Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (28): 12-16.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0811
Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Zhuoying(), ZHANG Xing, WEI Xiaojuan(), WU Siyu, LIANG Xiaojing
Received:
2022-09-26
Revised:
2023-02-27
Online:
2023-10-05
Published:
2023-09-25
YANG Zhuoying, ZHANG Xing, WEI Xiaojuan, WU Siyu, LIANG Xiaojing. Study on Cutting and Grafting Propagation Technology of Camellia mingii[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(28): 12-16.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0811
生长调节剂 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 新梢粗/mm | 叶片数/张 | 鲜重/g | 干重/g | 干重/鲜重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 86.67b | 53.85b | 2.83b | 2.12a | 4.40a | 1.33b | 0.46b | 0.35a |
M1 | 94.59a | 60.00a | 3.42a | 2.18a | 4.80a | 1.83a | 0.63a | 0.34a |
M2 | 92.45a | 51.02b | 3.10ab | 1.78ab | 4.60a | 1.72ab | 0.57ab | 0.33a |
生长调节剂 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 新梢粗/mm | 叶片数/张 | 鲜重/g | 干重/g | 干重/鲜重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 86.67b | 53.85b | 2.83b | 2.12a | 4.40a | 1.33b | 0.46b | 0.35a |
M1 | 94.59a | 60.00a | 3.42a | 2.18a | 4.80a | 1.83a | 0.63a | 0.34a |
M2 | 92.45a | 51.02b | 3.10ab | 1.78ab | 4.60a | 1.72ab | 0.57ab | 0.33a |
生长 调节剂 | 生根率/ % | 一级不定根数/ 条 | 平均根长/ cm | 最长不定根/ cm | 地下部分鲜重/ g | 地下部分干重/ g | 干重/鲜重 | 根系效果 指数 | 插穗生根情况比较 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 80.46b | 3.60c | 2.67b | 3.88b | 0.09b | 0.027b | 0.30a | 0.64c | 生根较慢,根数较少而细长 |
M1 | 93.81a | 7.60a | 3.18a | 7.02a | 0.25a | 0.075a | 0.30a | 1.61a | 生根快,根数多,根长而粗 |
M2 | 90.76a | 5.60b | 2.82ab | 6.74a | 0.24a | 0.067a | 0.28a | 1.05b | 生根快,根数较多,根细长 |
生长 调节剂 | 生根率/ % | 一级不定根数/ 条 | 平均根长/ cm | 最长不定根/ cm | 地下部分鲜重/ g | 地下部分干重/ g | 干重/鲜重 | 根系效果 指数 | 插穗生根情况比较 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 80.46b | 3.60c | 2.67b | 3.88b | 0.09b | 0.027b | 0.30a | 0.64c | 生根较慢,根数较少而细长 |
M1 | 93.81a | 7.60a | 3.18a | 7.02a | 0.25a | 0.075a | 0.30a | 1.61a | 生根快,根数多,根长而粗 |
M2 | 90.76a | 5.60b | 2.82ab | 6.74a | 0.24a | 0.067a | 0.28a | 1.05b | 生根快,根数较多,根细长 |
处理编号 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 抽梢粗/mm | 叶片数/片 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 94.18a | 90.52a | 11.85a | 4.01a | 7.42a |
R2 | 83.15b | 77.63b | 8.20c | 2.83c | 6.00b |
R3 | 66.67c | 54.30c | 3.58d | 2.12d | 4.30c |
R4 | 91.05a | 82.25b | 9.16b | 3.85b | 6.95b |
处理编号 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 抽梢粗/mm | 叶片数/片 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 94.18a | 90.52a | 11.85a | 4.01a | 7.42a |
R2 | 83.15b | 77.63b | 8.20c | 2.83c | 6.00b |
R3 | 66.67c | 54.30c | 3.58d | 2.12d | 4.30c |
R4 | 91.05a | 82.25b | 9.16b | 3.85b | 6.95b |
嫁接时间 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 抽梢粗/mm | 叶片数/片 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1月5日(冬季) | 59.18b | 84.82c | 10.53c | 3.35b | 6.93ab |
3月5日(春季) | 90.15a | 95.31b | 18.03a | 4.48a | 7.18a |
6月6日(夏季) | 88.24a | 93.33a | 13.70b | 3.72b | 6.63b |
9月7日(秋季) | 66.67b | 90.00b | 13.28b | 3.51b | 6.86ab |
嫁接时间 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 抽梢粗/mm | 叶片数/片 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1月5日(冬季) | 59.18b | 84.82c | 10.53c | 3.35b | 6.93ab |
3月5日(春季) | 90.15a | 95.31b | 18.03a | 4.48a | 7.18a |
6月6日(夏季) | 88.24a | 93.33a | 13.70b | 3.72b | 6.63b |
9月7日(秋季) | 66.67b | 90.00b | 13.28b | 3.51b | 6.86ab |
砧木类型 | 遮阴情况 | 处理编号 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 抽梢粗/mm | 叶片数/片 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
萌枝嫁接 | 牛皮纸遮阴 | L1 | 85.71a | 100.00a | 19.84b | 3.47a | 8.20a | |
全光照 | L2 | 58.21b | 87.93b | 19.93b | 3.35a | 7.33b | ||
大砧嫁接 | 牛皮纸遮阴 | L3 | 77.18ab | 85.00b | 25.24a | 3.48a | 8.60a | |
全光照 | L4 | 30.30c | 90.00b | 10.59c | 2.76b | 4.11c |
砧木类型 | 遮阴情况 | 处理编号 | 成活率/% | 抽梢率/% | 新梢长/cm | 抽梢粗/mm | 叶片数/片 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
萌枝嫁接 | 牛皮纸遮阴 | L1 | 85.71a | 100.00a | 19.84b | 3.47a | 8.20a | |
全光照 | L2 | 58.21b | 87.93b | 19.93b | 3.35a | 7.33b | ||
大砧嫁接 | 牛皮纸遮阴 | L3 | 77.18ab | 85.00b | 25.24a | 3.48a | 8.60a | |
全光照 | L4 | 30.30c | 90.00b | 10.59c | 2.76b | 4.11c |
[1] |
doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.393.1 URL |
[2] |
doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1596765 URL |
[3] |
韦晓娟, 梁晓静, 王坤, 等. 金花茶扦插生根类型比较及不定根形成的解剖观察[J]. 广西林业科学, 2019, 48(3):342-347.
|
[4] |
韦晓娟, 王坤, 唐国翠, 等. 不同生长调节剂及插穗对金花茶扦插生根的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2019, 48(1):116-119.
|
[5] |
陈祖娟. 不同生根处理对金花茶扦插育苗的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(9):179-183.
|
[6] |
谢富文. 金花茶的扦插育苗[J]. 中国林业, 1999(10):42.
|
[7] |
吴儒华, 潘子平, 潘子来. NAA和IBA在金花茶扦插育苗中的组合应用[J]. 科技信息, 2008(9):612-613.
|
[8] |
黄昌艳, 卜朝阳, 王晓国. 不同生根剂和基质对金花茶扦插生根的影响[J]. 中国热带农业, 2018(2):73-75.
|
[9] |
叶创兴, 李琳林, 石祥刚, 等. 关于开展张氏红山茶若干问题的思考[J]. 广东园林, 2009, 31(2):62-66.
|
[10] |
马锦林, 张日清, 韦晓娟, 等.香花油茶与普通金花茶嫁接亲和力的初步研究[A].// 中国广西(南宁)第三届金花茶国际学术论坛论文集[C]. 国际茶花协会, 2013.
|
[11] |
包志毅, 陈俊愉. 金花茶砧穗组合的初步研究[J]. 园艺学报, 1991, 18(2):169-172.
|
[12] |
张乃燕, 江泽鹏, 陈林强, 等. 金花茶嫁接繁殖砧木亲和力试验[J]. 经济林研究, 2007, 25(3):65-68.
|
[13] |
张乃燕, 王东雪, 江泽鹏, 等. 金花茶嫁接繁殖试验研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(21):34-36.
|
[14] |
杨治元. 葡萄嫁接栽培[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005:6-7.
|
[15] |
韦晓娟, 李开祥, 廖健明, 等. 金花茶大砧嫁接试验初报[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(8):68-70.
|
[16] |
李继华. 嫁接原理与应用[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1980:36-47.
|
[17] |
李锋. 植物嫁接不亲和力的问题讨论[J]. 惠州大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 14(4):170-172.
|
[18] |
叶航, 温如斯, 王东雪, 等. 普通油茶无性系岑软3号嫁接亲和力研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(1):30-34.
|
[19] |
温如斯, 蔡娅, 周招娣, 等. 4种砧木对普通油茶‘岑软3号’生长发育的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2018, 36(4):73-79.
|
[20] |
邓荫伟, 唐娅娜, 张敏, 等. 金花茶6种嫁接方法试验分析[J]. 经济林研究, 2017(4):18-26.
|
[21] |
何应会, 马锦林, 张日清. 3个油茶优良无性系光合特性研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2009, 38(6):212-217.
|
[22] |
庄瑞林, 王德斌, 蔡肖群. 茶花大树嫁接繁殖砧穗组合成活研究[J]. 花木盆景, 2006(1):10-11.
|
[23] |
季孔庶, 王章荣. 马尾松插穗生根能力变异的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1998, 22(3):66-70.
|
[24] |
韦晓娟, 王坤, 李开祥, 等. 四种越南金花茶嫁接亲和力试验[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(25):77-81.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17100016 |
[25] |
韦晓娟, 梁晓静, 廖健明, 等. 7种越南金花茶生物学特性及繁殖技术[J]. 广西林业科学, 2017, 46(3):248-252.
|
[1] | ZHANG Xiaoqin, LI Na, XU Hui, WANG Jianqiang, NIE Chaoren, WANG Caiyun. Effects of Substrate and Growth Regulator on Softwood Cutting of Viburnum brachybotryum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(28): 17-23. |
[2] | WANG Lihua, YANG Xiumei, ZHANG Yiping, XU Feng, WANG Jihua, WU Xuewei. Trichoderma: Effects on Microbial Diversity in Rhizosphere and Roots of Cutting-rose and Control Effects on Downy Mildew [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 69-78. |
[3] | MEI Li, HAN Lihong, ZHOU Jihua, ZHOU Jihong, ZHU Ning, WANG Junying, CAO Caihong, HE Bingqing. Screening and Cutting Feasibility of Quinoa Vegetable Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 31-37. |
[4] | Abdurishid RAHMAN, Yiliminuer , Talipujiang ABUDOUKEREMU, Haliguli AINI, Ruxianguli YIGANMU. Effects of Different Topdressing Measures on the Growth of Current-year Cutting Seedlings of Elaeagnus mooraroftii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 39-48. |
[5] | LIU Min, ZHU Shuangfeng, DAI Yujing, WANG Runxian. Effect of Different Substrate Proportions on Camellia sinensis Cutting Seedling Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 51-55. |
[6] | WANG Yinhua, REN Fei, LI Qinghua, ZHAI Guofeng, ZANG Zhenrong, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, YAO Junxiu. Study on Softwood Cutting Propagation Technology of Sambucus williamsii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 26-31. |
[7] | Ren Zhihong, Wu Huanhuan, Xiao Wenmin, Zhang Hong, Sun Haiwei, Dou Ling, Wang Zhaoxiang. Short-Spike Cutting Propagation Techniques of Tea Tree in Northern Tea Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(16): 43-50. |
[8] | Jiang Yudong, Xiong Youqing, Zhang Junmin. Different Rooting Powder Concentrations: Effects on Budding and Rooting of Cutting Segments in 5 Woody Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(14): 52-58. |
[9] | Liang Xiaochun, Huang Songdian, Jiang Yimin, Zhao Chunmei. Effects of Exogenous Hormones and Substrate on Cutting Rooting of Cryptocarya concinna [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(10): 24-29. |
[10] | Ren Fei, Wu Dejun, Li Qinghua, Kong Yuguang, Li Ping, Liu Cuilan, Liu Guoli, Wang Yinhua, Yan Liping. Softwood Cutting Propagation Technology of Pinus thunbergii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 27-31. |
[11] | Zhang Tianxiang, Niu Xianqian. Effects of Different Treatments on the Cutting Propagation of Passiflora edulis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(31): 37-41. |
[12] | He Aiguo, Dai Yanjiao, Hu Zhixin, Wu Jiamei, Chen Jin. Effect of IBA and NAA on Root Development of Sedum plumbizincicola Under Different pH [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(22): 49-54. |
[13] | Yan Liping, Wang Yinhua, Ren Fei, Shu Defeng, Liu Cuilan, Li Qinghua, Zang Zhenrong, Wu Dejun. Softwood Cutting Propagation Technique of Acer truncatum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(19): 55-61. |
[14] | . Exogenous Hormone Treatments Affect the Rooting Rate of Amesiodendron chinense [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(7): 54-57. |
[15] | . Effect of Deep Groove and Root Cutting on Shoots Control and Leaves Preserving of Pear [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(27): 54-57. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||