Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (16): 75-81.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0542
Previous Articles Next Articles
XIE Junhao1(), LING He1, KUANG Xiebin1, ZHANG Aoxiang1, SUN Rui1, GAO Yuxin1, TAO Ronghao2, MA Youhua1, LI Jiangxia1(
)
Received:
2024-08-28
Revised:
2024-12-15
Online:
2025-06-05
Published:
2025-06-05
XIE Junhao, LING He, KUANG Xiebin, ZHANG Aoxiang, SUN Rui, GAO Yuxin, TAO Ronghao, MA Youhua, LI Jiangxia. Differences in Cadmium Absorption and Accumulation Among Different Rice Varieties in Yangtze River Region of Anhui[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(16): 75-81.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0542
编号 | 品种 | 类型 |
---|---|---|
PZ1 | 荃广优银泰香占 | 籼型三系杂交水稻 |
PZ2 | 隆两优899 | 中籼两系杂交稻 |
PZ3 | 荃优1606 | 籼型三系杂交水稻 |
PZ4 | 特糯2072 | 中籼迟熟型品种 |
PZ5 | 两优5078 | 籼型两系杂交水稻 |
PZ6 | 徽两优898 | 籼型两系杂交水稻 |
PZ7 | 糯两优561 | 籼型两系杂交糯稻 |
PZ8 | 丰两优香1号 | 籼型两系杂交水稻 |
PZ9 | 镇糯29号 | 早熟晚粳糯稻品种 |
PZ10 | 天粳2号 | 常规晚粳品种 |
编号 | 品种 | 类型 |
---|---|---|
PZ1 | 荃广优银泰香占 | 籼型三系杂交水稻 |
PZ2 | 隆两优899 | 中籼两系杂交稻 |
PZ3 | 荃优1606 | 籼型三系杂交水稻 |
PZ4 | 特糯2072 | 中籼迟熟型品种 |
PZ5 | 两优5078 | 籼型两系杂交水稻 |
PZ6 | 徽两优898 | 籼型两系杂交水稻 |
PZ7 | 糯两优561 | 籼型两系杂交糯稻 |
PZ8 | 丰两优香1号 | 籼型两系杂交水稻 |
PZ9 | 镇糯29号 | 早熟晚粳糯稻品种 |
PZ10 | 天粳2号 | 常规晚粳品种 |
品种 | 千粒质量/g | 结实率/% | 有效分蘖数 | 穗粒数 | 产量/(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZ1 | 21.09±1.19d | 60.99±7.17b | 11.48±0.49c | 214.4±11.9ab | 7.60±0.37d |
PZ2 | 24.41±2.13bc | 76.90±11.29ab | 10.93±0.55cd | 175.4±14.0cd | 8.44±0.68cd |
PZ3 | 24.13±1.23c | 75.65±11.48ab | 9.76±0.61e | 193.9±11.7bc | 8.27±0.58d |
PZ4 | 26.88±1.56ab | 82.01±4.51ab | 8.59±0.29f | 204.4±10.3bc | 9.40±0.51b |
PZ5 | 24.23±1.25c | 79.64±6.38ab | 13.81±0.44a | 170.8±14.0cd | 10.77±0.33a |
PZ6 | 24.57±2.10bc | 80.52±10.81ab | 12.59±0.31b | 158.1±15.8d | 9.19±0.72bc |
PZ7 | 27.12±1.15a | 74.10±3.41ab | 8.58±0.30f | 187.2±15.7bc | 7.72±0.51d |
PZ8 | 26.90±1.26ab | 76.23±10.51ab | 8.88±0.53f | 234.3±14.4a | 9.83±0.43b |
PZ9 | 25.96±1.13bc | 89.82±4.64a | 11.49±0.19c | 121.2±9.8e | 7.75±0.55d |
PZ10 | 27.44±1.01a | 89.61±4.52a | 10.75±0.57d | 127.4±11.5e | 7.69±0.55d |
品种 | 千粒质量/g | 结实率/% | 有效分蘖数 | 穗粒数 | 产量/(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZ1 | 21.09±1.19d | 60.99±7.17b | 11.48±0.49c | 214.4±11.9ab | 7.60±0.37d |
PZ2 | 24.41±2.13bc | 76.90±11.29ab | 10.93±0.55cd | 175.4±14.0cd | 8.44±0.68cd |
PZ3 | 24.13±1.23c | 75.65±11.48ab | 9.76±0.61e | 193.9±11.7bc | 8.27±0.58d |
PZ4 | 26.88±1.56ab | 82.01±4.51ab | 8.59±0.29f | 204.4±10.3bc | 9.40±0.51b |
PZ5 | 24.23±1.25c | 79.64±6.38ab | 13.81±0.44a | 170.8±14.0cd | 10.77±0.33a |
PZ6 | 24.57±2.10bc | 80.52±10.81ab | 12.59±0.31b | 158.1±15.8d | 9.19±0.72bc |
PZ7 | 27.12±1.15a | 74.10±3.41ab | 8.58±0.30f | 187.2±15.7bc | 7.72±0.51d |
PZ8 | 26.90±1.26ab | 76.23±10.51ab | 8.88±0.53f | 234.3±14.4a | 9.83±0.43b |
PZ9 | 25.96±1.13bc | 89.82±4.64a | 11.49±0.19c | 121.2±9.8e | 7.75±0.55d |
PZ10 | 27.44±1.01a | 89.61±4.52a | 10.75±0.57d | 127.4±11.5e | 7.69±0.55d |
品种 | 投入/(元/hm2) | 水稻售价/(元/kg) | 总投入/(元/hm2) | 总产出/(元/hm2) | 投入产出比 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肥料 | 其他 | |||||
PZ1 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 6385±298e | 0.83±0.04e |
PZ2 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 7094±572de | 0.92±0.08de |
PZ3 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 6951±490de | 0.90±0.06de |
PZ4 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.5 | 7715 | 8465±462bc | 1.10±0.06bc |
PZ5 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 9047±279b | 1.17±0.04b |
PZ6 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 7721±605cd | 1.00±0.08cd |
PZ7 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 6486±463e | 0.84±0.06e |
PZ8 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 8257±363bc | 1.07±0.05bc |
PZ9 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.8 | 7715 | 13948±996a | 1.81±0.13a |
PZ10 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.5 | 7715 | 6921±500de | 0.90±0.07de |
品种 | 投入/(元/hm2) | 水稻售价/(元/kg) | 总投入/(元/hm2) | 总产出/(元/hm2) | 投入产出比 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肥料 | 其他 | |||||
PZ1 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 6385±298e | 0.83±0.04e |
PZ2 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 7094±572de | 0.92±0.08de |
PZ3 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 6951±490de | 0.90±0.06de |
PZ4 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.5 | 7715 | 8465±462bc | 1.10±0.06bc |
PZ5 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 9047±279b | 1.17±0.04b |
PZ6 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 7721±605cd | 1.00±0.08cd |
PZ7 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 6486±463e | 0.84±0.06e |
PZ8 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.4 | 7715 | 8257±363bc | 1.07±0.05bc |
PZ9 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.8 | 7715 | 13948±996a | 1.81±0.13a |
PZ10 | 1215 | 6500 | 1.5 | 7715 | 6921±500de | 0.90±0.07de |
[1] |
|
[2] |
鲍广灵, 杨庆波, 陶荣浩, 等. 铜陵市义安区蔬菜产地镉污染调查与评价[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2022, 34(3):40-44.
|
[3] |
陶荣浩, 高羽欣, 谢君豪, 等. 有机酸强化饲用玉米修复镉铅污染农田效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(4):823-834.
|
[4] |
许肖博, 安鹏虎, 郭天骄, 等. 水稻镉胁迫响应机制及防控措施研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5):415-426.
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.201209 |
[5] |
张宁, 陶荣浩, 张慧敏, 等. 不同玉米品种对镉积累和转运差异研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(6):1208-1216.
|
[6] |
刘湘军, 刘汇川, 刘嫦娥, 等. 应急性镉砷低积累水稻品种筛选[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2021, 8(3):46-53.
|
[7] |
薛涛, 廖晓勇, 王凌青, 等. 镉污染农田不同水稻品种镉积累差异研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(8):1818-1826.
|
[8] |
张玉烛, 方宝华, 滕振宁, 等. 应急性镉低积累水稻品种筛选与验证(英文)[J]. 农业科学与技术, 2019, 20(3):1-10.
|
[9] |
高鋆凤, 陈丽明, 杨世奇, 等. 镉低积累高产水稻品种筛选试验初报[J]. 杂交水稻, 2022, 37(6):109-114.
|
[10] |
江川, 朱业宝, 陈立喆, 等. 不同基因型水稻糙米对镉、铅的吸收特性[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(5):509-515.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
胡婧怡, 陶荣浩, 周晓天, 等. 硅和硒肥叶面调控对水稻镉铅吸收积累的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(6):1308-1318.
|
[13] |
时鹏涛, 罗义灿, 秦玉燕, 等. 镉胁迫对湘两优900及其再生稻稻米镉和矿质元素积累的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(12):127-133.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
王宇豪, 杨力, 康愉晨, 等. 镉污染大田条件下不同品种水稻镉积累的特征及影响因[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(11):5545-5553.
|
[20] |
陈德, 叶雪珠, 张棋, 等. 不同水稻品种对Cd、Zn的积累特性[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(10):2113-2118.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20201048 |
[21] |
宋瑞瑚, 胡兴钢, 李晓梅, 等. 重金属污染农田水稻低累积品种筛选[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2024, 36(2):40-44.
|
[22] |
潘荣庆. Cd低累积水稻品种筛选及降Cd组合技术研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2023.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
吴照祥, 孙小艳, 刘腾云, 等. 中、轻度污染农田杂交水稻对Cd的吸收和累积分布[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2019, 41(3):423-430.
|
[25] |
刘智超, 常龙学, 艾鑫, 等. 水稻穗粒数基因Gn1a的等位基因挖掘与育种应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2):220-230.
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.240105 |
[26] |
胡聪聪, 李红宇, 孙显龙, 等. 秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对寒地水稻光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025(1):147-154.
|
[27] |
刘洋, 张玉烛, 方宝华, 等. 栽培模式对水稻镉积累差异及其与光合生理关系的研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2014, 31(5):450-455.
|
[1] | WANG Xiuling, WANG Junzhen, WANG Anhu, LEI Wenjing. Evaluation of High-Quality Tartary Buckwheat Cultivars Suitable for Processing Sprout [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 80-87. |
[2] | LIU Yan, HAN Wei. Field Control Effect of Different Chemical Treatments on Potato Late Blight [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 117-122. |
[3] | YANG Hang, LI Yixuan, LI Qiang, LIU Xiaoming, YANG Tao, LUO Zhumei, LIU Jiangtao. Growth Characteristics of Switchgrass in Mu Us Sandy Land of Northern Shaanxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(34): 42-49. |
[4] | ZHANG Lihui, FENG Dan, BAI Bianxia, JIN Tingting, REN Jiahong. Screening and Identification of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria of Tussilago farfara and Its Inoculation Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(34): 33-41. |
[5] | XU Xinyue, DAI Wenlong, FU Haiyan, LIU Chunguang, SONG Xinyu, YANG Fengshan. Screening and Composting Application of Nitrogen-efficient Transformation Bacteria [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(32): 99-106. |
[6] | LU Jian, DONG Junjie, LIU Yu, LIAO Weiliang, SHU Zaifa, TONG Yan, CHEN Hongbing, ZHANG Fengdi. Analysis of Sensory Quality and Biochemical Components of Jingshan Black Tea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(31): 139-145. |
[7] | LI Qinghua, GU Zhiwei, LIN Haifeng, YAN Dunwei, ZHENG Long, CHEN Zilin, KE Qingming. Comprehensive Evaluation of Approved Fresh Soybean Cultivars Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(30): 17-25. |
[8] | GAO Jingjie, JIA Liguo, FAN Mingshou, LIU Guangjing, LIU Kun. The Genotypes Identification and Physiological Mechanisms of Potassium Efficiency in Potato: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(25): 6-10. |
[9] | LI Meixia, WANG Xiaofei, CHEN Yali, QIAN Xin, ZHOU Changyong, FU Yousheng, CAO Kaige, LIU Weizhong. Leaf Neoplasia Pathogen on Euryale ferox: Biological Characteristics and Fungicide Screening [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(23): 135-142. |
[10] | DONG Huixin, ZHAO Longmei, FENG Ming, LI Wang, LI Yuanxiao, CAO Pinghua, HE Wanling. Bacillus with Probiotic Function: Screening, Identification and Characterization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 146-155. |
[11] | GAO Bingying, WANG Ping, WANG Yanchun, DING Xi, ZHANG Jingwei, LIU Shuying. Investigation of Rhizosphere Fungi in Pinus tabuliformis Forests in Beijing ---- Taking Songshan National Nature Reserve as An Example [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 8-15. |
[12] | DONG Wenzhi, XU Feng, JIANG Yalian, YANG Xiumei, TANG Dongsheng, ZHANG Yiping. Laboratory Toxicity Test of 10 Fungicides Against Pathogens of Stem Rot of Iris germanica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 142-148. |
[13] | ZHU Manshan, FU Chongyun, LIU Wuge, LIAO Yilong, MA Xiaozhi, WANG Feng. Seedling Establishment Rate of Double-cropping and Direct-seeded Rice under Submergence in South China: Germplasm Screening and Comparative Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 1-8. |
[14] | YE Wenwei, MI Luo, LI Feixia, LIU Ranjin, DENG Chaoyang, LI Chaosu, LI Ming, ZHUANG Juan, ZHAO Wei, LIAO Yingxiu, WANG Zhihua, JING Shuzhong, CHENG Bin. Response of Brassica napus Varieties at Seedling Stage to Different Waterlogging Environments [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(16): 21-25. |
[15] | ZHAO Xinyu, SU Junyu, YANG Wei, YANG Jianning, TONG Kairong, YANG Zhiqing. Amomun tsao-ko Germplasm Resources in Different Origins: Cold Resistance Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 73-79. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||