Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (30): 1-6.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17010111
Received:
2017-01-20
Revised:
2017-10-16
Accepted:
2017-04-19
Online:
2017-10-31
Published:
2017-10-31
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17010111
[1] 厉广辉, 万勇善, 刘风珍, 等. 不同抗旱性花生品种根系形态及生理特性[J]. 作物学报, 2014,40(3):531-541. [2] 邵宏波, 梁宗锁, 邵明安. 小麦抗旱生理生化和分子生物学研究进展与趋势[J]. 草业学报, 2006, 15(3):5-17. [3] 王士强, 胡银岗, 佘奎军, 等. 小麦抗旱相关农艺性状和生理生化性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(11): 2452-2459. [4] 张军, 鲁敏, 孙树贵, 等. 7个冬小麦品种灌浆期抗旱性鉴定指标的综合评价[J]. 植物科学学报, 2014, 32(2): 148-157. [5] 于文颖, 纪瑞鹏, 冯锐, 等. 不同生育期玉米叶片光合特性及水分利用效率对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(9): 2902-2909. [6] 房全孝, 陈雨海, 李全起, 等. 灌溉对冬小麦水分利用效率的影响研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004, 20(4): 34-39. [7] Zhang J X, Kirham M B. Drought stress induced changes in activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase in wheat species[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 1994, 35(5): 785-791 [8] Chrismann A, Hoffmann T, Teplova I, et al. Generation of active pools of abiscisic acid revealed by in vitro imaging of water stressed Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiology, 2005, 137: 209-219 [9] Schereer B, Isidore E, Klein P, et al. Large intraspecific haplotype variability at the Rph7 locus results from rapid and recent divergence in the barley genome[J]. Plant Cell, 2005, 17:361-374. [10] Hieng B, Ugrinovic K, Sustar Vozlic J, et al. Different classes of proteases are involved in the response to drought of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivars differing in sensitivity[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, 161: 519-930 [11] Espartero J, Pintor-Toro J A, Pardo J M. Differential accumulation of synthetase transcripts in response to salt stress[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 1994, 25: 217-227 [12] 刘娥娥, 汪沛洪, 郭振飞. 植物的干旱诱导蛋白[J]. 植物生理学报, 2001, 37(2): 155-160Liu E E, Wang P H, Guo Z F. Drought-induced proteins in plants[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2001, 37(2): 155-160 [13] 高悦, 朱永铸, 杨志民, 等. 干旱胁迫和复水对冰草相关抗性生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(2): 336-341. [14] Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Devi M J, Vadez V, Sharma K K. Differential antioxidative responses in transgenic peanut bear no relationship to their superior transpiration efficiency under drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2009, 166: 1207-1217. [15] Krishnamurthy L, Vadez V, Devi M J, Serraj R., Nigam S N, Sheshshayee M S, Chandra S, Aruna R. Variation in transpiration efficiency and its related traits in a groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) mapping population. Field Crops Research, 2007, 103: 189-197 [16] Vadez V, Kholova J, Medina S, Kakkera A, Anderberg H Transpiration efficiency: new insights into an old story. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(21): 6141-6153 [17] 董宝娣, 师长海, 乔匀周, 等. 不同灌溉条件下不同类型冬小麦产量水分利用效率差异原因分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(5): 1096-1103. [18] 周桂莲, 杨慧霞. 小麦抗旱性鉴定的生理生化指标及其分析评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1996, 14(2): 65-71. [19] 景蕊莲. 作物抗旱节水研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2007,9(1):1-5. [20] 董建力, 许兴, 李树华, 等. 旱胁迫对不同春小麦叶绿素含量的影响及与抗旱性的关系[J]. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(3): 120-133. [21] Farquhar G D, óLeary M H, Berry J A. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves[J]. AusL J Plant Physiol, 1982, 9: 121-137 [22] Martinez J P, Lutts S, Schanck A, et al. Is osmotic adjustment required for water stress resistance in the Mediterranean shrub Atriplex halimus L[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, 161: 1041-1051 [23] 张维军, 袁汉民, 陈东升, 等. 小麦抗旱性生理生化机制及QTL研究进展[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(6): 139-148. [24] Arora A, Sairam R K, Srivastava G C. Oxidative stress and antioxidative system in plants[J]. Current Science, 2002, 82:1227-1238 [25] 杜建雄, 师尚礼, 刘金荣, 等. 干旱胁迫和复水对草地早熟禾3个品种生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2010,18(1): 73-77. [26] 金忠民. 干旱胁迫对三种冷季型草坪草保护酶的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2008(9): 120-122. [27] 郑鹤岭, 潘洁, 廉晓娟, 等. 冬小麦不同调亏量灌溉试验研究[J]. 天津农业科学, 2008, 14(2):26-28. [28] 卜令铎, 张仁和, 韩苗苗, 等. 干旱复水激发玉米叶片补偿效应的生理机制[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(2): 88-92. [29] 罗利军, 梅捍卫, 余新桥, 等.节水抗旱稻及其发展策略[J]. 科学通报, 2011, 56(11): 804-811. |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | HU Jun, DORJE Tashi, LABA , GESANG Droma, LUOSONG Quzhen. Definition of Grape Crowing Period and Analysis of Meteorological Conditions in Yanjing of Mangkang County of Qamdo City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 103-106. |
[3] | HU Shuai, LUO Liping, SUN Meng, YANG Yu, WEN Junbao. Combined Control of Semanotus bifasciatus by Pyemotes zhonghuajia and Scleroderma guani [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 107-111. |
[4] | LIU Zhijun, GU Liushuang, YAN Chao, FENG Gang, HE Chunping, WU Weihuai, ZENG Xinnian, YI Kexian. Effect of Organosilicone Adjuvant on Wettability of 7 Insecticides on Sisal Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 112-116. |
[5] | GONG Xuena, WANG Xuesong, LUO Ziwen, CHEN Hongyun, WANG Yungang, LONG Yaqin, CHEN Linbo. Laboratory Toxicity of Four Chemical Insecticides Against Agriophara rhombata [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 117-122. |
[6] | Pema Rigzin, Dhonyo Dorji, Delek Kunkyi, Dekyi Yangzom, Yeshe Dorji, Penpa Tsring. Constructing the Monitoring Model of High Temperature Damage on Rice by Combining Data from Satellites and Ground Automatic Weather Stations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 133-141. |
[7] | WU Song, ZHOU Tian, YANG Libin, JIANG Yunbing, PAN Hong, LIU Yongzhi, DU Jun. VOSviewer-Based Visual Analysis on Research Status of Phyllosphere Microorganisms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 142-150. |
[8] | CHEN Hemin, XIAO Wenfang, CHEN Heming, LV Fubing, ZHU Genfa, LI Zongyan, LI Zuo. Research Progress and Visual Analysis of Orchid Fresh-keeping Based on CiteSpace [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 151-164. |
[9] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. |
[10] | GAO Wei, ZHANG Jun, HAO Xi, LIU Juan, ZANG Xiuwang. Regional Change of Peanut Production in Henan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 22-30. |
[11] | KANG Yunqiang, LI Lingling, XIE Junhong, ZHANG Jian, DU Changliang, ZECHARIAH Effah. Adaptability and Wind Erosion Resistance of Winter Rapeseed in Semi-arid Area of Central Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 31-36. |
[12] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. |
[13] | GOU Jiquan, SU Liwen, CHENG Zhikui, HUANG Xiaochun, WU Wenting, LV Haixuan, LIU Zhengguo. Genetic Analysis of Chlorophyll Content in the Flesh of Wax Gourd [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 45-50. |
[14] | LI Xiaoyu. Cultivation and Product Analysis of Pleurotus eryngii on Phragmites australis Substrates [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 51-55. |
[15] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||