Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 9-14.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0532
Special Issue: 生物技术
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Xiaoyue1(), Wang Ronghua2, Wang Weicheng2, Liu Na1, Liu Xiaohan1, Liu Zhaoyang1, Liu Dali1, Wu Zedong1, Wang Maoqian1()
Received:
2020-10-09
Revised:
2020-12-16
Online:
2021-04-15
Published:
2021-04-13
Contact:
Wang Maoqian
E-mail:970766396@qq.com;haixiang80@126.com
CLC Number:
Liu Xiaoyue, Wang Ronghua, Wang Weicheng, Liu Na, Liu Xiaohan, Liu Zhaoyang, Liu Dali, Wu Zedong, Wang Maoqian. Cytokinin Concentrations: Effect on the Germination of Sugarbeet Seeds[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 9-14.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0532
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 0.1%6-BA | 8 | 处理4 | 0.5% 6-BA | 8 | 处理7 | 1%6-BA | 8 |
处理2 | 0.1%6-BA | 12 | 处理5 | 0.5%6-BA | 12 | 处理8 | 1%6-BA | 12 |
处理3 | 0.1%6-BA | 24 | 处理6 | 0.5%6-BA | 24 | 处理9 | 1%6-BA | 24 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 0.1%6-BA | 8 | 处理4 | 0.5% 6-BA | 8 | 处理7 | 1%6-BA | 8 |
处理2 | 0.1%6-BA | 12 | 处理5 | 0.5%6-BA | 12 | 处理8 | 1%6-BA | 12 |
处理3 | 0.1%6-BA | 24 | 处理6 | 0.5%6-BA | 24 | 处理9 | 1%6-BA | 24 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 0.1% 6-BA | 8 | 85±2.65 | 91.33±2.08 | 38.15±0.72 | 230.23±32.22 |
处理2 | 0.1% 6-BA | 12 | 90±1 | 92.33±0.58 | 43.22±7.34 | 237.03±12.85 |
处理3 | 0.1% 6-BA | 24 | 83.67±1.53 | 90.33±1.53 | 32.11±5.23 | 203.13±24.75 |
CK | TD802 | 0 | 82±2 | 89.67±2.51 | 26.75±1.03 | 189.21±2.22 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 0.1% 6-BA | 8 | 85±2.65 | 91.33±2.08 | 38.15±0.72 | 230.23±32.22 |
处理2 | 0.1% 6-BA | 12 | 90±1 | 92.33±0.58 | 43.22±7.34 | 237.03±12.85 |
处理3 | 0.1% 6-BA | 24 | 83.67±1.53 | 90.33±1.53 | 32.11±5.23 | 203.13±24.75 |
CK | TD802 | 0 | 82±2 | 89.67±2.51 | 26.75±1.03 | 189.21±2.22 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理4 | 0.5%6-BA | 8 | 88±1.53 | 90±2.65 | 29.67±2.35 | 201.23±24.53 |
处理5 | 0.5%6-BA | 12 | 85.67±0.58 | 92.33±1.53 | 33.45±6.21 | 213.65±25.69 |
处理6 | 0.5%6-BA | 24 | 80.33±2.52 | 90±2.65 | 25.23±3.62 | 190.03±19.23 |
CK | TD802 | 0 | 82±2 | 89.67±2.51 | 26.75±1.03 | 189.21±2.22 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理4 | 0.5%6-BA | 8 | 88±1.53 | 90±2.65 | 29.67±2.35 | 201.23±24.53 |
处理5 | 0.5%6-BA | 12 | 85.67±0.58 | 92.33±1.53 | 33.45±6.21 | 213.65±25.69 |
处理6 | 0.5%6-BA | 24 | 80.33±2.52 | 90±2.65 | 25.23±3.62 | 190.03±19.23 |
CK | TD802 | 0 | 82±2 | 89.67±2.51 | 26.75±1.03 | 189.21±2.22 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理7 | 1%6-BA | 8 | 80.33±4.51 | 85±5 | 25.96±3.89 | 186.26±11.32 |
处理8 | 1%6-BA | 12 | 81.33±1.53 | 92.33±2.52 | 26.93±2.65 | 192.63±12.56 |
处理9 | 1%6-BA | 24 | 79±2.65 | 89±3.61 | 23.56±2.55 | 182.37±8.51 |
CK | TD802 | 0 | 82±2 | 89.67±2.51 | 26.75±1.03 | 189.21±2.22 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理7 | 1%6-BA | 8 | 80.33±4.51 | 85±5 | 25.96±3.89 | 186.26±11.32 |
处理8 | 1%6-BA | 12 | 81.33±1.53 | 92.33±2.52 | 26.93±2.65 | 192.63±12.56 |
处理9 | 1%6-BA | 24 | 79±2.65 | 89±3.61 | 23.56±2.55 | 182.37±8.51 |
CK | TD802 | 0 | 82±2 | 89.67±2.51 | 26.75±1.03 | 189.21±2.22 |
[1] | 王茂芊, 王维成, 吴则东, 等. 中国甜菜种子引发研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2018,40(5):70-72. |
[2] | 耿贵, 吕春华, 於丽华, 等. 甜菜耐盐性形态学及生理生化特征研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2019,41(1):54-59. |
[3] | 王宇光, 田烨, 耿贵. 不同钠离子浓度下甜菜幼苗早期生理变化[J]. 中国糖料, 2018,40(5):22-24. |
[4] | 张泽旭, 骆岩, 王维成, 等. 不同浓度PEG对甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(13):48-52. |
[5] | 马悦, 王荣华, 朱腾翔, 等. 过氧化氢、硼酸、PEG对甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(6):19-23. |
[6] | 鲁兆新, 宫国军, 王立峰, 等. 甜菜种子活化剂的配方筛选及室内发芽试验[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 2001(1):24-25. |
[7] | 刘军. 微量元素浸种对甜菜种子活力、发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2000(5):228-230. |
[8] | Heydecker W. Germination of an idea: the priming of seeds[R]. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture Report, 1974: 50-67. |
[9] |
徐恒恒, 黎妮, 刘树君, 等. 种子萌发及其调控的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2014,40(7):1141-1156.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01141 URL |
[10] | 徐丽媛, 范家萌, 徐四静, 等. 农作物种子活力检测与引发技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018,24(20):37-40. |
[11] | Tariq Aziz, Erkut Pekşen. Seed priming with gibberellic acid rescues chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) from chilling stress[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2020,42(8):800-804. |
[12] | Singh A, Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A. Seed priming with calcium compounds abrogate fluoride-induced oxidative stress by upregulating defence pathways in an indica rice variety[J]. Protoplasma: An International Journal of Animal, Fungal and Plant Cell Biology, 2020,257(3):767-782. |
[13] | 杨于军. 4种盐胁迫对黑种草种子萌发的影响[J]. 山西林业科技, 2019,48(2):3-6. |
[14] |
Farooq M, Hussain M, Habib M M, et al. Influence of seed priming techniques on grain yield and economic returns of bread wheat planted at different spacings[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2020,71(8):725-738.
doi: 10.1071/CP20065 URL |
[15] | 韩云华, 王彦荣, 陶奇波. 种子激素引发[J]. 草业科学, 2016,33(12):2494-2502. |
[16] | 杜利霞, 赵凯玥, 王凯鑫, 等. 6-BA引发对赖草种子萌发、贮藏物质和内源激素的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020,28(3):667-674. |
[17] | 刘一灵, 刘仁祥, 李振华, 等. GA_3和6-BA协同引发对烟草种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 种子, 2013,32(12):76-78. |
[18] | 冯岳, 魏永胜, 冯浩. 低渗溶液促进小麦种子萌发的生理机制[J]. 西北农业学报, 2020,29(3):428-435. |
[19] | 朱建峰, 杨秀艳, 武海雯, 等. 植物种子萌发期耐盐碱性提高技术研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020,36(2):158-168. |
[20] | 张泽旭, 骆岩, 王维成, 等. 3种引发剂对甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(34):20-24. |
[21] | Arun M N, Shankara H  S, Bhanuprakash  K, et al. Influence of seed priming and different irrigation levels on growth parameters of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp][J]. Legume Research - An International Journal, 2020,43(1):90-104. |
[22] | 王鹏, 祝丽香, 陈香香, 等. 种子引发对盐胁迫条件下桔梗种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017,49(9):71-76. |
[23] | 杨小环, 马金虎, 郭数进, 等. 种子引发对盐胁迫下高粱种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011,19(1):103-109. |
[24] | 王瑞聪, 张源, 杨颜颜, 等. NaN3处理马齿苋种子的最适剂量与叶绿素荧光辅助筛选的方法[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015,43(9):224-228. |
[25] | 程大友, 张义, 陈丽. 氯化钠胁迫下甜菜种子的萌发[J]. 中国糖料, 1996(2):21-23. |
[26] | 张泽旭, 骆岩, 王维成, 等. 基于磷酸二氢钾引发剂组合对甜菜种子的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(22):25-30. |
[27] | 罗萍, 蒋升洁, 明航, 郑日如. GA(4+7)和6-BA复配剂对百合切花保鲜的影响研究[J]. 农业科技与信息(现代园林), 2015,12(4):267-268. |
[28] |
马庆, 齐璐璐, 李晓玉, 等. 外源细胞分裂素对玉米叶原基分化类型的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2008(11):2053-2058.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02053 URL |
[1] | KANG Yunqiang, LI Lingling, XIE Junhong, ZHANG Jian, DU Changliang, ZECHARIAH Effah. Adaptability and Wind Erosion Resistance of Winter Rapeseed in Semi-arid Area of Central Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 31-36. |
[2] | WANG Sizhi, GUAN Wenling, HAO Xiaohan, SONG Jie. Study on Germination Characteristics of Gaultheria procumbens Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 77-84. |
[3] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. |
[4] | LI Ruizhen, YAN Dingchun. Study on the Value of Honeybees as Pollinators of Oilseed Rape [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 129-134. |
[5] | XU Xinyang, ZHANG Yuejian, SHEN Jia, SHOU Weisong. Methods for Breaking Seed Dormancy of Thick-skinned Muskmelon ‘Cuixue 5’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 41-44. |
[6] | LI Xuefeng, WANG Jian, YE Xiaoyuan, ZHANG Xiuting, WANG Lixue. Plant Aqueous Extract of Momordica charantia: Effects on Rice Seed Germination and Seedling Growth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 1-7. |
[7] | MA Ruili, ZHAO Xiaoying. Climatic Suitability of Cauliflowers and Disaster Prevention in Duolun County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 80-86. |
[8] | YAN Yuntao, HE Xi, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. Advances in Research on the Storability of Rice Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 1-8. |
[9] | ZHAO Liqun, TIAN wen, TIAN Yanan, CAO Lingling, XU Xiulan. The Disinfection Effect of Allyl Isothiocyanate Applied in Nursery Greenhouse [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 37-42. |
[10] | LI Sen, FENG Di, ZHANG Jingmin, ZHU Haiyan, PENG Dianliang, WANG Zhihe, WANG Qinqin. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Germination and Seedling Growth of Cherry Radish Under NaCl Solution Hydroponics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 48-53. |
[11] | WANG Shenghao, YU Bing. Cloning and Bioinformatics Analysis of BvM14-UNG Gene in Sugarbeet M14 Line [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 16-22. |
[12] | HU Ping, FENG Minyu, WU Fengyu, CAO Heyu. Suitable Sowing Temperature for Direct Seeding Early Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 70-75. |
[13] | ZHANG Baohan, LIU Jingyi, YOU Jingjing, ZUO Qingsong. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Accumulation of Rapeseed in Coastal Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 22-26. |
[14] | YANG Xiaoxu, LI Mengdi, LIU Dajun, FENG Guojun, LIU Chang. Exogenous Melatonin Affects the Germination and Resistance Ability of Common Bean Seeds Under Chilling Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 34-38. |
[15] | HE Mengxia, CUI Shunli, ZHENG Baozhi, BI Zhile, LU Suizeng, QI Liya, LI Xinna, LIU Hong, HAN Peng, WANG Jin, LIU Lifeng. Suitable Density of Single-seed Precision Sowing for Peanut Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 23-27. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||