Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (19): 9-15.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0544
Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Shanhu1(), WU Zhongming2, WANG Yongping2, ZHANG Jintao1, XU Sai1, WU Jia2, DING Borui2, DA Yingfei2, ZHANG Mingtian3, LUO Qipeng3()
Received:
2022-07-07
Revised:
2022-12-07
Online:
2023-07-05
Published:
2023-07-03
GUO Shanhu, WU Zhongming, WANG Yongping, ZHANG Jintao, XU Sai, WU Jia, DING Borui, DA Yingfei, ZHANG Mingtian, LUO Qipeng. Preliminary Research on Reducing Effect of Different Fertilization Measures on Continuous Cropping Obstacles of Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 9-15.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0544
处理 | 基肥 | 第1次追肥(掏苗时) | 第2次追肥(团棵期进旺长期,12~13片叶) |
---|---|---|---|
A | 生物有机肥600 kg/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | 硝酸钾84 kg/hm2 | 烟草专用追肥450 kg/hm2+硫酸钾300 kg/hm2混合施用 |
B | 功能微生物菌剂A 30 kg/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | ||
C | 功能微生物菌剂B 30 kg/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | ||
D | 功能微生物菌剂C 30 L/hm2+烟草专用基肥25 kg/hm2 | ||
E | 10%谷胱甘肽15 L/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | ||
F | 烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 |
处理 | 基肥 | 第1次追肥(掏苗时) | 第2次追肥(团棵期进旺长期,12~13片叶) |
---|---|---|---|
A | 生物有机肥600 kg/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | 硝酸钾84 kg/hm2 | 烟草专用追肥450 kg/hm2+硫酸钾300 kg/hm2混合施用 |
B | 功能微生物菌剂A 30 kg/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | ||
C | 功能微生物菌剂B 30 kg/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | ||
D | 功能微生物菌剂C 30 L/hm2+烟草专用基肥25 kg/hm2 | ||
E | 10%谷胱甘肽15 L/hm2+烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 | ||
F | 烟草专用基肥225 kg/hm2 |
处理 | 基肥 | 第1次追肥 | 第2次追肥 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肥料种类 | 单株用量 | 肥料种类 | 单株用量 | 肥料种类 | 单株用量 | ||
A | 生物有机肥 | 36.36 g/株 | 硝酸钾 | 5.09 g/株 | 烟草专用肥 硫酸钾 | 27.27 g/株 18.18 g/株 | |
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
B | 功能微生物菌剂A | 1.82 g/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
C | 功能微生物菌剂B | 0.45 g/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
D | 功能微生物菌剂C | 1.82 L/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
E | 10%谷胱甘肽 | 0.91 L/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
F | 烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 |
处理 | 基肥 | 第1次追肥 | 第2次追肥 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肥料种类 | 单株用量 | 肥料种类 | 单株用量 | 肥料种类 | 单株用量 | ||
A | 生物有机肥 | 36.36 g/株 | 硝酸钾 | 5.09 g/株 | 烟草专用肥 硫酸钾 | 27.27 g/株 18.18 g/株 | |
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
B | 功能微生物菌剂A | 1.82 g/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
C | 功能微生物菌剂B | 0.45 g/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
D | 功能微生物菌剂C | 1.82 L/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
E | 10%谷胱甘肽 | 0.91 L/株 | |||||
烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 | ||||||
F | 烟草专用基肥 | 13.64 g/株 |
处理 | 移栽期 (月.日) | 团棵期 (月.日) | 旺长期 (月.日) | 现蕾期 (月.日) | 封顶期 (月.日) | 脚叶成熟期 (月.日) | 顶叶成熟期 (月.日) | 生育期/ d | 移栽至团棵期天数/ d | 移栽至旺长期天数/ d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
B | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
C | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
D | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
E | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
F | 5.12 | 6.16 | 7.8 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 35 | 57 |
处理 | 移栽期 (月.日) | 团棵期 (月.日) | 旺长期 (月.日) | 现蕾期 (月.日) | 封顶期 (月.日) | 脚叶成熟期 (月.日) | 顶叶成熟期 (月.日) | 生育期/ d | 移栽至团棵期天数/ d | 移栽至旺长期天数/ d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
B | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
C | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
D | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
E | 5.12 | 6.13 | 7.4 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 32 | 53 |
F | 5.12 | 6.16 | 7.8 | 7.12 | 7.20 | 7.22 | 9.10 | 121 | 35 | 57 |
名称 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 有效叶片数 | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 叶面积系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
团棵期 | A | 47.54 | 7.71 | 4.68 | 10.20 | 54.80 | 26.06 | 0.87 |
B | 47.28 | 7.71 | 4.30 | 11.07 | 55.03 | 26.60 | 1.14 | |
C | 49.24 | 7.55 | 4.39 | 11.27 | 50.61 | 28.02 | 1.06 | |
D | 48.87 | 7.64 | 4.30 | 11.40 | 55.05 | 27.61 | 1.15 | |
E | 52.95 | 7.39 | 4.61 | 11.53 | 54.92 | 27.94 | 1.60 | |
F | 45.85 | 7.55 | 3.99 | 11.53 | 56.01 | 26.08 | 1.09 | |
旺长期 | A | 107.93 | 8.07 | 5.97 | 18.13 | 57.54 | 27.85 | 2.44 |
B | 106.31 | 8.22 | 5.79 | 18.47 | 65.57 | 32.15 | 2.26 | |
C | 107.02 | 8.84 | 5.66 | 18.93 | 65.93 | 37.33 | 1.72 | |
D | 95.60 | 8.20 | 4.90 | 22.07 | 66.57 | 28.81 | 2.05 | |
E | 108.30 | 7.95 | 5.77 | 18.80 | 63.15 | 30.67 | 1.72 | |
F | 107.53 | 8.55 | 6.03 | 17.93 | 62.00 | 30.66 | 1.96 | |
现蕾期 | A | 129.53 | 8.57 | 6.96 | 18.60 | 58.75 | 28.88 | 2.32 |
B | 128.27 | 8.70 | 6.64 | 19.33 | 67.33 | 33.98 | 3.24 | |
C | 128.47 | 9.13 | 6.71 | 19.13 | 66.64 | 32.31 | 2.90 | |
D | 125.13 | 8.51 | 6.66 | 18.80 | 67.35 | 29.97 | 2.52 | |
E | 129.60 | 8.63 | 6.83 | 19.00 | 63.97 | 31.55 | 2.94 | |
F | 129.09 | 8.75 | 7.03 | 18.40 | 60.92 | 31.67 | 2.52 | |
封顶后 | A | 122.29 | 10.82 | 5.83 | 21.00 | 68.43 | 39.33 | 3.16 |
B | 120.85 | 11.19 | 5.83 | 20.80 | 79.51 | 42.03 | 3.28 | |
C | 120.44 | 11.15 | 5.84 | 20.60 | 79.61 | 43.28 | 3.47 | |
D | 120.66 | 10.89 | 6.14 | 19.67 | 78.70 | 43.28 | 3.43 | |
E | 120.91 | 10.11 | 6.10 | 19.87 | 79.85 | 41.63 | 3.37 | |
F | 119.78 | 10.56 | 6.00 | 20.00 | 79.91 | 42.47 | 3.38 |
名称 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 有效叶片数 | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 叶面积系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
团棵期 | A | 47.54 | 7.71 | 4.68 | 10.20 | 54.80 | 26.06 | 0.87 |
B | 47.28 | 7.71 | 4.30 | 11.07 | 55.03 | 26.60 | 1.14 | |
C | 49.24 | 7.55 | 4.39 | 11.27 | 50.61 | 28.02 | 1.06 | |
D | 48.87 | 7.64 | 4.30 | 11.40 | 55.05 | 27.61 | 1.15 | |
E | 52.95 | 7.39 | 4.61 | 11.53 | 54.92 | 27.94 | 1.60 | |
F | 45.85 | 7.55 | 3.99 | 11.53 | 56.01 | 26.08 | 1.09 | |
旺长期 | A | 107.93 | 8.07 | 5.97 | 18.13 | 57.54 | 27.85 | 2.44 |
B | 106.31 | 8.22 | 5.79 | 18.47 | 65.57 | 32.15 | 2.26 | |
C | 107.02 | 8.84 | 5.66 | 18.93 | 65.93 | 37.33 | 1.72 | |
D | 95.60 | 8.20 | 4.90 | 22.07 | 66.57 | 28.81 | 2.05 | |
E | 108.30 | 7.95 | 5.77 | 18.80 | 63.15 | 30.67 | 1.72 | |
F | 107.53 | 8.55 | 6.03 | 17.93 | 62.00 | 30.66 | 1.96 | |
现蕾期 | A | 129.53 | 8.57 | 6.96 | 18.60 | 58.75 | 28.88 | 2.32 |
B | 128.27 | 8.70 | 6.64 | 19.33 | 67.33 | 33.98 | 3.24 | |
C | 128.47 | 9.13 | 6.71 | 19.13 | 66.64 | 32.31 | 2.90 | |
D | 125.13 | 8.51 | 6.66 | 18.80 | 67.35 | 29.97 | 2.52 | |
E | 129.60 | 8.63 | 6.83 | 19.00 | 63.97 | 31.55 | 2.94 | |
F | 129.09 | 8.75 | 7.03 | 18.40 | 60.92 | 31.67 | 2.52 | |
封顶后 | A | 122.29 | 10.82 | 5.83 | 21.00 | 68.43 | 39.33 | 3.16 |
B | 120.85 | 11.19 | 5.83 | 20.80 | 79.51 | 42.03 | 3.28 | |
C | 120.44 | 11.15 | 5.84 | 20.60 | 79.61 | 43.28 | 3.47 | |
D | 120.66 | 10.89 | 6.14 | 19.67 | 78.70 | 43.28 | 3.43 | |
E | 120.91 | 10.11 | 6.10 | 19.87 | 79.85 | 41.63 | 3.37 | |
F | 119.78 | 10.56 | 6.00 | 20.00 | 79.91 | 42.47 | 3.38 |
处理 | 花叶病 | 黑胫病 | 赤星病 | 气候斑点病 | 炭疽病 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 6.00 | 11.33 | 1.33 | 2.67 | 2.00 |
B | 6.67 | 12.67 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 2.67 |
C | 5.33 | 12.00 | 1.33 | 2.67 | 1.33 |
D | 6.00 | 12.00 | 0.67 | 4.00 | 2.00 |
E | 6.67 | 12.67 | 0.67 | 3.33 | 1.33 |
F | 8.00 | 20.00 | 3.33 | 6.67 | 3.33 |
处理 | 花叶病 | 黑胫病 | 赤星病 | 气候斑点病 | 炭疽病 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 6.00 | 11.33 | 1.33 | 2.67 | 2.00 |
B | 6.67 | 12.67 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 2.67 |
C | 5.33 | 12.00 | 1.33 | 2.67 | 1.33 |
D | 6.00 | 12.00 | 0.67 | 4.00 | 2.00 |
E | 6.67 | 12.67 | 0.67 | 3.33 | 1.33 |
F | 8.00 | 20.00 | 3.33 | 6.67 | 3.33 |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% | 中上等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 2319 | 64004.4 | 27.6 | 65.32 | 87.69 |
B | 2292 | 64634.4 | 28.2 | 64.91 | 91.71 |
C | 2394 | 70383.6 | 29.4 | 63.64 | 89.23 |
D | 2322 | 67570.2 | 29.1 | 66.35 | 92.58 |
E | 2271 | 63133.8 | 27.8 | 62.87 | 88.37 |
F | 2229 | 64418.1 | 28.9 | 63.26 | 90.25 |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% | 中上等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 2319 | 64004.4 | 27.6 | 65.32 | 87.69 |
B | 2292 | 64634.4 | 28.2 | 64.91 | 91.71 |
C | 2394 | 70383.6 | 29.4 | 63.64 | 89.23 |
D | 2322 | 67570.2 | 29.1 | 66.35 | 92.58 |
E | 2271 | 63133.8 | 27.8 | 62.87 | 88.37 |
F | 2229 | 64418.1 | 28.9 | 63.26 | 90.25 |
部位 | 处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 氧化钾/% | 氯离子/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 两糖差 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中部 | A | 36.75 | 27.08 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 2.23 | 0.06 | 17.09 | 0.98 | 9.67 |
B | 32.90 | 23.93 | 2.29 | 1.75 | 2.97 | 0.21 | 18.80 | 1.31 | 8.97 | |
C | 29.60 | 20.07 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.83 | 0.39 | 13.96 | 1.00 | 9.53 | |
D | 25.23 | 18.52 | 2.40 | 2.23 | 2.72 | 0.28 | 11.31 | 1.08 | 6.71 | |
E | 32.84 | 24.17 | 1.90 | 2.07 | 2.21 | 0.08 | 15.86 | 0.92 | 8.67 | |
F | 41.67 | 29.32 | 1.77 | 1.49 | 2.17 | 0.01 | 27.97 | 1.19 | 12.35 | |
上部 | A | 30.72 | 22.09 | 3.01 | 3.00 | 2.33 | 0.40 | 10.24 | 1.00 | 8.63 |
B | 27.28 | 19.59 | 3.07 | 3.05 | 2.15 | 0.31 | 8.94 | 1.01 | 7.69 | |
C | 26.83 | 16.28 | 2.97 | 3.13 | 2.24 | 0.11 | 8.57 | 0.95 | 10.55 | |
D | 28.96 | 20.65 | 2.84 | 2.76 | 2.03 | 0.25 | 10.49 | 1.03 | 8.31 | |
E | 29.69 | 23.10 | 3.03 | 3.06 | 2.43 | 0.17 | 9.70 | 0.99 | 6.59 | |
F | 35.57 | 26.60 | 2.95 | 3.33 | 2.26 | 0.08 | 10.68 | 0.89 | 8.97 |
部位 | 处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 氧化钾/% | 氯离子/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 两糖差 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中部 | A | 36.75 | 27.08 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 2.23 | 0.06 | 17.09 | 0.98 | 9.67 |
B | 32.90 | 23.93 | 2.29 | 1.75 | 2.97 | 0.21 | 18.80 | 1.31 | 8.97 | |
C | 29.60 | 20.07 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.83 | 0.39 | 13.96 | 1.00 | 9.53 | |
D | 25.23 | 18.52 | 2.40 | 2.23 | 2.72 | 0.28 | 11.31 | 1.08 | 6.71 | |
E | 32.84 | 24.17 | 1.90 | 2.07 | 2.21 | 0.08 | 15.86 | 0.92 | 8.67 | |
F | 41.67 | 29.32 | 1.77 | 1.49 | 2.17 | 0.01 | 27.97 | 1.19 | 12.35 | |
上部 | A | 30.72 | 22.09 | 3.01 | 3.00 | 2.33 | 0.40 | 10.24 | 1.00 | 8.63 |
B | 27.28 | 19.59 | 3.07 | 3.05 | 2.15 | 0.31 | 8.94 | 1.01 | 7.69 | |
C | 26.83 | 16.28 | 2.97 | 3.13 | 2.24 | 0.11 | 8.57 | 0.95 | 10.55 | |
D | 28.96 | 20.65 | 2.84 | 2.76 | 2.03 | 0.25 | 10.49 | 1.03 | 8.31 | |
E | 29.69 | 23.10 | 3.03 | 3.06 | 2.43 | 0.17 | 9.70 | 0.99 | 6.59 | |
F | 35.57 | 26.60 | 2.95 | 3.33 | 2.26 | 0.08 | 10.68 | 0.89 | 8.97 |
[1] |
陈继峰, 孙会, 夏阳, 等. 不同连作年限烟田土壤酶活性及养分含量变化[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(10):60-64.
|
[2] |
李鑫, 张秀丽, 孙冰玉, 等. 烤烟连作对耕层土壤酶活性及微生物区系的影响[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(3):456-460.
|
[3] |
张仕祥, 过伟民, 李辉信, 等. 烟草连作障碍研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(5):823-829.
|
[4] |
方宇, 白涛, 刘冬梅, 等. 烟草黑胫病植株根际土壤真菌群落多样性及结构分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(4):822-830.
|
[5] |
张恒, 朱迪, 陈维林, 等. 增施微生物菌剂对烤烟生长的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2019, 38(1):57-61.
|
[6] |
何振宇, 戴良英, 陈武. 烟草连作障碍及其防治技术研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(10):64-69.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15040010 |
[7] |
李柘锦, 黄坤, 张加研, 等. 不同连作年限对烤烟品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(4):9-17.
|
[8] |
童文杰, 邓小鹏, 李卫, 等. 云南烟叶生产服务乡村振兴战略的现状与思考[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(14):254-257.
|
[9] |
云南省烟草科学研究所, 中国烟草育种研究(南方)中心. 云南烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007:98-103.
|
[10] |
梁永进, 尚海丽, 盘文政, 等. 微生物菌肥对‘K326'烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(23):45-51.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0661 |
[11] |
doi: 10.1007/BF00994606 pmid: 24253962 |
[12] |
李柘锦, 朱文桥, 黄坤, 等. 连作对烤烟农艺性状、根系形态与土壤养分的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(2):67-72.
|
[13] |
敖金成, 李博, 阎凯, 等. 连作对云南典型烟区植烟土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(1):46-54.
|
[14] |
马文富, 邓小鹏, 杜杏蓉, 等. 连作年限对植烟土壤化学特性及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 36(6):993-999.
|
[15] |
卢维宏, 张乃明, 包立, 等. 我国设施栽培连作障碍特征与成因及防治措施的研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(4):651-658.
|
[16] |
李俊领, 马晓寒, 张豫丹, 等. 土壤微生物与烟草青枯病发生关系的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(9):88-99.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-1268 |
[17] |
滕凯, 陈前锋, 周志成, 等. 烟草连作障碍与土壤理化性质及微生物多样性特征的关联[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(9):2848-2856.
|
[18] |
芶久兰, 顾小凤, 张萌, 等. 不同烤烟种植模式对贵州土壤养分、酶活性及细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(7):1475-1484.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.07.1475 |
[19] |
潘明锦, 彭丽娟, 李春黎, 等. 微生物菌剂对烤烟幼苗主要农艺性状与生理特征的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(9):20-25.
|
[20] |
根际促生菌促生机理及其增强植物抗逆性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5):1203-1215.
|
[21] |
韩键, 白云赫, 朱旭东, 等. 植物谷胱甘肽应答非生物胁迫的分子机制[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(5):1672-1680.
|
[22] |
闫慧芳, 毛培胜, 夏方山. 植物抗氧化剂谷胱甘肽研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(3):428-434.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.03.003 |
[23] |
罗映虹, 张一扬, 刘晓颖, 等. 外源抗坏血酸与谷胱甘肽对打顶后烟草氧化还原平衡及烟碱的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(3):356-364.
|
[24] |
孙国祥, 张旭, 张成国, 等. 谷胱甘肽在动植物领域的应用研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(8):42-45.
|
[25] |
汪宽鸿, 祝彪, 朱祝军. GSH/GSSG在植物应对非生物胁迫中的作用综述[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(4):647-660.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0589 |
[26] |
于威, 颉建明, 滕汉玮, 等. 外源谷胱甘肽对自毒作用下嫁接黄瓜及砧穗幼苗叶片抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(1):196-207.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.01.0196 |
[1] | REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157. |
[2] | ZHANG Ming, LIU Longsheng, FANG Shengliang, ZOU Dan, HU Yao. Application Effect of Simplified Control Technology “Three Prevention and Two Control” on Diseases and Pests of Ratooning Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 79-84. |
[3] | LIU Weixi, YIN Wenfeng, LI Xiaojuan, XIAO Youlun. The Occurrence Cause and Prevention and Control Measures of Rice Straighthead Disease in Dryland-to-Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 85-89. |
[4] | YU Chong, ZHANG Fengyun, HUANG Hao, LU Yuncai. Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Cob Correlated Traits in Maize F2 Population [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 13-20. |
[5] | MIAO Fan, LIU Xin, LIN Gang, CHEN Yanting, LIU Yanfei, ZHENG Yi. Characteristics Analysis of Phycosphere Bacteria and Algal Bacterial Communities of Shell Conchocelis of Porphyrahaitanensis with White Spot Disease [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 154-164. |
[6] | LI Yanlan, YANG Jincheng, JIN Hongyun, LUO Zhimin, LI Xiang, LI Zaofu, ZHANG Chunfan, HU Xinzhou, YU Zonghong, LIU Jianjian, GAO Shilan, AN Zhengyun, WANG Aiming, CAI Shujiang. Application Rates and Proportions of Organic Fertilizers: Control Effects on Three Diseases of Grain Pea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 106-111. |
[7] | CHEN Yunjiao, QU Yangyang, LI Jie, JIA Weijuan, CHI Shanshan, HE Yunjiang, MENG Qinglei, WANG Xueli. Research Progress of Newcastle Disease Virus Against Malignant Tumor [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 127-132. |
[8] | CAO Hongmei, HU Guiping, HUANG Zhenxia, SHI Xuping, CAI Xiang, WANG Feng, LIU Yuxin, WANG Yawei, WANG Lixian. Effects of Remote Straw Mulching on Crop Habitat Diseases, Insect Pests, Grass Damage and Soil Environmental Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(20): 100-108. |
[9] | NIE Fengjie, GAN Xiaoyan, ZHANG Li, GONG Lei, LIU Xuan, YANG Wenjing, SONG Yuxia. Leaf Diseases of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus: Pathogen Isolation and Identification and Disease Control [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 102-107. |
[10] | SUN Qiang, ZHAO Feng, CHEN Hongfan, DU Yixin, SHI Niuniu, XIAO Hongyong, YIN Changfa, LI Xiangmin, LAN Bo, YANG Yingqing. The Comprehensive Prevention and Control Techniques of Asparagus Stem Blight: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 108-115. |
[11] | ZHANG Hao, LI Haiyu, SHI Songmei, ZHANG Zhongrun, TANG Rongzi, GONG Yuefang, DENG Wenxin, YANG Zhengan. Two Varieties of Cucurbita ficifolia: Transcriptomic Studies in Response to Fusarium oxysporum Infection [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 107-116. |
[12] | HUANG Si, ZHANG Yongfang, SHI Zhiying, KUANG Jing, LI Feng, HUANG Guohua. Investigation and Analysis of Honghu Lotus Root Diseases, Pests and Weeds and Drone Application [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 131-135. |
[13] | LIU Kequn, WEN Zhourui, DENG Aijuan, YANG Qingqing, HAN Yuzhang. Climatic Characteristics and Prediction of Ulcerative Disease Syndrome of Pelteobagrus fulvidraco in Spring [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(14): 152-158. |
[14] | HAN Meimei, DUAN Qingqing, Tan Yanxiao, ZHANG Shaoli, LI Tengfei, LI Hua, ZHANG Chao, CHANG Peipei, Wang Jingjing, ZHANG Zikun. Breeding Capsium with Main Disease Resistance: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(14): 27-32. |
[15] | YE Wei, LAI Jingtao, ZENG Jian, GUO Jing. Visual Analysis of CiteSpace Knowledge Map in the Research on Plant Disease Resistance Genes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 154-164. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||