Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 24-29.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0282
Special Issue: 园艺
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liang Xiaochun1(), Huang Songdian1, Jiang Yimin2, Zhao Chunmei1
Received:
2020-07-22
Revised:
2020-12-22
Online:
2021-04-05
Published:
2021-04-12
CLC Number:
Liang Xiaochun, Huang Songdian, Jiang Yimin, Zhao Chunmei. Effects of Exogenous Hormones and Substrate on Cutting Rooting of Cryptocarya concinna[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(10): 24-29.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0282
编号 | 基质 | 激素种类 | 激素浓度/ (mg/L) | 激素浸泡时间/ min |
---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 河沙 | NAA | 1000 | 10 |
处理2 | 河沙 | IBA | 500 | 30 |
处理3 | 河沙 | IAA | 250 | 60 |
处理4 | 黄心土 | NAA | 500 | 60 |
处理5 | 黄心土 | IBA | 250 | 10 |
处理6 | 黄心土 | IAA | 1000 | 30 |
处理7 | 泥炭土+椰糠 | NAA | 1000 | 30 |
处理8 | 泥炭土+椰糠 | IBA | 500 | 60 |
处理9 | 泥炭土+椰糠 | IAA | 250 | 10 |
编号 | 基质 | 激素种类 | 激素浓度/ (mg/L) | 激素浸泡时间/ min |
---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 河沙 | NAA | 1000 | 10 |
处理2 | 河沙 | IBA | 500 | 30 |
处理3 | 河沙 | IAA | 250 | 60 |
处理4 | 黄心土 | NAA | 500 | 60 |
处理5 | 黄心土 | IBA | 250 | 10 |
处理6 | 黄心土 | IAA | 1000 | 30 |
处理7 | 泥炭土+椰糠 | NAA | 1000 | 30 |
处理8 | 泥炭土+椰糠 | IBA | 500 | 60 |
处理9 | 泥炭土+椰糠 | IAA | 250 | 10 |
编号 | 生根率/% | 基部愈伤率/% | 抽梢率/% | 抽梢长度/cm | 一级根数/条 | 一级根长/cm | 二级根数/条 | 单株抽梢数/条 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 36.7e | 46.7a | 33.3b | 2.111b | 2.110 | 6.320 | 6.890 | 0.890 |
处理2 | 53.3cd | 30.0b | 36.7b | 3.160ab | 1.600 | 7.287 | 8.733 | 1.733 |
处理3 | 60.0bc | 13.3c | 63.3a | 4.407ab | 1.767 | 6.717 | 7.177 | 1.923 |
处理4 | 60.0bc | 10.0c | 56.7a | 4.650ab | 2.387 | 11.700 | 10.750 | 1.390 |
处理5 | 76.7a | 10.0c | 70.0a | 6.071a | 2.187 | 11.453 | 11.100 | 1.863 |
处理6 | 73.3ab | 13.3c | 66.7a | 6.685a | 2.487 | 9.953 | 8.237 | 1.400 |
处理7 | 70.0ab | 13.3c | 36.7b | 1.401b | 2.137 | 9.710 | 9.513 | 0.453 |
处理8 | 43.3de | 16.7c | 33.3b | 1.108b | 2.017 | 11.683 | 8.167 | 0.650 |
处理9 | 66.7ab | 20.0bc | 26.7b | 1.930b | 2.570 | 8.493 | 11.130 | 0.560 |
编号 | 生根率/% | 基部愈伤率/% | 抽梢率/% | 抽梢长度/cm | 一级根数/条 | 一级根长/cm | 二级根数/条 | 单株抽梢数/条 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 36.7e | 46.7a | 33.3b | 2.111b | 2.110 | 6.320 | 6.890 | 0.890 |
处理2 | 53.3cd | 30.0b | 36.7b | 3.160ab | 1.600 | 7.287 | 8.733 | 1.733 |
处理3 | 60.0bc | 13.3c | 63.3a | 4.407ab | 1.767 | 6.717 | 7.177 | 1.923 |
处理4 | 60.0bc | 10.0c | 56.7a | 4.650ab | 2.387 | 11.700 | 10.750 | 1.390 |
处理5 | 76.7a | 10.0c | 70.0a | 6.071a | 2.187 | 11.453 | 11.100 | 1.863 |
处理6 | 73.3ab | 13.3c | 66.7a | 6.685a | 2.487 | 9.953 | 8.237 | 1.400 |
处理7 | 70.0ab | 13.3c | 36.7b | 1.401b | 2.137 | 9.710 | 9.513 | 0.453 |
处理8 | 43.3de | 16.7c | 33.3b | 1.108b | 2.017 | 11.683 | 8.167 | 0.650 |
处理9 | 66.7ab | 20.0bc | 26.7b | 1.930b | 2.570 | 8.493 | 11.130 | 0.560 |
基质 | 生根率/% | 基部愈伤率/% | 抽梢率/% | 一级根长/cm | 抽梢长度/cm | 单株抽梢数/条 | 一级根数/条 | 二级根数/条 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
河沙 | 50.0c | 30.0a | 44.4b | 6.886b | 3.226b | 1.515a | 1.826 | 7.600 |
黄心土 | 70.0a | 11.1b | 64.4a | 11.034a | 5.802a | 1.551a | 2.354 | 10.030 |
泥炭土+椰糠 | 60.0b | 16.7b | 32.2c | 9.962a | 1.480b | 0.555b | 2.240 | 9.715 |
基质 | 生根率/% | 基部愈伤率/% | 抽梢率/% | 一级根长/cm | 抽梢长度/cm | 单株抽梢数/条 | 一级根数/条 | 二级根数/条 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
河沙 | 50.0c | 30.0a | 44.4b | 6.886b | 3.226b | 1.515a | 1.826 | 7.600 |
黄心土 | 70.0a | 11.1b | 64.4a | 11.034a | 5.802a | 1.551a | 2.354 | 10.030 |
泥炭土+椰糠 | 60.0b | 16.7b | 32.2c | 9.962a | 1.480b | 0.555b | 2.240 | 9.715 |
处理 | 水平 | 生根率/% | 基部愈伤率/% | 抽梢率/% | 一级根长/cm | 一级根数/条 | 二级根数/条 | 抽梢长度/cm | 单株抽梢数/条 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
外源激素种类 | NAA | 55.6b | 23.3 | 42.2b | 9.244 | 2.213 | 9.051 | 2.721 | 0.911 |
IBA | 57.8b | 18.9 | 46.7ab | 10.140 | 1.934 | 9.334 | 3.447 | 1.416 | |
IAA | 66.7a | 15.6 | 52.2a | 8.498 | 2.273 | 8.960 | 4.340 | 1.294 | |
外源激素浓度 | 1000 mg/L | 51.1c | 25.6a | 44.4b | 9.319 | 2.205 | 7.765 | 3.301 | 0.979 |
500 mg/L | 60.0b | 20.0a | 40.0b | 9.160 | 2.185 | 10.316 | 3.247 | 1.227 | |
250 mg/L | 68.9a | 12.2b | 56.7a | 9.403 | 2.030 | 9.264 | 3.960 | 1.414 | |
外源激素浸泡时间 | 10 min | 60.0ab | 25.6a | 43.3 | 8.756 | 2.287 | 9.818 | 3.371 | 1.105 |
30 min | 65.6a | 18.9ab | 46.7 | 8.983 | 2.075 | 8.828 | 3.748 | 1.196 | |
60 min | 54.4b | 13.3b | 51.1 | 10.144 | 2.057 | 8.698 | 3.388 | 1.320 |
处理 | 水平 | 生根率/% | 基部愈伤率/% | 抽梢率/% | 一级根长/cm | 一级根数/条 | 二级根数/条 | 抽梢长度/cm | 单株抽梢数/条 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
外源激素种类 | NAA | 55.6b | 23.3 | 42.2b | 9.244 | 2.213 | 9.051 | 2.721 | 0.911 |
IBA | 57.8b | 18.9 | 46.7ab | 10.140 | 1.934 | 9.334 | 3.447 | 1.416 | |
IAA | 66.7a | 15.6 | 52.2a | 8.498 | 2.273 | 8.960 | 4.340 | 1.294 | |
外源激素浓度 | 1000 mg/L | 51.1c | 25.6a | 44.4b | 9.319 | 2.205 | 7.765 | 3.301 | 0.979 |
500 mg/L | 60.0b | 20.0a | 40.0b | 9.160 | 2.185 | 10.316 | 3.247 | 1.227 | |
250 mg/L | 68.9a | 12.2b | 56.7a | 9.403 | 2.030 | 9.264 | 3.960 | 1.414 | |
外源激素浸泡时间 | 10 min | 60.0ab | 25.6a | 43.3 | 8.756 | 2.287 | 9.818 | 3.371 | 1.105 |
30 min | 65.6a | 18.9ab | 46.7 | 8.983 | 2.075 | 8.828 | 3.748 | 1.196 | |
60 min | 54.4b | 13.3b | 51.1 | 10.144 | 2.057 | 8.698 | 3.388 | 1.320 |
抽梢率 | 一级根长 | 一级根数 | 二级根数 | 抽梢长度 | 单株抽梢数 | 生根率 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级根长 | 0.18 | ||||||
一级根数 | 0.07 | 0.21 | |||||
二级根数 | -0.03 | 0.601** | 0.449* | ||||
抽梢长度 | 0.641** | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.441* | |||
单株抽梢数 | 0.465* | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.475* | 0.761** | ||
生根率 | 0.524** | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.07 | |
基部愈伤率 | -0.518** | -0.500** | -0.21 | -0.29 | -0.36 | -0.21 | -0.565** |
抽梢率 | 一级根长 | 一级根数 | 二级根数 | 抽梢长度 | 单株抽梢数 | 生根率 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级根长 | 0.18 | ||||||
一级根数 | 0.07 | 0.21 | |||||
二级根数 | -0.03 | 0.601** | 0.449* | ||||
抽梢长度 | 0.641** | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.441* | |||
单株抽梢数 | 0.465* | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.475* | 0.761** | ||
生根率 | 0.524** | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.07 | |
基部愈伤率 | -0.518** | -0.500** | -0.21 | -0.29 | -0.36 | -0.21 | -0.565** |
主成分 | 特征值 | 贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.362 | 42.021 | 42.021 |
2 | 1.489 | 18.611 | 60.632 |
3 | 1.245 | 15.568 | 76.200 |
4 | 0.879 | 10.988 | 87.188 |
5 | 0.454 | 5.673 | 92.861 |
6 | 0.324 | 4.053 | 96.914 |
7 | 0.155 | 1.939 | 98.853 |
8 | 0.092 | 1.147 | 100.000 |
主成分 | 特征值 | 贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.362 | 42.021 | 42.021 |
2 | 1.489 | 18.611 | 60.632 |
3 | 1.245 | 15.568 | 76.200 |
4 | 0.879 | 10.988 | 87.188 |
5 | 0.454 | 5.673 | 92.861 |
6 | 0.324 | 4.053 | 96.914 |
7 | 0.155 | 1.939 | 98.853 |
8 | 0.092 | 1.147 | 100.000 |
生根性状 | 旋转成分系数 | 成分得分系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | ||
生根率 | 0.056 | 0.854 | 0.075 | -0.135 | 0.483 | -0.044 | |
基部愈伤率 | -0.077 | -0.789 | -0.389 | 0.161 | -0.412 | -0.139 | |
抽梢率 | 0.573 | 0.715 | -0.132 | 0.239 | 0.326 | -0.234 | |
一级根长 | 0.016 | 0.243 | 0.776 | -0.161 | 0.068 | 0.423 | |
一级根数 | 0.094 | 0.101 | 0.618 | -0.061 | -0.015 | 0.332 | |
二级根数 | 0.324 | -0.080 | 0.870 | 0.072 | -0.187 | 0.457 | |
抽梢长度 | 0.851 | 0.300 | 0.262 | 0.421 | -0.005 | -0.014 | |
单株抽梢数 | 0.937 | -0.007 | 0.172 | 0.545 | -0.192 | -0.051 |
生根性状 | 旋转成分系数 | 成分得分系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | ||
生根率 | 0.056 | 0.854 | 0.075 | -0.135 | 0.483 | -0.044 | |
基部愈伤率 | -0.077 | -0.789 | -0.389 | 0.161 | -0.412 | -0.139 | |
抽梢率 | 0.573 | 0.715 | -0.132 | 0.239 | 0.326 | -0.234 | |
一级根长 | 0.016 | 0.243 | 0.776 | -0.161 | 0.068 | 0.423 | |
一级根数 | 0.094 | 0.101 | 0.618 | -0.061 | -0.015 | 0.332 | |
二级根数 | 0.324 | -0.080 | 0.870 | 0.072 | -0.187 | 0.457 | |
抽梢长度 | 0.851 | 0.300 | 0.262 | 0.421 | -0.005 | -0.014 | |
单株抽梢数 | 0.937 | -0.007 | 0.172 | 0.545 | -0.192 | -0.051 |
[1] | 广西壮族自治区林业科学研究院. 广西树木志(第一卷)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012:167. |
[2] | 黄伟. 黄果厚壳桂的化学成分研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2014. |
[3] |
Yang B Y, Shi Y M, Luo J G, et al. Two New Arylalkenyl α,β-unsaturated δ-lactones with Cytotoxic Activity from the Leaves and Twigs of Cryptocarya concinna[J]. Natural Product Research, 2017,31(12).
doi: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1247080 URL pmid: 27764958 |
[4] |
Huang W, Zhang W J, Cheng Y Q, et al. Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Flavonoids from Cryptocarya concinna[J]. Planta Med, 2014,80(11):925-930.
URL pmid: 25029174 |
[5] |
Chang H S, Tang J Y, Yen Ch Y, et al. Antiproliferation of Cryptocarya concinna -derived cryptocaryone Against Oral Cancer Cells Involving Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress, and DNA Damage[J]. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2016,16(1).
doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1484-3 URL pmid: 27912751 |
[6] |
Chang H W, Tang J Y, Yen Ch Y, et al. Synergistic Anti-oral Cancer Effects of UVC and Methanolic Extracts of Cryptocarya concinna Roots Via Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage[J]. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 2016,92(5).
doi: 10.3109/09553002.2016.1145753 URL pmid: 26887975 |
[7] |
Huang H W, Chung Y A, Hang H Sh, et al. Antiproliferative Effects of Methanolic Extracts of Cryptocarya concinna Hance Roots on Oral Cancer Ca9-22 and CAL 27 Cell Lines Involving Apoptosis, ROS Induction, and Mitochondrial Depolarization[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014.
doi: 10.1155/2021/6621645 URL pmid: 33679259 |
[8] | 陆湘云, 刘晓玲, 韦鹏练, 等. 黄果厚壳桂木材生材性质[J]. 广西林业科学, 2019,48(2):269-272. |
[9] | 施福军, 刘晓玲, 李长鸿, 等. 黄果厚壳桂纤维特性变异规律研究[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2020(1):17-20. |
[10] | 张池, 黄忠良, 李炯, 等. 黄果厚壳桂种内与种间竞争的数量关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006(1):22-26. |
[11] | Peng Zongbo, Jiang Ying. Density Dependence of a Dominant Species and the Effects on Community Diversity Maintainance[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016,7(4):275-280. |
[12] | 李德军, 莫江明, 方运霆, 等. 模拟氮沉降对南亚热带两种乔木幼苗生物量及其分配的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005(4):543-549. |
[13] | 杜学梅, 杨廷桢, 高敬东, 等. 我国林木扦插基质研究现状与展望[J]. 世界林业研究, 2019,32(6):73-78. |
[14] | 燕丽萍, 王因花, 任飞, 等. 元宝枫嫩枝扦插快速繁育技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(19):55-61. |
[15] | 陈智涛, 刘德浩, 廖文莉, 等. 不同基质对苦郎树嫩枝扦插的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020(4):106-107,111. |
[16] | 方芳, 邱智敏, 王松, 等. 扦插基质和插穗长度对三叶青扦插生根的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020(9):85-87. |
[17] | 王小敏, 彭大庆, 吴文龙, 等. 扦插基质和生根剂处理对滨梅嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014,29(4):114-118. |
[18] | 吴擢溪, 肖晖, 何志斌, 等. 植物生长调节剂与基质对钟花樱扦插生根的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2020(1):56-62. |
[19] | 李晓梅, 马丽, 胡俊涵, 等. 不同基质与插穗粗度组合对石榴硬枝扦插的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(16):36-40. |
[20] | 戴晓勇, 袁丛军, 林泽信, 等. 贵州特有植物厚壳红瘤果茶扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 种子, 2016,35(8):124-127. |
[21] | Smith N G, Wareing P F. The Rooting of Actively Growing and Dormant Leafy Cuttings in Relation to Endogenous Hormone Levels and Photoperiod[J]. New phytologist, 1972:483-500. |
[22] | 赵瑞, 沈永宝. 林木扦插繁殖研究进展[J]. 种子, 2019,38(9):57-66. |
[23] | 林茂, 唐庆, 李进华, 等. 植物生长调节剂种类、浓度及浸泡时间对蒜香藤扦插繁殖效果的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019,50(6):1278-1283. |
[24] | 蓝金宣, 黄晓露, 李开祥, 等. 不同外源激素处理对细子龙扦插生根的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(7):54-57. |
[25] | 张沛健, 高丽琼, 尚秀华. 不同激素种类、浓度及浸泡时间对金蒲桃扦插生根的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2020(6):1084-1091. |
[26] | 孙昂, 李莲芳, 郭樑, 等. 长梗润楠扦插生根对IBA、NAA和IAA的响应[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(16):102-106. |
[1] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[2] | LU Shimin, LI Yayuan, LIU Chong, LIU Xingguo, BAO Xuteng, TIAN Changfeng, GU Zhaojun, ZHOU Liang, WU Fan. Ammonia-oxidizing Microorganisms and Their Application in Water Quality Control of Pond Aquaculture in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 145-151. |
[3] | MEI Li, HAN Lihong, ZHOU Jihua, ZHOU Jihong, ZHU Ning, WANG Junying, CAO Caihong, HE Bingqing. Screening and Cutting Feasibility of Quinoa Vegetable Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 31-37. |
[4] | YANG Fan, GUO Lina, DONG Meichao, WANG Ziran, FU Xiaomeng, LI Danping, YANG Hongxia, GAO Junyan, ZHOU Dongguo. Effects of Substrates on Rooting of Cutting Seedlings of Passiflora caerulea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 68-71. |
[5] | CHU Xiangqian, LI Hongna, LV Weiguang, ZHENG Xianqing, LI Shuangxi, ZHANG Juanqin, WANG Quanhua, ZHANG Hanlin. Nutrients and Heavy Metals in Sediments and Substrate of Shuifeng Lake Basin: Investigation and Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 72-78. |
[6] | YAO Xiaojian, ZHANG Xiongjian, YAO Zhufang, LUO Zhongxia, WANG Zhangying, HUANG Lifei, FANG Boping, YANG Yiling. Potted Conservation Substrates of Sweet Potato Germplasms: Screening and Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 28-37. |
[7] | YU Yueyue, GUO Ning, YAN Shi, LIANG Jinfeng, MA Nan, GUO Xiaoxue, MA Zili, TIAN Fei, JIA Xiaohong. Effects of Earthworm Manure Soaking on the Growth of Three Vegetable Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 45-50. |
[8] | HUANG Pingsheng, LIU Shinan, LI Ting, QIN Yonghua. Effects of Exogenous Silicon on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics and Antioxidant Enzymes of Cryptocarya concinna Seedlings Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 32-38. |
[9] | Abdurishid RAHMAN, Yiliminuer , Talipujiang ABUDOUKEREMU, Haliguli AINI, Ruxianguli YIGANMU. Effects of Different Topdressing Measures on the Growth of Current-year Cutting Seedlings of Elaeagnus mooraroftii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 39-48. |
[10] | LIU Min, ZHU Shuangfeng, DAI Yujing, WANG Runxian. Effect of Different Substrate Proportions on Camellia sinensis Cutting Seedling Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 51-55. |
[11] | WANG Shuqian, LI Lianfang, LIU Chang, JIANG Ruochao, HUANG Xiaojie, HE Jinxin, LI Yuxin. Effects of Exogenous Hormone and Substrate on Seed Germination of Keteleeria evelyniana [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 15-21. |
[12] | WANG Yinhua, REN Fei, LI Qinghua, ZHAI Guofeng, ZANG Zhenrong, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, YAO Junxiu. Study on Softwood Cutting Propagation Technology of Sambucus williamsii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 26-31. |
[13] | Gao Wenrui, Wang Xin, Li Decui, Sun Yanjun, Han Bing, Fan Xiaoxue, Xu Gang. Different Combinations of Fertilizer and Water: Effects on Plant Growth and Nutrient Absorption of Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(9): 49-56. |
[14] | Liu Zhongliang, Gao Luyang, Gao Junjie, Chen Zhen, Yan Weiqiang, Gu Duanyin. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Frequency on Yield and Quality of Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(5): 26-30. |
[15] | Zhang Bo, Tan Wei, Li Xiaolin, Ye Lei, Zhou Jie. The Cultivation Techniques of Ganoderma lucidum with Mulberry Branches: Research Status, Issues and Suggestions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(4): 74-78. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||