
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 52-58.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0468
Previous Articles Next Articles
LU Xinyuan1,2(
), QIAN Pin3(
), XU Yongxian3, WANG Yiliu1,2, WANG Huoyan1,2, LU Dianjun1, ZHENG Le4
Received:2025-06-12
Revised:2025-10-13
Online:2026-02-27
Published:2026-02-27
LU Xinyuan, QIAN Pin, XU Yongxian, WANG Yiliu, WANG Huoyan, LU Dianjun, ZHENG Le. Effects of Machinery Application in Integrated Ridging and Root-zone Fertilization on Tobacco Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Fuxian Lake Basin[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 52-58.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0468
| 处理 | 起垄方式 | 使用肥料及施肥方式 | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 常规起垄机 | 不施肥 | 0-0-0 |
| T2 | 常规起垄机 | 当地复合肥+硫酸钾,4次撒施 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T3 | 常规起垄机 | 根区专用肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T4 | 常规起垄机 | 根区专用肥+枸溶性钾肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T5 | 起垄施肥一体机 | 根区专用肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T6 | 起垄施肥一体机 | 根区专用肥+枸溶性钾肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| 处理 | 起垄方式 | 使用肥料及施肥方式 | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 常规起垄机 | 不施肥 | 0-0-0 |
| T2 | 常规起垄机 | 当地复合肥+硫酸钾,4次撒施 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T3 | 常规起垄机 | 根区专用肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T4 | 常规起垄机 | 根区专用肥+枸溶性钾肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T5 | 起垄施肥一体机 | 根区专用肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| T6 | 起垄施肥一体机 | 根区专用肥+枸溶性钾肥,根区1次施肥 | 84.6-36-372 |
| 指标 | 参数 | 指标 | 参数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 作业行数 | 一垄单行 | 料箱装肥量 | 30 kg |
| 起垄高度 | 40 cm(可调) | 料箱标记物料量 | 10 kg |
| 起垄底部宽度 | 60 cm(可调) | 作业速度 | 0.5~2.5 m/s |
| 单穴施肥量 | 10~60 g | 蓄电池 | 12 V/38 Ah |
| 施肥间距 | 10~100 cm(可调) | 整机动力 | 6.3 kW |
| 指标 | 参数 | 指标 | 参数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 作业行数 | 一垄单行 | 料箱装肥量 | 30 kg |
| 起垄高度 | 40 cm(可调) | 料箱标记物料量 | 10 kg |
| 起垄底部宽度 | 60 cm(可调) | 作业速度 | 0.5~2.5 m/s |
| 单穴施肥量 | 10~60 g | 蓄电池 | 12 V/38 Ah |
| 施肥间距 | 10~100 cm(可调) | 整机动力 | 6.3 kW |
| 项目 | 间距0.2 m | 间距0.3 m | 间距0.4 m | 间距0.5 m | 间距0.6 m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 测量点/m | 1 | 0.198 | 0.285 | 0.402 | 0.486 | 0.596 |
| 2 | 0.205 | 0.292 | 0.397 | 0.503 | 0.598 | |
| 3 | 0.208 | 0.295 | 0.409 | 0.497 | 0.608 | |
| 4 | 0.192 | 0.306 | 0.395 | 0.508 | 0.593 | |
| 5 | 0.206 | 0.312 | 0.397 | 0.514 | 0.586 | |
| 6 | 0.204 | 0.308 | 0.398 | 0.518 | 0.622 | |
| 7 | 0.206 | 0.298 | 0.418 | 0.493 | 0.624 | |
| 8 | 0.217 | 0.312 | 0.426 | 0.523 | 0.636 | |
| 9 | 0.208 | 0.317 | 0.415 | 0.516 | 0.617 | |
| 10 | 0.197 | 0.314 | 0.416 | 0.517 | 0.623 | |
| 平均值/m | 0.204 | 0.304 | 0.407 | 0.508 | 0.610 | |
| 标准差/m | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.017 | |
| 变异系数/% | 3.42 | 3.41 | 2.69 | 2.42 | 2.70 | |
| 合格率/% | 92 | |||||
| 项目 | 间距0.2 m | 间距0.3 m | 间距0.4 m | 间距0.5 m | 间距0.6 m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 测量点/m | 1 | 0.198 | 0.285 | 0.402 | 0.486 | 0.596 |
| 2 | 0.205 | 0.292 | 0.397 | 0.503 | 0.598 | |
| 3 | 0.208 | 0.295 | 0.409 | 0.497 | 0.608 | |
| 4 | 0.192 | 0.306 | 0.395 | 0.508 | 0.593 | |
| 5 | 0.206 | 0.312 | 0.397 | 0.514 | 0.586 | |
| 6 | 0.204 | 0.308 | 0.398 | 0.518 | 0.622 | |
| 7 | 0.206 | 0.298 | 0.418 | 0.493 | 0.624 | |
| 8 | 0.217 | 0.312 | 0.426 | 0.523 | 0.636 | |
| 9 | 0.208 | 0.317 | 0.415 | 0.516 | 0.617 | |
| 10 | 0.197 | 0.314 | 0.416 | 0.517 | 0.623 | |
| 平均值/m | 0.204 | 0.304 | 0.407 | 0.508 | 0.610 | |
| 标准差/m | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.017 | |
| 变异系数/% | 3.42 | 3.41 | 2.69 | 2.42 | 2.70 | |
| 合格率/% | 92 | |||||
| 移栽天数/d | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 最大叶面积/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | T1 | 59.26±0.23d | 6.64±0.19b | 50.76±0.37e | 27.80±0.44c | 895.36±16.34e |
| T2 | 67.74±0.50a | 7.34±0.16a | 57.62±0.23b | 32.18±0.32a | 1176.48±12.08b | |
| T3 | 62.42±0.33c | 6.66±0.26b | 52.66±0.36d | 27.66±0.30c | 924.18±11.03d | |
| T4 | 62.20±0.22c | 6.86±0.30b | 54.62±0.25c | 30.94±0.44b | 1072.24±13.64c | |
| T5 | 63.24±0.53b | 7.35±0.24a | 52.74±0.39d | 26.44±0.24d | 884.76±8.94e | |
| T6 | 67.46±0.29a | 7.54±0.050a | 69.14±0.53a | 28.14±0.42c | 1234.37±10.67a | |
| 65 | T1 | 99.20±2.19c | 7.46±0.18b | 61.14±0.45f | 34.02±0.48cd | 1319.78±23.46d |
| T2 | 108.68±3.45a | 8.38±0.08a | 80.18±0.86a | 34.68±0.27c | 1764.20±8.28a | |
| T3 | 100.56±3.04bc | 7.42±0.27b | 65.26±0.39c | 36.90±0.65b | 1528.05±35.80c | |
| T4 | 104.32±2.53b | 7.64±0.27b | 62.66±0.87e | 33.68±0.48d | 1338.85±9.81d | |
| T5 | 104.28±3.42b | 8.18±0.19a | 63.80±0.41d | 32.50±0.49e | 1315.64±22.27d | |
| T6 | 108.58±3.29a | 8.10±0.18a | 68.22±0.44b | 38.38±0.63a | 1661.33±31.85b |
| 移栽天数/d | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 最大叶面积/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | T1 | 59.26±0.23d | 6.64±0.19b | 50.76±0.37e | 27.80±0.44c | 895.36±16.34e |
| T2 | 67.74±0.50a | 7.34±0.16a | 57.62±0.23b | 32.18±0.32a | 1176.48±12.08b | |
| T3 | 62.42±0.33c | 6.66±0.26b | 52.66±0.36d | 27.66±0.30c | 924.18±11.03d | |
| T4 | 62.20±0.22c | 6.86±0.30b | 54.62±0.25c | 30.94±0.44b | 1072.24±13.64c | |
| T5 | 63.24±0.53b | 7.35±0.24a | 52.74±0.39d | 26.44±0.24d | 884.76±8.94e | |
| T6 | 67.46±0.29a | 7.54±0.050a | 69.14±0.53a | 28.14±0.42c | 1234.37±10.67a | |
| 65 | T1 | 99.20±2.19c | 7.46±0.18b | 61.14±0.45f | 34.02±0.48cd | 1319.78±23.46d |
| T2 | 108.68±3.45a | 8.38±0.08a | 80.18±0.86a | 34.68±0.27c | 1764.20±8.28a | |
| T3 | 100.56±3.04bc | 7.42±0.27b | 65.26±0.39c | 36.90±0.65b | 1528.05±35.80c | |
| T4 | 104.32±2.53b | 7.64±0.27b | 62.66±0.87e | 33.68±0.48d | 1338.85±9.81d | |
| T5 | 104.28±3.42b | 8.18±0.19a | 63.80±0.41d | 32.50±0.49e | 1315.64±22.27d | |
| T6 | 108.58±3.29a | 8.10±0.18a | 68.22±0.44b | 38.38±0.63a | 1661.33±31.85b |
| 处理 | 氮含量/ % | 钾含量/ % | 磷含量/ % | 钙含量/ % | 镁含量/ % | 吸氮量/ (g/株) | 吸钾量/ (g/株) | 吸磷量/ (g/株) | 吸钙量/ (g/株) | 吸镁量/ (g/株) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 1.64±0.23b | 1.81±0.48b | 0.11±0.02a | 2.43±0.26a | 0.51±0.13b | 1.08±0.20b | 0.77±0.54a | 0.07±0.05b | 1.43±0.76b | 0.33±0.18b |
| T2 | 1.79±0.21b | 2.29±0.24ab | 0.13±0.01a | 2.53±0.24a | 0.59±0.06ab | 1.92±0.76ab | 1.85±0.22a | 0.12±0.04ab | 2.04±1.07ab | 0.42±0.10ab |
| T3 | 1.71±0.17b | 1.84±0.09b | 0.12±0.01a | 2.51±0.60a | 0.55±0.05ab | 1.24±0.67b | 1.06±0.49a | 0.08±0.01b | 1.82±0.45ab | 0.49±0.25ab |
| T4 | 2.18±0.18a | 1.98±0.6ab | 0.12±0.01a | 2.84±0.30a | 0.67±0.05a | 1.08±0.20b | 1.58±0.68a | 0.10±0.05b | 2.99±1.49ab | 0.68±0.27ab |
| T5 | 1.74±0.05b | 1.99±0.12ab | 0.12±0.01a | 2.49±0.10a | 0.60±0.01ab | 1.59±0.79ab | 1.10±0.30a | 0.19±0.02a | 2.90±1.10ab | 0.61±0.31ab |
| T6 | 1.95±0.15ab | 2.64±0.32a | 0.12±0.02a | 2.93±0.29a | 0.67±0.07a | 2.58±0.42a | 1.58±0.86a | 0.14±0.05ab | 3.67±0.65a | 0.83±0.12a |
| 处理 | 氮含量/ % | 钾含量/ % | 磷含量/ % | 钙含量/ % | 镁含量/ % | 吸氮量/ (g/株) | 吸钾量/ (g/株) | 吸磷量/ (g/株) | 吸钙量/ (g/株) | 吸镁量/ (g/株) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 1.64±0.23b | 1.81±0.48b | 0.11±0.02a | 2.43±0.26a | 0.51±0.13b | 1.08±0.20b | 0.77±0.54a | 0.07±0.05b | 1.43±0.76b | 0.33±0.18b |
| T2 | 1.79±0.21b | 2.29±0.24ab | 0.13±0.01a | 2.53±0.24a | 0.59±0.06ab | 1.92±0.76ab | 1.85±0.22a | 0.12±0.04ab | 2.04±1.07ab | 0.42±0.10ab |
| T3 | 1.71±0.17b | 1.84±0.09b | 0.12±0.01a | 2.51±0.60a | 0.55±0.05ab | 1.24±0.67b | 1.06±0.49a | 0.08±0.01b | 1.82±0.45ab | 0.49±0.25ab |
| T4 | 2.18±0.18a | 1.98±0.6ab | 0.12±0.01a | 2.84±0.30a | 0.67±0.05a | 1.08±0.20b | 1.58±0.68a | 0.10±0.05b | 2.99±1.49ab | 0.68±0.27ab |
| T5 | 1.74±0.05b | 1.99±0.12ab | 0.12±0.01a | 2.49±0.10a | 0.60±0.01ab | 1.59±0.79ab | 1.10±0.30a | 0.19±0.02a | 2.90±1.10ab | 0.61±0.31ab |
| T6 | 1.95±0.15ab | 2.64±0.32a | 0.12±0.02a | 2.93±0.29a | 0.67±0.07a | 2.58±0.42a | 1.58±0.86a | 0.14±0.05ab | 3.67±0.65a | 0.83±0.12a |
| 主成分因子 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | 0.968 | -0.089 | -0.225 | -0.027 |
| 茎围 | 0.826 | -0.328 | -0.367 | -0.261 |
| 最大叶长 | 0.655 | -0.664 | -0.182 | 0.311 |
| 最大叶宽 | 0.471 | -0.010 | 0.863 | 0.170 |
| 最大叶面积 | 0.744 | -0.524 | 0.267 | 0.317 |
| 产量 | 0.968 | -0.173 | -0.041 | 0.167 |
| 产值 | 0.94 | -0.077 | -0.057 | 0.183 |
| 上等烟 | 0.729 | -0.535 | 0.129 | -0.407 |
| 中等烟 | -0.606 | 0.653 | -0.138 | 0.429 |
| 下等烟 | -0.686 | -0.666 | 0.050 | -0.124 |
| K含量 | 0.95 | -0.048 | 0.188 | -0.204 |
| Ca含量 | 0.67 | 0.638 | 0.204 | 0.048 |
| Mg含量 | 0.752 | 0.625 | -0.169 | 0.032 |
| K吸收量 | 0.857 | -0.021 | -0.279 | 0.374 |
| Ca吸收量 | 0.722 | 0.624 | -0.059 | -0.285 |
| Mg吸收量 | 0.663 | 0.71 | 0.117 | -0.177 |
| 主成分因子 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | 0.968 | -0.089 | -0.225 | -0.027 |
| 茎围 | 0.826 | -0.328 | -0.367 | -0.261 |
| 最大叶长 | 0.655 | -0.664 | -0.182 | 0.311 |
| 最大叶宽 | 0.471 | -0.010 | 0.863 | 0.170 |
| 最大叶面积 | 0.744 | -0.524 | 0.267 | 0.317 |
| 产量 | 0.968 | -0.173 | -0.041 | 0.167 |
| 产值 | 0.94 | -0.077 | -0.057 | 0.183 |
| 上等烟 | 0.729 | -0.535 | 0.129 | -0.407 |
| 中等烟 | -0.606 | 0.653 | -0.138 | 0.429 |
| 下等烟 | -0.686 | -0.666 | 0.050 | -0.124 |
| K含量 | 0.95 | -0.048 | 0.188 | -0.204 |
| Ca含量 | 0.67 | 0.638 | 0.204 | 0.048 |
| Mg含量 | 0.752 | 0.625 | -0.169 | 0.032 |
| K吸收量 | 0.857 | -0.021 | -0.279 | 0.374 |
| Ca吸收量 | 0.722 | 0.624 | -0.059 | -0.285 |
| Mg吸收量 | 0.663 | 0.71 | 0.117 | -0.177 |
| 处理 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | 总得分 | 综合排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 22550.0 | -19509.7 | -6884.4 | 18619.6 | 9889.6 | 6 |
| T2 | 30028.1 | -25894.7 | -9185.2 | 24816.3 | 13189.4 | 2 |
| T3 | 26906.6 | -23107.4 | -8251.7 | 22227.2 | 11838.6 | 4 |
| T4 | 26589.4 | -22605.4 | -8256.6 | 21922.6 | 11742.5 | 5 |
| T5 | 27205.5 | -23050.3 | -8481.0 | 22414.4 | 12029.6 | 3 |
| T6 | 30070.0 | -25752.6 | -9248.7 | 24822.8 | 13244.2 | 1 |
| 处理 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | 总得分 | 综合排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 22550.0 | -19509.7 | -6884.4 | 18619.6 | 9889.6 | 6 |
| T2 | 30028.1 | -25894.7 | -9185.2 | 24816.3 | 13189.4 | 2 |
| T3 | 26906.6 | -23107.4 | -8251.7 | 22227.2 | 11838.6 | 4 |
| T4 | 26589.4 | -22605.4 | -8256.6 | 21922.6 | 11742.5 | 5 |
| T5 | 27205.5 | -23050.3 | -8481.0 | 22414.4 | 12029.6 | 3 |
| T6 | 30070.0 | -25752.6 | -9248.7 | 24822.8 | 13244.2 | 1 |
| [1] |
陈相标, 丁文荣. 滇中高原湖泊流域土地利用变化及生态系统服务功能[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(3):205-212.
|
| [2] |
徐勇贤, 梁强, 周勇, 等. 抚仙湖流域典型农田土壤质量状况及烟草种植障碍因素[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(1):103-111.
|
| [3] |
杜彩艳, 吴迪, 周文兵, 等. 施氮水平对抚仙湖流域植烟区烤烟产质量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(6):197-205.
|
| [4] |
梁红丽, 郑欢莉. 抚仙湖径流区农业面源污染控制[J]. 云南农业, 2020(6):44-46.
|
| [5] |
杨绍聪, 吕艳玲, 沐婵, 等. 抚仙湖北部农田区不同施肥对水稻产量、氮素吸收及利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(15):1-6.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14110102 |
| [6] |
赵祖军, 郑田甜, 赵筱青, 等. 云南高原湖泊流域种植业面源污染物的流失特征分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(1):40-47.
|
| [7] |
王火焰, 周健民. 根区施肥——提高肥料养分利用率和减少面源污染的关键和必需措施[J]. 土壤, 2013, 45(5):785-790.
|
| [8] |
杨朔, 胡仁, 侯俊, 等. 根区施肥条件下氮肥品种及施氮量对玉米苗期根系特征及生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(9):111-119.
|
| [9] |
胡仁, 肖大康, 丁紫娟, 等. 根区施氮对水稻苗期根系生长及分布的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(22):93-99.
|
| [10] |
刘晓伟, 陈小琴, 王火焰, 等. 根区一次施氮提高水稻氮肥利用效率的效果和原理[J]. 土壤, 2017, 49(5):868-875.
|
| [11] |
姜超强, 王火焰, 卢殿君, 等. 一次性根区穴施尿素提高夏玉米产量和养分吸收利用效率[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(12):146-153.
|
| [12] |
王筱滢, 刘青丽, 李志宏, 等. 不同施肥位点对烤烟钾积累及土壤有效钾含量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(1):49-54.
|
| [13] |
李冬雪, 王一柳, 郇威威, 等. 施肥位点调控对植烟土壤及烤烟钾含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(30):65-71.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0839 |
| [14] |
李冬雪, 王一柳, 郇威威, 等. 枸溶性钾肥对玉溪烟叶及根区土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7):67-73.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0448 |
| [15] |
王一柳, 李冬雪, 卢殿君, 等. 根区施用杂卤石对昆明烤烟产质量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(3):199-206.
|
| [16] |
严陶韬, 王一柳, 卢殿君, 等. 根区施用钾肥对烤烟产量、钾含量及钾素吸收的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(5):70-76.
|
| [17] |
何阳, 段美珍, 何伟, 等. 南方稻田烟草施肥机械发展现状与展望[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(11):28-30.
|
| [18] |
曾纪铭, 李军政, 何伟, 等. 烟草施肥机械研究现状分析与发展建议[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6):9-11.
|
| [19] |
蒋鸿昆, 高海鹰, 张奇, 等. 抚仙湖梁王河流域农业耕作与流域水质响应关系研究[J]. 环境科学, 2007(10):2294-2300.
|
| [20] |
王筱滢, 张云贵, 刘青丽, 等. 根区施肥对烤烟干物质积累及氮吸收的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(8):70-73.
|
| [21] |
郇威威, 王一柳, 卢殿君, 等. 高钾用量和根区施肥可提升皖南不同质地土壤烟叶钾含量[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(3):458-464.
|
| [22] |
王晓, 王丰, 刘光快, 等. 干旱胁迫下枸溶性钾肥配施对烤烟钾素含量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(8):48-51.
|
| [23] |
李鑫, 周冀衡, 张毅, 等. 枸溶性钾肥与硫酸钾配施对烤烟生长及钾素积累与分配的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 42(5):480-483.
|
| [24] |
王一柳, 李冬雪, 郇威威, 等. 新型钾肥配施硫酸钾对烤烟生长及钾素吸收的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(6):72-76.
|
| [25] |
陆欣远, 徐勇贤, 陈小琴, 等. 枸溶性钾肥部分替代硫酸钾对抚仙湖流域烤烟生长和提钾的影响[J]. 土壤, 2025, 57(4):744-749.
|
| [26] |
李国昌, 吴雪梅, 殷坤勤, 等. 烟用自走式起垄定点施肥装置设计及试验[J]. 农机化研究, 2018, 40(4):104-109.
|
| [1] | LI Xingxing, OU Huan, YANG Jian, ZHANG Yongjie, CHEN Juan, LI Chunyan, MA Hui, LIU Rongsen, LI Jinhong. Adaptability Screening Test of Maize Varieties for Spring Sowing in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 1-7. |
| [2] | ZHU Yao, WANG Shunwang, YUAN Luyi, LI Wanxian, LI Yonghui, WANG Changmei, WU Kai, JIANG Jinhe, ZHANG Wudi, YIN Fang. Effects of Irrigation Volume of Vegetable Residues Biogas Slurry on Yield and Quality, Soil Enzyme Activity and Nutrients of Edible Dock [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 139-145. |
| [3] | YUAN Yanhua, LAN Jun, YANG Mengmeng, LIU Yingjie, YANG Xiaodong, ZHAO Li, ZHANG Jiasheng, YANG Yan, ZHOU Jintao, XIAO Lu, QI Liang, HUANG Lei, WANG Jianwei. Effects of Sealed Hypoxia and Summer Temperature Control in Warehouse on Key Chemical Components During Tobacco Lamina Aging [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 193-203. |
| [4] | LIU Yiming, ZOU Zongqing, XU Zhiqiang, WANG Qiye, CHEN Xiangdeng, HAO Xianwei, WU Xiaoping, MENG Lin. Study on Optimal Aging Period of Tobacco Lamina ‘CB-1’ Under Northern Climatic Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 204-209. |
| [5] | XIONG Ying, YANG Junjie, JIANG Jiazhu, LI Qiang, WANG Yong, ZHANG Yang, DONG Xiaowei, ZHANG Dongdong. Analysis of Differences and Usability of Chemical Components in Flue-cured Tobacco from Different Production Areas of Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 210-218. |
| [6] | FAN Yongxin, SONG Yuyang, LI Ruirui, FAN Shaopeng, ZOU Xiaoxia, FAN Yijie, YU Xiaona, ZHANG Xiaojun, SI Tong, NI Yu. Study on Optimal Sowing Dates for Rapeseed in Saline-alkali Soil of Yellow River Delta and Effects of Wood Vinegar in Alleviating Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 27-33. |
| [7] | LI Xinjian, LEI Ting, WEI Xingqi, YOU Andi, ZHOU Yangheng, LUO Mingquan, MO Zegang, LIU Xiaoang, ZHU Yinghua, TANG Xinggui. Influence of Leaf Pruning on Key Indicators of Cellar Transplanting Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 46-51. |
| [8] | LI Yuan, KANG Huiru, PENG Bo, WU Lianxia, XIA Weixin, BI Haiyan. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Rates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Walnut Trees in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 75-82. |
| [9] | WANG Ping, WANG Lei, XIE Chengjun, SUN Zhenrong, CHEN Juan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Potato Varieties in Longzhong Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 8-16. |
| [10] | XIAO Ting, NIE Qing, LIU Lei, LI Ting, YANG Meng, QU Mingshan. Effects of Combined Application of Compound Microbial Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Mini Chinese Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 90-96. |
| [11] | LIU Guimin, SU Lei, ZHENG Xiaoning, CHEN Di, LIU Binghua, SUN Mingjie, LIU Xinghong, XU Yingmei. Effects of Inoculating Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Physiological Characteristics of Maize Leaves in Medium- and Low-yield Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 119-124. |
| [12] | WANG Ying, LI Lu, ZHU Jiayi, JIA Yuanyuan, GAO Qi, HU Zhichao. Research on Identification and Yield Estimation of Artificial Alfalfa in Green-up Period in Hohhot Based on Satellite Remote Sensing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 125-132. |
| [13] | HUANG Wei, PAN Huixiao, WU Xuanke, HE Yan, TAN Mengxiang, LIU Yongyu. Analysis of Risk Zoning and Meteorological Factors of Double Cropping Rice Yield Disaster in Guangxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 144-154. |
| [14] | YANG Lei, HAO Huanhuan, HU Xinyu, YI Ke, JING Yongfeng, HUANG Wenkun. Biological Control Technology of Tobacco Pests and Diseases: Current Research Status and Future Prospects [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 163-170. |
| [15] | ZHAO Jiatao, GUO Mianyan, LIU Mengdao, FU Zhengbo, YU Qi. Effects of Planting Density and Cutting Period on Forage Yield and Quality of 'Baopimai 28' [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 177-182. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||