Welcome to Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,

Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (36): 211-219.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15080009

Special Issue: 园艺

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Urea and Straw Application on CO2 and N2O Emissions in Tea Field Soil in Central China

Yin Xin, Tian Yanan, Xie Qi, Lin Shan   

  1. (College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation in Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430070)
  • Received:2015-08-03 Revised:2015-12-11 Accepted:2015-09-25 Online:2015-12-30 Published:2015-12-30

Abstract: In order to study the effect of urea and straw application on CO2 and N2O emission in tea field soil and provide theory basis for the rational fertilization, hilly area tea field of red soil in central China was took as study object, the emission characteristics were studied after the application of CO2 and N2O by the method of static culture system under indoor incubation condition. Four different treatments (control, urea, crop straw and urea crop straw) were designed. The results showed that soil CO2 and N2O emission presented significant differences among four different treatments. The application of crop straw could remarkably promote soil CO2 emission, soil CO2 emissions were 5.57 and 4.99 times higher than CK after the application of crop straw and urea crop straw respectively. The application of urea could significantly promote N2O emission in the tea field soil, but the application of crop straw reduced soil N2O emission. There was a significantly positive correlation between the N2O emissions amount of CK and urea treatments and the NH4 -N content. The soil NO3--N content had a close relationship with N2O emission of the treatment without crop straw application, while the NO3--N content and N2O emission of the treatment with crop straw had no significant correlation. Soil soluble organic carbon (DOC) had significant impact on CO2 emission, the two had a significantly linear positive correlativity.

CLC Number: