Visual Analysis of Research Progress of Manure Composting Based on Bibliometric Method

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0856

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to comprehensively understand the research progress and cutting-edge dynamics in the field of manure composting at home and abroad, CiteSpace software was used to visualize and analyze the literature in the field of manure composting. The results showed that the number of Chinese and English literature published in this research field presented an overall upward trend from 2009 to 2022, and China, the United States, India, Spain, and Canada were the countries with the largest number of English literature. The main issuing institutions in this field were the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, China Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, etc. Among them, Chinese Academy of Sciences occupied an important position, which demonstrated that our country had a stronger academic influence and a more significant contribution to this research field. Analyzing from the aspect of cooperation, domestic and foreign authors in this field cooperated closely within their own research teams, but lacked communication and cooperation between teams. From the analysis of the keyword clustering diagram and the emergent intensity diagram, it could be seen that the research content in this field could be divided into two stages and one path: the first stage was to study the main ways of nitrogen loss in the process of manure composting as well as the microbial activity law and its biomass change in the process of composting; the hotspot of the second stage of the research shifted to the greenhouse gas emission in the process of manure composting, the bacterial community's successions and the antibiotic genes and heavy metal residues in the process of composting. The research trend was as follows: mixed compost and its quality→ the effect of fertilizers on soil→ nitrogen loss in the process of composting→ biological biomass and its structural and functional changes→ bacterial community succession→ greenhouse gas emission→residue of hazardous substances. The environmental impact in composting process can be a hot spot and frontier of research in this field.

Key words: manure composting, research progress, CiteSpace, bibliometric method, knowledge map

WANG Rencheng, GAO Yunlong, YANG Di, LI Cheng, WU Huiguang, YU Peng. Visual Analysis of Research Progress of Manure Composting Based on Bibliometric Method[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 150-158.

Figures/Tables 16

References 50

[1]	赵汝东, 董桓诚, 黄华, 等. 我国畜禽粪污肥料化利用研究现状[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(5):151-156. doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2020.05.025
[2]	武淑霞, 刘宏斌, 黄宏坤, 等. 我国畜禽养殖粪污产生量及其资源化分析[J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(5):103-111.
[3]	魏兆堂. 堆肥技术在粪污资源化利用中的应用[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2019, 15(5):38-39.
[4]	代文龙, 郑旭, 付海燕, 等. 畜禽粪污堆肥调理剂及其调控氮素转化的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(11):135-142. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-1047
[5]	曹丽娜, 王岩, 王跃, 等. 添加麦秸对鸡粪堆肥过程中氮素减排及细菌群落的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(11):2560-2569.
[6]	梁天, 张晓东, 张玉, 等. 不同C/N条件下菌酶制剂对牛粪堆肥进程的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31):77-82. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1090
[7]	王聪, 冀红柳, 尹苗, 等. 猪粪堆肥复合菌剂培养条件优化及其对好氧堆肥的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(17):751-58.
[8]	JIANG B, TIAN J, CHEN H, et al. Heavy metals migration and antibiotics removal in anaerobic digestion of swine manure with biochar addition[J]. Environmental technology & innovation, 2022, 27:102735.
[9]	魏上京, 张帆, 彭福来, 等. 猪粪堆肥及资源化利用研究进展[J]. 绿色科技, 2022, 25(11):160-165,171.
[10]	赵玥, 李翠霞. 畜禽粪污治理政策演化研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(2):232-241.
[11]	农业部. 农业部关于印发《畜禽粪污资源化利用行动方案(2017—2020年)[EB/OL].(2017-07-10)[2023-11-29]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/XMYS/201707/t20170710_5742847.htm.
[12]	朱继东. 主要发达国家和地区的畜牧业支持政策及其借鉴[J]. 世界农业, 2015(6):70-75.
[13]	姚棣夫, 徐建玲, 王汉席. 基于文献计量的堆肥研究现状与趋势研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2018, 43(3):26-29.
[14]	邹威, 罗义, 周启星. 畜禽粪便中抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)污染问题及环境调控[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(12):2281-2287.
[15]	EBRAHIM S, DENG M C, QIAN Q M, et al. Microbial community dynamics during composting of animal manures contaminated with arsenic, copper, and oxytetracycline[J]. Journal of integrative agriculture, 2021, 20(6):1649-1659. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63290-7
[16]	XIAO M C, ZHUANG D, DAN L, et al. Biochar mitigates the biotoxicity of heavy metals in livestock manure during composting[J]. Biochar, 2022, 4(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s42773-021-00127-w
[17]	尹芳, 杨智明, 张无敌, 等. 畜禽粪污综合利用对土壤肥力和持续农业的影响分析[J]. 中国沼气, 2019, 37(3):75-79.
[18]	KARIMI H, MOKHTARI M, SALEHI F, et al. Changes in microbial pathogen dynamics during vermicomposting mixture of cow manure-organic solid waste and cow manure-sewage sludge[J]. International journal of recycling of organic waste in agriculture, 2017, 6(1):57-61. doi: 10.1007/s40093-016-0152-4 URL
[19]	李冉, 孟海波, 赵立欣, 等. 微生物和生物炭联用对猪粪堆肥后重金属Pb和Cd的钝化效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(23):164-169.
[20]	高凌飞, 王义祥, 叶菁, 等. 堆肥过程中碳、氮转化与温室气体排放研究进展[J]. 福建农业学报, 2014, 29(8):803-814.
[21]	卢月, 徐建玲. 堆肥的温室气体排放和氮素转化进展研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2019, 44(5):57-60.
[22]	王孝芳, 万金鑫, 韦中, 等. 畜禽粪便堆肥过程中微生物群落演替[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(5):13-21. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2022-0138
[23]	刘颖, 付菁菁, 卢月. 堆肥稳定性和成熟度评价指标及堆肥应用现状[J]. 江苏农机化, 2021(4):9-12.
[24]	李敏清, 袁英英, 杨江舟, 等. 畜禽粪便堆肥过程中酶活性及微生物数量的变化研究[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2010, 30(11):56-60.
[25]	张勇, 陈宇鹏, 权秋梅, 等. 畜禽粪添加对菌糠堆肥过程中酶活性的影响[J]. 地球环境学报, 2019, 10(4):406-418.
[26]	范建华, 沈阳, 李尚民, 等. 畜禽粪污重金属残留现状及主要治理技术措施研究进展[J]. 中国家禽, 2019, 41(24):40-43.
[27]	WANG Mengmeng, WU Yuncheng, ZHAO Jiayin, et al. Comparison of composting factors, heavy metal immobilization, and microbial activity after biochar or lime application in straw-manure composting[J]. Bioresource technology, 2022, 363:127872. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127872 URL
[28]	王霜, 邓良伟, 王兰, 等. 猪场粪污中重金属和抗生素的研究现状[J]. 中国沼气, 2016, 34(4):25-33.
[29]	包灿鑫, 张园, 陈明龙, 等. 不同生物炭对猪粪堆肥过程中抗生素及抗生素抗性基因的削减规律研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2022, 44(2):160-164,172.
[30]	潘兰佳, 唐晓达, 汪印, 等. 畜禽粪便堆肥降解残留抗生素的研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(S2):191-198.
[31]	牟美睿, 杨凤霞, 田雪力, 等. 蚯蚓堆肥对畜禽粪污耐药基因的影响研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(6):1089-1098.
[32]	陶金沙, 李正东, 刘福理, 等. 添加小麦秸秆生物质炭对猪粪堆肥腐熟程度及温室气体排放的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(5):1233-1240.
[33]	付祥峰, 刘琪琪, 李恋卿, 等. 生物质炭对猪粪堆肥过程中氮素转化及温室气体排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(9):1893-1900.
[34]	徐鹏翔, 孙敏捷, 李季. 规模化肉牛场粪污收集与堆肥处理工艺设计[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(S2):213-217.
[35]	宋李思莹. 南方丘陵地区生猪养殖及粪污处理过程氨气排放研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2018.
[36]	曹玉博, 张陆, 王选, 等. 畜禽废弃物堆肥氨气与温室气体协同减排研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4):923-932.
[37]	YUE Zhengfu, ZHANG Jing, ZHOU Zhigao, et al. Pollution characteristics of livestock faeces and the key driver of the spread of antibiotic resistance genes[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2020, 409:124957.1-124957.11.
[38]	彭晶, 王科, 谷月, 等. 牛粪堆肥系统环境因子对抗性基因的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(3):1439-1445.
[39]	郑丁瑀, 王珏, 常瑞雪, 等. 堆肥工艺钝化粪肥中重金属及其形态变化的研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(5):778-786.
[40]	LU H, LASHARI S M, LIU X, et al. Changes in soil microbial community structure and enzyme activity with amendment of biochar-manure compost and pyroligneous solution in a saline soil from central China[J]. European journal of soil biology, 2015, 70:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.07.005 URL
[41]	CORATO D U. Agricultural waste recycling in horticultural intensive farming systems by on-farm composting and compost-based tea application improves soil quality and plant health: A review under the perspective of a circular economy[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020,738.
[42]	YANG O, JEANETTE M N. Short-term nitrogen fertilization affects microbial community composition and nitrogen mineralization functions in an agricultural soil[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019, 86(5).
[43]	袁京, 刘燕, 唐若兰, 等. 畜禽粪便堆肥过程中碳氮损失及温室气体排放综述[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11):2428-2438,2590.
[44]	宋晓勇, 高文君, 田航飞, 等. 不同粪污处理模式的潜在环境影响和经济效益评价[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2021(24):8-14,19.
[45]	吴伟祥, 李丽劼, 吕豪豪, 等. 畜禽粪便好氧堆肥过程氧化亚氮排放机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(6):1704-1712.
[46]	黄家庆, 叶菁, 李艳春, 等. 生物炭对猪粪堆肥过程中细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(5):1477-1491.
[47]	田哲, 张昱, 杨敏. 堆肥化处理对畜禽粪便中四环素类抗生素及抗性基因控制的研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2015, 42(5):936-943.
[48]	LIU Botao, YU Kaifeng, AHMED Imtiaz, et al. Key factors driving the fate of antibiotic resistance genes and controlling strategies during aerobic composting of animal manure: A review[J]. Science of the total environment, 2021,791.
[49]	张俊亚, 魏源送, 陈梅雪, 等. 畜禽粪便生物处理与土地利用全过程中抗生素和重金属抗性基因的赋存与转归特征研究进展[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(4):935-946.
[50]	温增欣. 抗生素在不同堆肥条件下降解特征及对堆体性质影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2023.

序号	发文量/篇	发文国家	占全部发文量的百分比/%
1	1825	中国	32
2	730	美国	13
3	438	印度	8
4	346	西班牙	6
5	278	加拿大	5
6	249	日本	4
7	215	巴西	4
8	212	澳大利亚	4
9	208	意大利	4
10	194	巴基斯坦	3

序号	发文量/篇	发文国家	占全部发文量的百分比/%
1	1825	中国	32
2	730	美国	13
3	438	印度	8
4	346	西班牙	6
5	278	加拿大	5
6	249	日本	4
7	215	巴西	4
8	212	澳大利亚	4
9	208	意大利	4
10	194	巴基斯坦	3

机构名称	发文数量/篇
山东农业大学	6
中国农业科学院	5
北京京鹏环宇畜牧科技股份有限公司	4
南京农业大学	4
四川农业大学	4
国家畜牧养殖废弃物资源化利用科技创新联盟	4
中国农业大学	3
中国农业大学烟台研究院	3
中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所	3
中国科学院大学	3

机构名称	发文数量/篇
山东农业大学	6
中国农业科学院	5
北京京鹏环宇畜牧科技股份有限公司	4
南京农业大学	4
四川农业大学	4
国家畜牧养殖废弃物资源化利用科技创新联盟	4
中国农业大学	3
中国农业大学烟台研究院	3
中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所	3
中国科学院大学	3

机构名称	发文数量/篇
Chinese Academy of Sciences	294
Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University	212
China Agriculture University	209
Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Affairs	196
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada	171
United States Department of Agriculture	153
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences	128
Indian Council of Agriculture Research	121
Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences	117
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas	115