Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (24): 79-86.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0814
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-11-18
Revised:
2024-04-19
Online:
2024-08-20
Published:
2024-08-20
LIU Liaoyuan. Effects of Five Conditioners on Speciation of Cadmium in Paddy Soil and Evaluation of Their Passivation Efficacy[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(24): 79-86.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0814
调理剂 | 来源 | 主要成分 | pH |
---|---|---|---|
石灰粉 | 河北省灵寿县旭诚矿产品加工厂 | CaO含量为68.02% | 9.71 |
白云石粉 | 河北省灵寿县丰聚矿产品加工厂 | CaO含量为43.94% | 9.77 |
牡蛎壳粉 | 福建省珊瑚岛生物科技有限公司 | CaO含量为52.97% | 9.66 |
泥炭土 | 河北省灵寿县顺天矿产品加工厂 | 有机质含量为38.9% | 5.00 |
硅钙镁钾肥 | 河北省石家庄春旭生物科技有限公司 | 有效硅*、CaO、MgO含量分别为≥25%、26.31%和12.46% | 9.49 |
调理剂 | 来源 | 主要成分 | pH |
---|---|---|---|
石灰粉 | 河北省灵寿县旭诚矿产品加工厂 | CaO含量为68.02% | 9.71 |
白云石粉 | 河北省灵寿县丰聚矿产品加工厂 | CaO含量为43.94% | 9.77 |
牡蛎壳粉 | 福建省珊瑚岛生物科技有限公司 | CaO含量为52.97% | 9.66 |
泥炭土 | 河北省灵寿县顺天矿产品加工厂 | 有机质含量为38.9% | 5.00 |
硅钙镁钾肥 | 河北省石家庄春旭生物科技有限公司 | 有效硅*、CaO、MgO含量分别为≥25%、26.31%和12.46% | 9.49 |
监测时间 | CK | SCⅠ | SCⅡ | SCⅢ | SCⅣ | SCⅤ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 | 5.78±0.10 a | |||||
处理后20 d | 5.71±0.07 a | 7.08±0.10 b | 6.67±0.12 b | 6.31±0.06 b | 5.92±0.11 b | 6.01±0.04 b |
处理后40 d | 5.74±0.10 a | 7.44±0.15 c | 7.07±0.07 c | 6.67±0.08 c | 6.05±0.10 bc | 6.24±0.06 c |
处理后60 d | 5.74±0.12 a | 7.55±0.09 c | 7.23±0.10 c | 6.91±0.07 d | 6.22±0.08 c | 6.34±0.06 c |
监测时间 | CK | SCⅠ | SCⅡ | SCⅢ | SCⅣ | SCⅤ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 | 5.78±0.10 a | |||||
处理后20 d | 5.71±0.07 a | 7.08±0.10 b | 6.67±0.12 b | 6.31±0.06 b | 5.92±0.11 b | 6.01±0.04 b |
处理后40 d | 5.74±0.10 a | 7.44±0.15 c | 7.07±0.07 c | 6.67±0.08 c | 6.05±0.10 bc | 6.24±0.06 c |
处理后60 d | 5.74±0.12 a | 7.55±0.09 c | 7.23±0.10 c | 6.91±0.07 d | 6.22±0.08 c | 6.34±0.06 c |
处理 | 赋存形态含量 | 全量 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水溶态 | 弱酸提取态 | 可还原态 | 可氧化态 | 残渣态 | ||
CK | 0.0014±0.0000a | 0.0712±0.0041a | 0.0218±0.0016a | 0.0083±0.0006c | 0.0556±0.0023d | 0.1569±0.0081a |
SCⅠ | 0.0003±0.0000d | 0.0432±0.0044c | 0.0248±0.0017a | 0.0103±0.0007a | 0.0774±0.0023bc | 0.1558±0.0041a |
SCⅡ | 0.0005±0.0001c | 0.0567±0.0016b | 0.0233±0.0017a | 0.0108±0.0008a | 0.0626±0.0041d | 0.1534±0.0052a |
SCⅢ | 0.0004±0.0000d | 0.0526±0.0019b | 0.0218±0.0010a | 0.0080±0.0009c | 0.0730±0.0026c | 0.1554±0.0029a |
SCⅣ | 0.0011±0.0001b | 0.0428±0.0036c | 0.0220±0.0023a | 0.0087±0.0007bc | 0.0834±0.0020a | 0.1569±0.0015a |
SCⅤ | 0.0010±0.0001b | 0.0466±0.0010c | 0.0231±0.0019a | 0.0099±0.0012ab | 0.0789±0.0025b | 0.1585±0.0050a |
处理 | 赋存形态含量 | 全量 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水溶态 | 弱酸提取态 | 可还原态 | 可氧化态 | 残渣态 | ||
CK | 0.0014±0.0000a | 0.0712±0.0041a | 0.0218±0.0016a | 0.0083±0.0006c | 0.0556±0.0023d | 0.1569±0.0081a |
SCⅠ | 0.0003±0.0000d | 0.0432±0.0044c | 0.0248±0.0017a | 0.0103±0.0007a | 0.0774±0.0023bc | 0.1558±0.0041a |
SCⅡ | 0.0005±0.0001c | 0.0567±0.0016b | 0.0233±0.0017a | 0.0108±0.0008a | 0.0626±0.0041d | 0.1534±0.0052a |
SCⅢ | 0.0004±0.0000d | 0.0526±0.0019b | 0.0218±0.0010a | 0.0080±0.0009c | 0.0730±0.0026c | 0.1554±0.0029a |
SCⅣ | 0.0011±0.0001b | 0.0428±0.0036c | 0.0220±0.0023a | 0.0087±0.0007bc | 0.0834±0.0020a | 0.1569±0.0015a |
SCⅤ | 0.0010±0.0001b | 0.0466±0.0010c | 0.0231±0.0019a | 0.0099±0.0012ab | 0.0789±0.0025b | 0.1585±0.0050a |
处理 | CK | SCⅠ | SCⅡ | SCⅢ | SCⅣ | SCⅤ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量/(mg/kg) | 0.0301±0.0022b | 0.0352±0.0021a | 0.0341±0.0016ab | 0.0298±0.0018b | 0.0308±0.0028b | 0.0330±0.0029ab |
效态比率/% | 19.18±0.50b | 22.58±1.40a | 22.23±0.27a | 19.15±1.04b | 19.60±1.64b | 20.78±1.35ab |
比率比CK±/% | +3.40 | +3.05 | -0.03 | +0.42 | +1.60 |
处理 | CK | SCⅠ | SCⅡ | SCⅢ | SCⅣ | SCⅤ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量/(mg/kg) | 0.0301±0.0022b | 0.0352±0.0021a | 0.0341±0.0016ab | 0.0298±0.0018b | 0.0308±0.0028b | 0.0330±0.0029ab |
效态比率/% | 19.18±0.50b | 22.58±1.40a | 22.23±0.27a | 19.15±1.04b | 19.60±1.64b | 20.78±1.35ab |
比率比CK±/% | +3.40 | +3.05 | -0.03 | +0.42 | +1.60 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
pmid: 6771869 |
[3] |
doi: 10.1007/BF03208342 pmid: 7857202 |
[4] |
代允超, 吕家珑, 曹莹菲, 等. 石灰和有机质对不同性质镉污染土壤中镉有效性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(3):514-519.
|
[5] |
张振兴, 纪雄辉, 谢运河, 等. 水稻不同生育期施用生石灰对稻米镉含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(10):1867-1872.
|
[6] |
邱静, 李凝玉, 胡群群, 等. 石灰与磷肥对籽粒苋吸收镉的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(1):187-192.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906(2009)01-0187-06 |
[7] |
林小兵, 张秋梅, 吴多基, 等. 石灰和牡蛎粉对酸性镉污染农田粉葛增产降镉效应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(7):1505-1513.
|
[8] |
范贝贝, 彭宇涛, 潘成杰, 等. 矿物调理剂对酸性土壤酸度降低和菠菜镉累积的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(5):96-105.
|
[9] |
郭京霞, 冯莲莲, 张起佳, 等.不同钙质钝化剂对稻田土壤水溶态镉动态变化的影响[A]. 中国土壤学会土壤环境专业委员会第十九次会议暨“农田土壤污染与修复研讨会”第二届山东省土壤污染防控与修复技术研讨会摘要集[C], 2017.
|
[10] |
孔晶晶. 钝化剂及其复合应用对镉污染稻田土壤的修复效果对比[J]. 海峡科学, 2022(11):43-45.
|
[11] |
项佳敏, 谢国雄, 章明奎. 镉低积累品种与调理剂降低黑色岩系农田水稻镉吸收的效果[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(7):12-16.
|
[12] |
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2011. 土壤和沉积物13个微量元素形态顺序提取程序:GB/T 25282-2010 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
|
[13] |
刘娟, 张乃明, 袁启慧. 不同钝化剂对铅镉复合污染土壤钝化效果及影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8):1732-1741.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.020 |
[14] |
中华人民共和国生态环境部.土壤pH值的测定电位法:HJ 962-2018[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2018.
|
[15] |
周婷, 南忠仁, 王胜利, 等. 干旱区绿洲土壤Cd/Pb复合污染下重金属形态转化与生物有效性[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(6):1089-1096.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
张朝升, 陈秋丽, 张可方, 等. 大坦沙污水厂污泥重金属形态及其生物有效性的研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(3):1259-1264.
|
[18] |
李亮亮, 张大庚, 李天来, 等. 土壤有效态重金属提取剂选择的研究[J]. 土壤‚2008‚40(5):819-823.
|
[19] |
李淑仪, 郑惠典, 廖新荣, 等. 有机肥施用量与蔬菜硝酸盐和重金属关系初探[J]. 生态环境, 2006, 15(2):307-311.
|
[20] |
国家环境保护总局科技标准司. 土壤环境监测技术规范:HJ/T 166-2004[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2004:7-18.
|
[21] |
单翔宇, 黄语娇, 谢如林, 等. 施用白云石粉对酸性土壤pH和有效养分及甘蔗生长的影响[J]. 广西农学报, 2019, 34(5):20-24,29.
|
[22] |
张国, 朱启法, 郭熙盛, 等. 皖南烟区白云石粉对酸性植烟土壤的改良研究[J]. 土壤, 2014, 46(3):534-538.
|
[23] |
罗泉达. 铬在土壤-作物系统中的迁移及安全利用调控研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2023, 38(6):746-752.
|
[24] |
许玲玲, 章骞, 王永明, 等. 煅烧牡蛎壳粉对土壤酸化及玉菇甜瓜品质的改良效果[J]. 集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 25(5):336-343.
|
[25] |
doi: 10.1007/s10653-020-00768-z pmid: 33175300 |
[26] |
|
[27] |
许玲玲. 牡蛎壳土壤调理剂对酸化土壤及两种作物品质影响的研究[D]. 厦门: 集美大学, 2020.
|
[28] |
文星. 几种土壤改良剂对酸性水稻土及红壤旱土的改良效果研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2014.
|
[29] |
郭京霞. 不同钙质纯化剂对不同水稻品种吸收富集镉铅的抑制效果[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2018.
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
廖敏, 黄昌勇. 黑麦草生长过程中有机酸对镉毒性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 13(1):109-112.
|
[32] |
窦韦强, 安毅, 秦莉, 等. 土壤pH对镉形态影响的研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(3):439-444.
|
[33] |
曹敏杰, 丁希月, 许玲玲, 等. 牡蛎壳资源利用研究进展[J]. 集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 26(5):390-397.
|
[34] |
曹英兰, 陈丽娜, 张金丽, 等. 牡蛎壳粉对酸性土壤的修复及其对镉的钝化作用研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(1):178-182.
|
[35] |
王忠强, 刘婷婷, 王升忠, 等. 泥炭在环境修复中的应用研究概况和展望[J]. 科技通报, 2007, 23(2):277-281.
|
[36] |
李超, 艾绍英, 唐明灯, 等. 矿物调理剂对稻田土壤镉形态和水稻镉吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(11):2143-2154.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.11.012 |
[37] |
|
[38] |
彭鸥, 刘玉玲, 铁柏清, 等. 调理剂及农艺措施对污染稻田中水稻吸收镉的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(3):574-584.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.03.010 |
[39] |
张蕴睿. 钝化剂对烟草中镉的消减效果研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
明佳佳, 向极钎, 康宇, 等. 不同钝化剂对恩施Cd污染土壤的钝化效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(1):93-99.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0108 |
[42] |
程通, 王小兵, 董君能, 等. 原位钝化对稻田镉污染土壤修复效果及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(2):28-33.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.02.006 |
[43] |
蔡鑫, 白珊, 陈绩, 等. 碱性肥料和生物质炭对土壤镉的钝化效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(2):448-452.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20210261 |
[44] |
杜彩艳, 木霖, 王红华, 等. 不同钝化剂及其组合对玉米(Zea mays)生长和吸收Pb、Cd、As、Zn影响研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(8):1515-1522.
|
[45] |
国生态环境部,国家市场监督管理总局. GB 15618-2018土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2018.
|
[1] | CHEN Guoan, SONG Xiaoqin, LIU Wenbin, LIU Dan, YE Zhengqian. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Cadmium Uptake and Accumulation in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 89-96. |
[2] | LI Cheng, WANG Shaoxi, QIAN Yanjie, YI Zhanping, YAN Xiaobing. Study on the Application Effect of Leaf Surface Conditioner in Rice Fields with Different Cadmium Pollution Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 101-106. |
[3] | XU Jin, TAN Jianbin, DENG Xiaoyu, LIANG Jinyang, SHI Peiqiong, ZHOU Hongkai. Effects of Different Concentrations of Cadmium on Growth of Salt-Tolerant Rice and Enzyme Activity of Common Cutworm Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 120-127. |
[4] | KUANG Zhiming, WANG Xiaohui, XIE Yuhua, LEI Menglong, WEN Minghui, GU Yajuan. The Impact of Comprehensive Cadmium Control Technology System on Cadmium Contaminated Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 78-83. |
[5] | LI Dongxue, LIU Xinyuan, SONG Zhengxiong, LI Haohao, ZHAO Shimin, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, WANG Huoyan, LU Dianjun, CHEN Xiaoqin, WANG Yujie. Potassium Conversion Characteristics of Mineral Potassium Fertilizer in Chinese Typical Tobacco-planting Soil and Preliminary Evaluation of Increasing Potassium Content in Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 84-90. |
[6] | ZHANG Fengchuan, WANG Pu, LU Yijun, XU Hong, ZHANG Wenjun, HUANG Chenxiang, LU Xingrong. Effects of Soil Amendments on Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus and Their Ecological Stoichiometry Ratios in Orchards [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 86-93. |
[7] | ZHAO Ouya, WANG Xueqing, LIU Lei, XIAO Guangmin, SUN Shiyou, HOU Limin, WANG Ce, WANG Ling, RU Shuhua. Difference Characteristics of Cadmium Uptake and Accumulation of 25 Spinach Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 94-101. |
[8] | XU Xiao, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Mingkui, HUANG Qiaoling, YIN Xianyuan. Remediation Effect and Safety Evaluation of Different Passivation Materials Applied in Cadmium and Arsenic Compound Contaminated Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 43-48. |
[9] | CHANG Haiwei, GUI Juan, FU Yuncong. Study on Effects of Soil Passivation Materials and Leaf Surface Control on Remediation of Cadmium Contaminated Farmland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(16): 112-117. |
[10] | CHEN Qiaomao, ZHANG Yusheng, HUANG Aoqi, CHEN Peng, AO Hejun. Research Advances on Prevention and Control of Cadmium Pollution and Nutritional Regulation in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(16): 118-123. |
[11] | LIU Lei, CHEN Chen, CHEN Jin, JIANG Moyun, JIA Zhen, YANG Xinglian, ZENG Yongjun, HUANG Shan. Effects of Liming and Straw Returning on Cadmium Content in Rice Grains in a Clean and Acidic Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(12): 53-58. |
[12] | WANG Li, JIANG Ya, LIU Guihua, CHAI Guanqun, FAN Chengwu. Study on Effect of Selenium Fertilizer Spraying on Absorption of Selenium and Cadmium in Chinese Cabbage at Different Growth Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(11): 44-48. |
[13] | REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157. |
[14] | YIN Liping, LIU Siyuan, CAI Chengmei, SHI Xiaoli, ZHU Xiaojuan, YUAN Guoming, WANG Jidong, ZHANG Hui, XU Cong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Jiabowen Soil Conditioner on Radish Yield and Quality and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 64-71. |
[15] | PAN Hongyang, ZHANG Kai, FAN Xiaoxu. Effects of Soil Factors on Atrazine Adsorption Kinetics and Microbial Remediation of Contaminated Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 97-104. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||