Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 139-145.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0397
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-05-15
Revised:
2022-08-15
Online:
2023-04-25
Published:
2023-04-21
LIAN Xiuye. Cadmium Enrichment Characteristics of 15 Rice Varieties and the Safety Risk Assessment[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 139-145.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0397
处理 | 土壤镉全量 /(mg/kg) | 稻谷镉含量/(mg/kg) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R01 | R02 | R03 | R04 | R05 | R06 | R07 | R08 | R09 | R10 | R11 | R12 | R13 | R14 | R15 | ||
FieldⅠ | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.098 | 0.064 | 0.072 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.076 | 0.084 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.064 | 0.048 |
FieldⅡ | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.083 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.090 |
Field Ⅲ | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.052 | 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.088 | 0.043 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.049 | 0.044 |
处理 | 土壤镉全量 /(mg/kg) | 稻谷镉含量/(mg/kg) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R01 | R02 | R03 | R04 | R05 | R06 | R07 | R08 | R09 | R10 | R11 | R12 | R13 | R14 | R15 | ||
FieldⅠ | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.098 | 0.064 | 0.072 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.076 | 0.084 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.064 | 0.048 |
FieldⅡ | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.083 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.090 |
Field Ⅲ | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.052 | 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.088 | 0.043 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.049 | 0.044 |
水稻品种 | 相关方程 | 相关系数(r) | 水稻品种 | 回归方程 | 相关系数(r) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R01 | y=0.6382x+0.014 | 0.9949** | R09 | y=1.8124x+0.0016 | 0.9959** |
R02 | y=1.6257x-0.0009 | 0.9919** | R10 | y=0.5526x+0.0056 | 0.9987** |
R03 | y=2.0083x+0.0110 | 0.9962** | R11 | y=0.7694x+0.0169 | 0.9984** |
R04 | y=1.5351x+0.0283 | 0.9984** | R12 | y=0.8753x+0.0110 | 0.9937** |
R05 | y=0.8045x | 0.9978** | R13 | y=0.8678x+0.0333 | 0.9842** |
R06 | y=0.9221x+0.0116 | 0.9961** | R14 | y=1.1627x+0.0268 | 0.9844** |
R07 | y=1.062x-0.0100 | 0.9925** | R15 | y=1.7326x+0.0514 | 0.9872** |
R08 | y=1.6212x-0.0091 | 0.9948** |
水稻品种 | 相关方程 | 相关系数(r) | 水稻品种 | 回归方程 | 相关系数(r) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R01 | y=0.6382x+0.014 | 0.9949** | R09 | y=1.8124x+0.0016 | 0.9959** |
R02 | y=1.6257x-0.0009 | 0.9919** | R10 | y=0.5526x+0.0056 | 0.9987** |
R03 | y=2.0083x+0.0110 | 0.9962** | R11 | y=0.7694x+0.0169 | 0.9984** |
R04 | y=1.5351x+0.0283 | 0.9984** | R12 | y=0.8753x+0.0110 | 0.9937** |
R05 | y=0.8045x | 0.9978** | R13 | y=0.8678x+0.0333 | 0.9842** |
R06 | y=0.9221x+0.0116 | 0.9961** | R14 | y=1.1627x+0.0268 | 0.9844** |
R07 | y=1.062x-0.0100 | 0.9925** | R15 | y=1.7326x+0.0514 | 0.9872** |
R08 | y=1.6212x-0.0091 | 0.9948** |
水稻品种 | R01 | R02 | R03 | R04 | R05 | R06 | R07 | R08 | R09 | R10 | R11 | R12 | R13 | R14 | R15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
盆栽 试验 | 富集系数/% | 140.1 ±14.7 | 64.2 ±5.4 | 51.0 ±3.5 | 57.9 ±5.8 | 124.1 ±5.9 | 99.7 ±8.2 | 96.7 ±9.5 | 63.0 ±1.3 | 55.6 ±1.6 | 179.3 ±16.7 | 121.9 ±6.4 | 111.6 ±3.4 | 113.4 ±8.1 | 84.5 ±9.3 | 46.6 ±7.7 |
差异水准 | b | g | gh | gh | c | de | ef | g | gh | a | c | cd | cd | f | h | |
大田 试验 | 富集系数/% | 148.8 ±10.9 | 57.8 ±9.4 | 45.3 ±7.4 | 51.3 ±2.9 | 121.6 ±10.4 | 105.3 ±4.7 | 99.4 ±5.8 | 67.4 ±15.1 | 52.3 ±11.8 | 179.4 ±18.0 | 114.3 ±8.3 | 109.6 ±25.5 | 79.2 ±12.2 | 64.3 ±11.6 | 38.3 ±5.6 |
差异水准 | b | efg | fg | fg | c | cd | d | ef | fg | a | cd | cd | e | ef | g | |
平均值 | 富集系数/% | 144.4 ±12.5 | 61.0 ±7.7 | 48.1 ±6.0 | 54.6 ±5.5 | 122.9 ±7.8 | 102.5 ±6.7 | 98.1 ±7.2 | 65.2 ±9.9 | 54.0 ±7.8 | 179.4 ±15.6 | 118.1 ±7.9 | 110.6 ±16.3 | 96.3 ±20.9 | 74.4 ±14.5 | 42.4 ±7.6 |
差异水准 | b | gh | hi | ghi | c | de | de | fg | ghi | a | c | cd | e | f | i |
水稻品种 | R01 | R02 | R03 | R04 | R05 | R06 | R07 | R08 | R09 | R10 | R11 | R12 | R13 | R14 | R15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
盆栽 试验 | 富集系数/% | 140.1 ±14.7 | 64.2 ±5.4 | 51.0 ±3.5 | 57.9 ±5.8 | 124.1 ±5.9 | 99.7 ±8.2 | 96.7 ±9.5 | 63.0 ±1.3 | 55.6 ±1.6 | 179.3 ±16.7 | 121.9 ±6.4 | 111.6 ±3.4 | 113.4 ±8.1 | 84.5 ±9.3 | 46.6 ±7.7 |
差异水准 | b | g | gh | gh | c | de | ef | g | gh | a | c | cd | cd | f | h | |
大田 试验 | 富集系数/% | 148.8 ±10.9 | 57.8 ±9.4 | 45.3 ±7.4 | 51.3 ±2.9 | 121.6 ±10.4 | 105.3 ±4.7 | 99.4 ±5.8 | 67.4 ±15.1 | 52.3 ±11.8 | 179.4 ±18.0 | 114.3 ±8.3 | 109.6 ±25.5 | 79.2 ±12.2 | 64.3 ±11.6 | 38.3 ±5.6 |
差异水准 | b | efg | fg | fg | c | cd | d | ef | fg | a | cd | cd | e | ef | g | |
平均值 | 富集系数/% | 144.4 ±12.5 | 61.0 ±7.7 | 48.1 ±6.0 | 54.6 ±5.5 | 122.9 ±7.8 | 102.5 ±6.7 | 98.1 ±7.2 | 65.2 ±9.9 | 54.0 ±7.8 | 179.4 ±15.6 | 118.1 ±7.9 | 110.6 ±16.3 | 96.3 ±20.9 | 74.4 ±14.5 | 42.4 ±7.6 |
差异水准 | b | gh | hi | ghi | c | de | de | fg | ghi | a | c | cd | e | f | i |
[1] |
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00517-9 URL |
[2] |
pmid: 6771869 |
[3] |
doi: 10.1007/BF03208342 pmid: 7857202 |
[4] |
环境保护部,国土资源部. ·全国土壤污染状况调查公报[R]. 中国: 环境保护部国土资源部, 2014.
|
[5] |
王凯荣. 中国农田镉污染现状及其治理利用对策[J]. 农业环境保护, 1997, 16(6):274-278.
|
[6] |
甄燕红, 成颜君, 潘根兴, 等. 中国部分市售大米中Cd、Zn、Se的含量及其食物安全评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2008, 8(1):119-122.
|
[7] |
谢燕湘, 郭志忠, 李兆敏, 等. 南方某市2012年市售大米镉污染状况及膳食暴露评估[J]. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2014, 20(1):5-6.
|
[8] |
罩芸, 冯莲, 冯看, 等. 2016-2017年柳州市市售大米镉污染状况及其健康风险评估[J]. 职业与健康, 2018, 34(22):50-52.
|
[9] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.057 URL |
[10] |
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.05.004 URL |
[11] |
毛亚西, 符建荣, 马军伟, 等. 不同水稻品种的镉吸收特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(5):695-701.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.05.03 |
[12] |
刘三雄, 刘利成, 闵军, 等. 水稻镉低积累新品系的筛选[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(4):5-7.
|
[13] |
陈院华, 李建国, 杨涛, 等. 水稻品种镉积累特征及相关性研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(9):10-14.
|
[14] |
张新柱, 刘汇川, 胡维军, 等. 不同水稻品种对镉、砷的吸收累积特征[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2020(6):20-23.
|
[15] |
唐非, 雷鸣, 唐贞, 等. 不同水稻品种对镉的积累及其动态分布[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(6):1092-1098.
|
[16] |
殷萍, 陈秋生, 张强, 等. 天津本地品种水稻镉累积特性差异研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(21):5581-5586.
|
[17] |
黄建立, 林滉, 赖应辉, 等. 不同水稻品种抗镉富集能力研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2020, 35(5):6-10.
|
[18] |
蒋芬, 范永义, 范存留, 等. 不同水稻品种镉积累特性差异研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2015(4):113-115.
|
[19] |
曾翔, 张玉烛, 王凯荣, 等. 不同品种水稻糙米含镉量差异[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(1):67-69.
|
[20] |
薛涛, 廖晓勇, 王凌青, 等. 镉污染农田不同水稻品种镉积累差异研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(8):1818-1826.
|
[21] |
白荣辉. 不同水稻品种稻谷对土壤中镉富集特性初探[J]. 福建农业科技, 2021(3):28-31.
|
[22] |
中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1121.2-2006土壤检测第2部分:土壤pH的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
|
[23] |
国家环境保护局. GB/T17141-1997土壤质量铅、镉的测定石墨炉原子吸收分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1997.
|
[24] |
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GB5009.15-2014食品安全国家标准食品中镉的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
|
[25] |
国生态环境部, 国家市场监督管理总局. GB 15618-2018土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2018.
|
[26] |
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,GB 2762 -2017国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品中污染物限量[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
|
[27] |
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0010 URL |
[28] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.013 URL |
[29] |
何玉亭, 李浩, 谢丽红, 等. 轻度镉胁迫下不同水稻品种籽粒镉富集及产质量差异研究[J]. 四川农业科技, 2019(7):40-43.
|
[30] |
周静, 杨洋, 孟桂元, 等. 不同镉污染土壤下水稻镉富集与转运效率[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(1):89-94.
|
[31] |
朱智伟, 陈铭学, 牟仁祥, 等. 水稻Cd代谢与控制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(18):3633 -3640.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.18.011 |
[32] |
熊婕, 朱奇宏, 黄道友, 等. 南方典型稻区稻米镉累积量的预测模型研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(1):22-28.
|
[33] |
doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-03899-6 |
[34] |
doi: 10.17221/2205-PSE URL |
[1] | CHEN Shujian, CHEN Jingdu, YANG Chengqin, XU Meigang, GAO Jianbo. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Quality of Rice with Mechanical Sowing in Line Under Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 1-6. |
[2] | ZHAO Shouping, XIAO Wendan, CHEN De, YE Xuezhu, ZHANG Qi, WU Shaofu, HU Jing, GAO Na, HUANG Miaojie. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Passivation in Contaminated Paddy Fields Based on Soil Quality and Rice Safety [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 51-62. |
[3] | ZHANG Ming, LIU Longsheng, FANG Shengliang, ZOU Dan, HU Yao. Application Effect of Simplified Control Technology “Three Prevention and Two Control” on Diseases and Pests of Ratooning Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 79-84. |
[4] | LIU Weixi, YIN Wenfeng, LI Xiaojuan, XIAO Youlun. The Occurrence Cause and Prevention and Control Measures of Rice Straighthead Disease in Dryland-to-Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 85-89. |
[5] | WU Longmei, ZHANG Yue, LIU Yan, ZOU Jixiang, YANG Taotao, BAO Xiaozhe, HUANG Qing, CHEN Qingchun, JIANG Yaozhi, LIANG Qiaoli, ZHANG Bin. Direct Seeding Rice: Research Progress and Development Strategy [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 1-5. |
[6] | TIAN Ting, ZHANG Qing, XU Wen. Prediction of Rice Canopy SPAD Value Based on UAV Multispectral Images [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 149-153. |
[7] | CHEN Lulu, MENG Xianghe. Study on the Best Brewing Technology of Sweet Ferment Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 148-155. |
[8] | XIAO Benze, WANG Zilin. Cultivation and Breeding Assessment of Rice Transgenic Restorers Carrying Herbicide-resistant EPSPS Gene [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 8-15. |
[9] | WEI Lan, QIU Chaocai, HUANG Lianxi, LI Xiang, HUANG Qing, ZHENG Xiaodong, LIN Qimei, LIU Zhongzhen, CHEN Weisheng. Four Biochar-based Conditioners Reducing Cd Accumulation in Brown Rice to Different Degrees [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 146-153. |
[10] | CAI Kai, ZHANG Qi, YAO Li, WANG Hong, LUO Fuxiang, LIN Chaowen. Utilization of Biogas Slurry in Rice Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 49-53. |
[11] | ZHANG Caijuan, ZHOU Kunneng, XIA Jiafa, WANG Yuanlei, YUN Peng, MA Tingchen, WU Dexiang, LI Zefu. Characteristics and Genotype Analysis of High-quality Indica Rice Photo-Thermo-Sensitive Genic Male Sterile Line ‘7-163S’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 1-9. |
[12] | CHU Yue, XUE Xiaoping, ZHANG Lijuan, HUANG Yutao, WANG Nan, WANG Nan, JIANG Meiyi, WANG Yumeng, GUO Xihui, YANG Yiping, ZHAO Yufeng, ZHAO Enbo. Risk Assessment and Zoning of Drought Disasters in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 101-112. |
[13] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[14] | Pema Rigzin, Dhonyo Dorji, Delek Kunkyi, Dekyi Yangzom, Yeshe Dorji, Penpa Tsring. Constructing the Monitoring Model of High Temperature Damage on Rice by Combining Data from Satellites and Ground Automatic Weather Stations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 133-141. |
[15] | LUO Xianfu, LIU Wenqiang, PAN Xiaowu, DONG Zheng, LIU Sanxiong, LIU Licheng, YANG Biaoren, SHENG Xinnian, LI Xiaoxiang. Mapping of Plant Height QTL Using NILs Derived from Residual Heterozygous Lines in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 1-5. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||