
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 204-209.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0414
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yiming1(
), ZOU Zongqing2, XU Zhiqiang3, WANG Qiye1, CHEN Xiangdeng2, HAO Xianwei3, WU Xiaoping2, MENG Lin1(
)
Received:2025-05-28
Revised:2026-01-15
Online:2026-02-27
Published:2026-02-27
LIU Yiming, ZOU Zongqing, XU Zhiqiang, WANG Qiye, CHEN Xiangdeng, HAO Xianwei, WU Xiaoping, MENG Lin. Study on Optimal Aging Period of Tobacco Lamina ‘CB-1’ Under Northern Climatic Conditions[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 204-209.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0414
| 处理编号 | 烟叶等级 | 醇化周期 |
|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 中部叶 | 0个月 |
| C3F-6 | 中部叶 | 6个月 |
| C3F-12 | 中部叶 | 12个月 |
| C3F-18 | 中部叶 | 18个月 |
| C3F-24 | 中部叶 | 24个月 |
| B2F-0 | 上部叶 | 0个月 |
| B2F-6 | 上部叶 | 6个月 |
| B2F-12 | 上部叶 | 12个月 |
| B2F-18 | 上部叶 | 18个月 |
| B2F-24 | 上部叶 | 24个月 |
| 处理编号 | 烟叶等级 | 醇化周期 |
|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 中部叶 | 0个月 |
| C3F-6 | 中部叶 | 6个月 |
| C3F-12 | 中部叶 | 12个月 |
| C3F-18 | 中部叶 | 18个月 |
| C3F-24 | 中部叶 | 24个月 |
| B2F-0 | 上部叶 | 0个月 |
| B2F-6 | 上部叶 | 6个月 |
| B2F-12 | 上部叶 | 12个月 |
| B2F-18 | 上部叶 | 18个月 |
| B2F-24 | 上部叶 | 24个月 |
| 处理编号 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有 | 强- |
| C3F-6 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有 | 强 |
| C3F-12 | 深橘 | 成熟 | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有 | 强+ |
| C3F-18 | 深橘+ | 成熟+ | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有- | 强+ |
| C3F-24 | 棕黄 | 成熟+ | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有- | 浓 |
| 处理编号 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有 | 强- |
| C3F-6 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有 | 强 |
| C3F-12 | 深橘 | 成熟 | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有 | 强+ |
| C3F-18 | 深橘+ | 成熟+ | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有- | 强+ |
| C3F-24 | 棕黄 | 成熟+ | 尚疏松 | 中等- | 有- | 浓 |
| 处理编号 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2F-0 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 稍厚- | 有 | 中+ |
| B2F-6 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 稍厚- | 有 | 中+ |
| B2F-12 | 深橘 | 成熟+ | 疏松+ | 稍厚- | 有 | 中+ |
| B2F-18 | 棕黄 | 成熟+ | 疏松+ | 稍厚- | 有- | 强 |
| B2F-24 | 深棕 | 成熟+ | 疏松+ | 稍厚- | 有- | 强 |
| 处理编号 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2F-0 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 稍厚- | 有 | 中+ |
| B2F-6 | 橘黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 稍厚- | 有 | 中+ |
| B2F-12 | 深橘 | 成熟+ | 疏松+ | 稍厚- | 有 | 中+ |
| B2F-18 | 棕黄 | 成熟+ | 疏松+ | 稍厚- | 有- | 强 |
| B2F-24 | 深棕 | 成熟+ | 疏松+ | 稍厚- | 有- | 强 |
| 处理编号 | 总烟碱/% | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 糖碱比 | 两糖比 | 氮碱比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 1.83a | 35.72b | 28.38a | 1.76a | 0.59a | 2.55a | 19.52c | 0.79a | 0.96a |
| C3F-6 | 1.72ab | 36.13a | 28.71a | 1.58a | 0.53a | 2.61a | 21.01bc | 0.79a | 0.92a |
| C3F-12 | 1.61bc | 36.46a | 29.19a | 1.50a | 0.56a | 2.57a | 22.65ab | 0.80a | 0.93a |
| C3F-18 | 1.55cd | 35.61b | 28.43a | 1.34ab | 0.57a | 2.52a | 22.97a | 0.80a | 0.86a |
| C3F-24 | 1.47d | 33.97c | 26.48b | 1.26c | 0.55a | 2.54a | 23.11a | 0.78a | 0.86a |
| 处理编号 | 总烟碱/% | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 糖碱比 | 两糖比 | 氮碱比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 1.83a | 35.72b | 28.38a | 1.76a | 0.59a | 2.55a | 19.52c | 0.79a | 0.96a |
| C3F-6 | 1.72ab | 36.13a | 28.71a | 1.58a | 0.53a | 2.61a | 21.01bc | 0.79a | 0.92a |
| C3F-12 | 1.61bc | 36.46a | 29.19a | 1.50a | 0.56a | 2.57a | 22.65ab | 0.80a | 0.93a |
| C3F-18 | 1.55cd | 35.61b | 28.43a | 1.34ab | 0.57a | 2.52a | 22.97a | 0.80a | 0.86a |
| C3F-24 | 1.47d | 33.97c | 26.48b | 1.26c | 0.55a | 2.54a | 23.11a | 0.78a | 0.86a |
| 处理编号 | 总烟碱/% | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 糖碱比 | 两糖比 | 氮碱比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2F-0 | 2.65a | 28.91a | 25.80 a | 2.36a | 0.46a | 2.43a | 10.91c | 0.89a | 0.89a |
| B2F-6 | 2.58a | 29.02a | 24.97a | 2.19ab | 0.47a | 2.31a | 11.25b | 0.86ab | 0.85a |
| B2F-12 | 2.34b | 28.36b | 23.46b | 2.01ab | 0.44a | 2.29a | 12.12a | 0.83b | 0.86a |
| B2F-18 | 2.26bc | 26.67c | 21.18c | 1.97ab | 0.43a | 2.38a | 11.80ab | 0.79c | 0.87a |
| B2F-24 | 2.19c | 25.32d | 20.82c | 1.90b | 0.41a | 2.32a | 11.56ab | 0.82b | 0.87a |
| 处理编号 | 总烟碱/% | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 糖碱比 | 两糖比 | 氮碱比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2F-0 | 2.65a | 28.91a | 25.80 a | 2.36a | 0.46a | 2.43a | 10.91c | 0.89a | 0.89a |
| B2F-6 | 2.58a | 29.02a | 24.97a | 2.19ab | 0.47a | 2.31a | 11.25b | 0.86ab | 0.85a |
| B2F-12 | 2.34b | 28.36b | 23.46b | 2.01ab | 0.44a | 2.29a | 12.12a | 0.83b | 0.86a |
| B2F-18 | 2.26bc | 26.67c | 21.18c | 1.97ab | 0.43a | 2.38a | 11.80ab | 0.79c | 0.87a |
| B2F-24 | 2.19c | 25.32d | 20.82c | 1.90b | 0.41a | 2.32a | 11.56ab | 0.82b | 0.87a |
| 处理编号 | 风格典型度 | 浓度 | 劲头 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 透发性 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 甜度 | 燃烧性 | 灰分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| C3F-6 | 4.5 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| C3F-12 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| C3F-18 | 5.0 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| C3F-24 | 4.5 | 6.1 | 5.4 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.3 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| 处理编号 | 风格典型度 | 浓度 | 劲头 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 透发性 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 甜度 | 燃烧性 | 灰分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3F-0 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| C3F-6 | 4.5 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| C3F-12 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| C3F-18 | 5.0 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| C3F-24 | 4.5 | 6.1 | 5.4 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.3 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| 处理编号 | 风格典型度 | 浓度 | 劲头 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 透发性 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 甜度 | 燃烧性 | 灰分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2F-0 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-6 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-12 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-18 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.9 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-24 | 4.0 | 6.9 | 6.0 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| 处理编号 | 风格典型度 | 浓度 | 劲头 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 透发性 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 甜度 | 燃烧性 | 灰分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2F-0 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-6 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-12 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-18 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.9 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B2F-24 | 4.0 | 6.9 | 6.0 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| [1] |
程昌新, 王超, 杨应明, 等. 储藏醇化措施对烤烟烟包内温湿度及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2015, 48(2):16-20.
|
| [2] |
管恩森, 孔芳芳, 王大海, 等. 烤烟自然醇化和人工醇化过程中感官质量的变化[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(2):54-58.
|
| [3] |
李炜, 马世金, 矫海楠, 等. 气调储存对醇化环境及库存白肋烟品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(3):71-77.
|
| [4] |
范坚强, 宋纪真, 陈万年, 等. 醇化过程中烤烟片烟化学成分的变化[J]. 烟草科技, 2003(8):19-22.
|
| [5] |
张梦玥. 不同类型烟叶长期贮藏过程中TSNAs及主要酮类香气成分的变化[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2019.
|
| [6] |
赵铭钦, 汪耀富, 杜士彬, 等. 陈化期间烟叶香气成份消长规律的研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1997(3):73-77.
|
| [7] |
浦绍占. 不同仓储条件对醇化烟叶品质的影响[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2017.
|
| [8] |
白维晓, 吴光丽, 王毅, 等. 云南不同仓储地复烤烟叶表面醇化期间可培养真菌的动态变化[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(6):23-29.
|
| [9] |
许春平, 黄家乐, 刘远上, 等. 贮存方式对烟叶常规化学成分及香味物质影响研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 33(1):41-49.
|
| [10] |
张仁琳. 烤烟良种翠碧一号[J]. 福建农业科技, 1985(3):21-22.
|
| [11] |
周美兰. 一个特色品种成就一个特色烟区[N]. 中华合作时报,2008-10-22(Y01).
|
| [12] |
王雪仁, 黄一兰, 姜占省, 等. 不同移栽深度对烤烟翠碧一号生长及抗逆性的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(12):3504-3506.
|
| [13] |
王雪仁, 黄一兰, 林建麒, 等. 不同移栽期对特色烤烟品种翠碧一号生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(36):69-72.
|
| [14] |
廖晓萍, 徐辰生, 肖鹏. 烟草CB-1品种适宜种植密度试验初报[J]. 江西农业学报, 2009, 21(8):49-50.
|
| [15] |
范思峰, 王涛, 王峰吉. 不同施氮量对烤烟CB-1产量和质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2009, 21(9):97-99.
|
| [16] |
张建忠, 叶想青, 李文卿, 等. 施氮量对翠碧1号生长发育及烟叶质量风格的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(5):63-67.
|
| [17] |
林彩萍, 张秀衢. 烤烟翠碧一号采收与烘烤对烟叶质量的影响[J]. 福建农业科技, 2015(5):73-77.
|
| [18] |
王传义, 徐秀红, 孙福山, 等. 特色烤烟品种翠碧1号密集烘烤工艺[P]. 中国专利:CN102106598B, 2013-02-27.
|
| [19] |
徐波, 姜焕元, 范明登, 等. 基于“翠碧1号”品种烟叶典型力学特性的打叶复烤加工技术及应用[J]. 烟草科技, 2020, 53(7):80-86.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
陈万年, 宋纪真, 范坚强, 等. 福建和云南烤烟烟片的最佳醇化期及适宜贮存时间[J]. 烟草科技, 2003(7):9-12.
|
| [22] |
闫铁军. 不同产区烤烟配方模块在醇化过程中质量的变化趋势及醇化周期研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2009.
|
| [23] |
王发勇, 王玉真, 刘泽, 等. 云南清香型烟叶在醇化过程中的化学成分变化及差异分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(8).
|
| [24] |
钟洪祥, 庄志雄, 郭松斌, 等. 翠碧1号复烤烟叶醇化中常规化学成分与感官质量的变化[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(34):70-72.
|
| [25] |
祝明亮. 醇化烟叶酵母菌分离鉴定及其生物学特性研究[J]. 工业微生物, 2006(2):22-25.
|
| [26] |
谢和, 韩忠礼, 赵维娜. 微生物发酵对烤烟内在品质的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 1999(4):27-30.
|
| [27] |
陈辰. 一株新的高效尼古丁降解菌的分离鉴定、降解条件优化及代谢机制研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2019.
|
| [28] |
张碰元, 黄家乐, 刘远上, 等. 醇化方式对津巴布韦烟叶微生物和香味成分的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2023, 56(3):6-16.
|
| [29] |
韩丽媛. 醇化库温度变化规律与烟叶醇化品质关联性研究[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2023, 3(4):41-44.
|
| [30] |
刘远上, 梁永伟, 许春平, 等. 不同贮存库对巴西片烟醇化质量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(10):158-165.
|
| [31] |
王光耀, 刘曙光, 李少鹏, 等. 醇化过程中不同产地片烟游离氨基酸差异及其与片烟品质的关系[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(5):1176-1184.
|
| [1] | XIONG Ying, YANG Junjie, JIANG Jiazhu, LI Qiang, WANG Yong, ZHANG Yang, DONG Xiaowei, ZHANG Dongdong. Analysis of Differences and Usability of Chemical Components in Flue-cured Tobacco from Different Production Areas of Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 210-218. |
| [2] | WANG Ping, WANG Lei, XIE Chengjun, SUN Zhenrong, CHEN Juan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Potato Varieties in Longzhong Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 8-16. |
| [3] | LUO Jing, DU Shanshan, YAO Qingqing, WANG Dongli, HE Zhongsheng, SUN Huijian, WANG Ruijun. Effect of NaCl and Na2SO4 Salt Stress on the Germination of Upland Cotton Seeds and Screening of Salt-tolerant Germplasm [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 48-56. |
| [4] | JI Bingyi. Evolution of Main Characteristics of Peanut Varieties Registered in Liaoning Province from 2017 to 2024 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 40-49. |
| [5] | ZHANG Xiaohong, YAN Zheng, WEI Guangbiao. Different Strains of Sweet Potato: Comparison of Accumulation Ability of Exogenous Organic Selenium [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 31-38. |
| [6] | ZHAO Fang, GAO Yunqing, GAO Shaobin, ZHENG Lizhen, LI Shutong, SHANG Qibing, XU Dongxu, GUAN Xiangyu. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Agronomic and Economic Characters of Mung Bean Germplasm Resources in Hebei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 23-29. |
| [7] | LI Jing, LI Haixia, LI Zhenghua, GUO Chengbo, WANG Yanmin, SUN Peilin, BAI Hui. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Syringa Germplasm Resources on Phenotypic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 74-83. |
| [8] | LONG Libing, LIANG Wei, YU Guo, QIN Zhenghao, HUANG Rongshao, YAO Shaochang. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Guangxi Cinnamomum cassia Leaves and Screening for Excellent Germplasm [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(34): 63-73. |
| [9] | ZHAO Jing, TUHANGULI Tuoheti, XU Lin, GAO Qiang, ZHENG Lipeng, ZHANG Yan, LUO Youpeng, YAN Qingqing, TANG Lisi, ZULKEYA Manaf, AYIJIAMALI Keranmu, YANG Yushuang, WANG Weiping. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Rubber Yield and Agronomic Traits of Taraxacum kok-saghyz in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(33): 51-58. |
| [10] | ZHENG Xinran, WU Qingsong, LIU Xingyu, LIU Shuxia, XIAO Yu, GUAN Xiangjun, ZHANG Pengju, WANG Jingjing, HU Ming, CHANG Yuan, WANG Xiaofei. Anatomical Characteristics and Environmental Adaptability of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus Leaves from Different Geographical Sources [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(32): 36-45. |
| [11] | GAO Rui, WU Qiong, LI Yunxi, CHEN Mulan, CUI Yihan, ZHA Yangliang. Comprehensive Fuzzy Evaluation and Analysis of Impact of Meteorological Conditions on Quality of Sweet Cherry in Guanzhong Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(32): 88-94. |
| [12] | LUO Jing, DU Shanshan, SUN Huijian, YAO Qingqing, HE Zhongsheng, WANG Dongli. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Upland Cotton Germplasm at Seeds Germination Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 25-35. |
| [13] | TANG Guimei, HUANG Guolin, ZHAO Fan, LIU Yang, ZHANG Li, LI Weidong, XIAO Xiaoling. Quantitative Evaluation on Stem Cutting Effectiveness of Medicinal Tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 42-47. |
| [14] | REN Jinping, BAI Xinming, BAI Xiaodong, CHEN Yanling, FENG Wenxia, ZHANG Jimei. Quality Evaluation and Component Determination of Angelicae Pubescentis Radix in Guanshan Region of Eastern Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(29): 122-129. |
| [15] | HAN Wenwen, JIANG Yanhua, ZHANG Xinru, WU Zhihua, SHI Lingxin, TANG Zhiyi, CUI Yanhong, DU Xiong, GAO Zhen. Screening of Shade-tolerant Summer Maize Varieties in Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(27): 21-27. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||