Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 142-147.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0084
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Zhongmeng(), HUANG Zhipeng, ZHAO Han, ZHANG Lu, DUAN Yuanliang, MU Chengyan, ZHOU Jian, LI Qiang(
)
Received:
2022-02-16
Revised:
2022-09-26
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2023-02-06
ZHAO Zhongmeng, HUANG Zhipeng, ZHAO Han, ZHANG Lu, DUAN Yuanliang, MU Chengyan, ZHOU Jian, LI Qiang. Morphological Differences Between Male and Female Populations of Gymnocypris chilianensis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 142-147.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0084
性别 | 数量/尾 | 体长范围/mm | 体长均值±标准差/mm | 体重范围/g | 体重均值±标准差/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌 | 56 | 151.78~233.48 | 195.22±22.22a | 54.33~175.72 | 116.12±39.74a |
雄 | 44 | 121.68~191.93 | 145.65±16.07b | 26.34~90.87 | 40.96±15.02b |
性别 | 数量/尾 | 体长范围/mm | 体长均值±标准差/mm | 体重范围/g | 体重均值±标准差/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌 | 56 | 151.78~233.48 | 195.22±22.22a | 54.33~175.72 | 116.12±39.74a |
雄 | 44 | 121.68~191.93 | 145.65±16.07b | 26.34~90.87 | 40.96±15.02b |
性状 | 雌 | 雄 | 方差齐性检验 | 单因素方差分析 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M±SD | CV/% | M±SD | CV/% | Sig. | F | df | Sig. | |||||||||
体高/体长 | 0.2100±0.01 | 7.12 | 0.1989±0.02 | 8.40 | 0.440 | 11.849 | 99 | 0.001 ** | ||||||||
体厚/体长 | 0.1589±0.01 | 8.57 | 0.1412±0.02 | 10.72 | 0.651 | 36.833 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
尾柄长/体长 | 0.1533±0.01 | 10.90 | 0.1638±0.02 | 10.57 | 0.861 | 2.454 | 99 | 0.120 | ||||||||
尾柄高/体长 | 0.0716±0.00 | 6.83 | 0.0722±0.00 | 6.38 | 0.967 | 0.489 | 99 | 0.486 | ||||||||
背吻距/体长 | 0.5099±0.05 | 10.65 | 0.4844±0.02 | 3.66 | 0.276 | 9.812 | 99 | 0.002 ** | ||||||||
背尾距/体长 | 0.3952±0.04 | 10.29 | 0.4070±0.05 | 13.42 | 0.024 | 1.470 | 99 | 0.228 | ||||||||
背鳍基长/体长 | 0.1131±0.05 | 49.90 | 0.1390±0.02 | 14.67 | 0.671 | 9.101 | 99 | 0.003 ** | ||||||||
头高/头长 | 0.6078±0.05 | 7.51 | 0.6325±0.24 | 38.20 | 0.204 | 0.492 | 99 | 0.485 | ||||||||
头厚/头长 | 0.5996±0.05 | 8.50 | 0.5466±0.04 | 7.58 | 0.243 | 31.958 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
吻长/头长 | 0.2951±0.02 | 7.68 | 0.2971±0.02 | 7.65 | 0.850 | 0.188 | 99 | 0.666 | ||||||||
眼后头长/头长 | 0.5172±0.03 | 5.44 | 0.4882±0.03 | 6.59 | 0.514 | 22.635 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
眼径/头长 | 0.1968±0.02 | 7.75 | 0.2222±0.02 | 8.60 | 0.127 | 53.258 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
眼间距/头长 | 0.4034±0.02 | 11.10 | 0.3879±0.05 | 12.45 | 0.302 | 2.715 | 99 | 0.103 | ||||||||
性状 | 雌 | 雄 | 方差齐性检验 | 单因素方差分析 | ||||||||||||
M±SD | CV/% | M±SD | CV/% | Sig. | F | df | Sig. | |||||||||
口裂宽/头长 | 0.3338±0.03 | 8.40 | 0.3182±0.03 | 8.53 | 0.640 | 7.789 | 99 | 0.006** | ||||||||
口裂长/头长 | 0.2673±0.02 | 9.30 | 0.2676±0.02 | 8.86 | 0.699 | 0.005 | 99 | 0.946 | ||||||||
鼻孔间距/头长 | 0.1787±0.02 | 12.14 | 0.1768±0.02 | 10.21 | 0.265 | 0.231 | 99 | 0.632 |
性状 | 雌 | 雄 | 方差齐性检验 | 单因素方差分析 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M±SD | CV/% | M±SD | CV/% | Sig. | F | df | Sig. | |||||||||
体高/体长 | 0.2100±0.01 | 7.12 | 0.1989±0.02 | 8.40 | 0.440 | 11.849 | 99 | 0.001 ** | ||||||||
体厚/体长 | 0.1589±0.01 | 8.57 | 0.1412±0.02 | 10.72 | 0.651 | 36.833 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
尾柄长/体长 | 0.1533±0.01 | 10.90 | 0.1638±0.02 | 10.57 | 0.861 | 2.454 | 99 | 0.120 | ||||||||
尾柄高/体长 | 0.0716±0.00 | 6.83 | 0.0722±0.00 | 6.38 | 0.967 | 0.489 | 99 | 0.486 | ||||||||
背吻距/体长 | 0.5099±0.05 | 10.65 | 0.4844±0.02 | 3.66 | 0.276 | 9.812 | 99 | 0.002 ** | ||||||||
背尾距/体长 | 0.3952±0.04 | 10.29 | 0.4070±0.05 | 13.42 | 0.024 | 1.470 | 99 | 0.228 | ||||||||
背鳍基长/体长 | 0.1131±0.05 | 49.90 | 0.1390±0.02 | 14.67 | 0.671 | 9.101 | 99 | 0.003 ** | ||||||||
头高/头长 | 0.6078±0.05 | 7.51 | 0.6325±0.24 | 38.20 | 0.204 | 0.492 | 99 | 0.485 | ||||||||
头厚/头长 | 0.5996±0.05 | 8.50 | 0.5466±0.04 | 7.58 | 0.243 | 31.958 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
吻长/头长 | 0.2951±0.02 | 7.68 | 0.2971±0.02 | 7.65 | 0.850 | 0.188 | 99 | 0.666 | ||||||||
眼后头长/头长 | 0.5172±0.03 | 5.44 | 0.4882±0.03 | 6.59 | 0.514 | 22.635 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
眼径/头长 | 0.1968±0.02 | 7.75 | 0.2222±0.02 | 8.60 | 0.127 | 53.258 | 99 | 0.000 ** | ||||||||
眼间距/头长 | 0.4034±0.02 | 11.10 | 0.3879±0.05 | 12.45 | 0.302 | 2.715 | 99 | 0.103 | ||||||||
性状 | 雌 | 雄 | 方差齐性检验 | 单因素方差分析 | ||||||||||||
M±SD | CV/% | M±SD | CV/% | Sig. | F | df | Sig. | |||||||||
口裂宽/头长 | 0.3338±0.03 | 8.40 | 0.3182±0.03 | 8.53 | 0.640 | 7.789 | 99 | 0.006** | ||||||||
口裂长/头长 | 0.2673±0.02 | 9.30 | 0.2676±0.02 | 8.86 | 0.699 | 0.005 | 99 | 0.946 | ||||||||
鼻孔间距/头长 | 0.1787±0.02 | 12.14 | 0.1768±0.02 | 10.21 | 0.265 | 0.231 | 99 | 0.632 |
性状 | 主成分 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
体高/体长 | 0.17 | 0.01 | -0.13 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.07 |
体厚/体长 | 0.17 | -0.07 | -0.18 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 0.17 |
尾柄长/体长 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.01 | -0.35 | 0.22 | -0.34 |
尾柄高/体长 | 0.09 | 0.10 | -0.06 | 0.16 | 0.53 | 0.01 |
背吻距/体长 | 0.11 | -0.21 | 0.30 | 0.21 | -0.10 | -0.27 |
背尾距/体长 | -0.11 | -0.13 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.46 | 0.22 |
背鳍基长/体长 | -0.15 | 0.15 | -0.29 | -0.09 | 0.05 | 0.36 |
头高/头长 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.25 | -0.19 | -0.10 |
头厚/头长 | 0.20 | -0.06 | -0.09 | -0.10 | -0.01 | 0.06 |
吻长/头长 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.40 | -0.15 | 0.11 | 0.33 |
眼后头长/头长 | -0.01 | -0.31 | -0.22 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
眼径/头长 | -0.12 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.02 | -0.01 |
眼间距/头长 | 0.18 | 0.16 | -0.40 | -0.15 | -0.07 | -0.22 |
口裂宽/头长 | 0.13 | -0.08 | 0.20 | -0.16 | -0.14 | 0.45 |
口裂长/头长 | 0.08 | 0.20 | -0.01 | 0.15 | -0.27 | 0.38 |
鼻孔间距/头长 | 0.12 | 0.11 | -0.04 | -0.29 | 0.04 | 0.12 |
特征值 | 4.02 | 2.42 | 1.78 | 1.40 | 1.30 | 1.05 |
贡献率/% | 25.11 | 15.14 | 11.13 | 8.76 | 8.14 | 6.58 |
累积贡献率/% | 25.11 | 40.25 | 51.38 | 60.14 | 68.28 | 74.86 |
性状 | 主成分 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
体高/体长 | 0.17 | 0.01 | -0.13 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.07 |
体厚/体长 | 0.17 | -0.07 | -0.18 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 0.17 |
尾柄长/体长 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.01 | -0.35 | 0.22 | -0.34 |
尾柄高/体长 | 0.09 | 0.10 | -0.06 | 0.16 | 0.53 | 0.01 |
背吻距/体长 | 0.11 | -0.21 | 0.30 | 0.21 | -0.10 | -0.27 |
背尾距/体长 | -0.11 | -0.13 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.46 | 0.22 |
背鳍基长/体长 | -0.15 | 0.15 | -0.29 | -0.09 | 0.05 | 0.36 |
头高/头长 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.25 | -0.19 | -0.10 |
头厚/头长 | 0.20 | -0.06 | -0.09 | -0.10 | -0.01 | 0.06 |
吻长/头长 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.40 | -0.15 | 0.11 | 0.33 |
眼后头长/头长 | -0.01 | -0.31 | -0.22 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
眼径/头长 | -0.12 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.02 | -0.01 |
眼间距/头长 | 0.18 | 0.16 | -0.40 | -0.15 | -0.07 | -0.22 |
口裂宽/头长 | 0.13 | -0.08 | 0.20 | -0.16 | -0.14 | 0.45 |
口裂长/头长 | 0.08 | 0.20 | -0.01 | 0.15 | -0.27 | 0.38 |
鼻孔间距/头长 | 0.12 | 0.11 | -0.04 | -0.29 | 0.04 | 0.12 |
特征值 | 4.02 | 2.42 | 1.78 | 1.40 | 1.30 | 1.05 |
贡献率/% | 25.11 | 15.14 | 11.13 | 8.76 | 8.14 | 6.58 |
累积贡献率/% | 25.11 | 40.25 | 51.38 | 60.14 | 68.28 | 74.86 |
[1] |
李思忠, 张世义. 甘肃省河西走廊鱼类新种及新亚种[J]. 动物学报, 1974, 20(4):414-419.
|
[2] |
王万良, 李勤慎, 刘哲, 等. 祁连山裸鲤胚胎及仔鱼发育的观察[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2014, 43(3):28-31.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
doi: 10.1111/jai.14263 URL |
[5] |
乐佩琦. 中国动物志-硬骨鱼纲鲤形目(下卷)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000:362-363.
|
[6] |
林植华, 雷焕宗. 黄颡鱼的两性异形和雌性繁殖特征[J]. 动物学杂志, 2004, 39(6):13-17.
|
[7] |
王元军, 李殿香. 大鳞副泥鳅雌雄个体的形态分析[J]. 四川动物, 2005, 24(2):159-160.
|
[8] |
杨景峰, 徐桂珠. 罗非鱼全雄控制技术研究进展[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 18(4):318-322.
|
[9] |
倪海儿, 龚启祥, 董瞻远, 等. 短吻舌鳎个体生殖力和雌雄个体性状差异的研究[J]. 浙江水产学院学报, 1989, 8(1):9-15.
|
[10] |
李虎, 陈四清, 刘海金, 等. 半滑舌鳎养殖群体的性比与雌雄形态差异比较[J]. 水产学报, 2012, 36(9):1331-1336.
|
[11] |
pmid: 9493353 |
[12] |
doi: 10.1007/s004120050425 URL |
[13] |
林晓煜, 肖世俊, 李完波, 等. 大黄鱼性别特异SNP标记的开发与验证[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(9):1329-1337.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01854.x URL |
[16] |
|
[17] |
doi: 10.1126/science.327542 URL |
[18] |
|
[19] |
doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90212-7 URL |
[20] |
庹云, 肖调义. 花䱻雌雄群体的形态指标体系分析与判别[J]. 水产科学, 2015, 34(10):603-608.
|
[21] |
苗懿, 陈雨薇, 赵仲孟, 等. 西伯利亚鲟、施氏鲟及其杂交种(西伯利亚鲟♀×施氏鲟♂)的形态差异分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2019, 43(6):1239-1245.
|
[22] |
李思发, 李晨虹, 李家乐. 尼罗罗非鱼品系间形态差异分析[J]. 动物学报, 1998, 44(4):75-82.
|
[23] |
邱楚雯, 王韩信, 陈迪虎. 台湾泥鳅雌雄形态差异分析[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2017, 38(5):87-91.
|
[24] |
谌微, 王盼盼, 肖世俊, 等. 大黄鱼形态指标体系及雌雄差异分析[J]. 集美大学学报(自然版), 2014, 19(6):401-408.
|
[25] |
张伟. 利用形态学和RAPD方法鉴定东南太平洋(公海)智利竹筴鱼种群结构[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2011.
|
[1] | SONG Yueqin, YUAN Haozhan, LIU Wentao, SUN Huizhong. Effects of Temperature on Growth, Development and Survival of Nymphs of Trialeurodes ricini [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(36): 120-125. |
[2] | LIANG Jingxuan, BAI Haiyan. Ultra-structural Characteristics of the Antennal Sensilla of Two Species of Caloptilia (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 110-118. |
[3] | HUANG Yuan, LIN Jun, SHUI Jing, HE Liye, GU Xiaohong, JIA Min, LIU Xuemei, ZHOU Yan, LIU Yang, WANG Xiaoqin, ZHANG Zhidong. Dynamic Monitoring of Sorghum Lepidoptera Pest Occurrence by Using Sex Pheromone Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(13): 135-140. |
[4] | JIN Wu, MA Xueyan, LV Guohua, GU Ruobo, HUA Dan, WEN Haibo. A Review of Reproductive Biology of Gastropoda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(11): 116-122. |
[5] | Qian Rong, Chen Weimin, Chai Hongmei, Tao Nan, Zhao Yongchang, Chen Yuhui. B Mating Locus from Agrocybe aegerita: Structural Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(2): 14-19. |
[6] | Fan Yongfang, Xu Shuo, Zhang Zhao, Yu Jing, Wei Xueping, He Lihong. Monoecious Phellodendron Amurense Rupr.: Sexual Reproduction Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(15): 26-32. |
[7] | Ma Xiaotong, Fu Buli, Qiu Haiyan, Li Shanguang, Yang Shiyou, Zhou Shihao, Tang Liangde, Zhang Fangping, Liu Kui. Oviposition and Behavior Preference of Menochilus sexmaculates to Different Colors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(27): 142-146. |
[8] | . Identification and Screening of Rice Quality Characteristics of Introgression Lines Carrying African Rice Genes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(31): 1-10. |
[9] | . Occurrence Regularity of Grapholitha molesta Adults in Yuncheng Area and Control Effect of Sex Pheromone Traps [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(25): 154-158. |
[10] | . Densities and Types of Traps Against Spodoptera litura: Trapping and Control Effects in Tobacco Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(31): 147-151. |
[11] | Chen Chuan,An Kejiang,Yang Meixia,Zhang Guanping and Sheng Chengfa. Observation of the Adult Dynamics of Adoxophyes orana in Orchards [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(13): 129-132. |
[12] | Liu Erxi,Yang Chaozhu,Zheng Xiaojiang,Mou Fanggui,Qin Yu,Pan Yani,Wu Ping,Wang Lin,Xiong Kun and Xie Yimei. Adaptability Evaluation of Amorphophallus albus [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(28): 57-63. |
[13] | . Advances in Water-cultured Rooting of Casuarina Branchlets [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(10): 42-46. |
[14] | 胡代花. Field Applied Technology of Sex Attractant on Chilo suppressalis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(23): 77-80. |
[15] | 朱国渊,普妹 and . Study on Principal Bionomics and Effective Accumulated Temperature of Eotetranychus sexmaculatus (Riley) on Rubber Trees [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(13): 164-168. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||