
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 159-166.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0440
Special Issue: 生物技术
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Pei1(
), SONG Changgui1, XIE Yong1, WANG Mei1, MA Jingqiu1, WU Jun1, HUANG Yue1, HE Jiayang2(
), WANG Xiaojing1(
)
Received:2025-05-30
Revised:2025-11-05
Online:2026-01-15
Published:2026-01-15
ZHAO Pei, SONG Changgui, XIE Yong, WANG Mei, MA Jingqiu, WU Jun, HUANG Yue, HE Jiayang, WANG Xiaojing. Effects of Particle Size on Composting Process and Compost Maturity of Sericulture Byproducts[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 159-166.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0440
| 物料名称 | pH | 碳/% | 全氮/% | 碳氮比 | 有效氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 含水量/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 果桑枝条 | 7.37 | 49.80 | 1.09 | 45.8 | 35.42 | 1.63 | 32.83 | 9.57 |
| 蚕沙 | 10.57 | 24.45 | 2.82 | 8.68 | 89.15 | 29.36 | 103.28 | 68.10 |
| 物料名称 | pH | 碳/% | 全氮/% | 碳氮比 | 有效氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 含水量/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 果桑枝条 | 7.37 | 49.80 | 1.09 | 45.8 | 35.42 | 1.63 | 32.83 | 9.57 |
| 蚕沙 | 10.57 | 24.45 | 2.82 | 8.68 | 89.15 | 29.36 | 103.28 | 68.10 |
| 处理 | 1 d | 39 d | 82 d | 151 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A组(<1 cm) | 22.87±0.5084b | 16.75±0.4600b | 17.03±0.0053b | 12.85±0.0783c |
| B组(1~2 cm) | 28.40±0.0546a | 17.93±0.0484a | 18.10±0.2007a | 14.82±0.2043a |
| C组(>2 cm) | 27.87±0.5112a | 16.61±0.1891b | 16.88±0.0012b | 13.79±0.0448b |
| 处理 | 1 d | 39 d | 82 d | 151 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A组(<1 cm) | 22.87±0.5084b | 16.75±0.4600b | 17.03±0.0053b | 12.85±0.0783c |
| B组(1~2 cm) | 28.40±0.0546a | 17.93±0.0484a | 18.10±0.2007a | 14.82±0.2043a |
| C组(>2 cm) | 27.87±0.5112a | 16.61±0.1891b | 16.88±0.0012b | 13.79±0.0448b |
| 养分 | 时期 | A组(<1 cm) | B组(1~2 cm) | C组(>2 cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有机质/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 742.73±1.4492b | 753.50±0.6142b | 793.04±0.6322a |
| 堆肥结束 | 698.04±0.4149a | 654.69±0.3933b | 658.55±0.3251b | |
| 全氮/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 17.50±0.0388a | 14.47±0.0026b | 14.96±0.0267b |
| 堆肥结束 | 23.19±0.0136a | 20.83±0.0291b | 21.67±0.0007b | |
| 全磷/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 5.30±0.1026b | 5.56±0.0054a | 5.46±0.1226a |
| 堆肥结束 | 9.02±0.2696b | 8.56±0.3799b | 11.04±0.2501a | |
| 全钾/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 20.74±0.0303a | 16.54±0.0001b | 16.33±0.0267b |
| 堆肥结束 | 17.80±0.0052c | 21.31±0.0264b | 22.93±0.0424a | |
| 总养分/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 43.54±0.2223a | 36.57±0.1380b | 36.75±0.1173b |
| 堆肥结束 | 50.01±0.1173b | 50.7±0.0686b | 55.64±0.0188a | |
| 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 堆肥前 | 69.08±0.0018b | 79.70±0.0035a | 71.44±0.0005b |
| 堆肥结束 | 61.40±0.0421c | 84.43±0.0050b | 93.28±0.0004a | |
| 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 堆肥前 | 12.58±0.0280c | 14.25±0.0019b | 15.36±0.0010a |
| 堆肥结束 | 17.21±0.0239b | 13.23±0.0080c | 24.82±0.0005a | |
| 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 堆肥前 | 78.47±0.0136a | 63.09±0.0206b | 56.64±0.0052c |
| 堆肥结束 | 64.58±0.0486c | 81.45±0.0055b | 87.90±0.0605a | |
| 总速效养分/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 160.13±0.0732a | 157.04±0.0463b | 143.44±0.0686c |
| 堆肥结束 | 143.19±0.0970c | 179.11±0.0973b | 206.00±0.0463a |
| 养分 | 时期 | A组(<1 cm) | B组(1~2 cm) | C组(>2 cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有机质/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 742.73±1.4492b | 753.50±0.6142b | 793.04±0.6322a |
| 堆肥结束 | 698.04±0.4149a | 654.69±0.3933b | 658.55±0.3251b | |
| 全氮/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 17.50±0.0388a | 14.47±0.0026b | 14.96±0.0267b |
| 堆肥结束 | 23.19±0.0136a | 20.83±0.0291b | 21.67±0.0007b | |
| 全磷/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 5.30±0.1026b | 5.56±0.0054a | 5.46±0.1226a |
| 堆肥结束 | 9.02±0.2696b | 8.56±0.3799b | 11.04±0.2501a | |
| 全钾/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 20.74±0.0303a | 16.54±0.0001b | 16.33±0.0267b |
| 堆肥结束 | 17.80±0.0052c | 21.31±0.0264b | 22.93±0.0424a | |
| 总养分/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 43.54±0.2223a | 36.57±0.1380b | 36.75±0.1173b |
| 堆肥结束 | 50.01±0.1173b | 50.7±0.0686b | 55.64±0.0188a | |
| 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 堆肥前 | 69.08±0.0018b | 79.70±0.0035a | 71.44±0.0005b |
| 堆肥结束 | 61.40±0.0421c | 84.43±0.0050b | 93.28±0.0004a | |
| 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 堆肥前 | 12.58±0.0280c | 14.25±0.0019b | 15.36±0.0010a |
| 堆肥结束 | 17.21±0.0239b | 13.23±0.0080c | 24.82±0.0005a | |
| 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 堆肥前 | 78.47±0.0136a | 63.09±0.0206b | 56.64±0.0052c |
| 堆肥结束 | 64.58±0.0486c | 81.45±0.0055b | 87.90±0.0605a | |
| 总速效养分/(g/kg) | 堆肥前 | 160.13±0.0732a | 157.04±0.0463b | 143.44±0.0686c |
| 堆肥结束 | 143.19±0.0970c | 179.11±0.0973b | 206.00±0.0463a |
| [1] |
白雪, 何松涛, 李莉, 等. 广西桑枝蚕沙综合利用工程的实施成效及发展方向[J]. 广西农学报, 2014, 29(6):80-82.
|
| [2] |
袁琳. “虫”变“龙”的启示——广西蚕沙桑枝高效利用面面观[J]. 农家之友, 2014(8):11.
|
| [3] |
张璐. 园林绿化废弃物堆肥化的过程控制及其产品改良与应用研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.
|
| [4] |
王亮. 城市垃圾好氧堆肥过程的动力学研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学,2006:30-35.
|
| [5] |
文昊深. 城市生活垃圾高温好氧堆肥工艺优化研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学,2004:35-38.
|
| [6] |
吴均, 黄传书, 刘艳, 赵珮, 等. 几种复合微生物发酵剂发酵废弃桑枝的比较研究[J]. 蚕学通讯, 2019, 39(3):9-14.
|
| [7] |
赵珮, 唐小平, 吴均, 等. 微生物及C/N比对果桑枝条堆肥腐熟的影响[J]. 农业工程, 2020, 10(6):51-56.
|
| [8] |
赵珮, 宋长贵, 吴均, 等. 添加鸡粪和菌剂对桑枝条堆肥腐熟效果及肥力的影响[J]. 蚕学通讯, 2023, 43(1):22-26.
|
| [9] |
李吉进. 畜禽粪便高温堆肥机理与应用研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2004.
|
| [10] |
李磊, 王淑琦, 郭小平, 等. 初始粒径和外源添加剂对绿化废弃物堆肥腐熟效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2020, 14(10):2804-2812.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
| [14] |
杨冬艳, 王丹, 桑婷, 等. 粉碎粒径对番茄和辣椒秸秆堆肥木质纤维素降解特征的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(2):210-219.
|
| [15] |
王引权. 葡萄冬剪枝条高温堆制化机理研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2005.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
doi: 10.1504/IJEWM.2012.044162 URL |
| [19] |
doi: 10.1002/clen.v41.7 URL |
| [20] |
王海候, 何胥, 陶玥玥, 等. 添加不同粒径炭基辅料改善猪粪好氧堆肥质量的效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(9):224-232.
|
| [21] |
顾娟, 齐希光, 李秀芬, 等. 固态微生物菌剂的制备及其在好氧堆肥中的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2020, 14(1):253-261.
|
| [22] |
赵珮, 高琴琼, 朱红艳, 等. 桑枝和蚕沙的基础成分测定及堆肥试验[J]. 蚕学通讯, 2024, 44(1):28-34.
|
| [23] |
金龙, 赵由才. 计算机与数学模型在固体废弃物处理与资源化中的应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006.
|
| [24] |
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.009 pmid: 21978622 |
| [25] |
张高升. 城镇污泥粒径对蚯蚓堆肥的影响[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2018
|
| [26] |
马秋颖, 王智, 徐道清, 等. 玉米秸秆收贮高效资源化利用模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(8):1190-1195.
|
| [27] |
张野, 王吉平, 苏天明, 等. 筛选微生物降解木质纤维素的研究进展[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(6):100-105.
|
| [1] | ZHANG Zhigao, WANG Chuang, ZENG Wenxin, HUANG Xumin, ZHANG Huifen, YIN Dong, WANG Libing, XU Xinghui, ZHANG Hong. Effects of Different Animal Manures on Aerobic Fermentation Process in Tobacco Stalk Composting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 68-75. |
| [2] | MAI Yichen, LUO Xiaoliang, LI Hong. Exploration on Composting Mode of Highland Summer Vegetable Waste in Jiuquan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 128-132. |
| [3] | YAN Hong, CHEN Taichun, FENG Zhizhen, CHEN Zhijie, XU Jin, XU Ximei, DONG Zhen, FU Bo. Effects of Tillage Practices on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Microbial Communities and Yield of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 110-119. |
| [4] | LI Zhengkui, XIA Yuhong, ZHAO Sha, HAN Tiankai, SUN Long, LIU Jiaxin, CHEN Min. Effect of Yellow River Water Drip Irrigation Coordinated with Soil Regulation Technology on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Maize Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 102-110. |
| [5] | CHEN Baozhu, HUANG Jichuan, Xu Yanggui, PENG Yiping, Li Zhuxian, LIANG Jianyi, ZHONG Wenliang, YAN Yuwei, TU Yuting. Effects of Different Crop Rotation Patterns on Soil Microbial Ecology in Late Flowering Cabbage Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 93-102. |
| [6] | FENG Zhizhen, CHEN Taichun, YAN Hong, CHEN Zhijie, LI Yingmei, XU Jin, GUO Huan, QIN Tao, FU Bo. Comparative Analysis of Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Community Structure Between Diseased and Healthy Soils in Wheat Fusarium Crown Rot [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(12): 109-118. |
| [7] | LU Tong, JI Cuimei, CHU Xiuli, LIU Ya, XIE Lisheng, ZHOU Liangliang, WANG Chuang. Effects of Different Additives on Physicochemical Properties of Garden Waste Composting Process [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(12): 103-108. |
| [8] | ZHANG Dongmin, HUANG Wanli, CHEN Xinyi, ZHANG Chaokun, XIAO Shiwei. Effect of Intercropping Model of Ziziphus mauritiana-Soybeans on Soil Nutrients and Fruit Quality of Z. mauritiana [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 153-158. |
| [9] | LIU Naijia, SA Rula, YANG Hengshan, TAI Jicheng, WU Yunlong. Effect of Application Periods of Straw Composting Agent on Soil Fertility and Soil Enzyme Activity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(27): 79-84. |
| [10] | WANG Jiangxiao, WANG Qinli, HE Guowei, XIONG Ying, DENG Haoliang, BIAN Kaiqi, JIN Yongsheng. Effects of Nitrogen Sources on Maturity Characteristics of Furfural Residue Aerobic Composting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(25): 94-99. |
| [11] | A Yingge, HE Liangrong, FU Yanbo, BIAN Qingyong, MENG Ajing, DAI Yufang, JIAO Yunqi. Effects of Carbon to Nitrogen Ratios on Quality of Lavender Straw Aerobic Compost [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(25): 85-93. |
| [12] | HAN Yanghua, ZHANG Jing, LIU Dejiang, ZHOU Xinming, QIU Taoyu. Influence of Three Fermentation Inoculants on High-temperature Composting Efficiency of Fennel Straw [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(18): 118-122. |
| [13] | ZHOU Yang, YANG Yongsen, DING Yuehua. Effects of Reducing Chemical Fertilizer and Applying Compost on Yield and Quality of Potato in Semi-arid Area of Ningxia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(15): 32-36. |
| [14] | LIU Wu, ZOU Qingxian, ZHANG Foyi, ZHONG Jialin, FAN Yulu, LIU Wei, WANG Qiong. Study on Community Composition and Diversity of Soil Fauna in Urban Forest in Nanchang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 80-88. |
| [15] | YUAN Tao, AN Qi, NIU Yanbo, MENG Liqiang, WU Haoqiong, FAN Chuan, CAO Yabin. Effects of Corn Stalks Composting on Soil Properties of Black Soil Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 47-52. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||