0.17 | MR | 0.29 | MR | |
2 | 郑稻25 | 0.20 | MR | 0.39 | S | |
3 | 豫稻24 | 0.32 | S | 0.63 | HS | |
4 | 郑稻22 | 0.16 | MR | 0.15 | R | |
5 | 宛粳608 | 0.26 | MR | 0.15 | R | |
6 | 豫稻27 | 0.18 | MR | 0.34 | S | |
7 | 新稻18 | 0.22 | MR | 0.27 | MR | |
8 | 新粮501 | 0.17 | MR | 0.52 | HS | |
9 | 新直1号 | 0.55 | HS | 0.83 | HS | |
10 | 哈勃110 | 0.47 | HS | 0.51 | HS | |
11 | 新粮早6号 | 0.84 | HS | 0.63 | HS | |
12 | 艺稻608 | 0.32 | S | 0.36 | S | |
13 | 郑稻209 | 0.32 | S | 0.17 | MR | |
14 | 郑稻201 | 0.58 | HS | 0.63 | HS | |
15 | Lemont | 0.32 | S | 0.46 | HS |
菌株编号 | 菌株名称 | 病斑面积 | 抑菌率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 平均值 | |||
1 | 1340 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 23.3 | 76.7 |
2 | BR-4 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 46.6 | 53.4 |
3 | Bs-9 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 53.3 | 46.6 |
4 | B579 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
5 | BR-9 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
6 | Dw-1 | 25 | 20 | 30 | 25.0 | 75.0 |
7 | Ww-1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
8 | 1501 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
9 | Bs-5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
10 | Bs-1 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 80.0 | 20.0 |
菌株编号 | 菌株名称 | 病斑面积 | 抑菌率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 平均值 | |||
1 | 1340 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 23.3 | 76.7 |
2 | BR-4 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 46.6 | 53.4 |
3 | Bs-9 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 53.3 | 46.6 |
4 | B579 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
5 | BR-9 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
6 | Dw-1 | 25 | 20 | 30 | 25.0 | 75.0 |
7 | Ww-1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
8 | 1501 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
9 | Bs-5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
10 | Bs-1 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 80.0 | 20.0 |
杀菌剂 | 种类 | 菌株 | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | 置信区间 | EC50 | 抗性倍数 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苯醚 甲环唑 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=4.3980+0.3204X | 0.9945 | 1.51~3795.03 | 75.67 | 2.58 | ||||||||
2 | Y=4.1953+0.6057X | 1 | 5.22~86.97 | 21.31 | 0.73 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=4.9783+0.4103X | 0.9958 | 0.20~6.30 | 1.13 | 0.04 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.1089+0.6842X | 0.9931 | 14.14~97.14 | 20.06 | 0.68 | ||||||||||
平均 | 29.54 | 1.01 | |||||||||||||
咯菌腈 | 吡咯类 | 1 | Y=6.4118+1.3352X | 0.9951 | 0.05~0.17 | 0.09 | 0.55 | ||||||||
2 | Y=6.6027+1.5160X | 0.9999 | 0.05~0.16 | 0.09 | 0.54 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=6.7436+1.1323X | 0.9906 | 0.01~0.06 | 0.03 | 0.18 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=7.2320+1.8269X | 0.9944 | 0.03~0.11 | 0.06 | 0.38 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.07 | 0.41 | |||||||||||||
戊唑醇 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=4.3113+0.9491X | 0.9999 | 1.55~18.24 | 5.32 | 48.77 | ||||||||
2 | Y=4.6470+1.0860X | 0.9991 | 0.88~5.06 | 2.11 | 19.39 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=4.6775+0.7561X | 1 | 0.96~7.43 | 2.67 | 24.50 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.1943+1.3394X | 0.9959 | 1.86~8.57 | 4.00 | 36.65 | ||||||||||
平均 | 3.52 | 32.33 | |||||||||||||
丙环唑 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=5.3533+0.7763X | 0.9912 | 0.08~1.52 | 0.35 | 1.06 | ||||||||
2 | Y=5.1930+0.4390X | 0.9945 | 0.07~1.77 | 0.36 | 1.10 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=5.1189+0.7323X | 1 | 0.14~3.29 | 0.69 | 2.09 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=5.4148+0.6223X | 0.9995 | 0.05~0.93 | 0.22 | 0.65 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.40 | 1.23 | |||||||||||||
氟环唑 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=5.2500+0.5833X | 0.99 | 0.09~1.47 | 0.37 | 6.43 | ||||||||
2 | Y=5.4942+0.5597X | 0.9995 | 0.03~0.61 | 0.13 | 2.26 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=5.3711+0.6512X | 0.999 | 0.08~0.93 | 0.27 | 4.64 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=5.4704+0.6120X | 1 | 0.03~1.05 | 0.17 | 2.94 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.24 | 4.07 | |||||||||||||
嘧菌酯 | 甲氧基丙烯酸酯类 | 1 | Y=5.3022+0.4562X | 0.9926 | 0.04~1.29 | 0.22 | 8.09 | ||||||||
2 | Y=5.3471+0.2666X | 0.995 | 0.00~0.88 | 0.05 | 1.86 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=5.3009+0.3414X | 0.9957 | 0.01~1.52 | 0.13 | 4.88 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.6197+0.8970X | 0.9984 | 1.12~6.30 | 2.65 | 98.69 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.76 | 28.38 | |||||||||||||
噻呋 酰胺 | 噻唑酰 胺类 | 1 | Y=5.1615+0.5119X | 0.9931 | 0.11~2.14 | 0.48 | 5.37 | ||||||||
2 | Y=7.5448+2.2321X | 0.9947 | 0.05~0.11 | 0.07 | 0.80 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=6.1537+1.0624X | 0.9988 | 0.05~0.15 | 0.08 | 0.91 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=6.6653+1.0488X | 0.9997 | 0.01~0.07 | 0.03 | 0.29 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.17 | 1.84 | |||||||||||||
井冈 霉素 | 抗生素类 | 1 | Y=3.4205+0.9277X | 0.9926 | 12.17~208.93 | 50.42 | 60.39 | ||||||||
2 | Y=4.3284+0.3927X | 0.9953 | 5.70~461.97 | 51.33 | 61.48 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=3.9894+0.4318X | 0.9975 | 15.16~3166.25 | 219.10 | 262.46 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.4541+0.2731X | 0.9974 | 1.99~4986.22 | 99.65 | 119.37 | ||||||||||
平均 | 105.13 | 125.93 |
杀菌剂 | 种类 | 菌株 | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | 置信区间 | EC50 | 抗性倍数 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苯醚 甲环唑 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=4.3980+0.3204X | 0.9945 | 1.51~3795.03 | 75.67 | 2.58 | ||||||||
2 | Y=4.1953+0.6057X | 1 | 5.22~86.97 | 21.31 | 0.73 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=4.9783+0.4103X | 0.9958 | 0.20~6.30 | 1.13 | 0.04 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.1089+0.6842X | 0.9931 | 14.14~97.14 | 20.06 | 0.68 | ||||||||||
平均 | 29.54 | 1.01 | |||||||||||||
咯菌腈 | 吡咯类 | 1 | Y=6.4118+1.3352X | 0.9951 | 0.05~0.17 | 0.09 | 0.55 | ||||||||
2 | Y=6.6027+1.5160X | 0.9999 | 0.05~0.16 | 0.09 | 0.54 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=6.7436+1.1323X | 0.9906 | 0.01~0.06 | 0.03 | 0.18 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=7.2320+1.8269X | 0.9944 | 0.03~0.11 | 0.06 | 0.38 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.07 | 0.41 | |||||||||||||
戊唑醇 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=4.3113+0.9491X | 0.9999 | 1.55~18.24 | 5.32 | 48.77 | ||||||||
2 | Y=4.6470+1.0860X | 0.9991 | 0.88~5.06 | 2.11 | 19.39 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=4.6775+0.7561X | 1 | 0.96~7.43 | 2.67 | 24.50 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.1943+1.3394X | 0.9959 | 1.86~8.57 | 4.00 | 36.65 | ||||||||||
平均 | 3.52 | 32.33 | |||||||||||||
丙环唑 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=5.3533+0.7763X | 0.9912 | 0.08~1.52 | 0.35 | 1.06 | ||||||||
2 | Y=5.1930+0.4390X | 0.9945 | 0.07~1.77 | 0.36 | 1.10 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=5.1189+0.7323X | 1 | 0.14~3.29 | 0.69 | 2.09 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=5.4148+0.6223X | 0.9995 | 0.05~0.93 | 0.22 | 0.65 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.40 | 1.23 | |||||||||||||
氟环唑 | 三唑类 | 1 | Y=5.2500+0.5833X | 0.99 | 0.09~1.47 | 0.37 | 6.43 | ||||||||
2 | Y=5.4942+0.5597X | 0.9995 | 0.03~0.61 | 0.13 | 2.26 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=5.3711+0.6512X | 0.999 | 0.08~0.93 | 0.27 | 4.64 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=5.4704+0.6120X | 1 | 0.03~1.05 | 0.17 | 2.94 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.24 | 4.07 | |||||||||||||
嘧菌酯 | 甲氧基丙烯酸酯类 | 1 | Y=5.3022+0.4562X | 0.9926 | 0.04~1.29 | 0.22 | 8.09 | ||||||||
2 | Y=5.3471+0.2666X | 0.995 | 0.00~0.88 | 0.05 | 1.86 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=5.3009+0.3414X | 0.9957 | 0.01~1.52 | 0.13 | 4.88 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.6197+0.8970X | 0.9984 | 1.12~6.30 | 2.65 | 98.69 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.76 | 28.38 | |||||||||||||
噻呋 酰胺 | 噻唑酰 胺类 | 1 | Y=5.1615+0.5119X | 0.9931 | 0.11~2.14 | 0.48 | 5.37 | ||||||||
2 | Y=7.5448+2.2321X | 0.9947 | 0.05~0.11 | 0.07 | 0.80 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=6.1537+1.0624X | 0.9988 | 0.05~0.15 | 0.08 | 0.91 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=6.6653+1.0488X | 0.9997 | 0.01~0.07 | 0.03 | 0.29 | ||||||||||
平均 | 0.17 | 1.84 | |||||||||||||
井冈 霉素 | 抗生素类 | 1 | Y=3.4205+0.9277X | 0.9926 | 12.17~208.93 | 50.42 | 60.39 | ||||||||
2 | Y=4.3284+0.3927X | 0.9953 | 5.70~461.97 | 51.33 | 61.48 | ||||||||||
3 | Y=3.9894+0.4318X | 0.9975 | 15.16~3166.25 | 219.10 | 262.46 | ||||||||||
4 | Y=4.4541+0.2731X | 0.9974 | 1.99~4986.22 | 99.65 | 119.37 | ||||||||||
平均 | 105.13 | 125.93 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
王安, 刘剑锋, 胡兆平. 水稻纹枯病发生规律及防治技术[J]. 中国农村小康科技, 2008,2:64-65.
|
[4] |
张鑫, 邢立志. 我国水稻主要病害防治研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(23):11-13.
|
[5] |
刘素玲, 汤玉煊, 楚宗艳, 等. 不同药剂对水稻纹枯病田间防效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(22):65-66,72.
|
[6] |
李兴龙, 李彦忠. 土传病害生物防治研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3):204-212.
|
[7] |
杜平. 水稻栽培及病虫害绿色防控技术要点[J]. 世界热带农业信息, 2023(8):7-9.
|
[8] |
王玲, 黄雯雯, 刘连盟, 等. 对中国南方部分籼型杂交水稻纹枯病抗性的评价[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(2):263-270.
|
[9] |
陈宗祥, 左示敏, 王龙平, 等. 江苏省“十五”前后主栽粳稻品种纹枯病抗性评价[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2010, 31(2):31-35.
|
[10] |
任小平, 谢关林, 赵丽涵. 水稻纹枯病拮抗细菌的筛选与利用[J]. 植物保护学报, 2005(4):337-342.
|
[11] |
卢钰升, 顾文杰, 蒋瑞萍, 等. 一株生防细菌GB58的鉴定与抑菌能力测定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(6):198-204.
|
[12] |
卢惠迪. 不同药剂对水稻纹枯病的防治效果[J]. 农业工程技术, 2023, 43(31):20-21.
|
[13] |
陈思宇, 陈志谊, 张荣胜. 水稻纹枯病菌拮抗细菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 植物保护学报, 2013, 40(3):211-218.
|
[14] |
杨清美. 如何充分发挥农药的药效[J]. 农家之友, 2004(7):35.
|
[15] |
杨红福, 张建华, 王莉莉, 等. 一种水稻纹枯病的接种方法[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(10):103-104.
|
[16] |
张华梦, 郑礼煜, 王继春, 等. 水稻纹枯病生防细菌筛选及其与病原菌侵染垫形成的关系[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(2):289-297.
|
[17] |
黄雯雯, 王玲, 刘连盟, 等. 水稻纹枯病立枯丝核菌的分类及遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2010, 16(3):34-38.
|
[18] |
肖勇, 刘明伟, 李刚, 等. 四川省水稻立枯丝核菌(Rhizoctonia solani)的遗传分化与致病力[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2008(1):87-92.
|
[19] |
胡永, 王绘华, 张琳. 不同药剂防治水稻纹枯病的田间药效评价[J]. 上海农业科技, 2023(3):138-139.
|
[20] |
栾春晶, 李修平. 水稻纹枯病生物防治的研究进展[J]. 农业与技术, 2023, 43(9):15-18.
|
[21] |
魏松红, 张亚婷, 孔令春, 等. 水稻纹枯病生防菌的筛选及田间防治效果[J]. 农药, 2022, 61(7):532-536.
|
[22] |
隋亚云, 王文东, 刘中卓, 等. 不同药剂防治水稻纹枯病试验总结[J]. 北方水稻, 2023, 53(5):36-38.
|
[23] |
周明国, 叶钟音, 刘经芬. 稻纹枯病菌对井岗霉素抗药性检测、监测和诱导[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1991(2):73-78.
|
[24] |
隋亚云. 嘧菌酯+苯醚甲环唑防治水稻稻瘟病纹枯病示范总结[J]. 北方水稻, 2020, 50(1):43-44.
|
[25] |
裴吉兵. 水稻纹枯病重发原因及防治对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(13):166-169.
|
[1] | ZHANG Haiting, YE Jianrong, XU Bingzhi, ZENG Shuocheng, FU Huijuan, LI Xingyue, LI Qiyong, ZHANG Hong, YI Jun. Identification, Biological Characteristics and Field Control Efficacy of Venturia inaequalis in Yuexi County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 115-120. |
[2] | LING Cuiqiong, LIAO Hongxin, WEN Jinrui, NIE Hongyan, ZHANG Liyan, WANG Wei, DONG Xian. Antifungal Effects of Essential Oils of Acorus tatarinowii and Artemisia argyi on Panax notoginseng Root Rot Disease [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 141-147. |
[3] | SUN Guangtao, BAO Guirong, TAI Jicheng, SA Rula, LIU Naijia, YU Miao, LI Anning. Effect of Maize and Peanut Intercropping on Crop and Soil Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 7-12. |
[4] | LIU Zidan, HU Binbin, CHEN Yuchang, ZHANG Jinglin, FEI Lina, LIN Jinquan, CHEN Yi, HE Chenggang, JIANG Yonglei. Analysis of Baking Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘NC297’ Introduced from American [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 134-143. |
[5] | YAN Xiaohua, CAO Tian, ZHANG Guobin. Effect of Water Stress on Root Growth and Antioxidant Enzyme System of Cucumber Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 31-38. |
[6] | FANG Baihan, LIU Jingjing, GUO Xiaowen, YE Yang, YANG Maoqi, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huijuan, MIN Wei. Effects of Equal Carbon Amounts of Straw and Straw Charcoal Incorporation on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Enzyme Activity in Cotton Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 69-82. |
[7] | GUO Juxian, HUANG Wangping, DIAO Jinhua, ZHOU Yonghang, WANG Tingqin. Effects of Seawater Stress on Germination of Lettuce Seeds and Seedling Growth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(15): 65-70. |
[8] | MA Xiaoying, MAN Benju, LI Tao, LIU Weifan, MA Fenglan, WAN Menghu, LIU Jili, WU Na. Effects of Potato/Legume Intercropping System on Soil Enzyme Activity and Potato Yield in Arid Region of Southern Ningxia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(14): 13-24. |
[9] | WANG Shuaiyu, WANG Yin, FU Sirui, WEI Shujun, CHEN Jincui, CAO Jinjuan, LI Jin, ZHANG Aihuan, LI Lin. Field Control Effect of Different Pesticides and Adjuvants on Tuta absoluta [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 152-157. |
[10] | ZHANG Shuwei, HUANG Linli, ZONG Yingjie, GUO Huimin, GUO Guimei, YANG Bangwei, CHEN Zhiwei, XU Hongwei, LIU Chenghong. Optimization of Total Flavonoids Extraction from Quinoa Seedlings and Evaluation of Its Inhibitory Effect on Xanthine Oxidase and Antioxidant Activity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 142-148. |
[11] | ZHU Haixia, LI Huan, CHENG Liang. Study on Infection Mechanism of Botrytis spp. Strain HY-021 on Chenopodium album L. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 146-151. |
[12] | QIN Xinke, LI Qi, LI Yuhang, ZHANG Huiyuan, HE Changlong, HUANG Xinrui, ZHANG Weizhen, LEI Ningfei, PEI Xiangjun. Impact of “Moss-Algae-SJP” on Restoration of Biological Soil Crusts in Sandy Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 64-73. |
[13] | WANG Haoling, ZHU Jiaonan, CHEN Qi, DING Jiasheng, WANG Xibo, LI Haitian, ZHANG Kai, XIE Lixia, GUO Wenxiu, WANG Guiping, YU Yi. Synergistic Effect of Three Microbial Pesticides Mixed with Chemical Pesticides on Tuta absoluta Eggs and Larvae [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 133-140. |
[14] | WEI Lingrong, XIE Xinyao, CHEN Xixian, YOU Deyang, WU Jianhui, SHAUKAT Ali. The Control Effect of Three Insecticides on Drosophila suzukii Larvae in Facility Blueberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 141-145. |
[15] | LIU Yao, ZHAO Wuchao, YANG Xiao, KOU Yuxin, DU Tingting, CHEN Xiuqing, QIN Mengfei, XU Lijian. Antibacterial Activities of Litter Fungus Neocucurbitaria salicis-albae and Its Metabolite [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 145-149. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||