Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (13): 65-70.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0569
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-09-09
Revised:
2025-02-20
Online:
2025-05-05
Published:
2025-05-07
JIANG Jinlan. Study on One-Step Seedling Technology of Dendrobium officinale Variety ‘Minghu No.5’[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 65-70.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0569
处理 | 因素 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A.6-BA/(mg/L) | B.NAA/(mg/L) | C.香蕉泥/(g/L) | D.活性炭/(g/L) | |
T1 | 1 | 0.1 | 50 | 0.5 |
T2 | 1 | 0.3 | 75 | 1 |
T3 | 1 | 0.5 | 100 | 1.5 |
T4 | 2 | 0.1 | 100 | 1 |
T5 | 2 | 0.3 | 50 | 1.5 |
T6 | 2 | 0.5 | 75 | 0.5 |
T7 | 3 | 0.1 | 75 | 1.5 |
T8 | 3 | 0.3 | 100 | 0.5 |
T9 | 3 | 0.5 | 50 | 1 |
处理 | 因素 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A.6-BA/(mg/L) | B.NAA/(mg/L) | C.香蕉泥/(g/L) | D.活性炭/(g/L) | |
T1 | 1 | 0.1 | 50 | 0.5 |
T2 | 1 | 0.3 | 75 | 1 |
T3 | 1 | 0.5 | 100 | 1.5 |
T4 | 2 | 0.1 | 100 | 1 |
T5 | 2 | 0.3 | 50 | 1.5 |
T6 | 2 | 0.5 | 75 | 0.5 |
T7 | 3 | 0.1 | 75 | 1.5 |
T8 | 3 | 0.3 | 100 | 0.5 |
T9 | 3 | 0.5 | 50 | 1 |
处理 | 6-BA/(mg/L) | NAA/(mg/L) | 香蕉泥/(g/L) | 活性炭/(g/L) | 生长速度 | 茎段增殖系数 | 萌芽率/% | 芽增殖系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1 | 0.1 | 50 | 0.5 | 1.92±0.27ab | 1.52±0.17ab | 38.87±2.61ab | 1.70±0.24ab |
T2 | 1 | 0.3 | 75 | 1 | 2.40±0.23abc | 1.97±0.19bc | 45.47±4.96ab | 1.98±0.16abc |
T3 | 1 | 0.5 | 100 | 1.5 | 3.69±0.72cd | 2.02±0.27bc | 54.24±10.81b | 2.15±0.20abcd |
T4 | 2 | 0.1 | 100 | 1 | 1.31±0.13a | 1.39±0.07a | 33.97±2.79a | 1.67±0.06a |
T5 | 2 | 0.3 | 50 | 1.5 | 2.08±0.14ab | 1.72±0.13ab | 34.62±1.87ab | 2.35±0.08bcde |
T6 | 2 | 0.5 | 75 | 0.5 | 4.56±0.46d | 1.83±0.12ab | 48.32±6.00ab | 2.59±0.06cde |
T7 | 3 | 0.1 | 75 | 1.5 | 2.58±0.38abc | 1.57±0.10abc | 36.78±3.31ab | 2.49±0.14cde |
T8 | 3 | 0.3 | 100 | 0.5 | 2.85±0.43abc | 1.93±0.20abc | 37.37±4.76ab | 2.71±0.44de |
T9 | 3 | 0.5 | 50 | 1 | 3.46±0.56cd | 2.56±0.17c | 47.87±8.13ab | 2.85±0.22e |
Ka1 | 8.01 | 6.08 | 7.46 | 9.06 | ||||
Ka2 | 7.95 | 7.06 | 9.81 | 7.17 | ||||
Ka3 | 8.89 | 11.71 | 7.58 | 8.62 | ||||
Ra | 0.31 | 1.88 | 0.78 | 0.63 | ||||
Kb1 | 5.51 | 5.42 | 5.81 | 5.67 | ||||
Kb2 | 4.94 | 4.84 | 4.81 | 5.75 | ||||
Kb3 | 5.9 | 6.09 | 5.73 | 4.93 | ||||
Rb | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.27 | ||||
Kc1 | 138.58 | 139.93 | 136.08 | 125.64 | ||||
Kc2 | 116.91 | 109.62 | 110.86 | 135.06 | ||||
Kc3 | 122.02 | 127.96 | 130.57 | 116.81 | ||||
Rc | 7.22 | 10.1 | 8.41 | 6.08 | ||||
Kd1 | 5.83 | 5.86 | 6.76 | 7.14 | ||||
Kd2 | 6.61 | 7.18 | 7.06 | 6.36 | ||||
Kd3 | 8.05 | 7.45 | 6.67 | 6.99 | ||||
Rd | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.13 | 0.26 |
处理 | 6-BA/(mg/L) | NAA/(mg/L) | 香蕉泥/(g/L) | 活性炭/(g/L) | 生长速度 | 茎段增殖系数 | 萌芽率/% | 芽增殖系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1 | 0.1 | 50 | 0.5 | 1.92±0.27ab | 1.52±0.17ab | 38.87±2.61ab | 1.70±0.24ab |
T2 | 1 | 0.3 | 75 | 1 | 2.40±0.23abc | 1.97±0.19bc | 45.47±4.96ab | 1.98±0.16abc |
T3 | 1 | 0.5 | 100 | 1.5 | 3.69±0.72cd | 2.02±0.27bc | 54.24±10.81b | 2.15±0.20abcd |
T4 | 2 | 0.1 | 100 | 1 | 1.31±0.13a | 1.39±0.07a | 33.97±2.79a | 1.67±0.06a |
T5 | 2 | 0.3 | 50 | 1.5 | 2.08±0.14ab | 1.72±0.13ab | 34.62±1.87ab | 2.35±0.08bcde |
T6 | 2 | 0.5 | 75 | 0.5 | 4.56±0.46d | 1.83±0.12ab | 48.32±6.00ab | 2.59±0.06cde |
T7 | 3 | 0.1 | 75 | 1.5 | 2.58±0.38abc | 1.57±0.10abc | 36.78±3.31ab | 2.49±0.14cde |
T8 | 3 | 0.3 | 100 | 0.5 | 2.85±0.43abc | 1.93±0.20abc | 37.37±4.76ab | 2.71±0.44de |
T9 | 3 | 0.5 | 50 | 1 | 3.46±0.56cd | 2.56±0.17c | 47.87±8.13ab | 2.85±0.22e |
Ka1 | 8.01 | 6.08 | 7.46 | 9.06 | ||||
Ka2 | 7.95 | 7.06 | 9.81 | 7.17 | ||||
Ka3 | 8.89 | 11.71 | 7.58 | 8.62 | ||||
Ra | 0.31 | 1.88 | 0.78 | 0.63 | ||||
Kb1 | 5.51 | 5.42 | 5.81 | 5.67 | ||||
Kb2 | 4.94 | 4.84 | 4.81 | 5.75 | ||||
Kb3 | 5.9 | 6.09 | 5.73 | 4.93 | ||||
Rb | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.27 | ||||
Kc1 | 138.58 | 139.93 | 136.08 | 125.64 | ||||
Kc2 | 116.91 | 109.62 | 110.86 | 135.06 | ||||
Kc3 | 122.02 | 127.96 | 130.57 | 116.81 | ||||
Rc | 7.22 | 10.1 | 8.41 | 6.08 | ||||
Kd1 | 5.83 | 5.86 | 6.76 | 7.14 | ||||
Kd2 | 6.61 | 7.18 | 7.06 | 6.36 | ||||
Kd3 | 8.05 | 7.45 | 6.67 | 6.99 | ||||
Rd | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.13 | 0.26 |
源 | 因变量 | III型平方和 | df | 均方 | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
校正模型 | 生长速度 | 8.035 | 8 | 1.004 | 0.000 | 0. 000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.758 | 8 | 0.095 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 413.659 | 8 | 51.707 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 1.470 | 8 | 0.184 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
截距 | 生长速度 | 68.614 | 1 | 68.614 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 29.703 | 1 | 29.703 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 15834.867 | 1 | 15834.867 | 0.000 | 0. 000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 46.649 | 1 | 46.649 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
6-BA | 生长速度 | 3.351 | 2 | 1.675 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.181 | 2 | 0.091 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 22.794 | 2 | 11.397 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.482 | 2 | 0.241 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
NAA | 生长速度 | 0.459 | 2 | 0.230 | 0.000 | 0. 000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.091 | 2 | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 53.262 | 2 | 26.631 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.263 | 2 | 0.131 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
活性炭 | 生长速度 | 1.780 | 2 | 0.890 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.187 | 2 | 0.094 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 131.589 | 2 | 65.794 | 0.000 | 0. 000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.104 | 2 | 0.052 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
香蕉泥 | 生长速度 | 2.445 | 2 | 1.223 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.298 | 2 | 0.149 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 206.014 | 2 | 103.007 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.621 | 2 | 0.310 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
误差 | 生长速度 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | ||
茎段增殖系数 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | |||
萌发率 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | |||
芽增殖系数 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | |||
总计 | 生长速度 | 76.649 | 9 | |||
茎段增殖系数 | 30.461 | 9 | ||||
萌发率 | 16248.525 | 9 | ||||
芽增殖系数 | 48.119 | 9 | ||||
校正的总计 | 生长速度 | 8.035 | 8 | |||
茎段增殖系数 | 0.758 | 8 | ||||
萌发率 | 413.659 | 8 | ||||
芽增殖系数 | 1.470 | 8 |
源 | 因变量 | III型平方和 | df | 均方 | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
校正模型 | 生长速度 | 8.035 | 8 | 1.004 | 0.000 | 0. 000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.758 | 8 | 0.095 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 413.659 | 8 | 51.707 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 1.470 | 8 | 0.184 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
截距 | 生长速度 | 68.614 | 1 | 68.614 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 29.703 | 1 | 29.703 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 15834.867 | 1 | 15834.867 | 0.000 | 0. 000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 46.649 | 1 | 46.649 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
6-BA | 生长速度 | 3.351 | 2 | 1.675 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.181 | 2 | 0.091 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 22.794 | 2 | 11.397 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.482 | 2 | 0.241 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
NAA | 生长速度 | 0.459 | 2 | 0.230 | 0.000 | 0. 000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.091 | 2 | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 53.262 | 2 | 26.631 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.263 | 2 | 0.131 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
活性炭 | 生长速度 | 1.780 | 2 | 0.890 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.187 | 2 | 0.094 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 131.589 | 2 | 65.794 | 0.000 | 0. 000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.104 | 2 | 0.052 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
香蕉泥 | 生长速度 | 2.445 | 2 | 1.223 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
茎段增殖系数 | 0.298 | 2 | 0.149 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
萌发率 | 206.014 | 2 | 103.007 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
芽增殖系数 | 0.621 | 2 | 0.310 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
误差 | 生长速度 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | ||
茎段增殖系数 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | |||
萌发率 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | |||
芽增殖系数 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.000 | |||
总计 | 生长速度 | 76.649 | 9 | |||
茎段增殖系数 | 30.461 | 9 | ||||
萌发率 | 16248.525 | 9 | ||||
芽增殖系数 | 48.119 | 9 | ||||
校正的总计 | 生长速度 | 8.035 | 8 | |||
茎段增殖系数 | 0.758 | 8 | ||||
萌发率 | 413.659 | 8 | ||||
芽增殖系数 | 1.470 | 8 |
处理 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 叶数/片 | 根数/条 | 根长/m | 单株重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 5.60±0.29ab | 2.33±0.23a | 2.63±0.62ab | 0.67±0.03ab | 3.67±0.67a | 3.33±0.33a | 3.20±1.16ac | 0.60±0.03a |
T2 | 6.07±0.34ab | 3.00±0.06a | 3.00±0.40ab | 0.67±0.09ab | 4.33±0.67ab | 4.00±0.58a | 4.80±1.68ab | 0.67±0.01bc |
T3 | 7.20±0.31bc | 3.30±0.21a | 3.07±0.23ab | 0.87±0.03bc | 4.67±0.33ab | 5.00±0.00ab | 8.60±1.12c | 0.71±0.02cd |
T4 | 5.20±0.50a | 3.60±0.56a | 2.17±0.12a | 0.50±0.00a | 4.67±0.33ab | 4.00±0.58a | 5.03±0.91ab | 0.65±0.01abc |
T5 | 5.30±0.40a | 3.70±0.20a | 2.33±0.35a | 0.60±0.06a | 4.67±0.33ab | 4.33±0.88ab | 6.10±0.95abc | 0.69±0.01cd |
T6 | 10.13±0.15d | 6.03±0.32b | 4.33±0.09c | 1.17±0.09d | 5.00±0.00ab | 5.00±0.58ab | 6.57±0.69abc | 0.71±0.01cd |
T7 | 6.37±0.18ab | 5.17±0.58b | 2.57±0.26ab | 0.70±0.06ab | 4.67±0.33ab | 4.33±0.67ab | 5.43±0.59ab | 0.62±0.01ab |
T8 | 8.67±0.95cd | 5.37±0.92b | 3.83±0.58bc | 0.97±0.12cd | 5.00±0.00ab | 5.00±0.00ab | 6.30±0.36abc | 0.74±0.04d |
T9 | 9.00±0.76d | 6.10±0.06b | 4.50±0.45c | 1.07±0.09cd | 5.33±0.33b | 6.00±0.58b | 6.70±1.08bc | 0.78±0.02d |
处理 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 叶数/片 | 根数/条 | 根长/m | 单株重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 5.60±0.29ab | 2.33±0.23a | 2.63±0.62ab | 0.67±0.03ab | 3.67±0.67a | 3.33±0.33a | 3.20±1.16ac | 0.60±0.03a |
T2 | 6.07±0.34ab | 3.00±0.06a | 3.00±0.40ab | 0.67±0.09ab | 4.33±0.67ab | 4.00±0.58a | 4.80±1.68ab | 0.67±0.01bc |
T3 | 7.20±0.31bc | 3.30±0.21a | 3.07±0.23ab | 0.87±0.03bc | 4.67±0.33ab | 5.00±0.00ab | 8.60±1.12c | 0.71±0.02cd |
T4 | 5.20±0.50a | 3.60±0.56a | 2.17±0.12a | 0.50±0.00a | 4.67±0.33ab | 4.00±0.58a | 5.03±0.91ab | 0.65±0.01abc |
T5 | 5.30±0.40a | 3.70±0.20a | 2.33±0.35a | 0.60±0.06a | 4.67±0.33ab | 4.33±0.88ab | 6.10±0.95abc | 0.69±0.01cd |
T6 | 10.13±0.15d | 6.03±0.32b | 4.33±0.09c | 1.17±0.09d | 5.00±0.00ab | 5.00±0.58ab | 6.57±0.69abc | 0.71±0.01cd |
T7 | 6.37±0.18ab | 5.17±0.58b | 2.57±0.26ab | 0.70±0.06ab | 4.67±0.33ab | 4.33±0.67ab | 5.43±0.59ab | 0.62±0.01ab |
T8 | 8.67±0.95cd | 5.37±0.92b | 3.83±0.58bc | 0.97±0.12cd | 5.00±0.00ab | 5.00±0.00ab | 6.30±0.36abc | 0.74±0.04d |
T9 | 9.00±0.76d | 6.10±0.06b | 4.50±0.45c | 1.07±0.09cd | 5.33±0.33b | 6.00±0.58b | 6.70±1.08bc | 0.78±0.02d |
[1] |
江金兰. 激素和有机质对铁皮石斛×重唇石斛F1代增殖的影响[J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2022, 18(4):252-258.
|
[2] |
中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志第19卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999:67,117.
|
[3] |
国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典(2020年版)(一部)[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020:295.
|
[4] |
福建省中药材产业协会, 厦门塔斯曼生物工程有限公司, 厦门大学, 等. DBS35/001—2020,食品安全地方标准铁皮石斛花[S]. 福州: 福建省卫生健康委员会, 2020:1-4.
|
[5] |
福建省中药材产业协会, 厦门塔斯曼生物工程有限公司, 厦门大学, 等. DBS35/002—2020,食品安全地方标准铁皮石斛叶[S]. 福州: 福建省卫生健康委员会, 2020:1-4.
|
[6] |
江金兰. 铁皮石斛新品种“泰斛1号”[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(5):1169-1170.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0033 |
[7] |
江金兰, 叶炜, 李永清, 等. 福建泰宁野生铁皮石斛种群的ISSR亲缘关系分析[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2016, 24(3):259-266.
|
[8] |
江金兰, 叶炜, 李永清, 等. 福建泰宁野生铁皮石斛ISSR亲缘关系分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2016, 57(2):208-210.
|
[9] |
曹奕鸯, 江金兰, 李永清, 等. 基于叶绿体DNA rps16序列的福建泰宁野生铁皮石斛多样性分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31(8):833-838.
|
[10] |
李永清, 叶炜, 江金兰, 等. 铁皮石斛种质亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(4):1530-1534.
|
[11] |
颜沛沛, 叶炜, 江金兰, 等. 不同仿生栽培模式下铁皮石斛的品质与安全性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(25):64-68.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0749 |
[12] |
张子璇, 张成才, 向增旭, 等. 金钗石斛工厂化高效育苗技术研究[J]. 中药材, 2021, 44(6):1299-1304.
|
[13] |
琚淑明, 朱伟玲, 王伟亮, 等. 铁皮石斛茎段离体培养一次成苗技术研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2016, 51(1):45-48.
|
[14] |
胡佳丽. 铁皮石斛种子组织培养条件的优化研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2017.
|
[15] |
周晨, 谷巍, 顾正国, 等. 金线兰一次性成苗及设施栽培关键技术研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(11):1695-1704.
|
[16] |
邹晖, 李海明, 王伟英, 等. 白芨无菌小苗一步成苗培养基优化[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2018(7):130-132.
|
[17] |
卢金东, 王波, 厉广辉, 等. 芦笋腋芽一步成苗组培技术研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(6):42-46.
|
[18] |
闫学彤, 郑珂媛, 王可佳, 等. 八仙花一步成苗离体培养方法[J]. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58(6):1153-1160.
|
[19] |
王将, 张子璇, 张成才, 等. 金钗石斛工厂化高效育苗技术研究[J]. 中药材, 2021, 44(6):1299-1304.
|
[20] |
梁晖辉, 张成才, 高真, 等. 响应面法探究铁皮石斛种子一步成苗[J]. 中药材, 2019, 42(11):2473-2479.
|
[21] |
成丹, 聂天骄, 李成慧. 铁皮石斛一次成苗技术初探[J]. 现代园艺, 2018(9):16-17.
|
[22] |
江金兰. 不同添加物对文心兰原球茎增殖及试管苗生长的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2012, 41(4):8-14.
|
[23] |
江金兰. 石斛新品种粉佳人增殖及生根条件优化[J]. 热带作物学报, 2024, 45(6):1184-1193.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2024.06.010 |
[24] |
蔡正旺. 铁皮石斛组织培养研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(13):161-164.
|
[25] |
高培元, 陈建妙, 甘铨. 金钗石斛的茎段培养与植株再生[J]. 中草药, 2002, 33(11):1031-1033.
|
[26] |
朱庆竖, 陈勇, 余花, 等. 铁皮石斛组织培养与快繁技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(31):23-24.
|
[27] |
汤久杨, 陈卿然, 马喆, 等. 铁皮石斛茎段快繁技术研究[J]. 北京农业职业学院学报, 2020, 34(4):33-40.
|
[28] |
刘雪兰, 孙长生, 朱虹, 等. 温度对铁皮石斛组培苗质量的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2015, 21(8):89-92.
|
[1] | JIANG Yongqiang, WU Yao, FANG Zhongjian, YE Guangying, HUI Jun’ai, ZHOU Rong, WANG Zaihua. Influence of LED Light Quality on Growth and Quality of Tissue Culture Plantets of Dendrobium officinale and D. nobile [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 65-72. |
[2] | CHEN Fang, ZUO Jin, LIU Yupeng, YANG Shiqiong, LI Huixuan, LIU Xuanming, GU Shuhong. Meteorological Condition Analysis and Climate Quality Certification of Dendrobium officinale in Guizhou: A Case Study of Anlong County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 112-118. |
[3] | LIU Kexing, YAN Shiwen, CUI Dong, ZHOU Longhao, XU Bingjie, SHI Chunyu, KONG Xiangyu, LI Cong, LIU Hongjuan. Effects of Hormone Proportions on Tissue Culture of Sweet Potato and Tube Seedlings Growth After Transplantation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 12-16. |
[4] | YAN Peipei, YE Wei, JIANG Jinlan, WANG Peiyu, JIANG Jianfang, HONG Zengchun. Analysis of Quality and Safety of Dendrobium officinale in Different Bionic Cultivation Modes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(25): 64-68. |
[5] | YANG Yuan, YANG Qiuyue, WANG Dachang, RUAN Baoli, YANG Yang, LUO Yingzi, HUANG Mingjin. Analysis of Volatile Components in Dendrobium officinale, Dendrobium nobile and Lily Flowers [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(25): 139-146. |
[6] | BAI Wei, HU Yang, HU Qingqing, CUI Jinli, ZHANG Baoying, YANG Sumei. Effect of Main Cultivation Factors on Yield of Oil Sunflower in North Hebei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 17-22. |
[7] | Peng Hua, Song Xia, Zhang Chun. Optimization of Ultrasonic Extraction Process of Red Pigment from ‘Carmine Radish’ by Orthogonal Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(27): 132-138. |
[8] | Zeng Jia, Liu Ling, Tan Yanning, Xu Ke, Sun Xuewu, Ouyang Ning, Yuan Guilong, Yuan Dingyang, Duan Meijuan. Mixed Seeding of ‘Longke638S’ and Red-hull line ‘XianhuiXK01’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(2): 1-6. |
[9] | Liu Xiaoyue, Wang Ronghua, Wang Weicheng, Liu Na, Liu Xiaohan, Liu Zhaoyang, Liu Dali, Wu Zedong, Wang Maoqian. Cytokinin Concentrations: Effect on the Germination of Sugarbeet Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 9-14. |
[10] | Liu Lin, Sun Xiaoshuai, Li Qian, Fan Shuchen, Shi Hongdi, Ma Jun, Liu Dandan. Establishment and Optimization of SSR-PCR Reaction System of Apple Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 61-66. |
[11] | He Aiguo, Dai Yanjiao, Hu Zhixin, Wu Jiamei, Chen Jin. Effect of IBA and NAA on Root Development of Sedum plumbizincicola Under Different pH [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(22): 49-54. |
[12] | Tang Lixue, Du Jinhui, Shi Chunyu, Liu Hongjuan, Meng Di, Liu Huaxue, Yan Kai, Kang Xinyuan. NAA/6BA Ratio at Different Concentrations: Effects on Shoot Tip Culture Characteristics of Different Sweet Potato Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21): 113-117. |
[13] | . Optimization of Extracting Total Flavonoids from Portulaca oleracea L. by Ultrasonic Method and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant and Antitumor Activities in Vitro [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(4): 130-135. |
[14] | . Study on Light Matrix Formula of Seedling Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(34): 124-130. |
[15] | . Flowering Regulation in Hybrid Cymbidium by Orthogonal Experimental Design [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(14): 52-56. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||