Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 8-15.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0381
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZUO Xueqian1,2(), TAN Jing1, DENG Wei2,3,4(
), XU Yuran2,3,4, LV Ying2,3,4, ZHANG Jinwen2,3,4, YU Qin2,3,4, DONG Wei2,3,4, GUAN Junjiao2,3,4, LI Xiaolin2,3,4(
)
Received:
2023-05-24
Revised:
2023-07-15
Online:
2024-01-17
Published:
2024-01-17
ZUO Xueqian, TAN Jing, DENG Wei, XU Yuran, LV Ying, ZHANG Jinwen, YU Qin, DONG Wei, GUAN Junjiao, LI Xiaolin. Hybrid Indica Rice Varieties in Yunnan Province: Experimental Analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 8-15.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0381
变异来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
试点内区组 | 14 | 13.88715 | 0.99194 | 2.39999 | 0.006 |
品种 | 8 | 57.36078 | 7.17010 | 17.34800 | 0.000 |
试点 | 6 | 631.28439 | 105.21407 | 254.56474 | 0.000 |
品种×试点 | 48 | 69.47267 | 1.44735 | 3.50185 | 0.000 |
误差 | 112 | 46.29068 | 0.41331 | ||
总变异 | 188 | 818.29568 |
变异来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
试点内区组 | 14 | 13.88715 | 0.99194 | 2.39999 | 0.006 |
品种 | 8 | 57.36078 | 7.17010 | 17.34800 | 0.000 |
试点 | 6 | 631.28439 | 105.21407 | 254.56474 | 0.000 |
品种×试点 | 48 | 69.47267 | 1.44735 | 3.50185 | 0.000 |
误差 | 112 | 46.29068 | 0.41331 | ||
总变异 | 188 | 818.29568 |
变异来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
试点内区组 | 14 | 5.40737 | 0.38624 | 0.91978 | 0.541 |
品种 | 7 | 32.31845 | 4.61692 | 10.99458 | 0.000 |
试点 | 6 | 1383.34040 | 230.55673 | 549.03993 | 0.000 |
品种×试点 | 42 | 286.79450 | 6.82844 | 16.26102 | 0.000 |
误差 | 98 | 41.15285 | 0.41993 | ||
总变异 | 167 | 1749.01358 |
变异来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
试点内区组 | 14 | 5.40737 | 0.38624 | 0.91978 | 0.541 |
品种 | 7 | 32.31845 | 4.61692 | 10.99458 | 0.000 |
试点 | 6 | 1383.34040 | 230.55673 | 549.03993 | 0.000 |
品种×试点 | 42 | 286.79450 | 6.82844 | 16.26102 | 0.000 |
误差 | 98 | 41.15285 | 0.41993 | ||
总变异 | 167 | 1749.01358 |
品种 | 品种均值 | 0.05显著性 | 0.01显著性 |
---|---|---|---|
云两优9801 | 14.91214 | a | A |
云两优42 | 14.64369 | ab | AB |
玉龙优和占 | 14.42338 | bc | ABC |
云两优9803 | 14.20493 | cd | BC |
云两优2198 | 14.19448 | cd | BC |
华中优9326 | 14.14013 | cd | BC |
云两优9802 | 13.92485 | d | CD |
凌禾优78 | 13.50574 | e | D |
云两优252 | 12.97454 | f | E |
品种 | 品种均值 | 0.05显著性 | 0.01显著性 |
---|---|---|---|
云两优9801 | 14.91214 | a | A |
云两优42 | 14.64369 | ab | AB |
玉龙优和占 | 14.42338 | bc | ABC |
云两优9803 | 14.20493 | cd | BC |
云两优2198 | 14.19448 | cd | BC |
华中优9326 | 14.14013 | cd | BC |
云两优9802 | 13.92485 | d | CD |
凌禾优78 | 13.50574 | e | D |
云两优252 | 12.97454 | f | E |
品种 | 品种均值 | 0.05显著性 | 0.01显著性 |
---|---|---|---|
云两优9801 | 14.37907 | a | A |
云两优42 | 13.97951 | b | AB |
云两优2198 | 13.93219 | b | AB |
玉龙优和占 | 13.69147 | b | B |
云两优9803 | 13.64177 | b | BC |
华中优9326 | 13.14628 | c | CD |
云两优9802 | 13.13577 | c | CD |
凌禾优78 | 13.09842 | c | D |
品种 | 品种均值 | 0.05显著性 | 0.01显著性 |
---|---|---|---|
云两优9801 | 14.37907 | a | A |
云两优42 | 13.97951 | b | AB |
云两优2198 | 13.93219 | b | AB |
玉龙优和占 | 13.69147 | b | B |
云两优9803 | 13.64177 | b | BC |
华中优9326 | 13.14628 | c | CD |
云两优9802 | 13.13577 | c | CD |
凌禾优78 | 13.09842 | c | D |
品种 | 2021年区域试验 | 2022年区域试验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | ||
云两优42 | 10982.70 | ab | 8.43 | 85.71 | 10556.85 | a | 8.06 | 85.71 | |
云两优252 | 9730.95 | d | -3.93 | 42.86 | - | - | - | - | |
云两优9801 | 11184.15 | a | 10.41 | 100.00 | 10666.65 | a | 9.18 | 100.00 | |
云两优9802 | 10443.6 | c | 3.10 | 71.43 | 9797.70 | a | 0.29 | 71.43 | |
云两优9803 | 10653.75 | abc | 5.18 | 71.43 | 10276.20 | a | 5.19 | 71.43 | |
云两优2198 | 10645.80 | abc | 5.10 | 85.71 | 10343.4 | a | 5.87 | 85.71 | |
华中优9326 | 10605.15 | bc | 4.70 | 85.71 | 9941.55 | a | 1.76 | 71.43 | |
玉龙优和占 | 10817.55 | ab | 6.79 | 100.00 | 10136.85 | a | 3.76 | 85.71 | |
凌禾优78(A组) | 10129.35 | cd | 8.43 | 85.71 | 9769.65 | a | - | - | |
凌禾优78(B组) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
品种 | 2021年区域试验 | 2022年区域试验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | ||
云两优42 | 10982.70 | ab | 8.43 | 85.71 | 10556.85 | a | 8.06 | 85.71 | |
云两优252 | 9730.95 | d | -3.93 | 42.86 | - | - | - | - | |
云两优9801 | 11184.15 | a | 10.41 | 100.00 | 10666.65 | a | 9.18 | 100.00 | |
云两优9802 | 10443.6 | c | 3.10 | 71.43 | 9797.70 | a | 0.29 | 71.43 | |
云两优9803 | 10653.75 | abc | 5.18 | 71.43 | 10276.20 | a | 5.19 | 71.43 | |
云两优2198 | 10645.80 | abc | 5.10 | 85.71 | 10343.4 | a | 5.87 | 85.71 | |
华中优9326 | 10605.15 | bc | 4.70 | 85.71 | 9941.55 | a | 1.76 | 71.43 | |
玉龙优和占 | 10817.55 | ab | 6.79 | 100.00 | 10136.85 | a | 3.76 | 85.71 | |
凌禾优78(A组) | 10129.35 | cd | 8.43 | 85.71 | 9769.65 | a | - | - | |
凌禾优78(B组) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
品种 | 两年平均区域试验 | 生产试验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | ||
云两优42 | 10769.85 | ab | 8.24 | 85.71 | 10589.40 | ab | 8.08 | 100.00 | |
云两优252 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
云两优9801 | 10925.406 | a | 9.80 | 100.00 | 10891.95 | a | 8.80 | 80.00 | |
云两优9802 | 10120.65 | c | 1.70 | 71.43 | 9830.85 | b | 0.34 | 60.00 | |
云两优9803 | 10465.05 | abc | 5.18 | 71.43 | 10327.80 | ab | 3.16 | 80.00 | |
云两优2198 | 10494.60 | abc | 5.49 | 85.71 | 10301.40 | ab | 5.14 | 80.00 | |
华中优9326 | 10273.35 | bc | 3.23 | 78.57 | 10415.70 | ab | 4.04 | 60.00 | |
玉龙优和占 | 10477.20 | abc | 5.28 | 92.86 | 10500.75 | ab | 7.18 | 80.00 | |
凌禾优78(A组) | 9949.50 | c | - | - | 9797.40 | b | - | - | |
凌禾优78(B组) | - | - | - | - | 1011.30 | b | - | - |
品种 | 两年平均区域试验 | 生产试验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.05 显著性 | 比CK±/% | 增产点率/% | ||
云两优42 | 10769.85 | ab | 8.24 | 85.71 | 10589.40 | ab | 8.08 | 100.00 | |
云两优252 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
云两优9801 | 10925.406 | a | 9.80 | 100.00 | 10891.95 | a | 8.80 | 80.00 | |
云两优9802 | 10120.65 | c | 1.70 | 71.43 | 9830.85 | b | 0.34 | 60.00 | |
云两优9803 | 10465.05 | abc | 5.18 | 71.43 | 10327.80 | ab | 3.16 | 80.00 | |
云两优2198 | 10494.60 | abc | 5.49 | 85.71 | 10301.40 | ab | 5.14 | 80.00 | |
华中优9326 | 10273.35 | bc | 3.23 | 78.57 | 10415.70 | ab | 4.04 | 60.00 | |
玉龙优和占 | 10477.20 | abc | 5.28 | 92.86 | 10500.75 | ab | 7.18 | 80.00 | |
凌禾优78(A组) | 9949.50 | c | - | - | 9797.40 | b | - | - | |
凌禾优78(B组) | - | - | - | - | 1011.30 | b | - | - |
品种 | 云两优42 | 云两优9802 | 云两优2198 | 玉龙优 和占 | 凌禾优 78(A组) | 云两优9801 | 云两优9803 | 华中优9326 | 凌禾优78(B组) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全生育期/d | 150.2a | 150.6a | 146.6ab | 150.6a | 143.8b | 146.8ab | 147.4ab | 148ab | 144b |
比CK生育期±/d | 6.4 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 0 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 4 | 0 |
品种 | 云两优42 | 云两优9802 | 云两优2198 | 玉龙优 和占 | 凌禾优 78(A组) | 云两优9801 | 云两优9803 | 华中优9326 | 凌禾优78(B组) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全生育期/d | 150.2a | 150.6a | 146.6ab | 150.6a | 143.8b | 146.8ab | 147.4ab | 148ab | 144b |
比CK生育期±/d | 6.4 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 0 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 4 | 0 |
品种 | 区试 年份 | 全生育期/d | 比CK生 育期±/d | 有效穗/ (万穗/hm2) | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 每穗总粒 数/粒 | 每穗实粒 数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云两优42 | 2021 | 157.7a | 1.8 | 247.5de | 114.1cd | 23.9cd | 209.6bc | 152.0ab | 77.8 | 27.3cde | ||||||
云两优252 | 2021 | 156.1ab | 0.4 | 307.5a | 117.5abc | 21.8e | 169.2de | 135.1bc | 79.4 | 25.9e | ||||||
云两优9801 | 2021 | 155.9ab | 0.2 | 262.5cde | 119.8a | 25.8a | 218.5ab | 172.3a | 78.9 | 28.7bcd | ||||||
云两优9802 | 2021 | 154.9abc | -0.8 | 289.5ab | 111.7d | 23.3d | 161.7e | 123.6c | 76.2 | 28.9bc | ||||||
云两优9803 | 2021 | 151.7c | -4 | 279.0abc | 104.8e | 23.1de | 196.8bcd | 153.9ab | 78.0 | 27.2de | ||||||
云两优2198 | 2021 | 152.4c | -3.3 | 291.0ab | 115.7bc | 24.3bcd | 160.5e | 120.8c | 74.9 | 29.8ab | ||||||
华中优9326 | 2021 | 154.1bc | -1.6 | 240.0e | 111.6d | 25.3abc | 246.8a | 172.7a | 70.9 | 27.1de | ||||||
玉龙优和占 | 2021 | 155.7ab | 0.0 | 276bcd | 117.7abc | 23.1de | 181.5cde | 151.4ab | 83.0 | 26.8e | ||||||
凌禾优78(CK) | 2021 | 155.7ab | 0.0 | 243.0e | 119.1ab | 25.4ab | 182.4cde | 143.7bc | 78.2 | 30.7a | ||||||
云两优42 | 2022 | 149.0ab | 4.6 | 243.0abcd | 109.5ab | 24.6bc | 212.7b | 165.1ab | 81.3 | 24.4e | ||||||
云两优9801 | 2022 | 150.6a | 6.2 | 219.0cd | 115.2a | 25.4ab | 202.5a | 160.2ab | 78.3 | 28.3bc | ||||||
云两优9802 | 2022 | 151.9a | 7.5 | 256.5ab | 104.0bc | 23.5d | 156.8d | 125.6c | 80.0 | 29.5b | ||||||
云两优9803 | 2022 | 145.7bc | 1.3 | 268.5a | 101.0c | 23.1d | 176.5cd | 148.1bc | 83.5 | 28.2c | ||||||
云两优2198 | 2022 | 146.3bc | 1.9 | 240.0abcd | 102.9bc | 23.6 cd | 180.6cd | 142.4bc | 78.7 | 30.8a | ||||||
华中优9326 | 2022 | 148.3ab | 3.9 | 231.0bcd | 105.1bc | 24.1cd | 246.8a | 177.7a | 73.1 | 26.8d | ||||||
玉龙优和占 | 2022 | 150.9a | 6.5 | 249.0abc | 113.4a | 23.5d | 183.71cd | 155.4ab | 84.1 | 27.1cd | ||||||
凌禾优78(CK) | 2022 | 144.4c | 0.0 | 213.0d | 109.5ab | 25.9a | 192.5bc | 166.0ab | 86.1 | 30.9a |
品种 | 区试 年份 | 全生育期/d | 比CK生 育期±/d | 有效穗/ (万穗/hm2) | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 每穗总粒 数/粒 | 每穗实粒 数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云两优42 | 2021 | 157.7a | 1.8 | 247.5de | 114.1cd | 23.9cd | 209.6bc | 152.0ab | 77.8 | 27.3cde | ||||||
云两优252 | 2021 | 156.1ab | 0.4 | 307.5a | 117.5abc | 21.8e | 169.2de | 135.1bc | 79.4 | 25.9e | ||||||
云两优9801 | 2021 | 155.9ab | 0.2 | 262.5cde | 119.8a | 25.8a | 218.5ab | 172.3a | 78.9 | 28.7bcd | ||||||
云两优9802 | 2021 | 154.9abc | -0.8 | 289.5ab | 111.7d | 23.3d | 161.7e | 123.6c | 76.2 | 28.9bc | ||||||
云两优9803 | 2021 | 151.7c | -4 | 279.0abc | 104.8e | 23.1de | 196.8bcd | 153.9ab | 78.0 | 27.2de | ||||||
云两优2198 | 2021 | 152.4c | -3.3 | 291.0ab | 115.7bc | 24.3bcd | 160.5e | 120.8c | 74.9 | 29.8ab | ||||||
华中优9326 | 2021 | 154.1bc | -1.6 | 240.0e | 111.6d | 25.3abc | 246.8a | 172.7a | 70.9 | 27.1de | ||||||
玉龙优和占 | 2021 | 155.7ab | 0.0 | 276bcd | 117.7abc | 23.1de | 181.5cde | 151.4ab | 83.0 | 26.8e | ||||||
凌禾优78(CK) | 2021 | 155.7ab | 0.0 | 243.0e | 119.1ab | 25.4ab | 182.4cde | 143.7bc | 78.2 | 30.7a | ||||||
云两优42 | 2022 | 149.0ab | 4.6 | 243.0abcd | 109.5ab | 24.6bc | 212.7b | 165.1ab | 81.3 | 24.4e | ||||||
云两优9801 | 2022 | 150.6a | 6.2 | 219.0cd | 115.2a | 25.4ab | 202.5a | 160.2ab | 78.3 | 28.3bc | ||||||
云两优9802 | 2022 | 151.9a | 7.5 | 256.5ab | 104.0bc | 23.5d | 156.8d | 125.6c | 80.0 | 29.5b | ||||||
云两优9803 | 2022 | 145.7bc | 1.3 | 268.5a | 101.0c | 23.1d | 176.5cd | 148.1bc | 83.5 | 28.2c | ||||||
云两优2198 | 2022 | 146.3bc | 1.9 | 240.0abcd | 102.9bc | 23.6 cd | 180.6cd | 142.4bc | 78.7 | 30.8a | ||||||
华中优9326 | 2022 | 148.3ab | 3.9 | 231.0bcd | 105.1bc | 24.1cd | 246.8a | 177.7a | 73.1 | 26.8d | ||||||
玉龙优和占 | 2022 | 150.9a | 6.5 | 249.0abc | 113.4a | 23.5d | 183.71cd | 155.4ab | 84.1 | 27.1cd | ||||||
凌禾优78(CK) | 2022 | 144.4c | 0.0 | 213.0d | 109.5ab | 25.9a | 192.5bc | 166.0ab | 86.1 | 30.9a |
品种 | 稻瘟病 | 稻曲病 | 白叶枯病 | 纹枯病 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
稻瘟损失率级 | 综合抗性指数 | 病级 | 反应 | 病级 | 反应 | 病级 | 反应 | ||||
云两优42 | 1.2 | 0.92 | 9 | HS | 3 | R | 5 | MR | |||
云两优252 | 1 | 1.28 | 7 | S | 3 | R | 5 | MR | |||
云两优9801 | 6.3 | 2.91 | 7 | S | 3 | R | 3 | R | |||
云两优9802 | 0.7 | 1.39 | 9 | HS | 1 | HR | 3 | R | |||
云两优9803 | 5.1 | 3.33 | 7 | S | 3 | R | 5 | MR | |||
云两优2198 | 0.9 | 1.36 | 9 | HS | 3 | R | 1 | HR | |||
华中优9326 | 1.9 | 0.98 | 7 | S | 1 | HR | 3 | R | |||
玉龙优和占 | 4.2 | 1.26 | 5 | MR | 3 | R | 7 | S |
品种 | 稻瘟病 | 稻曲病 | 白叶枯病 | 纹枯病 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
稻瘟损失率级 | 综合抗性指数 | 病级 | 反应 | 病级 | 反应 | 病级 | 反应 | ||||
云两优42 | 1.2 | 0.92 | 9 | HS | 3 | R | 5 | MR | |||
云两优252 | 1 | 1.28 | 7 | S | 3 | R | 5 | MR | |||
云两优9801 | 6.3 | 2.91 | 7 | S | 3 | R | 3 | R | |||
云两优9802 | 0.7 | 1.39 | 9 | HS | 1 | HR | 3 | R | |||
云两优9803 | 5.1 | 3.33 | 7 | S | 3 | R | 5 | MR | |||
云两优2198 | 0.9 | 1.36 | 9 | HS | 3 | R | 1 | HR | |||
华中优9326 | 1.9 | 0.98 | 7 | S | 1 | HR | 3 | R | |||
玉龙优和占 | 4.2 | 1.26 | 5 | MR | 3 | R | 7 | S |
品种 | 参试 年份 | 糙米率/% | 精米率/% | 整精 米率/% | 垩白 粒率/% | 垩白度/% | 透明 度/级 | 粒长/mm | 长宽比 | 碱消 值/级 | 胶稠 度/mm | 直连 淀粉/% | 部标 (等级) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云两优42 | 2021 | 80.8 | 73.0 | 70.1 | 19 | 2.3 | 1 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 5.5 | 78 | 15.9 | 优3 |
云两优252 | 2021 | 80.8 | 73.8 | 69.8 | 36 | 3.6 | 1 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 80 | 15.0 | 普通 |
云两优9801 | 2021 | 81.7 | 73.7 | 64.6 | 11 | 1.1 | 1 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 67 | 16.6 | 优2 |
云两优9802 | 2021 | 80.1 | 72.7 | 68.6 | 18 | 1.8 | 1 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 7.0 | 70 | 17.6 | 优2 |
云两优9803 | 2021 | 80.6 | 72.9 | 62.6 | 24 | 2.2 | 1 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 71 | 22.8 | 普通 |
云两优2198 | 2021 | 80.4 | 72.5 | 57.3 | 23 | 1.7 | 2 | 7.0 | 2.9 | 6.7 | 70 | 23.9 | 普通 |
华中优9326 | 2021 | 81.3 | 73.8 | 71.2 | 14 | 1.1 | 1 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 72 | 16.7 | 优2 |
玉龙优和占 | 2021 | 80.2 | 72.6 | 68.6 | 9 | 0.8 | 1 | 6.8 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 67 | 19.3 | 优2 |
凌禾优78(CK) | 2021 | 81.8 | 73.6 | 52.0 | 11 | 1.2 | 1 | 7.3 | 3.1 | 5.8 | 70 | 18.4 | 优3 |
云两优42 | 2022 | 81.1 | 72.3 | 68.5 | 4 | 0.3 | 1 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 6.6 | 72 | 14.5 | 优1 |
云两优9801 | 2022 | 82.2 | 73.6 | 69.6 | 4 | 0.5 | 1 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 76 | 16.7 | 优1 |
云两优9802 | 2022 | 80.5 | 73.1 | 70.7 | 11 | 1.2 | 1 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 7.0 | 70 | 17.4 | 优2 |
云两优9803 | 2022 | 81.2 | 73.6 | 71.8 | 10 | 1.2 | 2 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 72 | 21.4 | 优3 |
云两优2198 | 2022 | 81.2 | 73.1 | 68.0 | 12 | 1.6 | 2 | 7.0 | 2.9 | 6.8 | 76 | 23.3 | 普通 |
华中优9326 | 2022 | 82.1 | 75.2 | 74.5 | 8 | 0.9 | 1 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 6.7 | 78 | 16.2 | 优1 |
玉龙优和占 | 2022 | 80.6 | 72.1 | 69.4 | 6 | 0.9 | 1 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 78 | 18.7 | 优2 |
凌禾优78(CK) | 2022 | 81.9 | 74.1 | 69.5 | 6 | 1.3 | 1 | 7.3 | 3.1 | 5.3 | 78 | 16.9 | 优3 |
品种 | 参试 年份 | 糙米率/% | 精米率/% | 整精 米率/% | 垩白 粒率/% | 垩白度/% | 透明 度/级 | 粒长/mm | 长宽比 | 碱消 值/级 | 胶稠 度/mm | 直连 淀粉/% | 部标 (等级) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云两优42 | 2021 | 80.8 | 73.0 | 70.1 | 19 | 2.3 | 1 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 5.5 | 78 | 15.9 | 优3 |
云两优252 | 2021 | 80.8 | 73.8 | 69.8 | 36 | 3.6 | 1 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 80 | 15.0 | 普通 |
云两优9801 | 2021 | 81.7 | 73.7 | 64.6 | 11 | 1.1 | 1 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 67 | 16.6 | 优2 |
云两优9802 | 2021 | 80.1 | 72.7 | 68.6 | 18 | 1.8 | 1 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 7.0 | 70 | 17.6 | 优2 |
云两优9803 | 2021 | 80.6 | 72.9 | 62.6 | 24 | 2.2 | 1 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 71 | 22.8 | 普通 |
云两优2198 | 2021 | 80.4 | 72.5 | 57.3 | 23 | 1.7 | 2 | 7.0 | 2.9 | 6.7 | 70 | 23.9 | 普通 |
华中优9326 | 2021 | 81.3 | 73.8 | 71.2 | 14 | 1.1 | 1 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 72 | 16.7 | 优2 |
玉龙优和占 | 2021 | 80.2 | 72.6 | 68.6 | 9 | 0.8 | 1 | 6.8 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 67 | 19.3 | 优2 |
凌禾优78(CK) | 2021 | 81.8 | 73.6 | 52.0 | 11 | 1.2 | 1 | 7.3 | 3.1 | 5.8 | 70 | 18.4 | 优3 |
云两优42 | 2022 | 81.1 | 72.3 | 68.5 | 4 | 0.3 | 1 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 6.6 | 72 | 14.5 | 优1 |
云两优9801 | 2022 | 82.2 | 73.6 | 69.6 | 4 | 0.5 | 1 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 76 | 16.7 | 优1 |
云两优9802 | 2022 | 80.5 | 73.1 | 70.7 | 11 | 1.2 | 1 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 7.0 | 70 | 17.4 | 优2 |
云两优9803 | 2022 | 81.2 | 73.6 | 71.8 | 10 | 1.2 | 2 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 72 | 21.4 | 优3 |
云两优2198 | 2022 | 81.2 | 73.1 | 68.0 | 12 | 1.6 | 2 | 7.0 | 2.9 | 6.8 | 76 | 23.3 | 普通 |
华中优9326 | 2022 | 82.1 | 75.2 | 74.5 | 8 | 0.9 | 1 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 6.7 | 78 | 16.2 | 优1 |
玉龙优和占 | 2022 | 80.6 | 72.1 | 69.4 | 6 | 0.9 | 1 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 78 | 18.7 | 优2 |
凌禾优78(CK) | 2022 | 81.9 | 74.1 | 69.5 | 6 | 1.3 | 1 | 7.3 | 3.1 | 5.3 | 78 | 16.9 | 优3 |
[1] |
武舜臣, 赵策, 胡凌啸. 转变中的粮食安全观:理论期待与新粮食安全观的构建[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(3):17-28.
|
[2] |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01863 URL |
[3] |
胡贤巧, 张卫星, 邵雅芳, 等. 中国近20年稻米品质优质率状况分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4):84-87.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.04.017 |
[4] |
林海, 李红英, 鄂志国, 等. 2020年中国审定的水稻品种基本特性分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(6):6-11.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.06.002 |
[5] |
林海, 王志刚, 鄂志国, 等. 2018年中国审定的水稻品种基本特性分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(6):65-71.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2019.06.016 |
[6] |
张卫星, 马晨怡, 袁玉伟, 等. 中国水稻三大优势产区稻米品质现状及区域差异[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(5):12-18.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.05.003 |
[7] |
李慕菡, 刘雅, 宋春风. 国外大米产业的发展对中国的启示[J]. 天津农业科学, 2017, 23(12):36-40.
|
[8] |
周正平, 占小登, 沈希宏, 等. 中国水稻育种的现状与进展[J]. 粮食科技与经济, 2020, 45(6):10-11.
|
[9] |
曾波, 钟育海, 郭利磊, 等. 中国优质水稻品种发展现状与展望[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(8):53-56.
|
[10] |
涂敏, 王云月, 卢宝荣, 等. 云南省不同地理位置水稻品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(6):998-1003.
|
[11] |
曾亚文, 李自超, 杨忠义, 等. 云南稻种主要性状多样性分布中心及其规律研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2000(6):511-517.
|
[12] |
doi: 10.1023/A:1024436501289 URL |
[13] |
董树斌, 卢宝荣, 王云月, 等. 云南水稻传统品种内的遗传多样性及其维持机制初探[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2010, 25(1):1-9.
|
[14] |
赵才美, 程在全, 殷富有, 等. 云南省地方稻种资源研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(9):1-10.
|
[15] |
汤翠凤, 张恩来, 董超, 等. 云南新收集水稻地方品种的表型多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(6):1106-1116.
|
[16] |
pmid: 26498440 |
[17] |
李全衡, 郑智, 夏艳波. 云南稻品种管理工作十年[J]. 中国种业, 2023(5):17-19.
|
[18] |
李全衡, 陈洁, 郑智, 等. 云南省水稻品种科研育种及应用[J]. 中国种业, 2021(12):27-30.
|
[19] |
中共云南省委农办秘书综合处. 加快建设特色农业强省扎实推进乡村全面振兴——《中共云南省委、云南省人民政府关于做好2023年全面推进乡村振兴重点工作的实施意见》解读[J]. 云南农业, 2023(5):10-11.
|
[20] |
许靖波, 曾波, 杨璐. 坚持需求导向严把入市关口创新引领种业高质量发展——近5年国家水稻品种审定工作成效及思考[J]. 中国种业, 2023(3):5-10.
|
[21] |
李全衡. 云南省水稻品种管理工作初探[J]. 种子科技, 2017, 35(5):32,34.
|
[22] |
钟波. 广西农作物品种区域试验体系现状与发展对策思考[J]. 广西农学报, 2014, 29(4):69-71,74.
|
[23] |
陈晓波, 饶鸣钿, 雷伏贵, 等. 长江中下游中籼迟熟组水稻品种区域试验研究[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2021, 33(5):15-21.
|
[24] |
乔金玲, 张景龙. 水稻新品种区域试验工作的总结与探讨[J]. 北方水稻, 2018, 48(6):53-55.
|
[25] |
胡建, 董阳均, 陈赟娟, 等. 云南发展高产、多抗、强再生力杂交籼稻探讨[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2014(9):23-25.
|
[26] |
李全衡, 陈洁, 郑智, 等. 学习种业发展史开创云南稻种业新局面[J]. 种子科技, 2021, 39(18):129-132.
|
[27] |
任菊章, 陶云, 邢冬, 等. 2021/2022年云南冬季异常气候特征及成因分析[J]. 灾害学, 2023, 38(1):72-79,87.
|
[28] |
朱全斌, 殷利, 李华, 等. 在品种对比试验中应注重的因素[J]. 种子世界, 1998(10):13.
|
[1] | DUAN Guohui, TIAN Wenzhong, GAO Haitao, YANG Hongqiang, ZHANG Shaolan, DONG Zhongdong, WEN Hongxia, LV Shuzuo, GU Jingjing. Effect of Different Irrigation Patterns on Stem Structure, Yield Composition and Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat in Huanghuai Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 1-8. |
[2] | CHEN Shaojie, HE Bingqing, LUO Baojie, JIANG Qi. Effect of Slow Release Fertilizers on Yield and Population Structure of Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 34-38. |
[3] | YUAN Wenxia, BI Yingdong, FAN Chao, LI Wei, LIU Miao, LIU Jianxin, YANG Guang, DI Shufeng, LIANG Wenwei. Impact of Two New Fertilizers on Effect of Soybean Fertilizer & Planting Density and Soil Enzyme Activity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 53-61. |
[4] | LIN Haiqing, LI Jing, LI Jiawei, WANG Jiahui, JIAO Jiabin, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, ZHANG Baige, SONG Zhao. Effect of Magnesium Fertilizer Dosage on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Four Leafy Vegetables [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 74-82. |
[5] | LIU Tianpeng, YANG Kai, CHEN Lin, LONG Wenjing, DENG Hao, SUN Yuantao, XIANG Jianyu, NI Xianlin. Effect of Dense Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Dwarf and Compact Hybrid Waxy Sorghum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 1-5. |
[6] | LIANG Haibo, LI Shengdong, LIU Fenghua, CAO Yongchang, WANG Xiangling, XU Yan. Characteristics of Maize Yield and Fertilizer Efficiency in Yellow River Delta Based on Meta Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 103-110. |
[7] | TAN Jianxin, TONG Jian, YUN Minzheng, JIANG Zhibing, LIANG Sha. Effects of Excessive Nitrogen Application on the Growth and Development of Highland Barley in Tibet Valley Agricultural Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 6-13. |
[8] | GE Wanqing, FENG Di, ZHANG Jinlei, SUN Xiao’an, WANG Zhihe, ZHU Haiyan. Effects of Planting Environment and Density on Growth, Yield and Quality of Fruit Radish [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 67-73. |
[9] | DAI Xianglai, ZHAO Jixian, HU Quan, ZHOU Weihua. Effect on the Number of Adult Plants and Yield of Brassica napus: Sowing Rate Under Direct Seeding [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 54-61. |
[10] | LIAO Yilong, LIU Wuge, WANG Feng, LIU Dilin, KONG Le, LI Jinhua, HUO Xing, FU Chongyun, ZHU Manshan, ZENG Xueqin. Dynamics of Leaf SPAD Values and Its General Combining Ability and Genetic Effects of Late-season Hybrid Rice in South China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 1-7. |
[11] | XU Jin, TAN Jianbin, DENG Xiaoyu, LIANG Jinyang, SHI Peiqiong, ZHOU Hongkai. Effects of Different Concentrations of Cadmium on Growth of Salt-Tolerant Rice and Enzyme Activity of Common Cutworm Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 120-127. |
[12] | CHI Meili, LU Kaiwen, JIANG Wenping, PAN Lingjie, CHENG Shun, ZHENG Jianbo, SUN Jian, LI Fei. Tolerance of Red Claw Crayfish Juvenile to Four Kinds of Rice Pesticides [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 152-157. |
[13] | ZHANG Xijuan, WANG Wenlong, MENG Ying, TANG Ao, DONG Wenjun, LIU Youhong, XU Yingzhe, WAN Lizhi, JIANG Shukun, YANG Xianli, LIU Kai, JIANG Hui, REN Yang, LAI Yongcai. Effects of Planting Methods on Lodging Resistance of Rice in Cold Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 16-25. |
[14] | GUO Xinsong, WEI Juhua, SHA Chunyan, GAO Han, SONG Zhi, FAN Zhongqing, YIN Jing, DING Fangjun. Effect of Optimizing Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Potato and Soil Nutrient Supply [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 84-90. |
[15] | KAN Jianluan, SHI Lv, HAN Xiao, ZHOU Zhihong, SU Jianping, LIU Jian, XUE Yaguang. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction and Side Deep Application of Controlled-release Blend Fertilizer on Grain Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization of Japonica Rice ‘Nanjing 5055’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 91-96. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||