Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (28): 17-23.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0577
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xiaoqin1(), LI Na1, XU Hui1, WANG Jianqiang1, NIE Chaoren1, WANG Caiyun2(
)
Received:
2022-07-11
Revised:
2023-01-05
Online:
2023-10-05
Published:
2023-09-25
ZHANG Xiaoqin, LI Na, XU Hui, WANG Jianqiang, NIE Chaoren, WANG Caiyun. Effects of Substrate and Growth Regulator on Softwood Cutting of Viburnum brachybotryum[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(28): 17-23.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0577
正交实验号 | 因素 | 方案 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.扦插基质 | B.生长调节剂 | C.处理浓度 | D.处理时间 | ||
1 | 1(蛭石) | 1(IAA) | 1(100 mg/L) | 1(0.5 h) | A1B1C1D1 |
2 | 1 | 2(IBA) | 2(200 mg/L) | 2(1 h) | A1B2C2D2 |
3 | 1 | 3(NAA) | 3(400 mg/L) | 3(2 h) | A1B3C3D3 |
4 | 2[V(泥炭):V(珍珠岩)=1:1] | 1 | 2 | 3 | A2B1C2D3 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | A2B2C3D1 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | A2B3C1D2 |
7 | 3[V(蛭石):V(泥炭):V(珍珠岩)=2:1:1] | 1 | 3 | 2 | A3B1C3D2 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | A3B2C1D3 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | A3B3C2D1 |
正交实验号 | 因素 | 方案 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.扦插基质 | B.生长调节剂 | C.处理浓度 | D.处理时间 | ||
1 | 1(蛭石) | 1(IAA) | 1(100 mg/L) | 1(0.5 h) | A1B1C1D1 |
2 | 1 | 2(IBA) | 2(200 mg/L) | 2(1 h) | A1B2C2D2 |
3 | 1 | 3(NAA) | 3(400 mg/L) | 3(2 h) | A1B3C3D3 |
4 | 2[V(泥炭):V(珍珠岩)=1:1] | 1 | 2 | 3 | A2B1C2D3 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | A2B2C3D1 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | A2B3C1D2 |
7 | 3[V(蛭石):V(泥炭):V(珍珠岩)=2:1:1] | 1 | 3 | 2 | A3B1C3D2 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | A3B2C1D3 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | A3B3C2D1 |
序号 | A.扦插基质 | B.生长调节剂 | C.处理浓度 | D.处理时间 | 生根率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 85.91±3.36ab |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 77.82±4.63abc |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 31.99±1.42d |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 95.96±1.65a |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 65.81±6.78c |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 61.76±5.00c |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 65.69±6.55c |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 71.69±6.45bc |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 57.72±5.70c |
T1 | 65.24 | 82.52 | 73.12 | 69.81 | |
T2 | 74.51 | 71.77 | 77.17 | 68.42 | |
T3 | 65.03 | 50.49 | 54.49 | 66.54 | |
R | 9.48 | 32.03 | 22.67 | 3.27 |
序号 | A.扦插基质 | B.生长调节剂 | C.处理浓度 | D.处理时间 | 生根率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 85.91±3.36ab |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 77.82±4.63abc |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 31.99±1.42d |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 95.96±1.65a |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 65.81±6.78c |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 61.76±5.00c |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 65.69±6.55c |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 71.69±6.45bc |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 57.72±5.70c |
T1 | 65.24 | 82.52 | 73.12 | 69.81 | |
T2 | 74.51 | 71.77 | 77.17 | 68.42 | |
T3 | 65.03 | 50.49 | 54.49 | 66.54 | |
R | 9.48 | 32.03 | 22.67 | 3.27 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正的模型 | 0.799a | 8 | 0.1 | 8.856 | 0.000 |
截距 | 12.58 | 1 | 12.58 | 1115.558 | 0.000 |
扦插基质 | 0.053 | 2 | 0.026 | 2.339 | 0.125 |
生长调节剂 | 0.478 | 2 | 0.239 | 21.203 | 0.000 |
浓度 | 0.263 | 2 | 0.132 | 11.67 | 0.001 |
处理时间 | 0.005 | 2 | 0.002 | 0.215 | 0.809 |
错误 | 0.203 | 18 | 0.011 | ||
总计 | 13.582 | 27 | |||
校正后总数 | 1.002 | 26 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正的模型 | 0.799a | 8 | 0.1 | 8.856 | 0.000 |
截距 | 12.58 | 1 | 12.58 | 1115.558 | 0.000 |
扦插基质 | 0.053 | 2 | 0.026 | 2.339 | 0.125 |
生长调节剂 | 0.478 | 2 | 0.239 | 21.203 | 0.000 |
浓度 | 0.263 | 2 | 0.132 | 11.67 | 0.001 |
处理时间 | 0.005 | 2 | 0.002 | 0.215 | 0.809 |
错误 | 0.203 | 18 | 0.011 | ||
总计 | 13.582 | 27 | |||
校正后总数 | 1.002 | 26 |
指标 | 变异来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | 显著性 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不定根数 | 扦插基质 | 2 | 31.932 | 15.966 | 5.908 | 0.011* | |||||
生长调节剂 | 2 | 43.203 | 21.601 | 7.994 | 0.003** | ||||||
处理浓度 | 2 | 3.176 | 1.588 | 0.588 | 0.566 | ||||||
处理时间 | 2 | 32.394 | 16.197 | 5.994 | 0.01* | ||||||
最长不定根长 | 扦插基质 | 2 | 3.948 | 1.974 | 9.407 | 0.002** | |||||
生长调节剂 | 2 | 2.01 | 1.005 | 4.79 | 0.021* | ||||||
处理浓度 | 2 | 0.311 | 0.155 | 0.74 | 0.491 | ||||||
处理时间 | 2 | 0.994 | 0.497 | 2.37 | 0.122 |
指标 | 变异来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | 显著性 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不定根数 | 扦插基质 | 2 | 31.932 | 15.966 | 5.908 | 0.011* | |||||
生长调节剂 | 2 | 43.203 | 21.601 | 7.994 | 0.003** | ||||||
处理浓度 | 2 | 3.176 | 1.588 | 0.588 | 0.566 | ||||||
处理时间 | 2 | 32.394 | 16.197 | 5.994 | 0.01* | ||||||
最长不定根长 | 扦插基质 | 2 | 3.948 | 1.974 | 9.407 | 0.002** | |||||
生长调节剂 | 2 | 2.01 | 1.005 | 4.79 | 0.021* | ||||||
处理浓度 | 2 | 0.311 | 0.155 | 0.74 | 0.491 | ||||||
处理时间 | 2 | 0.994 | 0.497 | 2.37 | 0.122 |
因素 | 水平 | 不定根数/条 | 最长不定根长/cm |
---|---|---|---|
扦插基质 | 1 | 11.89b | 7.36a |
2 | 13.96a | 6.43b | |
3 | 14.38a | 7.02a | |
生长调节剂 | 1 | 14.40a | 6.55b |
2 | 14.20a | 7.10a | |
3 | 11.62b | 7.15a | |
处理浓度 | 1 | 12.93a | 6.85a |
2 | 13.56a | 7.09a | |
3 | 13.73a | 6.87a | |
处理时间 | 1 | 12.33b | 7.03a |
2 | 14.91a | 6.67a | |
3 | 12.98b | 7.11a |
因素 | 水平 | 不定根数/条 | 最长不定根长/cm |
---|---|---|---|
扦插基质 | 1 | 11.89b | 7.36a |
2 | 13.96a | 6.43b | |
3 | 14.38a | 7.02a | |
生长调节剂 | 1 | 14.40a | 6.55b |
2 | 14.20a | 7.10a | |
3 | 11.62b | 7.15a | |
处理浓度 | 1 | 12.93a | 6.85a |
2 | 13.56a | 7.09a | |
3 | 13.73a | 6.87a | |
处理时间 | 1 | 12.33b | 7.03a |
2 | 14.91a | 6.67a | |
3 | 12.98b | 7.11a |
序号 | 生根率/% | 不定根数/条 | 最长不定根长/cm | 平均隶属函数值 | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 85.91±3.36ab | 11.33±0.47cd | 6.97±0.25abc | 0.505 | 5 |
2 | 77.82±4.63abc | 14.33±0.33abc | 7.41±0.25ab | 0.705 | 1 |
3 | 31.99±1.42d | 10.00±0.98d | 7.69±0.21a | 0.333 | 8 |
4 | 95.96±1.65a | 14.67±1.50ab | 6.37±0.27c | 0.568 | 3 |
5 | 65.81±6.78c | 14.00±0.57bc | 6.63±0.20bc | 0.441 | 7 |
6 | 61.76±5.00c | 13.20±0.90bc | 6.29±0.20c | 0.303 | 9 |
7 | 65.69±6.55c | 17.20±052a | 6.31±0.13c | 0.512 | 4 |
8 | 71.69±6.45bc | 14.27±0.55abc | 7.27±0.20ab | 0.639 | 2 |
9 | 57.72±5.70c | 11.67±0.39bcd | 7.48±0.20ab | 0.495 | 6 |
序号 | 生根率/% | 不定根数/条 | 最长不定根长/cm | 平均隶属函数值 | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 85.91±3.36ab | 11.33±0.47cd | 6.97±0.25abc | 0.505 | 5 |
2 | 77.82±4.63abc | 14.33±0.33abc | 7.41±0.25ab | 0.705 | 1 |
3 | 31.99±1.42d | 10.00±0.98d | 7.69±0.21a | 0.333 | 8 |
4 | 95.96±1.65a | 14.67±1.50ab | 6.37±0.27c | 0.568 | 3 |
5 | 65.81±6.78c | 14.00±0.57bc | 6.63±0.20bc | 0.441 | 7 |
6 | 61.76±5.00c | 13.20±0.90bc | 6.29±0.20c | 0.303 | 9 |
7 | 65.69±6.55c | 17.20±052a | 6.31±0.13c | 0.512 | 4 |
8 | 71.69±6.45bc | 14.27±0.55abc | 7.27±0.20ab | 0.639 | 2 |
9 | 57.72±5.70c | 11.67±0.39bcd | 7.48±0.20ab | 0.495 | 6 |
[1] |
中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志(第72卷)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1988:58.
|
[2] |
李方文, 刘晓莉, 马娇, 等. 中国荚蒾属植物及观赏应用[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2020:110.
|
[3] |
吕文君, 刘宏涛, 夏伯顺, 等. 荚蒾属植物资源及其园林应用[J]. 世界林业研究, 2019, 32(3):36-41.
|
[4] |
吕文君, 刘宏涛, 袁玲, 等. 荚蒾属植物在武汉地区的引种调查及观赏性状评价[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(8):86-91.
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00042 URL |
[6] |
孙晓蕾, 张世尧, 陈文华, 等. 荚蒾属植物化学成分的研究进展[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2020, 37(15):1907-1913.
|
[7] |
冯小璐, 陈俊强, 游捷, 等. 荚蒾属植物研究进展[J]. 山东林业科技, 2021, 51(1):76-80.
|
[8] |
许宏刚, 黄蓉, 汉梅兰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对忍冬科植物生根的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2017, 52(2):71-77.
|
[9] |
寇凤仙, 王丽, 王秋涛. 不同生长调节剂对天目琼花硬枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(1):134-135.
|
[10] |
马晓华, 郑坚, 张旭乐, 等. 不同扦插基质与激素对荚蒾生根的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(5):811-813,820.
|
[11] |
王华玺, 李敏, 郭志文, 等. 香荚蒾扦插育苗技术[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 2017, 42(1):12-14.
|
[12] |
殷万利, 闫双虎. 香荚蒾硬枝扦插育苗试验[J]. 青海农林科技, 2012(1):48-50.
|
[13] |
史喜兵, 赵海红, 孙毅宁. 枇杷叶荚蒾的引种栽培技术研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(6):121-123.
|
[14] |
杨巧云, 刘杰, 周小娟, 等. 植物生长调节剂对枇杷叶荚蒾嫩枝扦插的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2013, 45(1):79-80.
|
[15] |
王勇. 五种荚蒾属植物的扦插繁育与生态适应性研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2016.
|
[16] |
王宝党, 陈献志, 李贺鹏, 等. 日本荚蒾嫩枝扦插繁殖研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2018, 38(3):9-15.
|
[17] |
黄梓良, 钱永平, 林芳. 常绿荚蒾扦插生根试验初报[J]. 林业调查规划, 2018, 43(4):160-163.
|
[18] |
孔雨光, 燕丽萍, 吴德军, 等. 基质和生长调节剂对紫椴嫩枝扦插的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(6):25-33.
|
[19] |
李焕勇, 刘涛, 张华新, 等. 植物扦插生根机理研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, 27(1):23-28.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
王书胜, 单文, 张乐华, 等. 基质和IBA浓度对云锦杜鹃扦插生根的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(9):165-172.
|
[22] |
叶纯子, 吴炳懿. 不同基质及激素对天目琼花嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2017(3):14-15.
|
[23] |
吴雅琼, 汪贵斌, 曹福亮, 等. 基质、插穗及促根剂对喜树扦插生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(3):1-8.
|
[24] |
张乐华, 王书胜, 单文, 等. 基质、激素种类及其浓度对鹿角杜鹃扦插育苗的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(3):45-54.
|
[25] |
尚秀华, 高丽琼, 谢耀坚, 等. 油料植物南美油藤扦插技术研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(2):14-18.
|
[26] |
张琳, 程亚男, 张欣, 等. 两种植物生长调节剂对木槿插穗生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(3):123-129.
|
[27] |
王因花, 任飞, 李庆华, 等. 接骨木嫩枝扦插繁育技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(10):26-31.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0299 |
[1] | CHEN Gaolin, MAI Yongxin, ZHANG Dongqing, LV Mengyu, LI Xia. Antibiotic Removal Mechanism in Constructed Wetland: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 63-70. |
[2] | SUN Kexin, GUO Ranran, WANG Ziming, HUO Ruipeng, SUN Yangyang, ZHAI Sheng, WANG Juyuan. Efficient Resource Utilization of Vegetable Waste [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 92-99. |
[3] | LIU Jinna, ZHANG Di, YE Jiayi, ZHOU Meng, ZHANG Cunli. Effects of 6-Carbonyl Spirostane Compounds on Fruit Quality and Yield of Kiwifruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 37-43. |
[4] | GUAN Tikun, LIU Zilu, LI Xiaoyu, WANG Jianli, HOU Shuangying, LIU Xushan, XU Shiyi, CHEN Qingjun, ZHANG Guoqing. Biochar from Spent Mushroom Substrate of Industrial Pleurotus eryngii: Preparation Process and Quality Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 71-79. |
[5] | YANG Zhuoying, ZHANG Xing, WEI Xiaojuan, WU Siyu, LIANG Xiaojing. Study on Cutting and Grafting Propagation Technology of Camellia mingii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(28): 12-16. |
[6] | ZHENG Deyou, ZUO Dongyun, WANG Qiaolian, LV Limin, CHENG Hailiang, GU Aixing, SONG Guoli. Interaction Between Plant Growth Regulator and Fungicide to Control Cotton Fusarium wilt and the Synergy Mechanism [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 136-141. |
[7] | TIAN Subo, GUO Yanchun, SONG Yuxiao, LI Chuanxing, WANG Kunting, LI Yingjie, GUO Jiajin, LIN Guiyu, DING Junyang, ZHANG Jingmin, HU Yongjun, XIA Haibo. Effects of Vegetable Straw Fermentation and Recycling Seedling Substrate on the Growth of Tomato Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 20-24. |
[8] | CHENG Ziyue, LIANG Mingzhu. Effects of Different Substrate Formulations on Yield and Quality of Cucumis melo var. makuwa [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 25-28. |
[9] | JIANG Jie, LI Na, WANG Jianqiang, ZHANG Sisi, ZHANG Xiaoqin. Research Progress of Plant Tissue Culture Techniques of Oxalis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 61-67. |
[10] | HE Lingfeng, CHEN Chen, DENG Yuanjie, LU Jie, WANG Guanglong, TAN Guofei, WANG Yahui, DUAN Aoqi, SHU Sheng, LIU Hui, XIONG Aisheng. Effects of Substrate Ratio on Root Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Carrot [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 12-19. |
[11] | CHEN Liang, LUAN Qianqian, LIN Yi, ZHANG Ziqiang. Effects of Substrate Cultivation Modes on Greenhouse Watermelon Growth, Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 38-44. |
[12] | WANG Min, ZHANG Wen, HAN Shou’an, XIE Hui, PAN Mingqi, CAIKASIMU Aiermaike, ZHONG Haixia, ZHANG Fuchun, ABUDULIMU Yilihamu, WU Xinyu. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Fruit Cracking Characteristics of ‘Black Monukka’ Grape [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 56-62. |
[13] | WANG Lihua, YANG Xiumei, ZHANG Yiping, XU Feng, WANG Jihua, WU Xuewei. Trichoderma: Effects on Microbial Diversity in Rhizosphere and Roots of Cutting-rose and Control Effects on Downy Mildew [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 69-78. |
[14] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[15] | LU Shimin, LI Yayuan, LIU Chong, LIU Xingguo, BAO Xuteng, TIAN Changfeng, GU Zhaojun, ZHOU Liang, WU Fan. Ammonia-oxidizing Microorganisms and Their Application in Water Quality Control of Pond Aquaculture in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 145-151. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||