The Relationship between Yield and Nutrient Content of Rootstock and Scion on Rubber Budding Tree

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2585

Abstract

Abstract: The change of the dry rubber content, soluble solids content, thiol content, sucrose content, inorganic phosphorus content and protein content in the latex of rootstock and scion on different yield rubber budding tree were analysis in the article for discussing the relationship between nutrient content and yield. The results showed that (1) There is no difference between the rootstock and scion in supper-high-yield and high-yield rubber tree beside the thiol content and the sucrose content in rootstock of supper-high-yield rubber tree is very significantly higher than the scion itself, but the dry rubber content and the soluble solids content in scion of CK is very significantly higher than the rootstock itself. (2) The nutrient content in rootstock of higher yield rubber tree are higher relatively, the dry rubber content, soluble solids content, thiol content and sucrose content in supper-high-yield rubber tree are very significantly higher than the high-yield and CK. (3) The thiol content, sucrose content and protein content have no very significantly difference in the scion. The good rootstock material is more important than the nutrient transportation between the rootstock and scion for higher yield on rubber budding tree.

References

[1] 狄克曼 M J.三叶橡胶研究三十年[M].热带作物杂志社,1956.
[2] 黄志敏.云南勐腊农场有株橡胶高产树王[J].热带农业科技,2003, 26:51.
[3] 许闻献,潘衍庆,魏小弟,等.无性系 PR107的产胶潜力及其生量特性[J].热带作物学报,1990(1):11-22.
[4] 校现周,许闻献,魏小弟.中龄芽接树 PR107和 GT1刺激割胶生理诊断的研究[J].热带作物学报,1990(1):1-6.
[5] 魏芳,校现周.巴西橡胶树热研 7-33-97、 PR107、 RRIM600 生理特性比较[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(18):7561-7563.
[6] 林位夫,曹建华.橡胶芽接树砧穗间的相互影响——胶乳中 3种植物激素的差异[J].热带作物学报,2005,26(1):1-5.
[7] 丁璇,袁坤,杨礼富,等.巴西橡胶芽接树砧穗互作的蛋白质组初步研究[J].热带作物学报,2010,31(9):1514-1518.
[8] 刘世彪,林位夫,郝秉中.巴西橡胶树不同高度导管的结构特性及其对嫁接树导管结构的影响[J].热带作物学报,2000,21(4):7-13.
[9] 刘世彪,林位夫,郝秉中等.巴西橡胶树嫁接接合区接穗和砧木径向生长差异的研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(7):1178-1181.
[10] 黄国涛,林位夫.橡胶芽接树砧木与接穗在生化上的相互影响[J].热带作物学报,2003,24(3):7-11.
[11] 刘子凡,王军,林位夫.超高产橡胶芽接树产排胶生理研究[J].北京林业大学学报.2010.32(4):122-125.
[12] 杨少琼,莫业勇,范思伟.PR107初产树对强加刺激的生理反应[J].热带作物学报,1995,16(1):29-37.
[13] 杨少琼,何宝玲.橡胶树乳管系统功能的胶乳诊断.Ⅰ硫醇含量的测定[J].热带作物研究.1989,1:65-68.
[14] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:268-275.
[15] 西北农业大学.基础生物化学实验指导[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社.1986:13-15,66-68.
[16] 李如亮.生物化学实验[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1998:57-59.
[17] Schlitzberger A, Beiderbeck R. Transformation by Agrobacterium tu mefaciens changes graft compatibility of Nicotiana tabacum L.[J]. Phytopathology,1990,128:257-262.
[18] 韩富光.论在当前生产中应该注意橡胶实生砧木的作用与选择[J].海南大学学报,1985,3(3):14-18.
[19] Gan Lian Tiong.橡胶树砧木对提高芽接树生长量和产量影响的初步研究结果[J].陈建白译,云南热作科技,1991,14(2):35-38.
[20] 黄婉秋译,张怡仙校.橡胶实生砧木对嫁接树生长和产量的影响[J].热带作物译丛,1979,5:48.
[21] 曹建华,林位夫.巴西橡胶芽接树砧木与接穗间的相互影响[J].热带农业科学,2004,24(5):56-60,68.
[22] 毛丽君,林位夫.橡胶树嫁接无性系的研究进展[J].江西农业学报, 2008,20(1):65-67.
[23] 曹建华,林位夫,陈俊明.砧木与接穗嫁接亲合力研究综述[J].热带农业科学,2005,25(4):64-69.
[24] 校现周,许闻献.RRIM600刺激割胶制度及生理状况的研究[J].热带作物学报,1991,12(2):1-8.
[25] 农业部农垦局热作处,中国热带作物学会割胶与生理专业委员会.橡胶树割胶制度改革论文集[C].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2000.
[26] 敖硕昌,赵淑娟,何长贵.橡胶树高产生理条件的研究(总结报告) [J].云南热作科技,1996,19(2):1-6.
[27] 黎仕聪,林欣声.微量元素对橡胶死皮病的防治作用[J].热带作物科技,1997(6):35-37.
[28] 罗世巧,校现周,魏小弟,等.热研7-33-97幼龄开割树对低频刺激割制的适应性研究初报[J].热带作物学报,2005,26(4):28-33.
[29] 谭德冠,姚庆收,张伟算,等.10个橡胶树新品系幼龄试割期间生理参数的分析与比较[J].热带农业科学,2004,27(1):1-6.
[30] 杨少琼,莫业勇,范思伟.PR107 初产树对强割加刺激的生理反应[J].热带作物学报,1995,16(1):29-37.
[31] 高新生,李维国,黄华孙,等.4个胶木兼优品系生长量、初产期与排胶生理特性[J].热带农业科学,2007,27(3):1-4.
[32] 莫业勇,杨少琼,黎喻.橡胶树无性系PR107胶乳生理参数的季节性变化[J].热带作物学报,1999,20(3):12-15.